Global Warming Lie: The Real Data
Tom Harris
For decades now mainstream media and climate alarmists have been telling us that manmade emissions are going to cause a runaway greenhouse effect. They claim that ‘the science is settled’, and further, that 97% of scientists agree. Tom Harris has a master’s degree in mechanical engineering, with specialties in thermodynamics and fluid dynamics, two of the disciplines most qualified to assess our coming extinction via environmental disaster. Tom worked as an engineer for the National Research Council. As a lecturer at university, he taught climate change to 1500 students. For many years Tom was an advocate for the global warming movement, until another professor showed him some data that made him question. Since then Tom has been working hard to spread the truth about manmade global warming. And the simple truth is, it’s a lie.
Tom joins me today with the real data on climate change, and proves that not only is manmade global warming a complete myth, but that the actions which are being taken by governments around the world to save us all from this non-existent threat could in fact result in severe environmental repercussions. Mr. Harris gives us the real data which shows that a new ice age may not be more than a thousand years away, and shares his concerns that attempts to address the global warming lie could in fact result in that new ice age starting, not in a thousand years, but before the end of this century. Indeed, as the global warming alarmists claim, we are running out of time to wake people up.
Questions That Were Deleted by Rogers TV Before Uploading the Debate:
Mindy J. Thomas, Ambassador of the Ontario Fringe Farm Network
“My question is for Catherine [McKenney], Mark [Sutcliffe] and Ade [Olumide]. When it was brought up in debate #1 that Texas’s reliance on wind power led to 700 deaths when wind failed just before the cold hit last year, Catherine said, referring to Energy Evolution: ‘The key commitments for energy really are district energy, solar energy and looking at ways of reducing greenhouse gases. I don’t know that wind power takes precedence in it.’ That is deceptive and wrong. District energy doesn’t address how power is generated. Ottawa’s plans for wind power is about three times as much as solar. Did you vote for a fifty-seven-billion-dollar plan without knowing what was in it?”
Jay Nera, a candidate for the People’s Party of Canada in the last federal election:
“Fifty-seven point four billion dollars. In the first debate, I pointed out that Ottawa, if it reduced its emissions to net zero would only affect the global temperature by one-ten-thousandths of a degree Celsius. And the response I was given was that it’s important because Ottawa would lead the world. And we’re expected to believe that the world is going to follow Ottawa. China, the world’s largest emitter, twice that of the USA, has made it crystal clear that they are not slowing down. They are not following Ottawa. They are actually massively increasing, for example, coal consumption. So, when essentially no one of magnitude is following us, why is Ottawa expected to pay billions and billions and billions of dollars in expenditures for statistically zero global effect?
LINK:
ICSC Canada testimony to City of Ottawa
Originally posted 2023-03-14 16:10:06.
4 Comments
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
We are being sold a false bill of goods, No we Don’t have “Global Warming” = (Greenhouse Effect Theory) we have “Climate Change” = (abnormal local & regional weather patterns)
the two are not the same, the two do not have the same cause & thus it goes without saying they have totally different solutions.
so why are we being sold the solution for the self debunked “Greenhouse Effect Theory” to solve the problem of abnormal weather patterns that most evidence suggests parallels the increase in wireless communications ?
its quite simple the wireless microwave & other EMF affect the earths magnetic fields & ley lines, this in turn alters the jet stream altering the weather patterns.
this year we have more 5G than ever before & its been the mildest winter on record with average temps being -6 to +2c most of the winter when normal weather patterns for my area used to be -15 to -30c Jan through Feb in the early 90’s
we also have much less snow, I used to have to shovel my roof off in the 90’s as it would have 4ft of snow on it by Jan1, in the past 15+ years I have not had more than 2ft of snow on the roof & this year I did not even need the roof rake to clear the snow of the sheds.
so either the wireless generations is causing “Climate Change” or the more sinister NWO as DARPA scientists were bragging in the early 90’s that they were well on their way to owning the weather by 2025 & the only thing left to decide is who gets to control the thermostat.
so regardless before we spend any more on this insane BS solution, we need to know to what extent is geoengineering of our climate causing climate change ???
because Co2 is close to its scary relative Co in the sense of being a close to neutral buoyancy gas, thus how are surface emissions magically floating into the upper atmosphere when they linger low by nature where they are absorbed by plants & trees.
so even if Co2 were a major contributor, it would only be upper atmospheric emissions like those from planes, rockets / space launches & upper atmospheric detonations.
it would not be from the commoners driving cars, trucks & farm equipment, cutting their grass, cooking on gas stoves or heating their homes, as they are all surface emissions.
so as usual its an ass backwards solution attacking us commoners while no restrictions are placed to prevent upper atmospheric emissions as those sources in the most come from the elite, governments & military activities.
the bottom line is these globalists have written books for decades explaining all of this we are under today in order to de-industrialize & de-populate the planet by 2050
the only way we will win this war is by first taking out their leftist propaganda machine, followed by the UN , EU & their NGO’s while at the same time bringing their minion politicians & bureaucrats to justice for their crimes against humanity.
the Idea of runaway climate change is a myth as even if you buy the Co2 BS the largest per household contribution is not modern cars driven with clean fuels that along with fuel burning technology have become cleaner & cleaner every decade since the 1950’s
no its home heating in cold climates as the average life of a furnace is of old was 80 years 40 years with today’s modern furnaces.
so seeing as the majority of personal emissions are supposedly responsible for global warming, that can not be true as it has a built in 0 point self limiter.
as the temps warm closer towards the ideal temp for our species of 70F we automatically burn less fuel to heat our homes with a theoretical 0 emissions at 70F
I burn about half of what I used to to heat the same place for a winter 30 years ago, so over 30 years I have cut my Co2 emissions by over 50% by doing absolutely nothing.
I am not buying the idea that its all fake because In Southern Ontario I recognize noticeable difference in winter temps & snow fall over the last 50 years.
what I can tell you is Co2 induced “Global Warming” is a hoax self debunked over 20 years ago when the upper atmosphere stopped warming when the sun went into a dormant cycle for over 17 years & thus upper atmospheric temps (the proper place to measure for greenhouse effect warming) dropped while surface temps & Co2 levels continued to rise contrary to the theory.
thus if the heat is not in the upper atmosphere as it should be per the theory (trapped below the blanket of greenhouse gasses)
then the theory is wrong & the warming is from sources other than greenhouse effect, its just that simple.
Instead of maintaining and repairing infrastructure, the governments of this country waste time and resources on communist fake bs. Here’s an easy way for lazy people to know if something is real or fake. This is just my opinion so excuse me if I make you cry. If sock puppet endorses it, it’s fake, period, end of discussion(the anti-science is settled and anyone who questions this is racist, homophobic, islamophobic (whatever that means), hates every gender times 100, and looks stupid. Some stupider than others. I believe the person who said that believing humans can raise the world’s temperature by 1 or 2 degrees to be arrogance.