(0:00 - 0:26) Nova Scotia is the first jurisdiction in North America to institute climate lockdowns. Since early August, the government of Nova Scotia, under Premier Tim Houston, has forbidden people to enter the forests, claiming that the move is to prevent forest fires. You may be familiar with the case of Jeff Evely, who received a $28,000 fine for walking 13 steps into the woods.   (0:27 - 1:00) But as with the COVID lockdowns, the data does not in any way support these restrictions. Peter MacIsaac, the author of The Redneck Conservative and in Nova Scotian himself, has almost 30 years of experience in forest fire management and investigation. In this interview, Peter will reveal the many holes in the provincial government's narrative, as well as show evidence for the Nova Scotia government itself, which gives the lie to what they are telling the public.   (1:01 - 1:30) In addition, Peter and I will draw many parallels to the COVID lockdowns and show how the globalist agenda will attempt to expand climate lockdowns across Canada as yet another tool of totalitarian control. Peter, welcome back to the show. Well, thanks for the invite, Will.   (1:30 - 1:45) There's a lot been happening here on Canada's east coast that affects the rest of Canada. So where do you want to start? You're right there in Nova Scotia, which is ground zero for climate lockdowns, the first ones in the world. Tell us exactly what's going on there.   (1:45 - 2:02) I know people are probably familiar, maybe, with the story of Jeff Evely and how he got that ticket observed for going into the woods. But there's more than that going on. Yeah, so what happened down here, a little background is I fought forest fires in Nova Scotia professionally at the Department of Natural Resources for 29 years.   (2:03 - 2:18) So I was a combination game warden and professional forest fire fighter. So everything that I'm going to tell you tonight in regards to what's happening in this situation in Nova Scotia, I'm going to be speaking from a very professional standpoint. And I've been incident commander on over 100 fires here in Nova Scotia.   (2:18 - 2:34) Right, so I've got a lot of experience as to what I'm talking about. So what happened down here, Will, is in direct correlation with what Mark Carney is trying to push all across the country. And that's that we're in the middle of some kind of a climate crisis.   (2:35 - 2:56) And because of that, and the constant fear mongering that goes on down here in Nova Scotia on mainstream media, people are afraid that the province is going to burn. And the premier, Tim Houston, who, by the way, is a progressive conservative in name only. Him and Doug Ford are hardcore liberals, the pair of them, basically.   (2:56 - 3:19) That's my interpretation of it. But Tim Houston, I believe, may have cut some kind of a side deal with Mark Carney to help push the initiative. So for the first time in North American history, a premier or a governor, someone here in North America, actually has instituted a 10-week travel ban province-wide from the southern tip of Nova Scotia to the northern tip of Cape Breton Island.   (3:19 - 3:33) You're not allowed to walk in the woods, or you weren't allowed to not walk in the woods under that proclamation, even during the rain. So, for example, Jeff Evely had given me a call. I know Jeff, and he stayed at my place in the past, actually.   (3:34 - 3:51) And back in 2023, the premier brought in another travel ban after we had record-breaking forest fires here in the province. One was caused by arson, and one was caused by somebody burning when they weren't supposed to be burning. And so the premier said that we can't have a repeat of 2023.   (3:51 - 4:13) And back in 2023, he put in a travel ban. Well, Jeff Evely, at the time, he tried to launch a charter challenge against the premier for what he viewed, rightly so, as a Section 1 charter violation. And a Section 1 charter violation allows people in Canada, or the government, they can put restraints on you, but they have to be proportional.   (4:14 - 4:30) And back in 2023, when the premier did this for the first time, Will, we got record-breaking rainfall. And in my area of Bedford, Nova Scotia, our main street was under 10 feet of water. It was the largest flood we've had here probably in 150 years.   (4:31 - 4:51) And the premier left the travel ban for forest fire reasons in place for four more days in my area, and then left it on for several more weeks in other areas around the province. And it was completely and totally unjustified. And Jeff Evely, at the time, when it got to court, the judge said, Jeff, you don't have standing because you didn't get a ticket.   (4:51 - 5:00) Well, this time around, he wasn't going to let it happen. He took some of his military background, and he's a pretty tough dude. And he said, enough's enough.   (5:01 - 5:15) He was one of the guys up in Ottawa at the Truckers' Convention guarding some of those military things up there. And he's not afraid to call out a wrong when he sees wrong. And what the premier did in Nova Scotia was 100% wrong.   (5:15 - 5:37) On the second last day, I believe, of July, I think it was July 30th, he put in, he started off with a fire ban, Will. And because I've worked on forest fires over my career, most people aren't aware of there's scientific data that has to be consulted on a daily basis as to what you can do in regards to forest fires. It's called the Fire Weather Index.   (5:38 - 5:52) And the Fire Weather Index in Nova Scotia, we take weather readings at 31 stations around the province. And they take it in the morning and then again at noon. And then that data is posted publicly for everyone to see at 2 p.m. in the afternoon.   (5:52 - 6:02) And Nova Scotia has a series of microclimates. It's kind of like in B.C. We've got mountains, the mountainous area in the north and Cape Breton Highlands. And then we've got areas with heavy fog banks.   (6:02 - 6:25) And we've got dozens and dozens of microclimates. So it's impossible to put any kind of an application on the province of Nova Scotia with anything to do with fires. And the premier was worried that the province screwed up so badly in 2023, and we had over $189 million in damage and our biggest forest fire in our history.   (6:25 - 6:39) He didn't want the same thing happening again. So on July 30th, he declared a fire ban. And so immediately with my background, I just pulled up the data and the data said 40% of the province was in low to intermediate.   (6:40 - 7:01) And I went, how could you possibly legally do that? And I started doing research, whatever. I said, this is a charter ban, or this is a charter breach. So when I looked at the data, I said, what would the possible justification be for what just happened here? Because 40% of the province, they should have been able to burn.   (7:01 - 7:15) They should have been able to do anything they wanted to do. And at that point, I said, okay, there has to be more than what we're seeing here. There has to be something taking place at different levels.   (7:16 - 7:26) Why would Tim Houston do that? And what he said was, he said, I'm losing sleep at night. I'm worried 2023 is going to happen again. And he said, I'm just not going to allow it.   (7:27 - 7:34) Well, putting in a fire ban doesn't stop arsonists. Our largest fire was arson. Like I said, the second biggest fire was someone burning when they weren't supposed to burn.   (7:34 - 7:47) Both of them were breaking the law. And so a couple of days later, I had already started doing research for a charter challenge of our own. And then Jeff Evely said, well, I'm going to go get a ticket and do this the proper way so I have standing.   (7:48 - 7:53) And he asked me how to set things up. So I said, go talk to a game warden. I used to be one.   (7:53 - 8:07) Walk into the woods in front of them, force the issue, get a ticket. The ticket was supposed to be 25,000, Will. But when all was said and done, it was 28,872 dollars and 50 cents for walking 13 steps into the woods and 13 steps out.   (8:08 - 8:32) And so what it was was complete disproportionality and massive government overreach. And when the travel ban got put in place a couple of days after the fire ban, it was unprecedented for the premier to say this is going to stay in effect till October the 15th. And so this morning was the opening day of bow season for deer hunting.   (8:32 - 8:51) I was hunting deer earlier this morning. Like I started pretty early around four o'clock and, you know, up and around and getting ready to go hunting. Now, on August 29th, the premier list lifted seven of the 18 zones in the province and allowed people to go back in the woods and start walking.   (8:52 - 9:13) The pressure cooker was so bad and he was getting so much public pressure to do something about it. He said, well, we'll open some areas, but we're not going to open others. And I sent you some data there earlier that, you know, even today here in Nova Scotia, you're looking at, well, we had decent rain here yesterday and we had the same amount of rain in August in Nova Scotia that we normally have.   (9:14 - 9:44) Normally in Nova Scotia, we get 87 to 93 millimeters of rain in a month. And in the month of August, outside of the Halifax area that I'm in, we got over 95 mils of rain. So what happens is all across the province, everybody is being penalized by the premier, who's decided to completely ignore the scientific data and bring in, like I said, the first time ever in North American history, a climate lockdown of this length of time.   (9:45 - 10:04) Yes. And that's a very important point to dwell on is that what they're doing here is they're setting this up to be much, much bigger. They tried global lockdowns with COVID.   It didn't last. They couldn't keep that going. So now they're going to try climate lockdowns and they're starting these fires intentionally.   (10:04 - 10:27) We won't get into that, but either way, they win. If they keep people in the woods and the fires stop, then they can say, oh, well, see, it's, you know, people and global warming and fires and all that, or the fires don't stop. And they say, well, the global warming is so bad that we have to extend these lockdowns to other areas like cities.   (10:27 - 10:42) You know, you can't have a backyard fire. You can't drive your car too far because that'll create heat, right? So either way, they win the narrative and they just keep going with it. So here in Nova Scotia, our number one cause of forest fire is arson.   (10:43 - 11:02) As a matter of fact, from 2007 to 2023, we had 1144, I believe, arson fires. Second largest cause of fire is debris fires, where people burn stuff in their backyard and it gets away on them. And so what ended up happening here, and, you know, I want people to try to get a handle on what actually happened.   (11:03 - 11:22) When the climate scare narrative began around 2000 and later, right, where all of a sudden, when you looked on the weather map in the evening where it used to be green, you know, you'd get temperatures of 25 Celsius, which is only, you know, 25 Celsius. People don't realize that's in the 70s. That's like around 75 degrees Fahrenheit.   (11:22 - 11:34) You and I, we were both old enough to, you know, go back to the Fahrenheit days. But we didn't go to the beach till it was down here in Nova Scotia till it was 30 degrees Celsius. That's only around 84, 85 degrees.   (11:34 - 11:42) And now at 30, you get heat warning. We get heat warnings down here when it's 25. When it's 25 Celsius, which is absolute lunacy.   (11:43 - 12:14) So if the big concern for government in Canada was that we're going to have, you know, some kind of a climate meltdown and a global warming crisis, you would think that they would universally across Canada start doubling down on their forest fire fighting initiatives and budgets and planning. Instead, from coast to coast Canada, they cut a lot in a lot of places, their assets by up to 50%. Here in Nova Scotia, I'll give you an example.   (12:14 - 12:27) Out in Alberta right now, there's over 100 fire towers. Down in Nova Scotia in 2016, they tore the last fires down. We had 32 of them, 34 of them, and they tore them all down.   (12:28 - 12:37) And they said specifically at the time, well, now everybody's in the woods. Everybody that travels in the woods carries cell phones. So they're going to be our new early warning system.   (12:37 - 12:59) And when the premier banned travel in the woods, he canceled the entire early warning system. Now, in all fairness to the Department of Natural Resources, they do run a couple of fixed wings patrols province-wide on a daily basis when weather permits. The problem with when you do fire patrols, Will, is arsonists just watch a plane go by and then when they wait till they leave, they leave to start a fire.   (13:00 - 13:23) Even in one day in mid-August here, up in the northern section of the province, we had three arson fires late in one afternoon. And the problem is with nobody in the woods, there's nobody to report the vehicle. When I did law enforcement, we used to rely on travelers in the woods that say, yeah, we saw a white F-150 pickup leaving out there going kind of relatively fast, big trail of dust behind him, and there's two guys in it, look kind of fishy.   (13:23 - 13:36) Well, then we got two numbers off a plate. Well, then you had something to deal with. Well, in Nova Scotia, the Department of Natural Resources won't allow the conservation officers in for the last over seven years now to do the investigations on fire reports.   (13:38 - 13:58) So we have, I think, on that same other data sheet from 07 to 2023, we had, I think, 302 fires cause unknown. Well, over my career, cause unknowns were almost always arson. We couldn't call it arson unless we were 100% sure, but sometimes you'd have 99, 98% certainty, but you still had to put a cause unknown.   (13:58 - 14:11) And you might put in brackets behind it, you know, suspected arson. But the issue is, well, and you pointed out, in order to meet the climate narrative, you have to have fires. They have to be panic driven and people have to be afraid.   (14:13 - 14:37) And every single tactic in Nova Scotia that was used to frighten people on COVID was used to frighten people on forest fires. I was on talk show radio and we had people calling in from apartments in Halifax, worrying about their homes burning down, you know, on the eighth story in a concrete building. And people actually were so terrified that people normally could think logically, we're gonna know that this is the worst we've ever seen.   (14:37 - 14:45) Well, it isn't the worst. In the eighties and nineties, we had a lot more dry times than we do right now. Like I said, in August, we had more than our average rainfall.   (14:45 - 14:56) It just didn't all come spaced out, but we still got that amount of water. And here we are now, it's September the ninth. And as of yesterday, like I said, 97% of the province was in low.   (14:57 - 15:11) Now, normally when it's low, you can start burning a brush in your backyard at two o'clock in the afternoon without permits. I mean, and we still have a fire ban in place and half of the province is still locked down. They're not allowed to hunt in the Southern end of the province.   (15:12 - 15:22) On Crown land, you're not allowed to walk on it. There's a whole bunch of things still in place and none of it makes sense. And as you mentioned, people are afraid that their homes are gonna burn.   (15:22 - 15:40) And I went and did the research not long ago. What I did was I looked at the number of hectares burned across Canada and the US in the last 10 years, and then divided into that the number of houses that had been burned. And sure enough, the number of houses burned per hectares burned is going steadily up.   (15:41 - 15:55) Well, because they're potentially burning houses in order to frighten people. Because if there's a fire in the woods, the average person's, you know, oh, well, that's really too bad. If their house burns down, oh, well now this is an emergency and the government needs to do something.   (15:56 - 16:05) So now they're getting the support behind the bans. And what you're saying is 100% true. The federal government needs this to help drive their narrative.   (16:05 - 16:25) And when people are afraid, well, so what happened down here in Nova Scotia? Nova Scotia, we're normally a bunch of scrappers down here, right? And Tim Houston, when he first put that fire ban in and the travel ban in, he ended up with probably at least 70% support. And people went, yeah, it's pretty dry. And well, it might be dry in your area, but it could be damp in another.   (16:26 - 16:32) And people didn't realize that. And the premier was on every day and his voice was cracking. He was saying, I can't sleep.   (16:32 - 16:38) He had a meeting with his MLA. He said, I know a fact somebody sat in on it. And he said, look, you people don't know the pressure I'm under.   (16:38 - 16:54) He said, imagine sitting with families waiting to find out if their home was burned to the ground and pulling charred bodies from the wreckage. Well, here in Nova Scotia, well, we've had more people killed by coyotes than who've been killed in forest fires. We've had nobody in the history of Nova Scotia killed in a forest fire.   (16:54 - 17:04) But we've had a person killed by a coyote. So the fear-driven narrative took a lot of good people, guys I go to coffee with. And they were staring, well, it's pretty dry.   (17:05 - 17:13) I mean, the premier's got to, and I would explain things to them. And it would take a while. And you'd think he got through to them and they'd look at you like they understood.   (17:14 - 17:20) And then at the end of it, they go, but it's pretty dry. He's got to do something. I don't want to lose a cottage back in the woods, man.   (17:20 - 17:30) I don't want it burning down. Because as soon as you threaten people's property, now they'll go along with it. Now, Peter, I want to access your knowledge as a fire investigator.   (17:30 - 17:44) As you mentioned, you've been the lead in over a hundred fires in Nova Scotia. And there's some questions that occurred to me that I don't know the answers to, but I know you do. And the first one I'd like to know is, most of these fires, as you've told us, they're starting, they're being started by arson.   (17:45 - 18:12) How difficult is it when the fire risk, as you've shown on those charts, is low to moderate at best, to start a forest fire intentionally? Well, when it's low, you're going to need, it's not easy to get a fire going well. When you look at the fire weather index, the number one, one of the number one things that you look for is what something's called fine fuel moisture content. And that's the fine fuels like grass.   (18:12 - 18:37) When you go to get, you know, when you first build a fire, you use those fine fuels, the little sticks, and then you build bigger sticks on top of it. Well, those fine fuels are the first ones to dry out. But when you're fine fuel moisture content, for example, in Nova Scotia is like it was today, or like yesterday and today, it's almost impossible to get a fire going because you can't get that dry tinder that you need, because that's the stuff that soaks up dew in the morning.   (18:37 - 18:48) That's the stuff that doesn't dry out a lot of times till midday. If you're going to get a fire going in these types of conditions, you're going to need some form of an incendiary device. You might need a blow torch.   (18:48 - 19:08) You might need some fuel, you know, as gas, kerosene, whatever it is you're going to need. But here's the bigger issue when it comes to that, Will, is today the technology is there that you can fly a small drone that you can buy for around 1,500 bucks, 32 kilometers at 120 kilometers an hour with an incendiary device on it. You can light a fire anywhere in Canada.   (19:08 - 19:18) Yes. And you were the one who a few years ago posted that satellite video. I think it was in Quebec showing what, 20 different fires all starting at the same time over a large area.   (19:19 - 19:25) Actually, the final number came in. I watched it again here just recently. It was 26 and they were virtually all at the same time.   (19:25 - 19:39) Yes. And they were as far as 1,000 kilometers from one point to another. And the key thing about those fires when they lit, Will, because I'm an investigator, I just look at circumstantial evidence and all the circumstances are pointing to one thing only.   (19:39 - 19:54) And that looks like that was coordinated because all the wind from those fires when they lit was blowing down into New York. And there was a seven-day conference down there on global warming. And that's all you saw in the U.S. was Canadian forests are burning down.   (19:54 - 19:59) Look what it's doing into New York. We need more climate. We need more climate lockdowns.   (19:59 - 20:04) We need more everything. So there's a lot more than what's going on here in Nova Scotia. I'll give you an example.   (20:04 - 20:21) The premier of Nova Scotia wants to turn Nova Scotia into the largest windmill power producing area, I think, in the world. And the talk that he's talking about, with his plans, it's going to be billions and billions and billions of dollars to build it. Well, Nova Scotia doesn't have that money.   (20:24 - 20:48) So let's start looking at some circumstantial evidence. Where's the money going to come from? It's going to have to come from the federal government and then investors that would be willing to invest in such a project. And one of those key investors will very likely be, the premier was originally involved with Blackrock, Vanguard and State Street and Mark Carney's heavily invested in Brookville Assets Management.   (20:48 - 21:09) And we wonder where the money's going to come from for these windmills. And all of a sudden, the very first place in all of North America that brings in a 10 week climate lockdown, when like it's almost impossible yesterday and today to get a fire going in Nova Scotia. And you're not allowed to walk right now in some of those areas on a paved trail through the woods with your dog while it's raining.   (21:09 - 21:17) Because if you do, you're getting a $28,000 fine. And the premier has said there's going to be no, there's no leniency. They're nailing everybody's hide right to the wall.   (21:18 - 21:31) So I saw a meme not long ago and you've probably seen it too well. And it was a guy, he just squashed a house fly with a 20 pound maul. And he said, you don't kill a fly with a 20 pound maul to kill the fly.   (21:31 - 21:54) You do it for the flies that are watching. Yes, exactly. So how convenient that Nova Scotia, the province that is wanting to create the largest wind generation system in North America is also the one that's engaging in climate lockdowns while they have drastically reduced overwatch of the fires so that, you know, they're, you know, as you say, it's hard to get this going.   (21:54 - 22:01) I imagine it doesn't spread very fast when the woods are wet. No, no. So if you're watching, it's not going to be that hard to put that out.   (22:01 - 22:10) Unless of course, no one's watching. And then by the time that people know about it, you've got this huge forest fire to deal with. So we had, we had accumulation of a number of things that happened.   (22:10 - 22:23) In 2011, this is an intriguing story. In 2011, we had a new person become a supervisor in charge of our forest firefighting suppression for the province. He had zero forest firefighting experience.   (22:24 - 22:30) He came on the job. He was a Mason. Three of four people on the hiring committee were brother Masons and gave him the job.   (22:30 - 22:36) He had zero experience on fires. He'd never been on a grass fire, none. No training on fires, nothing.   (22:37 - 22:47) And then he became the manager. And now he's the director in charge of the entire program. And one of his very first tasks that he did when he get into power, Nova Scotia had only one helitack team.   (22:47 - 23:00) And we had three smaller helicopters and then one Bell 212, which is the size helicopters you'd saw most of the Vietnam movies, the big ones, you know, where a gunship crew come in and that type of thing. So we had a Bell 212. That was our largest capacity helicopter.   (23:00 - 23:11) And that could deliver a five-man helitack team. And for people who don't know what a helitack team is, those guys are normally the best of the best. Those are the guys that's all they do is lift weights, train and train some more.   (23:11 - 23:29) And they have, when we would call them in an emergency, for example, in a remote area, their response time was they were supposed to be up in the air within 15 minutes. And then a lot of times, especially in remote areas are, you know, in really bad conditions, they were our first line of defense. We call these guys in.   (23:29 - 23:33) And a lot of times they would be there. They'd be dropped on the ground. They'd set up their fire pumps.   (23:34 - 23:43) And then the 212, they'd hook a bucket on and start dropping water immediately. And they would be our first line of offense. Basically, they were Nova Scotia's tip of the spear for fighting forest fires.   (23:43 - 24:12) And they would keep fires a lot of times, well, because of the size of the province, under 10 acres, that if we didn't have them, they may be 20, 30,000, 40,000 acre fires. And over my career, they saved my hide, probably at least a dozen or more times where we would have had major, major fires if we didn't have them. Well, the new supervisor got in and he got in a, you know, he got in basically daily arguments with the helitack crew because he had no experience.   (24:12 - 24:28) He wanted them painting buildings and mowing lawns and raking roads and doing all kinds of stuff. Well, those guys can't be doing that in, you know, when it's 30 degrees all day and then get a major fire call at three in the afternoon. Those guys need to be fresh when they roll out the door.   (24:28 - 24:46) Same as at any, you know, a professional fire department in the city. Those guys have stuff that they need to do. And so he fired the team, got rid of them, decided not to rehire them, and then got rid of our Bell 212 and bought four new helicopters, none of them capable of delivering a helitack team.   (24:46 - 24:51) So the tip of the spear was gone. And then at the same time, they get rid of all of our fire towers. They tore them down.   (24:52 - 25:10) Like I said, they were going to use cell phones as our new early warning system. And then they did another critical thing. In Nova Scotia, we used to have a paper permit system where you'd have to come into a district, natural resources office, talk to a fire tech, and he'd look over the conditions, the FWI data that we were talking about that we rely.   (25:10 - 25:24) And it's not just Nova Scotia that relies on it. Every province of Canada and all across the US use fire weather index data to determine what they're going to do for the day or for the next few days on fire. And so we'd look at that data and we'd give them a long list of things.   (25:25 - 25:36) A lot of times we'll, my career, at least 50% of the time, I talk people out of burning until it was a rainy day. I'd say, look, we can give you a permit, but you have to have a charged water hose on site. You've got to burn on bare mineral soil.   (25:36 - 25:42) You have to have another person with you. You have to have a shovel and a bucket. And then you have to have a means of contacting somebody right away.   (25:44 - 26:11) And so what happened was even the biggest fire we had in the province where we had $189 million in damage and lost over 200 homes, the person didn't have a charged hose. They didn't have to go in and get a permit. Not only all those permits we used to give out, you weren't allowed to burn till after 5 p.m. And when they changed the system and tore everything down and get rid of helitack and the fire towers, they said that you're not allowed to start burning at two o'clock in the afternoon when the winds are highest and it's most likely to have a fire.   (26:12 - 26:33) And then every district used to have a team of at least five summer crew firefighters for the fire truck from every district. And then what ended up happening was some of those districts now in Nova Scotia are down to only two people and three and four, nobody's back up to five. They may have put some back up this summer again, we started off, I'll give you an example, Will.   (26:34 - 26:43) Nova Scotia started off their fire season this year. We were supposed to have six full-time helicopter pilots and four full-time helicopters for combating fires. We only had two pilots.   (26:45 - 26:57) Because across Canada, Nova Scotia is known now as not the place to be fighting forest fires because senior management is so dysfunctional. It's a toxic environment. No one wants to work there.   (26:58 - 27:16) So we only had two pilots going into the start of the season. Then a buddy of mine, who I probably flew with 30 or 40 times over my career, he was in a helicopter crash at the major fire that's going on in the province now called the Dalhousie fire. And it was a mechanical failure.   (27:16 - 27:29) I mean, the guy was, you know, he was a month out from retirement and he busted his back up. They stitched them back together with rods and screws. And that helicopter crash, I believe, was either the 16th or the 18th of August.   (27:29 - 27:41) And that's still laying in a lake. They haven't pulled it out yet. And the amount of absolute cluster-effedness that I've seen on this fire is the worst I've ever witnessed ever.   (27:42 - 28:10) And I can't blame it all on massive incompetence because all of these things that I'm pointing to, from the fire towers to the perimeter system and all these things and reducing staff, when everybody's saying that we're entering a climate crisis, right? And the data doesn't support it, but that's the narrative. If that was the issue, all across Canada, people would have been doubling down. It's no different than out in Alberta when there's another team above helitack and they're called RAP teams.   (28:10 - 28:29) They're called the rappel attack teams. And I remember, I think, oh, it was around about the same time, maybe around 2016, 17 or 18 out in Alberta, when they started making budget cuts, one of the first teams that they got rid of were the bulk of the RAP teams. And I've worked with those guys on big fires in Alberta.   (28:29 - 28:42) They were the best of the best. I mean, those are the guys that when you can't land a helicopter, they slide down on ropes with all their equipment and they cut a landing pad for the chopper to land in. And those boys are like tough and the best that there is.   (28:43 - 28:59) And most of them got, because things are starting to switch around in Alberta, but down here in Nova Scotia, man, it's completely upside down. Right now, if we had another major fire in Nova Scotia, we have neither personnel or equipment to send to it. It's a disaster.   (29:00 - 29:18) Which just about guarantees, in my mind, is going to be one. So what we've got here is this narrative where they're telling us on the one hand, well, we have to combat the global warming to stop the forest fires while they themselves are doing everything possible to create a situation in which there will be uncontrolled forest fires. And that's exactly what's happened.   (29:18 - 29:33) So if you look at the data all across Canada, coast to coast, we have fewer fires now than we ever had, but they're all bigger. And they're not bigger because of climate change. They're all bigger because of poor response times.   (29:33 - 29:41) And that's key. Like you need that helitack team. You need those guys on, you need to keep those fires under 10 acres.   (29:41 - 29:55) Because once they go past that, if you don't have road access and you don't have enough air support, you're going to, under windy conditions, you lose the fires. And so now that's happening all across Canada. So when a fire start, because of reduced response capacity, they all get bigger.   (29:55 - 30:27) So we have bigger fires burning more area, but fewer fires. Right. One more thing I want to ask you, Peter, based upon your experience of overseeing in these forest fires for years, is there anything from the data you're seeing, I mean, you're probably not allowed to go and look at the fires yourself, but from the data you're seeing, are there things, other odd things here that are setting off your alarm bells? On the biggest fire the province is working on right now, they can't determine whether or not it was a lightning strike or arson.   (30:27 - 30:40) And they won't let the best investigators in the province in to do the work. And so when you have that many arson fires and nobody caught, very few people caught well. Out of those 1,144 fires, there wouldn't have been 100 people caught.   (30:41 - 31:33) For example, I talked to an enforcement, one of the enforcement guys here last week, and he told me that on the Southern tip of the province in one county down there, they had, I think, 13 or 14 fires last year arson, and the arsonist was never caught. So it's critical when a fire first starts to bring in an investigator immediately. And it's the same as a murder scene, that area that you suspect the fire start, that has to be cordoned off, pictures have to be taken, evidence has to be gathered, and the rest of it, because if it does turn out to be arson, well, it's critical that you activate a team, that we have an active arsonist with dry conditions, and this person needs to be caught, because if not, if they're a serial arsonist, I mean, they can burn up one pile of government funding, and they can create whatever narrative that somebody could benefit from by doing that.   (31:33 - 32:12) So all you gotta do is get one wacko, pay him enough money to go start setting arson, and then restrict the best investigators in the province from going investigating. Now, once an area has been burned black, tens of thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of hectares, how do you determine if it was lightning or arson? Ah, what ends up happening is when you're first called in on a fire, one of the first things you're looking at is all the weather data, so that you can determine where the wind came. And in most cases, for example, especially with fire towers and even with satellite data now, you can go back and narrow it down pretty close to where the point, original point of ignition was.   (32:12 - 32:39) And a lot of times at an original point of ignition, you'll find that you may find, you may find a cigarette butt, you may find a gas jug, you may find a number of different things. And you can tell initially from when a fire starts, well, if the wind's blowing, before the flames get really hot, one side of a stick will be burnt, and the backside in the direction that it's heading, as the fire goes around, it doesn't get as burnt as bad as the front. So you can tell there's a whole series of things that you're looking for.   (32:40 - 33:17) And then based on that data and wind speed and based on rate of spread and what you could think it do, you can go back and you'd be surprised how many times you can find an exact spot and an exact cause of ignition. And the problem is, is with the advances in technology, I could mimic a lightning strike virtually anywhere with technology that's available today. When those fires started in Quebec, I got ahold of a couple of friends I knew in the military and right off the bat, I said, how did that just happen? And they said, Pete, the technology has been there to, it's wars, lighting forest fires is a tactic of war and it has been for thousands of years.   (33:17 - 33:36) It's just now it's perfected. So how would they do that? How would they fake a lightning strike? Well, on a fake, like you could just go in with a drone and you don't start the fire at ground level, you start it up at the top of a tree. An investigator goes in and you're trying to figure out where a point of ignition was, or you may even have satellite image of it now and you see a top of a tree burning.   (33:37 - 33:56) Well, fires normally start from the bottom and work up. On a lightning strike, the fire may start, you know, halfway down the tree where it blows out through the side of the tree or up at the top, or sometimes it'll go down and blow out on the bottom. But I could go in easily with the drone wheel and with an ignition source and get a fire going on a tree halfway up or up at the top of it.   (33:56 - 34:20) And if I was just looking at satellite data and it was a small enough drone, because you can get drones today, they're only the size of a pigeon, that'll fly 120 K and there's technical things that you can do. And the other thing is you could have a timed incendiary device. You could go in and have timed incendiary devices set up in 20 different areas and I'll be triggered with one click from a cell phone at the exact same time.   (34:20 - 34:47) And if they're a small incendiary device with the right conditions and you don't have access and that person knows that we don't have helitack and it's, you know, let's say it's a kilometer from the nearest road, that thing's going to be quite ablaze by the time somebody gets to it. It's a simple, it's not difficult. So what happens is, it's not that I'm a, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but I'm a person who was trained to look at evidence.   (34:47 - 35:03) And I look at evidence for years and years as a conservation officer and all these different investigations that I used to do. And so what would happen is the preponderance of evidence points to a lot of this stuff as being coordinated. So when the province says, well, we think it's lightning, well, you don't have to think anything.   (35:03 - 35:24) They could have had investigators in there within, you know, as soon as that area was burnt. And once an area is burnt, it can't burn twice well, right? So as soon as it's moved out of that area, you can put your team in right away to start doing your investigation. Well, the people in charge of fire suppression in Nova Scotia won't allow the most highly trained conservation officers in to do the job.   (35:25 - 35:34) And it's absolutely criminal. And nobody's doing anything about it. I'm calling for the dismissal of both the minister of natural resources, the deputy minister and the director.   (35:35 - 35:41) All three of them got to go. They have to clean house. After 2023, after our major fires, they did an after action report.   (35:41 - 35:52) And that after action report was very specific on all of the things that were just disastrous. Why that turned into what it turned into. Nobody was prepared, budget, all those things.   (35:53 - 36:04) And like I said, a person on the outside might go, well, this is just gross incompetence. But you can't have that much incompetence. You can't somewhere have someone like me and you that will say, whoa, whoa, whoa.   (36:04 - 36:16) We got a monkey flying the airplane here, boys. I'm not getting on this plane because he's going to crash it. Has anyone looked and seen who the pilot was? Well, we got a pilot up there that, you know, he's not capable of running a bicycle, let alone an airplane.   (36:16 - 36:31) And so what happens is these series of catastrophic decisions have cascaded one on top of another to the point where we're at today, where the premier said, things are such a mess. We can't control anything. And we have to shut down.   (36:31 - 36:37) And it's always about it's for your safety. It's the same as the Nazis always said. And everything is about safety.   (36:38 - 36:49) And so when you try to put this in perspective, I'll give you an example. In 2024 in Nova Scotia, we had 77 fatal crashes on our highways. We had another 182 people seriously injured.   (36:49 - 37:05) So we had at least that many deaths. If the premier at his will can ignore all the data and say it's for your safety, comrades, we don't want you walking in the woods, even though walking in the woods has never caused a forest fire. Fishing has never caused a forest fire ever.   (37:06 - 37:18) Cell phones have never caused a forest fire. A smartwatch has never caused a forest fire. And even people that got permits to travel in the woods for industrial reasons, were not allowed to have a phone with them or a smartwatch.   (37:19 - 37:40) And at the same time, they didn't ban electrical vehicles working on construction projects in the woods or any kind of woods working thing. So I look at all this stuff and I go, the evidence is pointing to something a lot more than just gross negligence and incompetence. It appears to me to be part of a much bigger plan.   (37:41 - 37:56) And so how do I prove that? Well, I can't, but I can look at what happened in Jasper. When Jasper burnt, a team of 50 professional forest fighters showed up on the edge of town as houses were starting to burn. And they had 20 pieces of some of the best firefighting equipment that you could get.   (37:56 - 38:09) They even had some of the big tankers that they use at airports that they shoot water at a couple of hundred yards, right? And shoot foam and stuff. And the federal government said, no, you're not allowed to work on this fire. And they stood back and watched homes burn to the ground.   (38:10 - 38:30) In 2023, I put together a team of five, myself and four other guys, recently retired forest fire professionals. And when those fires were going on and the premier was begging for help, I called the premier's office, the minister of natural resource and fire control every day that week, offering up that team. Said, look, we can be anywhere as you want us for four hours.   (38:30 - 38:38) We'll give you 18 days minimum, maybe 30 if you need us. We can work anywhere as you want in incident command other than on nozzle. I mean, we're getting up there.   (38:38 - 38:52) That's a young man's job. But for every person on the nozzle, there's four people behind the scenes making things happen, right? Because there's a whole series of things that have to happen in ops and management and finance and all these other types. And they didn't have staff.   (38:53 - 39:15) And for five days in a row, we were turned down every day. And eventually rather than hire locals ourselves, they brought in people from Africa, people from out West Canada in the US to come to the Acadian forest region in Nova Scotia that none of them had any experience fighting fires in. And they brought them in and didn't hire the locals who I had fought over 100 fires down here as I see.   (39:17 - 39:44) So why would anybody have to start asking why would anybody not bring in the professionals to put out the fire when all these homes are threatened? Because we lost over 200 homes in the Tantalum area, which is kind of a suburb of Halifax. Because the professionals there would see the signs and start asking questions. So if you bring in firefighters who are not familiar with the area, not familiar with how fires burn there, they're not necessarily going to see those signs, are they? So here's what happens.   (39:45 - 40:08) You and I are looking at this through a set of glasses that most people don't have, right? I'm looking at it through 29 years experience doing this stuff. Plus on top of that being a professional investigator. And so what happens is when I look at this stuff, I'm not like the average guy who watches CTV or CBC News down here that has the premier on almost in tears saying, you know, your homes are going to burn down.   (40:08 - 40:21) He said, can you imagine walking your dog and getting caught in flames and knowing that you couldn't escape and we couldn't get in to help you. And for God's sakes, out of humanity alone, you have to support what I'm doing. And every single thing that he was doing was out of the COVID playbook.   (40:22 - 40:43) And every one of those plays came out of the Tavistock Institute, SIOP mind control things that were perfected by the military. And how do you control millions of people when you have to? And this is not rocket science and I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but the data is the data and the science is all being ignored. And that's why I sent you those other two charts today.   (40:43 - 40:50) And as a matter of fact, even in mid August, we had rain the same. I'll give you an example, Will. This is how crazy it got in Nova Scotia.   (40:51 - 41:04) I think it was around the 16th or 17th or the 18th to know in mid August, we have a Sandcastle Exhibition. It's a competition on a place called Clam Harbor Beach. And about 10,000 people show up.   (41:04 - 41:20) The people planned a vacation to come down and they go out to sing and it's a big deal. And that was planned for a Sunday. And while people could go in golf courses all around the province in the woods and golf, because golf didn't get shut down, right, just fishing and some of the other things.   (41:21 - 41:42) You know, the type of people who actually look around and see things going on, outdoors types of people, they were shut out of the woods. Well, down at Clam Harbor, HRM, Halifax Regional Municipality, under request from the province, shut down the entire event and they only gave them three days notice. And they said, well, there's only one road in and one road out.   (41:43 - 42:09) Well, in every year leading up to this year, Will, they used to mow the sides of the road and then they had volunteers and they had no smoking signs and they had all this stuff because he never wanted to worry about a forest fire. And all it would have taken was to go in in the morning of the event with water trucks and hose down either side of the road and put some people out there and anybody walking in. You can tell people not to smoke, but even if they do give everybody a bottle of water, put your cigarette out and a bottle of water, man, don't be dropping cigarettes.   (42:09 - 42:45) And they shut down the largest, the largest tourism event on a beach in Nova Scotia, on the beach, man, for fire safety reasons in the middle of the summer. So not only were people restricted from going in the woods, when the premier shut us down until the middle of October, he single-handedly destroyed tourism in Nova Scotia, which is our number one biggest industry, biggest industry in Nova Scotia, you know, still for us is tourism. And tourism got destroyed in Nova Scotia because if you're coming to Nova Scotia, you can't even walk through the woods to get down to the beach.   (42:46 - 43:11) People canceled everything and the data hasn't come in yet. And why, what Jeff Evely's doing is so important because when it's proven that the premier broke the charter on what he did, all of those people that took financial hits are going to be able to sue the province. But ultimately, it's going to be someone like me, the taxpayer, who's going to have to pay for what the premier did because he's going to walk away from it all.   (43:11 - 43:22) He's a multi-multimillionaire. He's walking away from it all, bud. When he's done, I mean, he'll go back down where he was running the Paradise Papers down in the Bahamas and take his, you know, over 10 million and he'll be gone.   (43:22 - 43:36) And the damage that will be left behind for us to pick up are not going to be able to, not going to be able to fix. I'll give you an example, Will. Even in the last, even here since 2015, we've, our population has just exploded.   (43:36 - 44:02) We're looking at a water, the water authority in Halifax right now is looking at shutting down the normal use of water here, maybe tomorrow or the next day, even though we've just had a big rain. Because we keep adding, we're bringing in immigrants, like it's unbelievable the amount of, the amount of new immigrants coming into Nova Scotia. And they put a bunch of them in Halifax with zero planning.   (44:02 - 44:05) There's no traffic planning. There's no police planning. There's no schooling planning.   (44:05 - 44:21) There's no bus planning. And all of a sudden, people are surprised because the reservoir water's down, but you've added another, you know, 50, 60,000 new residents that are all using water and people going, where's the water going? It's not because we're in a drought. We got the same amount of rain as we get almost every summer.   (44:21 - 44:32) You can't jam a bunch of people into an area and not have any planning. So everything to me seems to be a planned demolition. Yes, and I agree completely, Peter.   (44:33 - 44:46) As to this thing with shutting down this beach festival. Yeah. As we were talking about earlier, if you want to get people on board and this is what I said before, okay, you can tell people, we've lost hundreds of thousands of hectares of forest and people are, oh yeah, it's too bad.   (44:46 - 44:54) Until their houses are at risk of burning down. Now it's a crisis and they're going to go along with the narrative, but you can't threaten everybody's houses. So what do you do? Well, you threaten their livelihoods.   (44:54 - 45:00) You take that away as well. Okay. Now you've got all those people on board with your narrative because you say, well, we can't afford this to keep happening.   (45:00 - 45:18) So we've, you know, obviously we have to do what the government says so that we could stop this climate emergency. At the same time, they're bringing in record numbers of immigrants. And let's be honest here, all of these reports we've been hearing out over the last couple of years of people were killing total strangers on transit.   (45:19 - 45:32) Every single time it's an immigrant who did it. And I did an interview just earlier today with a guy named Vincent May. He's an expert in, I wouldn't want to say self-defense, but in danger proofing yourself.   (45:33 - 45:42) And we were talking about all of that, about how they're scaring people. They don't want to go out anymore. So this is all leading to the same thing of lockdowns.   (45:42 - 46:00) Basically keep everybody at home, not going anywhere, not doing anything. And it's all part and parcel of the same thing. Now I wanted to ask you though, this week, you made allusion to this earlier, this largest forest fire this year, and they still haven't determined if it's lightning or arson.   (46:01 - 46:33) As an investigator yourself, does that seem realistic to you? And if not, why are they holding off on telling us what it is? Well, in this, without being too conspiratorial, what happens is, is what should have happened and happened over my entire career. If a fire started tonight or this afternoon, I would tomorrow, I would get ahold of an investigator and said, I look, I need you on scene here at daylight in the morning. We've already flagged off where we think it started.   (46:33 - 46:43) Everything's been, nobody's been walking on, it's protected, but I need you there at daylight looking at fresh evidence. And nobody's been in, my understanding, nobody's gone in to do an investigation. And this is weeks later.   (46:44 - 46:49) I mean, weeks later. Okay. So here's, here's the big issue that we're confronted with.   (46:49 - 47:17) If the premier can get away with this, and this is why it's so critical again, while Jeff Evely does this charter thing, what would stop the premier? Because the 77 deaths last year and the 182 people injured saying, you know what? Just to flatten the curve and for all our safety, the next upcoming long weekend, we want everybody to stay home. Cars are going to be off the road, province wide, or we're just going to start off just in the Halifax area or an area that we've had a lot of accidents. We're going to tell people that they're not allowed on the highway.   (47:18 - 47:37) And let's see if we can save some lives just because imagine what the poor volunteers have to go through and what they see in their families and the millions that are lost and people are being killed and maimed on the highway. And it's only going to be for this long weekend, just to flatten the curve. And then at Christmas time, they could say, well, you know what? We just had a bad snowstorm.   (47:37 - 47:44) People need to stay off the roads for about a week until we get all the roads clean. It's way easier for the snow plows. And it's just this time.   (47:44 - 47:49) And, you know, we don't want people being killed. It was three or four accidents. People were killed.   (47:49 - 48:03) Someone would have to explain to me, what was it? What's the difference in that? Because I don't see any. So this is a very, very, very slippery slope. And that's why when the JCCF got a hold of me, I'm going to be an expert witness on their case.   (48:04 - 48:11) And I've already put together an eight page affidavit that is going to got the natural resources. Heads need to roll. People need to be fired.   (48:11 - 48:21) People need to be replaced. The DEI, the province of Nova Scotia also has a DEI hiring policy. And Tim Houston has embraced it like, you know, with a bear hug.   (48:22 - 48:33) And it doesn't, you don't have to be qualified to do anything now to work for the province of Nova Scotia. And it's the same thing federally across all departments. And now we're really, really starting to see what's happened.   (48:33 - 48:50) I'll give you an example, Will. I only found out here the other day that on these fires now, the volunteer fire department, if fire heights are above your head, they don't want the firemen in fighting the fire. And I thought, you know, that can't be true.   (48:51 - 49:02) I can't, that's nonsense. Well, I had a couple other people tell me that today that work with volunteer fire departments. They said on a forest fire, once the flames get a certain height, that you have to just leave it to the equipment.   (49:03 - 49:19) Well, forest fires, if they're, you know, if you get a crown fire and the trees are 80 feet high, your wall of fire is 160 feet. I've seen walls of fire, Will, out in Alberta, a hundred foot trees that are twice the height of a tree. That's 300 foot wall of fire, man.   (49:19 - 49:24) It sounds like a train. Now you don't get in front of that. And, but that's what's capable.   (49:24 - 49:33) But you can't fight forest fire if you're not, if you're not able to fight fire when the flames are up to your head. That's what happens in trees. I mean, flames shoot up a tree.   (49:33 - 49:49) So what's happening is, is the people running the show, in many cases, it's people are being put in positions of life, life where they have to make life and death decisions. And they're not qualified. Literally, they're not qualified to be saying hello, welcome to Walmart.   (49:49 - 50:01) Really, it's a tragedy. Wow. I'd like to make a little bit of a left turn here before we finish up, Peter, because I did an interview with a while back with some of your own struggles with the Nova Scotia government.   (50:02 - 50:30) Can you give us a summary and an update on where you're at with that? Yeah, so we had a snap election called in November 2024 here in Nova Scotia. We had a set election date legislated to happen in July. The premier called a snap election and he kept 19 independents off the ballot by throwing a, a section three charter violation market barrier in front of the independents being able to access qualified auditors to represent them.   (50:30 - 50:40) And it kept them off the ballot. And we've been in court since December 6th, last year, multiple times. And we were in court on Friday again, Supreme Court.   (50:40 - 51:00) And we finally have access to all the records of government has done everything humanly possible to make sure we don't have access to, you know, the bulk of the emails, phone calls, phone conversations, meeting notes, all this stuff. And the judge ordered on Friday that what we request, it all has to be given to us. And there's a high problem.   (51:00 - 51:08) I don't know how this is going to end, but I can tell you one thing. It is not going to end well. And the premier, once again, he, he knew that would be a charter violation.   (51:08 - 51:31) I mean, it would be impossible for him as an accountant, not to know you just placed a market barrier in front of people running. And what he just did here is another charter violation, because you can't put a blanket wide ban either on fires or on travel and completely ignore proportionality. Proportionality is guaranteed in section one of the charter.   (51:31 - 51:54) And also you have mobility rights under section six. So the data is the data and the premier is showing that the charter, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms means nothing. So we've had people, Will, from the day we started, say you're wasting your time and what's the point? And you and I both know this and there's thousands and thousands of more Canadians coming to this realization every day.   (51:55 - 52:05) You can't sit back and let them to continue to do this because it's amazing what one person can accomplish what Jeff did, you know, no more. I'm not doing it. I don't care what you do to me.   (52:06 - 52:14) We're going to fight this in court. And so I'm on board with him 100% what he's doing. But this is starting to happen everywhere.   (52:14 - 52:23) And we've got a fantastic legal team behind us on our case. And they don't want to be there. They don't actually come into court with us.   (52:23 - 52:46) They're behind the scenes, giving all the information that we need because we're representing ourselves in the case under rule two in Nova Scotia's legal system. No matter how bad we screw up with technical data, the judge has to has to weigh in our favor and tell us how to fix it. And if we had a lawyer and he made any technical error, we'd have been thrown out after about the first two weeks.   (52:46 - 52:57) So for playing English for people who aren't that familiar with their courts, representing yourselves prevents the possibility of losing the case in our technicality. Correct. 100%.   (52:57 - 53:19) So what happens is is because we've been able to access a team, no matter what we do, the lawyers go over it and then we take it back in and we present it. But under under that rule in Nova Scotia's Supreme Court, it's we can't get jammed up on the technicality. And they are doing everything.   (53:19 - 53:30) They're doing everything possible they can throw technicalities at us. And the judge has to has to weigh in with us every time. So it actually has turned out to be a, I'm not taking credit for this one.   (53:30 - 53:52) That was a brilliant move. Now, between that what we've discussed with the forest fires and the complete cluster, yes, that it is. Is there any doubt in your mind as a Nova Scotian that your government there is completely corrupt, possibly completely controlled by outside forces.   (53:52 - 54:05) And most certainly not only working, not working for the interest of the people, it's working against the interest of the people and consciously so. So I believe that and about 20% of the province believes that. But here's the thing, Will.   (54:07 - 54:13) Fear overtakes everything. On a couple other couple of talk shows, I've had a chance to bring in a guy named Jason Kristoff. You'd really like him.   (54:14 - 54:36) And he was talking about how does fear work and how does it shut down a person's ability to think critically? And when you're afraid on your frontal cortex up here in the front of your head is where you do your critical thinking. And when you're afraid, blood actually moves from that area into your organs to try to protect you. It's like in an accident or when you're fleeing and it's something that we had left over from, you know, before we were really civilized.   (54:37 - 55:00) And once people are afraid, even the smartest people, their brain stops working and they stop being able to think critically in a lot of cases. And the only way to overcome that is the only reason I'm lucky of it because I'm not afraid of forest fires and I wasn't afraid of a bunch of things law related. Because even when COVID came along, my wife worked in cancer clinical trials and she knew a lie when she heard it and we weren't afraid.   (55:00 - 55:10) So because we weren't afraid, we would be able to always think critically. And because we can think critically, you could spot a lie from, you know, a mile away. There's just, you know, lies are lies.   (55:11 - 55:25) Propaganda is propaganda. And right now in Nova Scotia, a lot of people are still falling to the propaganda. And it's not and you got to remember, you know, for a province that people love to hunt and I'll do all this type of stuff in.   (55:25 - 55:38) We're down here right now and people aren't fighting tooth and nail for their ability to go in the woods and feed their families. They think, well, you know, the premier means well, he's only doing what's best for us, comrades. Well, he's not doing what's best for us.   (55:38 - 55:45) He's not doing what's best for anybody. I agree with you 100%. This is happening at a level way above Tim Houston.   (55:45 - 55:58) He's just doing what he's told to do. And I actually been fishing with the man, right? And I was one of them guys that got sucked in and helped getting them voted in. And he's the classic Manchurian candidate.   (55:58 - 56:04) And if you don't know what that was, you want to do some research. By the way, well, I'm reading another book right now. That's absolutely fantastic.   (56:04 - 56:11) I always wanted to get around to it. It's called The Creature from Jekyll Island. And that's how the Fed was created in the US.   (56:11 - 56:23) And then when you start looking at what's happening in government, you realize behind the scenes, the biggest players behind the scenes are the bankers. Yes. They control the politicians.   (56:23 - 56:35) They control it all, man. Yes. And if anybody wants evidence of that, there have been three US presidents that have either been assassinated or died in office under very suspicious circumstances.   (56:36 - 56:44) And that was Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield, and John F. Kennedy. And all three of them were trying to shut down fractional reserve banking. Exactly.   (56:44 - 56:59) And when you understand fractional reserve banking, right now in Nova Scotia, we've got the highest taxes in Canada. And my wife and I, we were crunching numbers here a couple of weeks ago, and we've lost over 50% of our purchasing power since 2019 in Nova Scotia. 50%, buddy.   (56:59 - 57:02) In just six years. In just six years. It's that bad.   (57:03 - 57:14) And mass immigration prices, trying to buy a house down here now is almost impossible. Congestion on the roads. I mean, it's just... I was in a Costco the other night.   (57:14 - 57:21) I thought I was in Mumbai, India, buddy. I was a rare person in that building. It was shocking, we'll tell you the truth.   (57:21 - 57:37) I mean, I knew it was getting bad, but I was like, whoa, man, am I still in Canada? I was shocked, tell you the truth. And I've got nothing against someone trying to get a better life, but I just saw data that said that we flooded Canada since 2015 with over 10 million new immigrants. 10 million, buddy.   (57:37 - 57:47) Yes, yes. It averaged out annually. It's roughly an addition of a million people every year, the equivalent of the population of Saskatchewan.   (57:48 - 57:56) Yeah. And same thing in Nova Scotia. So we're adding a new Nova Scotia, like right now we're up to 1.03 million people.   (57:57 - 58:02) So we're getting a whole new Nova Scotia every year. Yeah, yeah. And you're right, and it's happening here in Alberta too.   (58:02 - 58:15) My daughter and I were in the Walmart here a couple of months ago and we're walking around for about 15 minutes. And as we walked out, we looked at each other and we said, we overheard, I don't know, a dozen conversations in there. And not a single one of them was in English.   (58:15 - 58:21) Not one of them. So I'm looking around going, what happened to my country? And it was all planned. Everything you see is planned.   (58:21 - 58:31) None of this happened by accident. And Tim Houston wants to double our population here. And people need to understand that Mark Carney bought in to a program that's called the 100 Initiative.   (58:32 - 58:56) And by 2050, they want to have 100 million people in Canada. Well, I can tell you one thing, they're not going to be coming here from Norway or Switzerland or Denmark, right? Like the demographic here has changed dramatically. And the worst of it is, I got granddaughters that they were lucky, they found a job this summer, but most of their friends didn't because they're not getting, a lot of employees down here are getting incentives to hire immigrants.   (58:57 - 59:17) Everything's changing. And it's all nothing that I'm seeing going on around me right now is happening by accident. And here's the thing, the people who understand how the Tavistock Institute gets things done, realize that if you put people in and they come across as incompetent, that you blame it on incompetence when it's not incompetence.   (59:17 - 59:29) If I hire a monkey to fly a plane, I know the plane will eventually crash. Now you can dress the monkey up like a pilot and people from behind him goes, man, that's a long haired pilot we got up there. That guy needs a shave.   (59:29 - 1:00:10) Well, how do you know it's not a monkey running the controls of the plane? So what ends up happening, the people behind the scenes that make the decision who ends up in power, it's like Mark Carney being installed, he's a banker. When you read the creature from Jekyll Island, you will understand that bankers are like they, if I had to define evil, what's happened inside the fractional reserve banking system has caused more grief and more damage worldwide than I think wars actually. Well, it's absolutely, absolutely insane as to what's happening right now, right? If you need an example of the evil of the bankers, here's a perfect example in World War II.   (1:00:11 - 1:00:22) The European central banks financed both sides. Both sides. And both sides were under the agreement that if they won, they would pay back not only their debt, but the losers debt.   (1:00:22 - 1:00:36) And that money that they injected allowed those countries to extend the war far longer than they could have afforded to do on their own, resulting in additional tens of millions of deaths. These people have no conscience. They don't care as long as they get more power and control.   (1:00:37 - 1:00:48) And the whole immigration thing, that's another part of the side war. By bringing in more and more immigrants, you destroy Canadian identity. And Canadian identity is what unifies us.   (1:00:48 - 1:00:56) So if there's no unity anymore, then everybody feels isolated. It's much easier to control people. Yeah, and that's all.   (1:00:56 - 1:01:16) Once you start research in the Tavistock Institute and what come out of some of those teachings, Edward Bernays was one of the very best people at mind control as well. I think he was the nephew of... I'm trying to think of the guy's name. It'll come to me after the show, I'm sure.   (1:01:16 - 1:01:24) Sigmund Freud, he was Sigmund Freud's nephew. And he was probably the best person on mass mind control. One of the very best people out there.   (1:01:25 - 1:01:51) As a matter of fact, it was him who they got in to bring in smoking, started getting women smoking and putting cigarettes on TVs in all the movies and stuff, right? So Edward Bernays was hired by governments to say, how can we control how people think? And I'm watching the things that Tim Houston was doing during the warm season here. And every word that come out of his mouth was planned. And it was coming across as he's being genuine.   (1:01:52 - 1:02:09) But then the phraseology will be, look, for the sake of humanity. I mean, you have to support your fellow man on this. He said, imagine if it was your home gonna burn down, right? Like what if you accidentally burn someone, how are you gonna feel? And people are going, yeah, I don't wanna burn down my friend's house.   (1:02:10 - 1:02:36) People don't realize the Nova Scotia will, that we have legislation that if you light a fire and it burns down somebody else's house, you get sued, you have to pay the entire suppression costs, right? It's bigger than that. Because I've known for years now, ever since this whole globalist agenda began, that they control people through fear. And specifically through five things.   (1:02:37 - 1:02:44) Loss of life, loss of health, loss of income, loss of freedom. But then there's a last one. And it's the biggest one.   (1:02:45 - 1:03:09) And it's everything that we've been talking about that leads towards and explains those people you were sitting there talking to, where you show them all the data and they go, oh yeah, well, it's really dry this year. And that is loss of social acceptance. People will go to enormous lengths not to be ejected from the herd, not to have their friends and their family turn their backs on them because they're not going along with the narrative.   (1:03:10 - 1:03:31) And so that's what they're doing is they're frightening people through various means until they get a critical mass on board to the point where even the people who can see the data, who can see that this does not make sense, aren't gonna say anything because that will get them ejected from the herd. And the CIA perfected that. I've got a whole chapter in my book about it actually.   (1:03:31 - 1:03:41) So CIA figured out that 20% of the population are what they refer to as goats. You and I are a goat. No matter what the government tells you, we're gonna go, okay, we're gonna do our own research because we don't trust you.   (1:03:41 - 1:03:47) You're a serial liar. And then 20% are sheep. No matter what the government tells them to do, they're gonna do it.   (1:03:47 - 1:03:58) When Tim Houston put the fire ban on and the travel ban, first thing they did was set up a snitch line. And you could not get through to the snitch line because there were so many people calling in, ratting out their neighbors, thinking, oh, I'm a really good guy. Look at me, I'm virtuous.   (1:03:59 - 1:04:19) I'm gonna rat out somebody doing something. And so from snitch lines to that 20% sheep, they're on the snitch line constantly. But the issue is, and the CIA pointed this out, that 60% of the population given enough data where you can get them so they're unafraid might change their minds.   (1:04:20 - 1:04:28) So you and I, they've given up on. The only thing they can do with us is censor us, right? And then the sheep, they don't have to do anything. Whatever somebody in uniform tells them to do, they'll do.   (1:04:28 - 1:04:37) And when I was a conservation officer, we knew that. That's why we would wear an officer's cap when we wanted to intimidate. And people go, oh, authority, you have to do what we're told.   (1:04:37 - 1:05:01) And we would get away with all kinds of things. I was doing law enforcement before there was a charter buddy. It's just the wild west, right? And so what happens is I learned back then how people, and if anybody does any research, go research the Milgram experiment and find out what people are capable of doing by somebody with a lab coat and a pair of glasses and a clipboard, a stranger telling you what to do, what you can convince a human being to do to another human being.   (1:05:01 - 1:05:15) That's insane. So if you don't know what the Milgram experiment is, go do some research, then go read The Creature from Jekyll Island. And then actually, I don't want to see Mark Carney make any money of this, but go read Values and find out what a sleazeball pond scummy is.   (1:05:15 - 1:05:27) And how dangerous he is. I can't believe that we have a banker from that echelon of the worst of the worst of the worst of humanity that got put in to be a prime minister. I mean, literally.   (1:05:27 - 1:05:31) As you say, put in. He was put into that position. He was installed.   (1:05:31 - 1:05:43) Yes. You know, I look at things that happened in that election, buddy, that, like I said, once again, well, I just keep looking at circumstantial evidence. People can get convicted on circumstantial evidence if you have enough of it all pointing in one direction.   (1:05:44 - 1:05:55) And I look at what happened with Mark Carney and the way everything that happened through there, and Mark Carney was installed. And, you know, I don't know how the elbows up crowd's feeling now because it's not elbows up, man. It's bend over.   (1:05:56 - 1:06:04) Yeah, it is indeed. Peter, thank you so much for your time once again. And for the research that you keep on doing, the things you keep on covering.   (1:06:07 - 1:06:22) Let's hope we can turn this around and best of luck with you and the JCCF in your case against the Nova Scotia government. Cause somewhere along the way, we're going to win in one of the courts and that'll start a domino effect. Well, don't get me wrong, buddy.   (1:06:22 - 1:06:37) I'd rather be fishing and hunting, but I'm a grandfather of six and they're waiting for Grampy to help fix out. I mean, my granddaughters, I got twin granddaughters, 17, and they're terrified of what's going to be left of them. So old Grampy here, I don't care who's out there, if you're paying attention in your government.   (1:06:40 - 1:06:49) Kind of like you, Will, we're some of them people probably best left alone. Yes, indeed we are. Just saying.   (1:06:50 - 1:06:54) All right. Anyways, guys, you know what? Speak up. You're just like a pebble in a pond.   (1:06:54 - 1:07:06) You don't know where the waves are going to end up. It only takes one person standing up at the right time that maybe inspired somebody else and you don't know where that inspiration is going to end up. So, you know, don't be afraid, speak up.   (1:07:07 - 1:07:21) You're going to get a few tomatoes, but you know, if you're smart, you can catch them tomatoes and actually make a sandwich with them if you have to. One way or another, we're going to win this whole thing. And if you have to watch anything on TV at all, go back and watch Braveheart.   (1:07:23 - 1:07:40) I'm going to add, I usually let my guests have the last word, but I'm going to add something because you said something very important. Everybody has to push back because you never know who you're going to influence. And this is one of the reasons why I've known since the beginning of this whole COVID narrative and everything that's followed it, that the globalists are going to lose.   (1:07:40 - 1:07:46) And the reason is this. Think of it as two enemy camps. Defections happen every day.   (1:07:47 - 1:07:55) And only in one direction. People who wake up, see the truth, they come over to our side. People who know the truth never go back that way.   (1:07:55 - 1:08:01) And eventually, we're going to outnumber them. And they're going to lose. 100%, buddy.   (1:08:01 - 1:08:04) Thanks for the invite. Anytime, Will. All right.   (1:08:04 - 1:08:05) Thank you, Peter.