Will Dove 00:07 Most of you are aware by now of the collusion between big pharma, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the WEF, the WHO, the Chinese government and others to promote the COVID narrative and to produce billions of doses of a supposedly COVID vaccine. At last count, if you believe the official numbers, over 5 billion people worldwide have been injected with these products. So far, hundreds of millions of people have suffered severe adverse reactions. And as a conservative estimate, over 20 million have died. Birth rates around the world have dropped dramatically, while stillbirths have skyrocketed to levels never seen before. But undoubtedly, many hundreds of millions of young people have been sterilized and will never have children. What you might not know is that in addition to the other entities involved in this conscious attack upon humanity, the vaccine development and manufacturing industry is being heavily funded by the US Military Industrial Complex. 10s of billions of dollars have been simply handed out by the US Department of Defense to vaccine manufacturers and suppliers, while at the same time, they have activated a complex legal structure, which has been building for decades to absolve all parties of responsibility for the harms caused and to hide those activities under layers of bureaucracy. Sasha Latypova is a former executive and lead researcher for companies that conducted clinical trials of pharmaceutical products. She has uncovered absolute proof positive for the entire vaccine manufacturing complex is not only heavily funded by the Department of Defense, but in actuality is controlled by them. laws do not apply. clinical trials were not performed. Manufacturing Practice Guidelines were completely ignored. Contracts to supply the injections to other countries stipulate that they are not allowed to subject them to independent testing. Here with the proof of the links, where you can confirm all of this for yourself is Sasha Latypova. Further information beyond what we will cover today in this in-depth interview can be found on her Substack, at Sasha Latapova’s substack.com, Ms. Latypova, welcome to the show, what you're about to see and what you're about to find out, is going to take things to a whole new level in your understanding of what's going on behind the scenes, behind this entire COVID narrative. Sasha, please. Sasha Latypova 02:42 This is one of my presentations, I've been looking into this problem, the COVID situation since almost the beginning, I first looked at VAERS data and did a lot of analysis. And later on this the FOIA documents started becoming available, I started reading more of the FOIA information from different manufacturers. And also, now we have a lot of Department of Defense contracts became FOIA'd and available and posted online. You know, overall, this presentation is about summarizing the intent behind the so called COVID response, which in my opinion, is it's intentional harm caused by a consortium or an enterprise that infected all sorts of governments or COVID investors, including US government, Canadian, Chinese, Israeli, Europeans, Australians, Singapore, and practically, you know, all of them, all of the nations, which are part of the WEF, and all those global organizations and WHO and so they are jointly running this operation with US. You know, leading it before a lot of items. And obviously, I have more access to this and more interest in it. So I'm looking at it from this perspective. It's definitely a joint venture and it's a joint enterprise of the government's against the people of the world against us. That's my summary, summarizing how this is done, the legal framework in the US -- Will Dove 04:09 -- and if I could just interject something folks, don't discount what Sasha is about to tell us because she's talking about the US. This is actually something that's important on a global scale, because remember, these pharmaceutical companies that are being funded by the US government, as you're about to see, well, they're the ones that are producing these billions of doses that are being shipped around the world. So it's not just the US that we're really talking about here. All we're talking about here is where's the money coming from. Sasha Latypova 04:38 All of our community, we see it very clearly. We see that these products, these injections are toxic by design. This has been brought up many, many times before a lot of scientific literature, historical and that I have reviewed and a lot of prominent scientists talked about it, that these products cannot possibly be safe. There are numerous mechanisms over 20 different mechanisms of injury. built right into the design of these products. So that's very important to understand. So far, you know, we have a lot of outcomes data now. We're, you know, two years of VAERS surveillance databases, that point will point to the same thing. There's horrific deaths and injury to people. And so definitely there is no safety in these products. Obviously, there is no efficacy. There, there are many studies pointing this way. The mortality, they all-cause mortality data shows it, but also we know that there is negative efficacy. Now there are two, recently large studies were published one from Kaiser Permanente, which is a California healthcare provider and insurer, of their 120 thousand, I believe employees that they forced mandated to vaccinate. So Cleveland Clinic did the same they publish data on their employees that they also forced vaccinated. And they have demonstrated that, you know, the more injections you get, the more COVID you get. These injections, amongst other things and other types of injury, they also cause people to get more so called COVID illness, which is still not quite clear what that is. But it's, you know, in my opinion, it's more like a collapse of the immune system and break down and destruction of the own cells. And then you also because your immune system is so destroyed, you pick up all sorts of infections, opportunistic infections that are around. What my focus was at the beginning was on manufacturing aspects of these products. And I've concluded and it was very easy to actually demonstrate that there is no Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) compliance for these products. They're not manufactured as pharmaceuticals, they don't follow any quality rules. They violate all sorts of laws that exist in the US and exist worldwide about manufacturing and pharmaceuticals and also import / export. And so every, every single thing is wrong and broken, and nobody seems - like, nobody from the authorities seems to be paying attention to it or enforcing any of these Good Manufacturing Practice laws. We also know that there is malignant policy worldwide, for from all the governments that are participating in this, and, you know, there's obviously lies very a lot of lies, fear mongering, together with, you know, mainstream media sources, obviously, they're co-conspirators, and they're covering up injuries and deaths. They're gaslighting the public. They persecute anybody who is dissent or you know, journalists, especially doctors, if they're dissenting, or if they're speaking up or giving exemptions or prescribing the early treatments that actually do work, then they get prosecuted by the government. And that's, you know, particularly clear in Canada, there's very, you know, flagrant cases. But also in the US, you know, there's so many doctors that have been prosecuted for trying to treat their patients and trying to be a good doctor. And also, of course, all this in collusion with media, hugely perverse financing of all of the above. So again, in the US, US government simply prints money, trillions of it, and gives it to all of their co-conspirators, which is the media, the academic institutions, hospitals, especially, you know, hospital systems, schools, and employers. The employers are getting money from the government also. They're aren't just these grants to institute mandates to wear masks to do all this ridiculous stuff. The schools, again, they get funding from the government, large amounts of funding from the government, and the condition is children must be masked, children must be vaccinated, you know, so that's the perverse funding that is getting distributed everywhere. So at that point, you know, people are always asking for, so this is all horrible, and why nobody's taking any action, why there is no action by regulators or by the courts. And so the next part is, you know, I'm going to explain the legal structure and how this is implemented in law in the United States. This is based on the research of my colleague, Katherine Watt, and she's a paralegal and a journalist. And she's done extremely extensive investigation of US legal history, and put together I would say, an encyclopedia of law on this matter, I advise everyone to subscribe to her Substack. It's called Bailiwick News. And there, you can read all this in detail. And she has a lot of very helpful documents for lawyers, especially, or anybody who is interested in this. There is a lot of stuff and it goes back. I mean, she traced it back to the Civil War. But the most recent set of laws that were put in place that are being used here, first is the in the US its Emergency Use Authorization. So this was introduced in 1997, under the Clinton administration, and this was a piece of law that allowed FDA to authorize products that were otherwise not approved, or a use over, you know, unapproved use of an approved medication or entirely new medication for what they call emergency use. And at that time, so normally these things, I mean, typically how they introduce these things that they said always very limited, it's only for certain cases, it's only when there are and key criteria for there's like four criteria that have to be met to enable this. But one of the key criteria is that there are no alternative treatments. Will Dove 10:19 This is something that my viewers know, but some will not. The reason why medications like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, were discredited is because under that Emergency Use Authorization, they cannot get emergency use approval to a vaccine, if a safe and effective treatment already exists. So they had to discredit these very effective, very cheap treatments, so that they could use the Emergency Use Authorization to push through the vaccines. Sasha Latypova 10:45 And that was the explanation of why there was such an incredible campaign of smearing and suppression of these otherwise, pretty safe, you know, with long history, were very well-known products that everybody knew how to use and are cheap and available. And actually, they work. So that was one. The second piece of legislation that's used here, it's called Other Transaction Authority (OTA). The most recent implementation of it for these purposes was in 2015. However, the practice goes back to even the 60s in the US, they originally allowed to other transaction authority means other than it's a "carve out". There are normally regulated ways of contracting for the government. And they are regulated and accountable. And you have to, you know, to designate whatever you do and needs to be designated into one of these categories that says, you know, it's a procurement, it's a grant, it's a research, collaboration is something and then certain regulatory requirements apply. Now, they, in their brilliance, obviously, the US government, since the 60s, were saying, Well, you know, sometimes we want to do 'other', which is unregulated. And that the first 'other' was for NASA in the 60s, but then it obviously expanded and now all - well, 11 federal government agencies use it. And Department of Defense is a particular form of this method of contracting because under 'Other', you don't have to follow any regulations, you don't, you're not accountable, you can do whatever you like. And that's why they're doing - that enables Department of Defense to order undisclosed military prototypes from private industry that is otherwise regulated and not following your regulations. But all COVID countermeasures, which includes vaccines, therapeutics, masks, swabs, there's even staffing and many other things have been contracted using this 'Other Transaction Authority', meaning secret and regulated, we don't have to follow any regulations. And all of this is a prototype. Then finally, when this becomes, you know, kind of like clicks into place, is with this public health emergency announcement and PREP Act. So these two other pieces are extremely important. So public health emergency is basically it's a law that they put in place. Trump invoked it basically, in 2021, they went along with WHO's pronouncement, assertion, based on no data, based on 40 cases, out of 8 billion people worldwide, that there is a global pandemic, you know, of a novel virus. These were just statements that WHO made and WHO is not government, is not accountable to anybody, doesn't have any legal authority over everyone yet. All of our governments went right along, right? So that's very, very interesting. So including Trump, who says, oh, yeah, we have public health emergency announces it, and then all of this legal cage slams on all of us. That's how it is so. So then under public health emergency, what happens is a very, very important piece of law comes into play when it's cited here, which says the use of emergency use authorized medical countermeasures, which DoD ordered through OTA contracting, once designated as such, by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, which he can do whenever he likes under the public health emergency, they shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation. So that's extremely important. These countermeasures cannot be clinical investigational products with devices or drugs or whatever. So because these products are not pharmaceuticals, they're not pharmaceuticals - they're not drugs and medical devices. They're not vaccines, they're 'other', they're these countermeasure vaguely defined countermeasure prototypes, Will Dove 14:45 and I want to clarify what you're saying, Sasha, under this legal structure, they've created this 'Other' category. It doesn't matter that they're called vaccines. It doesn't matter that they come from a pharmaceutical company under that category. They don't count as that and therefore, they don't fall under anybody's purview to regulate them. Sasha Latypova 15:03 Yep, exactly. You know, when they are saying, oh, you know, vaccines safe and effective, they're using little what's called, you know, nouns and adjectives instead of legally defined terms. So in pharmaceutical regulation, when you call something safe, safe and effective, it's a legally defined term, you have to actually prove it. Yet we observed everyone there on TV and the regulators going and doing just that, just to continue these countermeasures. Okay, so how are they getting deployed? So in fact, FDA doesn't approve them and doesn't put them on the market, who does? Well, turns out that in the US, it's up to the sole authority of the Health and Human Services Secretary, who's under Trump, was Alex Azar and currently, it's Xavier Becerra, this is what the law says again, so under this public health emergency and Public Health Safety Act, the HHS, which is Health and Human Services Department in the US can decide whenever they like, with no criteria whatsoever that there is a public health emergency, and then they can announce it themselves. And there is no way to announce it. And then HHS Secretary at his sole authority can decide based on the scientific data available - if available, so it doesn't have to be available. If he decides that they may be effective, then they go on the market, and then they get injected into every man, woman and child in the United States. Will Dove 16:25 There's no criteria for what may be effective is entirely the opinion of the HHS Secretary? Sasha Latypova 16:30 Yes. Will Dove 16:31 So that leads me to another question. Because we're talking here about the avoidance of any kind of legal liability, under the way they've structured this, would the HHS Secretary have liability? Sasha Latypova 16:43 No, they're all protected. So again, this is by these illegal laws. None of this is constitutional. By the way, I don't agree that this is lawful, I think that everyone should pursue criminal responsibility. Specifically, these individuals, including Alex Azar, including Xavier Becerra, including Trump, including Biden, including all of them who have participated in this; they should be held criminally liable, because all of these laws that I'm describing are illegal laws. These are the things that our new dirt Congress authorized over the years. They don't debate the laws, they don't read what they're signing, they get shoved 1000s of pages of so called, you know, Act and laws, which nobody has ever read, other than people who write those laws who are not Congress, okay? And so over the years, they put this absolute nonsense that I'm citing here in place. This is just explanation why no regulatory agency did anything to stop this. And no courts, by the way, either, because this also has a lot of presumption of judicial review, so that all of this is judicially not reviewable, and they can continue committing these crimes. Will Dove 17:55 And there certainly isn't going to be any prosecution by government lawyers, because as you pointed out, in your Substack article related to this, government lawyers were defending Pfizer. Sasha Latypova 18:04 Oh, yes, we'll get to that. We'll get to that. Right. So that's what we have. We have this dictatorship, I'm sure there's something similar in Canada, the public health officers here are essentially absolute dictators. So basically, that means that the vaccine development and approval is actually a fake performance art. It's just fakery to convince the public that there really is a health crisis that really, these are pharmaceuticals, and they're manufactured by pharmaceutical companies, and therefore everyone should trust them and get injected. It explains this curious use of word demonstration in DoD contracts, in which we find over and over and over again, that's exactly what DoD ordered from the pharmaceutical companies, a 'demonstration'. So they're 'demonstrating' something to the public to convince them to go and get injected. So like DoD contracts for Pfizer was for $10 billion, huge amount of money, even for Pfizer, it's huge amount of money saying okay, well, we're ordering this large scale manufacturing 'demonstration'. That's the scope of the contract. They're saying in the separate part that Pfizer will, by themselves, do clinical trials and approvals, which means that that's not ordered by the contract and cannot be, like demanded from them in fulfillment of this contract in exchange for this money, but just mentioned this as well, voluntary activity someplace else happening someplace else on Pfizer's own time and own interest. Will Dove 19:28 What Pfizer passed for a clinical trial was actually injecting people and then getting voluntary reports back to them from the doctors who were doing this as to what was happening. And many of my viewers are aware of the very first release of the Pfizer trial documents that showed over 1,200 people had died. That's Pfizer essentially regulating themselves. Sasha Latypova 19:50 Yes, exactly. That first report that they FOIA'd out of them, but they did have it as early as middle of February of 2021. The report itself was issued like February 28. So that means that they already had the data by then so much of it 1,200 deaths the same with the Good Manufacturing Price compliance, it was never actually ordered, like the contracts mentioned, it applies somehow. They're never in the actual scope of the deliverable, which again, if you're enforcing your contract for some reason, right, then you have to look at what did they order for what amount of money and it's very clear that what was ordered for $10 billion was a 'demonstration'. Everything else is just language, words in the contract, but they don't have any enforceability, I would say. So GMP was not ordered, because it's not possible for these things. And legally, therefore, there were no clinical trials. And there were no clinical trial subjects or investigators. So that's, again, it's a legal definition of clinical trials, not possible, a clinical investigation is not possible for this class of things such as countermeasures. Then whoever was being injected with them under this pretense of a clinical trial cannot be deemed a clinical trial subject, whoever was doing it cannot be deemed a clinical trial investigator. Will Dove 21:05 Right. And I just want to explain one thing on your slide here. CGMP stands for Current Good Manufacturing Practice. So what you're telling us is that because of all this legal trickery they've pulled, none of the manufacturing processes for these injections were ever subjected to these standards. Sasha Latypova 21:22 Exactly. Yeah, there's, I have very extensive evidence of that, including direct statements by the regulators that Pfizer and whether or not we're not cGMP compliant. And in fact, they were formally recorded regulatory objections, which is like a showstopper. If you have a major objection from the regulator, you can't proceed until you resolve it. So they record this major objection that Pfizer Moderna, you're not GMP compliant. And then, a few days later, globally, the product gets shipped. What was happening is the FDA and all global regulators were pretending to be regulating this product who was in charge of it in the US. The body that was in charge of the COVID response, was National Security Council, very surprisingly. So in fact, this was known sort of out in the open from the beginning, but it was very much misrepresented in the media, as far as like what it was. So National Security Council is an advisory body to the President of the United States. And they are for foreign policy and national security. And they do not have any representatives from health agencies on that council, the regulator of this, as you can see, it's mostly defense and intelligence, they put National Security Council in charge of COVID policy. And that in itself is saying that the US government is treating this as an act of war. So US government is treating COVID responses as a wartime thing as some kind of a war going on. And they're telling the American public and everyone, everybody else that this is a health event. Well. they're saying that the list of regular attendees you've got here, these are almost all military people. And as you pointed out, there's not a single health expert on that panel. Exactly. So if this was a health emergency, where's the health experts? Very few of them have any sort of health experience. So it was all military brass, no health, but they're telling us it's a virus, or it's a virus, it's a flu, so you know, some kind of a disease and we have to do all these idiotic health things, then, this is actually like detail behind this. There is a document that's available online. It's called Pandemic Crisis Action Plan, adapted National Security Council is in charge of the decisions of all decisions about COVID. And then there are a bunch of interagency stuff happening and HHS is obviously involved, but they're not even the lead federal agency. Again, very puzzling. The lead federal agency is FEMA agency in charge of responding to things like hurricanes and earthquakes and things of that nature. For some reason, they get put in charge as a lead federal agency. So it's not even Health and Human Services, that is lead federal agency and National Security Council. So it's, it's just makes no sense. But the only way this makes sense is and the only reason they put FEMA as a lead federal agency is because FEMA had never had any pandemic preparedness plan. And when they were expecting to manage pandemics wasn't there in their mandate yet, because they're responding to hurricanes. Also, Trump used a Stafford Act to declare this emergency and the Stafford Act was never used before. And so this was done to just make FEMA as a figurehead. It's a perfect figurehead when you don't have any plans, when you don't expect to do this particular thing. It means you don't know what you're doing. So make some extremely useful figurehead and then behind them, HHS can pull all the strings and manipulate all the information and do this performance theater pretending like they're regulating these products. Will Dove 24:57 Sasha, can I get you to back up one slide for just a moment. Folks, just in case you missed Sasha's comment on this, and I want to make sure I understood it. This is from an actual government document. This is the government's own, essentially flowchart of who's in charge of all of this. So there's if anybody's got any doubt right now that everything that Miss Latyapova is telling us is not some sort of weird conspiracy theory. Well, there's the government's flowchart, right. They're telling you the structure they put in place. Sasha Latypova 25:25 This is another very interesting org chart, also available publicly. So this was from Operation Warp Speed. Remember, when they announced all of this, then they said, Oh, we're going to have operation Warp Speed that's going to develop safe and effective vaccines. Very quickly. What's very interesting, this is an org chart turned on the site. But you can see that the head of this operation is the Department of Defense. So the Department of Defense is the chief operating officer of the entire operation warp speed, HHS is working very closely with the military to help with logistics. That's how we were sold this story. Turns out, in fact, here, the most senior person on the chart is the Department of Defense chief operating officer. HHS is a scientific adviser, whatever that means. Then we also see that the whole like executive function on the top is National Security Council, DoD and BARDA. BARDA is Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, kind of like DARPA, of HHS. So all of these executive functions essentially, are done by the US government. All of these actors here are executive branch of US government, they're performing all the functions related to development of the vaccines, which is the design of the clinical trials, design of the product production, supply, distribution, manufacturing, infrastructure, security, personnel, information, Public Affairs, Legislative Affairs, which means they interact with Congress Office of General Counsel, which is Department of Justice lawyers, Chief of Staff, so all of the executive functions are government. Then the third layer down, we have people who are not in charge, but they are fulfilling the orders and they get tremendous amount of money. So they're very happy, which is pharma companies. So all of these pharma companies. Now this, this, to me looks very, very strange, because I am familiar with pharmaceutical companies, when they're developing some sort of a new product. They're extremely sensitive about all of these executive functions. And here in this structure, they will preclude it from that. So the contracts that I read, they all specify that the pharmaceutical manufacturer will not have independent contact with FDA, that all correspondence will be copied to the Department of Defense in BARDA. And if they have any meetings with the FDA, then up to four BARDA representatives will go with them. So all of this is extremely tightly controlled by the government. And again, as I said, the pharma companies typically if they're working on some product, they're very sensitive about that part, they need to do it themselves. Who is really manufacturing these products was really responsible for development and manufacturing. And then the same presentation from the same date, we have this information. So this was Operation Warp Speed, and BARDA bragging about their vaccine manufacturing portfolio. And so on the right hand side, you see what they call vaccine supporting efforts - and these are the traditionally established, longtime established, essentially, defense contractors, while they're private companies in the university. This is a very long standing Department of Defense contractor, notorious for never following any good manufacturing practices. And also they have exclusive contract for anthrax vaccine, which is also notorious for injuring about 200,000 service members, and never complying with any regulations that's been used for COVID has been established in 2012 with them. Then there are these other ones 'ology', Texas A&M, so the ones they circled, they're like identified in these contracts as centers for manufacturing excellence, something like that. So and in fact, this collection is just it's very small, they used it in this presentation, but the consortia include hundreds of companies. Now, on the left hand side, you can see what they call vaccines. Alright, so these are just brand names. These are big companies, big pharma companies that public would trust. So here on the left hand side, all of these blue boxes are labeled as demo. And on the right hand side, they all say manufacturing, so what in fact, they're doing on the left hand side, those are those are the cover for the activity that's going on the right hand side and have been going for a long time. It's not possible to design a completely new product and manufacture, you know, billions of doses of it in the time that they were advertising to us, like six months. It's not possible. It's nonsense. It's a lie. You cannot do it. There has to be in place and it wasn't always the department events and BARDA. They just Which didn't on the announced pandemic, they switched it on and they told Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen, go procure it from these guys, we already established them. Here, they're bragging again how they made these so called vaccines happen in six months by doing what? By printing money first is turns out, you know Moderna receives half a billion Janssen gives half a billion AstraZeneca gets a billion. Pfizer gets 10 billion the Regeneron Mayo Clinic, they just throw a bunch of money at these companies and they order from them demonstrations -- Will Dove 30:35 -- just to recap, folks what she was talking about earlier with these OTA demonstrations where they've done these legal loopholes. So that basically they don't have to follow any regulations for this. Sasha Latypova 30:45 So they don't have to follow any regulations. 'Demo' is fake by definition. They ordered fake performances from these companies, while they're established network of manufacturers was cranking out whatever they're cranking out without any oversight, any regulation. And so the way they innovate is by breaking the law, because they're the government and they're above the law. Here we have them admitting that they're doing large scale commercial manufacturing before any safety is demonstrated for these products, that they shipped a huge number of doses. But even before they received the emergency use authorization, they already pre manufactured millions of doses. And even while they were being found in huge non compliance during this EUA authorization two days later, they ship them globally anyway, they just make whatever brew and concoction of poison that they want. Then they run around and pretend there's a theater going on that we're approving them that has no relationship to what's been produced and shipped. At this particular meeting, this was recently in November 2022, regulating these so called countermeasures and vaccines. So as I said, FDA doesn't regulate them. But I was wondering who does well, apparently these guys take credit. And they're saying that they are regulating these products, because here they did product acceptance for all COVID vaccine doses and for all therapeutic doses. And they also say in the increased industry and regulatory surveillance, and they also do some sort of thing about good manufacturing practices. But I am not aware of any act of Congress that said BARDA is a regulatory authority in the United States. So whatever they're doing, it's not for the purposes of regulating pharmaceuticals in the United States. It's something else, but they're claiming authority over these. Yeah. And another thing, of course, is they funneling tremendous amount of money into these exercises. BARDA historically pretended like they're just helping this niche product for which there is no market. Well, turns out that they are funneling about $47.5 billion into the R&D of which 33 billion goes to the vaccines. And the entire US pharmaceutical industry spends only about 100 billion on R&D every year. So okay, so this is quite a niche. And in fact, they took over the entire pharmaceutical industry, because if there's one buyer that buys 50% of R&D, I guarantee you that buyer controls the whole thing. They essentially took over private industries, multiple, in the United States, and they merged with them. And so now we have a form of health related fascism. Right now, all of this is done together, government and industry and government prints money takes over the industry and does this to all of us, Will Dove 33:33 and to clarify what Sasha is talking about when she uses the term "fascism", because that's a word that gets misunderstood a lot. And in this particular case, she's using it absolutely correctly. And yes, while we all understand fascism is a form of autocratic dictatorship or a dictatorial government, but it's also a form of government in which the government controls private industry. And that's exactly what we're seeing here. The government controlling the private industries. Sasha Latypova 33:57 they controlled the private industry, they merged with a diverse their interests with them such that they are now indistinguishable from each other. Large corporations, and specifically large corporations. It's not that - they actually want to eliminate small businesses, as you've seen like all their actions were against the small business and farmers and things of that nature, but they're really into this large corporate merged with government so that they can establish this totalitarian control over society, which they did here through health. Will Dove 34:26 That's the main reason for the lockdowns, to destroy the small businesses. Not because they particularly care about the small business owners one way or the other. But because those small businesses are incredibly difficult to control, but large corporations, mega corporations, those can get in bed very closely with the government, as you're seeing right here. All be part of that fascist structure. Sasha Latypova 34:47 Here it is in detail. So again, under this website, where all these contracts are posted now. You can see all of them and I've circled to so you can assure yourself this is just a screenshot. It's just the top part. You can scroll down and there is over 400 contracts on it. So you can assure yourself that they're all DoD. So every single company here, and this includes everything, as I said, it's not so here for example, therapeutics and another therapeutic and diagnostics and blood products and some, you know, some other sent monoclonal antibodies, but everything was contracted through the Department of Defense, all of them, say DoD. And sometimes they have parallel contracts with HHS and BARDA. But all of them have DoD. That's where the $47.5 billion went into these contracts. And they were distributed. And in fact, I was told personally approved, by Robert Kadlec, to ensure that they went to the right people, to the right corporations. Will Dove 35:48 And you'll get the link to if you're watching this interview on our website at ironwiredaily.com as always, you will find links to all of this directly underneath the interview so you can get to them easily. It's actually showing you a screenshot here and yeah, she says this scrolls down for quite a long ways. All the major manufacturers are there not just AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson Nova Vax, they're all there for billions and billions of dollars of government contracts. Sasha Latypova 36:13 Now, exactly. So and as you can see, at the top, it says Advanced Technology International, ATI, right, so they are like a manager of all of these contracts. So DoD doesn't even manage them directly. They manage them some of the managers so here's the manager, ATI. ATI is a - here's their website - they are a long established manager of various consortia of defense contractors manage consortium of manufacturers that make them you know, machine guns, weapons, Navy carriers, helicopters, engines, you know, everything, metal works, whatever, whatever Department of Defense needs. They're also advertised themselves as a specialist in these OTA contracts. Right. So all of those contracts were OTA. These guys are specialists in OTA. So you can see how much they the volume of money that gets pumped through this contracting method of OTA, which is unaccountable and not regulatable. Will Dove 37:07 Okay, ATI is a company who has Sasha pointed out their job is to assist with government contracts that are focused on weapons. So why would they be involved in this? Well, because these injections are not vaccines, they're a bio weapon. And therefore the natural company be handling this is ATI. Sasha Latypova 37:28 Absolutely, they're buying weapons because why would you need to hide all this information and make it so secret and so untraceable with this OTA method, jumping through all these other hoops to hide all this information if they were legitimate pharmaceuticals? You know, none of our regular drugs get funded this way, there is no need to have military participating in drug development. Unless it's a dual use biological weapon. For drug development, we have extremely experienced, high quality, very knowledgeable, very capable, huge industry that can do it. And they can do it under regulations. So the only reason to hire all of these guys through this mechanism and is just to hide stuff. And when you're hiding stuff, and it's Department of Defense, that's hiding stuff. Well, you know what they're hiding. That's the story. And they're clearly hiding the bio weapon manufacturing in these contracts, because they have huge degree of micromanagement, they're very tight. So the Department of Defense dictates everything, how things are going to be done. But they're very light on terms of the scope, definition of the scope. It's very vague, poorly defined. And so it says things like prototypes and demonstrations and countermeasures. So all of those words are very poorly defined. So you can hide anything you want under them, they have to use DoD established infrastructure, because there's no way to fulfill them in time. The PREP Act is important one, you know, I've mentioned it at the beginning, but the PREP Act completely absolves everyone participating in this from any liability. And that goes for manufacturers, that goes for also for any subcontractors that they have, you know, raw material suppliers or delivery or full finish or the, you know, even the vaccinators. Everyone that along the supply chain is completely absolved and treated as a government employee regardless of where they work. So they're covered by the government's. Also, this product, this bio weapon in the vial is owned by the Department of Defense throughout from the manufacturer to distribution to administration until it gets injected in the in the person it's property of the Department of Defense. Pharmaceuticals they don't follow this kind of a protected chain and they're not property of Department of Defense. In fact, pharmaceuticals what happens is, once it's manufactured, it's sold to a distributor. The distributor who is also regulated by good distribution practices and accountable and licensed they take possession of it. So there they have liability for anything that goes wrong and gets adulterated or mislabeled or lost or anything. Again, why are we not using this traceable, transparent, regulated chain? And why even go into this black box? If not to just hide the bioweapon in it? Right. I have some examples of foreign contracts. First of all, they waive all the importation regulations, any good manufacturing practice or distribution practice related things. They also even remove national sovereignty because they prohibit the foreign government from changing the laws in their country, that impact liability, which is nonsense. So obviously, it's not it's really a merger of Pfizer with Department of Defense that is able to do that, because Pfizer, by themselves don't have enforcement power like this. And also, the contract specifically prohibit independent vial testing. So the governments who are importing them cannot do any testing. Will Dove 40:53 Trudeau, for example, the purchase of 100 million doses last year in 2022, he's purchased 95 million for 2023. And so those purchases come along with a clause that says the Canadian government or health authorities aren't allowed to test these products. Sasha Latypova 41:07 Yep. Basically, it says like, if something is found deficient when the product when it's imported. So that's basis for termination of the contract, but you're not allowed to test. Yeah, so that's basically that was kind of conclusion of my presentation. Will Dove 41:22 As we had discussed by email prior to the interview, there's a few points on your one of your most recent Substack articles, and link to Sasha's Substack will be beneath this interview, as well. And there's just a few points that I'd like you to touch on, because I felt that they were extremely significant. Sasha Latypova 41:37 So I was looking at the Securities and Exchange Commission contracts for biotech specifically. And I found these several contracts that kind of put in a timeline. Initially, you know, this looks very, very obvious, right. So first, in 2018, Pfizer and BioNTech, structured research collaboration, R&D Alliance, as part of that alliance, Pfizer invested equity money, so they became a shareholder in BioNTech. And then subsequent to that, in August of 2018, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation invested into them also became a shareholder, then, you know, just months after, so this is August 2019. So just a few months later, this global pandemic is announced, March 11 of 2020. And then after that on March 16, so just a couple of days after and by the way, these contracts, you cannot negotiate them in a matter of days, that - it doesn't happen. It takes about, I would say, for a scope of the contract like this, it would take a year, you know, so it cannot be that oh, we just announced pandemic and four days later for someone decides to do this deal. Now they already - it was already in progress. They were all orchestrating it. So Fosun Industries is a pharmaceutical large pharma company from China, is controlled by CCP, their chairman of Fosun conglomerate. So the first one is part of a huge Chinese conglomerate that owns all kinds of companies. And chairman of that conglomerate is a high ranking CCP member. And in China, any large company is controlled by CCP. Definitely now we have a collaboration, a joint venture between BioNTech, Pfizer, CCP, Fosun, and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, with Pfizer, up their equity investment after Fosun - like a day after Fosun structures this deal. So again, all of this was going on simultaneously. And then a month later, two months later, DoD gives them a contract for $10 billion. Again, a contract for $10 billion dollars, you cannot negotiate in a matter of days or even months, DoD essentially awarded $10 billion to a venture in which CCP is an investor and Bill and Melinda Gates is investor and Pfizer invests in BioNTech -- -- and to explain why you can't negotiate these sorts of things in days, folks, remember, this is all a legal process. So you've got all this documentation that's been drawn up by lawyers, it has to be reviewed by the lawyers on the other side, it's going to go through multiple revisions before both parties are going to agree to and sign that contract. So no, it's not. She's absolutely right. You can't do this in a matter of days. This is going to take months at the very least, and probably much longer than that. So all these things that she's saying, were already in place. So what you're seeing here, and this once again, you can go to her Substack. And you can review this and you can read the, her comments on it. What you're seeing here is that it's big pharma companies, the Chinese government, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the US DoD, they are all collaborating on this. And they were doing it before the supposed pandemic was announced. So up until 2020, they were a tiny company with just a handful of employees, which is normal. I've worked with a bunch of small pharmas, there's core staff, and then they you know, because they're research-based, they're just in research. They don't have any products on the market yet. So there's just doing experiments. And that's what BioNTech supposedly was doing. That they had this new technology and they were trying to develop it but they have no products in even late phase clinical trials. And if you don't have products in development and in human trials, none of it is very expensive. It may take a long time, but - I can't see it - so they raised about $1.7 billion in nine rounds. But all the time, I was like, what was this money for? You know, if you're running some cell cultures, and maybe some animal trials, that's not expensive, and they didn't have a lot of staff, and they didn't have any big manufacturing facilities fought for if you don't have any products, and the investors include a hugely international crowd, big funds, as far as I can tell, you know, these funds probably have government entities in the global government consortium pouring money into biotech. Moderna was the same thing, they raised $5 billion. Again, not having any products, not having anything, consortia between biotech and Moderna, and probably some others, have governments pouring money into them over time creating the pharma, and then they just turned on this whole operation. Will Dove 46:00 And just as a reminder, folks, if you remember from my introduction of Ms. Latypova, this is an area where she has a great deal of experience. She ran companies that did clinical testing, clinical trials. So when she tells you that the amounts of money we're looking at here go well beyond anything that would have been required for early clinical trials of some, you know, experimental product, she knows exactly what she's talking about. She's an expert in that area. So we have to be asking the question, What were these billions of dollars for, because it certainly wasn't for that Sasha Latypova 46:27 Big bad pharma doing bad things, and for money. So it's all pharma, committing this crime. Government just loves them. If this happens here, then this will happen again, and again. And again, we're not addressing the root cause. And the government is driving this. And it's not just our government, it's ours, and yours, and Chinese and Australians, and everybody's driving it against us people of the world. So don't tell me it was profit motive only. Sure, there's a lot of profits involved. And sure, there's a lot of people who are interested in profits and doing it for profits. But that's not the only motive. And it's not the most important one, because they're actually killing their profits by killing their customers. You know, otherwise, they could have shipped placebo, it was all legal. They wouldn't be breaking any laws. It's just as 'demonstration' as everybody else is doing 'demonstration'. And if they were shipping, if they shipped placebo, nobody would be hurt. And there would be many, many more customers for them, I would have no problem. None of us would say, Oh, these are dangerous products, we would say no, they look good. COVID would have gone away very quickly. Because it always like all these Yeah, epidemics or whatever they just self extinguish. Will Dove 47:39 Yes., and I have to say, Sasha, that this is one of the most lucid and concise pieces of logic I have ever had the pleasure to read when I hit that statement, which is towards the end of your Substack. I thought, wow, that can't possibly be any clearer. If you still think that this whole thing is being driven by big pharma greed, then simply take a look at that statement by Sasha, that makes it extremely clear that if that's what it was about, they would have gone about it in a completely different way. Yeah, absolutely. Sasha, thank you so much for this information. It's I think this is one of the most significant interviews I've done. I know that you've done other interviews on this, I appreciate you taking the time to share this with our Canadian audience so they can see this information as well. So they can get this kind of in-depth introduction to it from you to understand just how deep all of this goes. And how, as you said, yes, it's all of these gigantic organizations, including governments that are colluding to destroy us to kill us and imprison us and enslave us. It's not about profit. It's not, it's not incompetence, it's intentional. They were planning it for a long time and they know exactly what they're doing.