Will Dove 00:00 James Roguski is an author, researcher, activist and natural health advocate. He specializes in researching highly complex issues and translating data into simple language that is easily understood to facilitate action. Mr. Roguski's Substack has been a source of information for a number of my own weekly news segments on the Iron Will Report. James and I have sometimes been in the same meetings with other freedom leaders. We're both contributors to the World Council for Health and we're both doing everything we can to make the truth accessible to as many people as possible. Recently, I reached out to James with a request for an interview. His Substack makes it clear he is knowledgeable on a wide range of subjects in regards to the attempted globalist takeover of our rights and freedoms. But James turned the tables on me and instead invited me to be interviewed by him. In this interview, James asks for my bird's eye view of the globalist strategy, what are they really doing? What are they likely to do? And most importantly, what can we all do to stop them? James Roguski 01:16 I came across you a number of times, and I got a chance to listen to you express your view of the situation, of you know, at least your view of the world as you see it, what's going on. And I was intrigued enough to want to set us up to have a discussion with you about it. I just really want to give you a platform and give you the opportunity to say what you think is important to be said, and I want to listen and then we'll have a little bit of a conversation about it. Will Dove 01:43 Well, thank you very much, James, it's a pleasure to be here with you. As you say, you and I have met each other a number of times in various meetings of freedom leaders that are getting together to try to figure out how we're going to fight these globalists. Folks, you know, or most of you, I'm sure are Americans since you're watching James, you see my Canadian flag behind me, I am indeed a Canadian. But as James points out, this is a global problem. This is not something where we can afford to be geocentric in our thinking. We can't just look at Canada, we can't just look at the US, we have to pay attention to what's going on around the world, because that's what they want. They want a one world order and if you listen to some of the comments at the recent meeting in Davos, they're not even trying to hide it anymore. Several, several of the people there used that term, World Order, One World Order, World Government, they're getting quite out in the open, what their plans are. And what that means for all of us, is a loss of our freedoms. And let's talk about this international health treaty. You've been talking about this on your Substack. And it's not just them removing this clause for, in fact, I think I have got it here: "full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms". A child can see through what that means. But we have to understand the whole tactic that's going on here with this international health treaty. And that's when they get all these nations to sign on with it. Because what's happened and what's happened in Canada, what's happened in the US with the lockdowns and not forced vaccinations, but certainly coerced vaccinations, and mask mandates and all of that crap, which is a complete violation of our rights. And for your American viewers. We have a constitution too, we have a Bill of Rights, we have a Charter of Rights and Freedoms that's being violated left, right and center, just like your Bill of Rights is. We want to hold these politicians accountable for what they've done. And we're trying to, and we are starting to get some of them into court. We've had some victories here in Canada already, hopefully, we're gonna see a lot more. But what the globalists are doing with this is they're moving the decision making offshore, all these countries that sign up to this International Health Treaty, they're giving up their sovereignty, and it's being done with a very specific purpose. And that is so that when the international or when the WHO comes along, and mandates a lockdown or mandates, vaccinations or whatever, because basically, this Treaty is going to give them the authority to do anything they want. whenever they want. The politicians who are the henchmen for this can throw their hands up and say, well, it wasn't me, I had to follow the Health Treaty. So who do you go after? Who do you haul into court? Now it has to go to an International Criminal Court, if you want to hold these people accountable for what's being done. And this is why countries like the US, like Canada, we have to wake up and refuse to sign on with this and understand the degree to which we're giving up our autonomy. And not just that, but indemnifying the criminals against any kind of prosecution for their actions. So let's paint a picture of where they're trying to go with all of this. What do they want? Let's start with the basics. These people as most of you know, they're psychopath and sociopaths. What's the difference? And it's important to understand the difference. Unfortunately, years ago, I studied Abnormal Psychology on my own, out of my own interest, it started there. It started with that idea of we throw those terms around interchangeably, but what do they actually mean? And so I discovered the difference between a psychopath and sociopath. It's important to understand this because the upper echelons of this it's all composed of psychopaths and sociopaths. And when you understand what these things are, you have an easier time getting your head around the way they think. Some important differences: a psychopath is born, a sociopath is made. Psychopaths actually have something physically wrong with their brain. Some of the structures in their brain that are responsible for love, empathy, they're underdeveloped, they're malformed. These people don't feel those emotions. Now many of them are capable of understanding them and using them against other people, but they don't feel them themselves. Now, sociopath does feel those things, but typically because they spend a lot of their lives using I think, what you get, is this upper echelon of psychopaths at the top. The Schwab's, you know, the Gates, a whole bunch of these people that we could rattle off the names are, but you guys know who they are. And they're the leaders up here and they're all psychopaths. They have no conscience whatsoever. Now the sociopaths which are thicker layer, they're riding on their coattails. These are these are like the people in government. A lot of people ask, you know, is Justin Trudeau a psychopath? Well, technically, no, he's a sociopath. I interviewed his brother, his half brother, Carl Kemper. And I know something about his childhood just so I can tell you from his younger days, no, he's not a psychopath. But he is a sociopath. Which means he didn't really doesn't care that much anymore how much harm he's causing as long as he benefits. I couldn't speak to Biden, because the problem is he's so addled these days who, God knows if there's anything going through his head, rather than what's being spoken into his earpiece for him. The other way to think about them though, is and this is also important, think of a sociopath as an Arrested Development teenager. What do teenagers want what they want control, they're resentful that other people get to tell them what to do that adults in their life utility, and a lot of them, especially boys, and boys, by the way, become psychopaths, at a and sociopaths at a much higher rate than women do. So they're resentful, they want control, they want to be able to force other people to do what they want. And then you got the psychopaths, they have a god complex. Not only do they have no empathy, but they genuinely believe they're better than the rest of us. And that they should be the ones in charge. And because they have no empathy, they can look down on all of us and they don't see people, they see cattle, they see a cash crop. These are the sorts of people who could throw a baby off a cliff and feel nothing. It's hard for us to get our heads around that most of us, thankfully, It's good that it's hard for us to get our heads around that. But that's what these people are, I tell you all of this so you can understand that the extent to which they are willing to go, they have no morals, they have no empathy. And then you've got, you know, the sociopaths underneath who may have some, but typically a sociopath only expresses those feelings for people they're close to. They don't care about anybody else. And so you get these psychopaths who rise to the top. And by the way, for example, it's an interesting statistic. While it's estimated that psychopaths might be at most 2% of the general population -- James Roguski 07:44 -- which is frightening, Will Dove 07:46 Which is frightening but it also have to keep in mind that a lot of them are called functional psychopaths have come to understand that the best way to get what they want is to play the social game, the harm that they have is quite limited. They're not the sorts of people who turn into a Klaus Schwab or Bill Gates. So fortunately, those ones are minimal. among the general population, it's estimated that psychopaths it might be 2%. But among CEOs of major corporations, it's more like 20%. And who are the globalists, they're the CEOs of major corporations. And many of them, they're even, interestingly enough, self aware psychopaths, who know they're psychopaths and they see it as a good thing. Because they're not crippled by emotion like the rest of us are. So I'm painting all this, I'm giving this little psychological study so you can really understand what we're dealing with: an extremely powerful group of people, with no conscience, literally no conscience, a God Complex, and a long trail of sycophants behind them who are willing to do their bidding in order to have power over others. It's pretty scary when you think about that, and how much power and control these people already have. But they don't know a psychopath doesn't want some power, they want absolute power. Remember, they have a God Complex. Everybody has to do what I say. So they start maneuvering. And unfortunately, they're not stupid. So this is where you get things like this International Health Treaty. It's where you get things like the attacks on the food processing plants, which we now know to have been carried out by the US Department of Defense, by and large, we've got the evidence for that. We've got them looking for all sorts of different surveillance structures. Recently, in one of my weekly news reports, I reported on smart dust and neural dust. And this isn't science fiction, folks. This stuff has actually been around for about 20 years, the military way back in 2001 did a test with smart dust, almost nano machines. You could see them if it had them on your hand what you might see if you look close would be a little black speck. You have no bigger than a grain of sand. What they did with this test is they dusted 174 military vehicles with it and successfully tracked their direction and speed. You can pass this stuff with a handshake. Now it gets even scarier. They invented neural dust you can inhale This stuff is so small, you can inject it with a needle, think about that. And what that stuff will do is get inside your body and attach to your nerves. It can be activated with ultrasound. See, there's a little difference. The smart dust requires a radio frequency. And that's a bit of a problem trying to use that in the human body. Because radio frequencies don't travel well through the human body were mostly water and these radiofrequencies don't travel well through water. But smart dust is activated by ultrasound, or sorry, neural dust. And that, you know, neuro ultrasound does travel to the human body. We've been using it in medicine for years. Now, I'm not a physicist. And there may be people out there watching this who know much better than I do, I did a little bit of research on this and found that you know, the sort of the maximum frequency, or maximum range of a meaningful ultrasound signal is about 50 feet. But think about that. Now you've now maybe you've got enforcers like police officers, who are armed with a directional ultrasound emitter, and all they do is just pointed out, you'll press a button and the effect will be like a taser. They don't have to hit you with electrodes, they just have to be within range. What if the government wanted to keep you away from a certain space? Well, all they'd have to do is put up ultrasound emitters at a certain frequency and the closer you get, the more pain you'll experience. Until eventually you collapse if you try to keep going, What a marvelous means of control. Now let's take a look at things like the facial recognition surveillance cameras, that they're wanting to put in everywhere. Recently, I reported on a couple of different people in New York, incidentally, both of them lawyers, who got kicked out of Radio City Music Hall by security, because the cameras picked them up and a computer program plus spotted them and said this person is on the list of people who are not allowed in this building, because their employer is suing the owner of Radio City Music Hall. In neither case was the lawyer themselves involved in the case, the lawyers hadn't done anything. But they were still escorted out of the building. In one case, a woman was there with her nine year old daughter to take her to a presentation, she had to stand outside in the rain for an hour while her daughter attended it because they wouldn't let her in the building. So think about that. And we have cameras, everywhere. But there's a state right now that's running a pilot program for digital driver's licenses. Right now, it's voluntary. But what you what you do if you sign up for this supposedly convenient digital driver's license is you have to enter your driver's license details, and then use your web camera to do scans of your face. What do these people do, they just voluntarily put their face into a facial recognition system that's tied to your primary form of ID. Now think about all those traffic monitoring cameras that are out there, I don't know about in the US. But here in Canada, we got them everywhere, just about every intersection, you can look up you can see the traffic monitoring cameras mounted above the lights. So now they tie that into a facial recognition system. And they know everywhere you're going even if you're not carrying your cell phone, they know where you are. They know where you're going. So they got you know, surveillance, control. They're setting up these systems where they can mandate anything they want. And holding the people behind it accountable is almost impossible. So here's where I've been going with all of this because what I've been doing, folks is I've been giving you some background information to paint, I am afraid a very, very frightening picture. I don't know about the US. I'm going to talk specifically now about Canada. So for that I have to give you a little bit of background. Most of you have heard of Justin Trudeau, our treasonous prime minister, and he is a traitor. He's an absolute traitor, and he's completely owned by the WEF. He's one of the graduates of their five year Young Global Leader indoctrination program, as is our Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland and she even sits on the board of trustees at the WEF and even more frightening she's been pegged as the next potential leader of NATO. I've joked on my show, that's a little bit like getting crazy Harry from the Muppets, the nuclear launch codes. This woman's insane. She's a complete Nazi. So this is what we're dealing with here in our country. Now we have another politician, you guys have a two party system. You got your Republicans and your Democrats. Okay. So here in Canada, we have Liberals and Conservatives, we have more parties than that, but you can still roughly divide them into these two categories. So Trudeau and his party, they're all liberals or what you guys would called Democrats. And on the other side are the Conservatives or what you would call Republicans. So the leader of the Conservative Party in Canada right now is guy named Pierre Poilievre and he seems very, very reasonable. For years, he's been giving our government the gears on where they're spending all this money, for example, $7 billion that were spent to enforce all the COVID mandates that he's been hammering at them. So where did the money come from? What exactly was it spent on and he's not getting any answers, surprisingly enough, now, my own jury on Poilievre is still out. Maybe he's exactly what he appears to be. Maybe he's one of the good guys. But what if he is controlled opposition, as has been theorized by a number of people I know. Now, here's a frightening picture. Trudeau, he was elected in 2015. In fact, I'm going to give you a little bit more history on Trudeau. And a very suspicious story I came across in an interview I did not long ago with a gentleman named Dr. William Makis. Dr. Makis was a head researcher in cancer research at the University of Edmonton, Alberta that's in the Western Canada. In fact, Alberta is the province in which I live. In 2015, about two months after Trudeau was elected for the first time. Dr. Makis, his research was taken away from him. He was barred from the campus with no reason given, so much so that they continued his $60,000 a month salary for a year afterwards because they had no reason for dismissing him. Now, his cancer research was revolutionary is revolutionary what he did and I'm speaking by the way, as someone who's been through cancer, I had stage four cancer in 2016. So I've been through radiation and chemotherapy, I know what it's like. But what he did was he came up with this idea of injecting a radioisotope with a receptor on it, that would only bind to cancer cells. So the radiation- the range of the radiation is about two cells, which means it'll bind to the cancer cells, the radiation will destroy those cancer cells while doing very minimal damage to healthy cells around it. Basically, you can take just about any cancer and with four injections, you can cure them - that revolutionary. So they take it away from him two months after Trudeau was elected. You want to guess what's happening with that cancer treatment now? Trudeau is heavily involved in constructing a multi block multi story installation in Vancouver, the largest city on Canada's west coast, to sell this cancer treatment to foreign dignitaries at $100,000 - half a million dollars a pop. So here's the question that I asked Dr. Makis. And he had to admit the thought had not occurred to him before then but he said, Well, it would certainly fit the facts. Remember, Trudeau is a graduate of the Young Global Leaders Program, he's been indoctrinated by the WEF, he knows what's going on. Did he know in 2015, that these mRNA shots were going to cause a huge increase in cancer? Well, we don't know. But we should be asking that question. That just gives you a little bit more of a picture of this guy. So now we've got Trudeau on the one side, who elected in 2015, gets reelected in 2019, shortly before all the COVID madness hits, calls an early election in 2021, knowing that it was rigged so that he would win, because by then he'd already become immensely unpopular. By the way guys give you another idea about this guy, he has now more than doubled Canada's national debt. In the six years he's been in office, it took us well over 100 years of Prime Ministers to run up the national debt we had He's doubled it in six years. on his own. He's ruining our country financially, just destroying it. Now, I'm gonna get to my point. Let's talk about Poilievre and the possibility that he's controlled opposition. As I said, I don't know. I don't know the man, I have never been able to talk to him. My Jury's out. But let's just consider for a minute that he is. And the reason why this is important and it doesn't just apply to Canada. This is a strategy that globalists will use around the world. At this point in time, we get a lot of people waking up and understanding that the lockdowns did way more harm than good. Some of the more awake ones even know that, you know, COVID was a weak flu, that, as was revealed in my recent interview with Denis Rancourt, a Canadian scientist and expert in data analysis, did not kill any extra people at all. All the extra people died as a result of government actions, putting vulnerable people together in small spaces where they would all pass diseases to each other and die. And you know of the obscene medical treatments that are being pushed by people like Fauci, Fauci. Let's, I mean, let's take somebody who's already suffering from respiratory distress, and stick them on a ventilator and shove them full of remdesivir, which is going to shut down their kidneys and cause them to drown in their own fluids. And then they write that off as COVID. Here's the thing. So we got all these people now who are starting to understand that they were lied to. We know that they're planning more "vaccines". We'll get back to the proof of that later. So let's say that Poilievre, and politicians in other countries around the world are in fact controlled opposition, because the globalists have been maneuvering for decades to put into place people they control. Trudeau is already talking about doing another early election again, this year, just two years after the last one. Well, here in Canada, you don't have to hold the federal election every four years. And this time, I mean, he knows he has no support. But he's controlled by the WEF. He does whatever Klaus Schwab and his cronies tell them to do. Maybe they're not planning to rig this one. Maybe they're planning to let Poilievre win and then here's the scenario that terrifies me, because what they really want is control. So Poilievre gets elected. And now we have a conservative or republican government, who says that they're in favor of the rights of the people. But along comes the International Health Treaty, the WHO says, Oh, well, we've got this dangerous virus out there. And everybody has to do this, this and this. And Poilievre responds with well, you know, we're not going to lock down because that didn't work last time. And we're not going to force people to wear masks because that didn't work last time, in order to protect everyone. We do have to know where everyone is and who they're coming in contact with at all times. So let's back up to smart dust and neural dust and facial recognition and human psychology where people go, Oh, we don't have to lock down. Well, that's fantastic. I mean, all I have to do is just, you know, sign up to be followed, tracked, traced everywhere I go, everything I do, and now they have their control mechanism in place, and people will sign up for it. They'll do it, they'll do it in droves, because it's not locked downs, but lock downs were never really their objective, their objective is control. James Roguski 20:15 I very much agree. And what I have been saying for quite some time, is that the international health regulations are misnamed. They should not be called health regulations, because they don't talk about treatment or essential medications or vitamins or minerals or herbs. It's all about, you know, if they were called the International Surveillance, Monitoring, Reporting, Emergency Declaring Fear-mongering Regulations, everybody would see what it is they're trying to do, okay? And so one point of clarification, the talk of a treaty, in many ways, is a decoy. So I'm very careful to not use the word treaty. That's a separate document that they would love to have, it would give them all kinds of powers in addition to what the international health regulation amendments would do. But it confuses the crap out of people. Because I can certainly speak to the United States, you say treaty to someone in the United States, they go, Oh, the Senate will never approve that. And people don't realize that that's just not how it really works. They won't even need a signature from the president or a prime minister or a monarch or king or whatever. We're already party to the International Health Regulations. They're legally binding, they don't have much that they currently demand of the various nations. You have to put in a report, you have to have a point person, there's a few things that nations are obligated to do. But the document itself has been agreed to for decades. And so it is legally binding. And the system by which it would be changed is just greased, it is so smooth and slick, that all that would be required is to I'll just say influence a majority of the nations to vote to adopt it. And if a majority of the nations adopt it, its law. No signature needed. No parliamentary or Senate approval needed. Okay, boom, it's in. And so what I feel that I have observed, is that you can ask all over the world, anybody, do you have the foggiest idea who the delegate from your nation is to the WHO? Let alone the delegation, which could be up to 50 people? Okay. No one has the foggiest idea who is purporting to represent them. Right. Most people don't even know who their congressman or senator or parliamentarian or whatever are. But they absolutely do not know who the delegate to the WHO is. There has been absolutely zero public input, public comment, public discussion, all of the meetings about these proposed amendments have been confidential. Okay, the report that was prepared and presented on January 15, from the International Health Regulations review committee to Tedros. It's more than two weeks now, and it's totally unavailable. And last year, when Biden submitted it, it was kept secret until April 12. And so ideally, they would love to keep all of this completely secret, and have their little insulated group of delegates that are just a bunch of bureaucrats, technocrats and have no connection to the people of the world decide amongst themselves in Geneva to give themselves more power. The simple answer is, Oh, hell no. Okay, we're in a predicament. And I think the main reason that I wanted to have this interview and talk with you is all of the things that you just said. But it was also I think, a passion about how, hey, people stop paying attention to all of these other things that are distractions. I don't want to be a gloom and doom type of you know, fear monger. But if you're not paying attention to the things that really matter, and you're paying attention to things that are really serious, but minor, you know, in some other level, you're being distracted away from that which they are trying to do. And I think you more than, you know, anybody I've come across has a set of priorities that make more sense to me. Everything that's in the news, everything that the mainstream media is talking about, if you look at it from, I think a wiser perspective as I think you do, you got well that's just distracting you. It seems important, It seems vital. But oh please people pay attention to the stuff that's really important. Will Dove 25:05 I agree with everything that you've just said, James. People are getting distracted by the details, they need to understand that it's all connected. You can't just focus on one thing. This is a multi pronged, multifaceted attack on all of us, on our rights, our freedoms on our lives. But there is a way to fight back. Politically, there's a way to fight back. And individually, there's a way to fight back, let's cover the political first because something's starting to happen here in Canada. And it's happened already to some extent in the US. And that's decentralization of power. The reason why these people can do what they're doing is that they have spent decades centralizing power. Now, you in the US actually have a bit of an advantage over US and Canada, because it's already in your Constitution, that the individual states have somewhat more autonomy than our individual provinces do. But I'll tell you a little bit of story which about what's happening in my own province of Alberta. Very recently, just a few months ago, the premier of Alberta same thing as a governor Jason Kenney, who was a complete traitor and working for these people stepped down, he saw the writing on the wall, he could see that the noose was coming and so he ran. And very fortunately, the party, the Conservative Party, of which he was the leader, voted to replace him with a lady named Danielle Smith. Now, I know Danielle, somewhat peripherally. I've been in a couple of meetings with her. That's about all she's very smart lady. So I want to give you a very quick rundown of what she's doing, because constitutional reform in either of our countries is extremely difficult to do, but there's ways to work within what's already there. So it's written in the Canadian Constitution, that the federal government can indeed unilaterally pass a law that applies to all Canadians. But it also says that if the province didn't have a say, in writing that law, they are not required to enforce it. What Danielle Smith did very shortly after taking office was to write and pass into law, what's called the Alberta Sovereignty Act. And all this Act really did was it formalized, among other things, that concept I just described, that said, Okay, Ottawa, which is our nation's capital, you guys can go and pass all the laws you want but I'm not required to enforce them for you. That's your job. Now, we have a national police force, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. So what's the other thing she's doing? She's working on kicking the RCMP out of Alberta and replacing them with a provincial police force. So she takes those two steps. And Ottawa goes and issues more mandates, which she just said, Well, we're not going to enforce them. We're not required to enforce them, because we weren't involved in writing those laws. And you don't have any RCMP here, you don't have any enforcers in our province, to go to hell. All without challenging the Constitution, which is very much what Ron DeSantis has done and is doing in Florida, we're just not going to participate, rest of the country can go to hell, if you want to. And this is the power of decentralization. So this is what we have to be doing. We have to be moving towards making those changes in our laws, starting by taking advantage of the ones that are already there, just as you were talking about what they're doing, the globalist, taking advantage of something that's already there. They just have to formalize it. But we have laws, both of our countries that do decentralize power. So we have to start by using those. And then once we get that much power back, now we pass more laws that decentralize power even further. So one of the things that I've done on my show is twice now I've had the privilege to interview Sam Bushman, who is the vice president of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association of America and why I've been wanting to interview Sam is because in Canada, we don't have elected sheriffs, but we should. That's the ground level folks, electing your sheriff over your county, and your police force was appointed by your sheriff is the only authority to administer the law in your county, beyond, you know, capital crimes where yes, okay, maybe we should all have a national police force who has limited power to go after those particular individuals, because they're likely to flee the county, but within the county for the everyday citizen who says they're speeding or it's domestic abuse, or whatever, your local sheriffs deal with that, not an appointed police force. And so we start there, and we start moving up the chain. Okay, now we get more autonomy for our cities or municipalities. And then we get more autonomy for our states, our provinces. And we start decentralizing this power. And then of course, the next step is to get our countries out of the WHO, and the WEF, and the UN and NATO, and stop letting people outside of our countries control what happens inside our countries. James Roguski 29:25 So to summarize this, Canada, in particular, other nations like Australia, and the United Kingdom, did not propose any of the amendments that are being considered. And so one view of all of this is very clear from nations in that situation. What in the world are all of these delegates from all of these other nations doing to give power over to the WHO, which would then obligate all of the nations in the planet? Okay, and so I very much agree with you. Back in May, when we went through this the first time, the state of Louisiana, their assembly, passed a resolution that in my own language, said to the WHO, hey, we're the state of Louisiana, the federal government knows that they don't have authority to speak for the states in regards to health related issues. The United States actually said that in the International Health Regulations, you can go to page 61 and read it for yourself. The federal government in the US does not have authority. So Louisiana passed a resolution saying to the WHO, whatever you think you're doing, forget about it. Unless the people of Louisiana say that they want it. It doesn't matter. You don't have authority over the people of that particular state, which for all intents and purposes is its own sovereign country. I'll give you the last word I would like for you to talk about is how do people need to change the way they look at this onslaught of information from all of the distractions to what is really important? Will Dove 31:06 What's most important is to do what you and I are doing it to help James and I do what we're doing, and that is to spread the truth. There's a mathematical formula, truth times pain equals resistance, we bring people the truth, our governments are the tyrants who will bring them the pain. And once enough people who know the truth have suffered enough pain, they will stop complying, and they will resist. And once enough people resist, the tyrants will lose because tyrants always lose in the end, and they always lose for the same reasons. Tyrants gain power through fear, fear of loss, loss of life, loss of health, loss of income, loss of freedom, loss of social acceptance. But to make those fears real, they actually have to take things from people. And as soon as they take something from someone, that person no longer fears losing it. You can't fear losing what you don't have. So now they have to take something else, and something else until there's nothing left to take. And when enough people reached the point where they realize they have nothing left to lose, they stop complying. They get angry, and they fight back. And if you look at history, the tyrants lose the same way every time and this time won't be any different. Spread the Truth.