Gain of Function Series: Playing with Fire | Dr. Richard Fleming
September 4, 2025
- What are the risks of gain of function research?
- What level of control could this technology have on targeting certain people or traits?
- Why would you make a bioweapon more transmissible but not more deadly?
- Could you design a virus to not have symptoms to drive asymptomatic transmission?
- What is the antigenic load of shot vs. the actual c-19 virus?
- What are the implications of the mutations we see of the c-19 virus?
LINKS:
The Book: Is Covid-19 a Bio-weapon?
Originally posted 2022-10-13 15:52:34.
1 Comments
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.











the concept of making it highly transmissible but not highly lethal among a healthy population is perfect for both scientific observation (as all science is a fraud, its all achieved by trial & error) & testing population control & pandemic management, as we seen from the first with this plandemic, it was more hype & propaganda to create fear in the mass population than it ever was a threat.
its like they released it in key population centers & the rest was fear, as the normal protocol when you have a real pandemic is to avoid public speech that would create fear or panic, where here is was the opposite, they were advertising death stats hourly, showing garbage trucks implying they were removing body bags & they were criminalizing any speech that would calm the public & promote rational & critical thinking.
thus the jab is the far more lethal & controllable bio-weapon these mad scientists are observing, as although it can shed to others it is most commonly spread from long term exposure too a jabbed individual who is still manufacturing the virus, thus among family & co-workers & such, thus they have created the fear with the highly transmittable bio-weapon essentially with no major payload to get people to take the highly lethal experimental jab which is more controlled & far less contagious, ideal for monitoring various results & impact on a large scale population without the risk of wiping out the entire population as with a highly transmissible version.
thus the need to track “vaccination” status, something that has never been needed & would not be needed if it were actually a vaccine, you would only need that level of detail if you were running experiments with different substances on different populations & demographics.
So why the need to track batch numbers down to the individual if governments & drug companies have full liability protection, if not to see how a specific product responds to a specific individual?
the only people who really know are the drug companies who need to be raided & have their computers & documents seized & be arrested & face tribunals for crimes against humanity, the outcome needs to be not only their top figure heads swinging from a rope after conviction but their business licensed revoked & all current drugs by that company given generic license.
but this time we can not stop at the guilty minions & useful idiots of protocol following healthcare, but go after the elite families & their NGO’s & corporations, foundations & entities that used the drug companies & healthcare systems of the modern world as the tools for this medical experiment.