(0:00 - 1:00) Five years after mRNA injections were forced on an unsuspecting public, finally a recognised governing body has issued a declaration that the injections are in fact a bioweapon. The Alliance of Indigenous Nations International Tribunal is the first governing body and judicial authority in the world to issue an order declaring mRNA nanoparticle injections biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. Furthermore, this body is recognised by the Government of Canada as having official nation status. Lawyer Lisa Miron, the author of the excellent book World on Mute, has been the driving force behind this groundbreaking effort. She joins me today to discuss the details and implications of this declaration. Lisa, it's a pleasure to have you back on the show. (1:01 - 1:29) It's so good to see you again, Will. You do tremendous work and so I'm really happy to be with you and your audience today. Well, thank you so much. And you as well, Lisa, you have been one of our top legal warriors in this country. We did an interview not long ago on your book, World on Mute, many of your other efforts, and recently you have spearheaded something that is quite frankly groundbreaking. I'm going to let you tell the viewers what you've done and what it all means. (1:31 - 1:50) Yeah, so I want to give a shout out to Dr. Sansone as well and the AIN Tribunal and the plaintiff complainant who's a Clan mother. So just those are who we're going to give a shout out to. The viewers know AIN is the Alliance of Indigenous Nations. (1:50 - 2:16) Correct. And Dr. Sansone had brought a couple cases, a mandamus case and another case to have the shots declared a bioweapon in Florida. And in working with him on various initiatives and being aware of it, I decided that, well, that's a lot of material that is not being utilised. (2:17 - 2:43) And in the research of my book, I saw how courts were upholding through judicial review the censorship regime. And I was seeing just a collusion around the world that was enabling these bioweapons to be continued to be sold. And declaring them bioweapons is an important notional idea for people. (2:44 - 3:14) A lot of people are aware of the fact that the shots cause a lot of harms. Anybody who follows Dr. Peter McCullough to any of our other wonderful doctors will know that these shots cause harm in a variety and myriad of ways. But declaring a bioweapon is really important because it takes it out of the regime of whether or not, even for the PrEP Act, right? Because the PrEP Act has protection for sort of four categories. (3:14 - 3:31) Bioweapon is not one of them. And so, you know, Reiner Fuellmich had tried to do this with an Indigenous nation in New Zealand and was unable to. And all the court cases that were going around the world were upholding the system of censorship. (3:32 - 3:54) They were allowing a rogue power to censor medical doctors, but a lot of other professionals and even non-professionals, MPs, politicians. So that collusion meant to me that we were not going to see a lot of justice out of that system. And, you know, maybe they don't want to call it collusion. (3:54 - 4:24) I'll call it collusion asterisks. You know, I see a system that is set up, like look at the Sean Hart case, that allowed the courts to have one person decide the informed consent for the entire population and decide whether undue harm up to and including death could be informed consent, right, for her to decide, the person at the top. So we have a centralised system that informed consent is, you know, at the very top. (4:25 - 5:14) So the idea that both declaring the shots bioweapons was really critical, important for people to have a new dialogue with what they are and for justice. And then I got to know the AIN tribunal and see that they were, they had a jurisdiction and that they were providing relief to complainants and plaintiffs over the last three years. And they've done over 30 cases now and various, you know, I don't go into their files, but I thought to myself, here is a tribunal that's outside of the system. (5:16 - 5:49) Here's something that, you know, maybe this is what Reiner was trying to do in New Zealand. So I pitched it to Dr. Sansone, you know, why don't we take your material and bring it to the AIN tribunal and ask them for a declaration to declare the shots bioweapons? And, you know, then I took it to the tribunal and pitched this idea. And they had an initial meeting. (5:51 - 6:17) And, you know, there was hundreds of pages of material, right, between the studies, the published studies, the affidavits, the attachments to the affidavits, the briefs. And they said, well, we're going to, we will take this on, but it's a, it's a, it's a big ask. And we're going to put it further out into our hearing agenda. (6:18 - 6:32) And so then I argued urgency. And I argued that they should hear this on an urgent basis. And Dr. Sansone echoed this. (6:34 - 6:56) And ultimately, they decided that urgency was required. And, you know, a plane of cancer doctors will go down. You know, cases that should, in all intents and purposes, judicial review cases should be won. (6:57 - 7:02) Right. They have the law and the facts behind them. And, and they don't win. (7:03 - 7:20) And my instinct was, if we had a long lead time, there would be a certain vulnerability to the complainant, to the judges, to myself, to anybody else involved. Yes. And as you, as you mentioned, Reiner Fuellmich was trying to do this. (7:20 - 7:25) And what they do, they set him up and he's still in prison. Correct. Correct. (7:25 - 7:46) And I have my own incidents that I've reviewed with you cursorily, but won't review here. So they did take in the material. And then they have a procedure where they have what is essentially their own crown attorney present the case. (7:46 - 8:14) So the crown attorney drafts their, and that's the name I give it, but for people to understand, drafts the file, drafts the case, puts together the complainant material and complaint. And did so on the basis of the material that I compiled from Dr. Sansone's case. And I want to do a shout out to Dr. Speicher, who also put together an affidavit. (8:16 - 8:42) That material was then presented. They had a hearing I was not present at. And, you know, they took a good amount of my own advocacy work to assist in the crafting of the order and put together their own flair to it and changes to it. (8:42 - 9:08) But they, they largely accepted the arguments. And I'm going to read and share some of the screen because this really is a groundbreaking finding. So the Alliance of Indigenous Nations International Tribunal issued an order that the mRNA nanoparticle injections are in fact biological and technical weapons of mass destruction. (9:10 - 9:21) And so I think this is an important finding. And it's fine. And we'll go over how important it is. (9:21 - 9:36) But here are some of the people who provided affidavits that we took from the Florida system. Okay. So Dr. Ana Mihalcea, Dr. Rima Label, Karen Kingston. (9:36 - 9:56) Although her affidavit didn't make it into the order itself, I understand that her affidavit on the mandamus and her work on the mandamus was quite important to the work in the Florida case. And so a shout out to Karen. And thank you for all you've done in the past on this. (9:57 - 10:23) Dr. Andrew Zwick, and I'm just going to call her, call him Dr. Z. That's what I call him. Dr. Marivic Villa, Dr. Avery Brinkley, Dr. Ben Marble, Dr. Paul Alexander, and the late Francis Boyle. And he's a law professor. (10:23 - 10:52) It's very important to consider that his affidavit was done before he died. And he wrote the U.S. domestic implementation legislation of the biological weapons convention called the Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act of 1989. So, you know, his opinion that the shots, the COVID shots were biological weapons are really important. (10:52 - 11:20) So in addition to those affidavits, a shout out to Dr. Speicher, who also provided an affidavit. And because the date was on a fairly urgent basis, a lot of doctors who would have liked to have contributed to this were unable to. And there was a willingness from Dr. Trozzi as well. (11:21 - 11:33) And I think we could have got a lot more affidavits in place. However, this was enough. There were hundreds and hundreds of pages of studies here and affidavit material. (11:35 - 11:57) So this, here's a little bit about what it says. And maybe I'll just take you down to the Alliance of Indigenous Order itself. And it's an actual order and rendered on October 8th, 2025. (11:59 - 12:14) So a shout out to the clan mother from Haida Gwaii. And she's to the most, she's going to be revealing herself. And she's an injured clan mother. (12:14 - 12:28) And she had the support of other clan mothers. So, you know, I want to really thank her for her courage as well. So we have the Whereas Statements. (12:28 - 12:39) They have entered some of their judgments in superior court with various success. And so they've mentioned some of those. They've mentioned UNDRIP. (12:39 - 13:24) And I understand some people have issues with UNDRIP. And we can discuss that as well. But the meat and bones are of it, of the declaration, are that the tribunal finds and hereby declares that the COVID-19 nanoparticle injections or mRNA nanoparticle injections or COVID-19 injections meet the criteria of biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction according to the Biological Weapons Antiterrorism Act in the U.S., the 18 U.S.C. 75, the Weapons and Firearms 790-166 Florida statute, Canada's Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention Implementation Act of 2004. (13:25 - 13:49) And importantly, because 189 countries have signed the International Biological Weapons Convention. So that's important because they say under their UNDRIP, they have unceded territories around the world. And therefore, they have worldwide authority to issue this on a nation to nation status. (13:50 - 14:14) Also, I'd like to say when we get near the end, you can see very much that this is a greater truth and reconciliation in Canada than I have ever seen, because reconciliation is a joining of the peoples. And they are asking for the uniting of people around the world to give this moral authority. This is beyond truth. (14:14 - 14:35) This is a truth that no one actually dares to say on bought and paid for media. Even in alternative media, they shy away from calling it a biological weapon. And so there's no more excuse for not calling this a biological weapon of mass destruction. (14:36 - 15:02) This tribunal finds and hereby declares that the COVID-19 injections, mRNA injections or mRNA nanoparticle injections are in fact biological and technical weapons of mass destruction. Lisa, before you continue on, can I ask you to please scroll back up to the where as section, because there's something extremely important that I want the viewers to note before you continue. Yes, which part? The nation to nation. (15:03 - 15:21) There's going to be people, and I was one of them when I first saw this, they were concerned about the involvement of UNDRIP in this. But that's a separate issue. What is very important here for people to recognise is that the Canadian government recognises the AIN and the indigenous peoples as a nation. (15:22 - 15:37) And therefore, when they say nation to nation basis, that carries significant weight. This is not just some document that a bunch of natives made up. This is in special notice from one nation to another and a nation which Canada recognises. (15:39 - 15:53) That's important. And we have, we'll go through the last page, is the Canadian government's recognition of AIN's nation to nation status. All right. (15:53 - 16:03) So that's appended to the order. And this is in some ways using their own systems against them. They've locked everything down. (16:04 - 16:33) And so they have empowered an area in which, you know, I'd like to say imperfect men and women have sprouted up, encouraged to enable this order to actually appear in print and have the force it does. So the reasons are upon review of expert evidence and published peer review articles, it is proved beyond a reasonable doubt. So that's a high, very high standard of proof that they gave. (16:34 - 16:51) That the COVID-19 injections, mRNA injections or mRNA nanoparticle injections are in fact biological and technical weapons of mass destruction. And so importantly, we started in this order. Let's look at the expert opinion of Dr. Francis Boyle. (16:54 - 17:16) And Dr. Francis Boyle provided his expert opinion that COVID-19 nanoparticle injections met the criteria of biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction. And I'll just, you know, according to those statutes. And of course, he is or was a professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law. (17:16 - 17:46) And he received an AB in 1971 in political science from the University of Chicago with JD magna cum laude from Harvard, PhD degrees from political science from Harvard. He died not long after he put together his affidavit. In 1985, he drafted the U.S. domestic implementation legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention known as the Biological Weapons and Anti-Terrorism Act. (17:46 - 18:07) We have reviewed this. He also wrote the book, The Biowarfare and Terrorism like which was published in 2005. And he, in addition to this, he's acted around the world for governments in their own bioterrorism legislation. (18:07 - 18:21) So he's very, very well known or was and should still be. And he lives posthumously as a result of this injection, sorry, as a result of this order. And I think that's also important. (18:22 - 18:55) And he labelled the COVID nanoparticle injections an offensive biological warfare weapon with gain of function properties to make it more lethal, more infection, more infectious. And it also has HIV, the precursor to AIDS, DNA genetically engineered into that. He concludes as we do, this is the AIN Tribunal that they are biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction. (18:57 - 19:25) So this in and of itself could have been convincing basis on which to find any court. And to all the people who say our systems should be the ones doing this, well, where are they? Why haven't they? And to all the judges sitting on the sidelines, you've now seen some graves. Stand up. (19:25 - 19:56) Why don't you follow suit? And I do know that there are other First Nations or original peoples who will be entering this into their bands and creating orders within their own bands. And just like how globalism works, they create a circle until the whole globe is their circle of influence. You can imagine circles all over the globe creating influence. (19:57 - 20:01) They will be serving them. And I ask you to do the same thing. Print this up. (20:01 - 20:09) Serve it on your schools. Serve it on your pharmacies. Ask to speak to the pharmacy. (20:10 - 20:23) Take down their name and give it to them. Part two, the expert opinion of Dr. Ana Mihalcea. There's a lot of people who do not think that nanotech is real science. (20:24 - 20:50) I just published, I publish a lot in this area, but I just published that the FDA has been regulating nanotech since 2014 under an area called devices. They think nanotech is devices, and I can bring that up. But there's an incredible amount of cancer research, videos that I will drop in behind here. (20:51 - 21:18) TEDMED talks dating back to 2013 to show how nanobots in injections can find each other, do work, do payloads, be introduced through basically your phone or a joystick and move through the body. They can make themselves connect to one another. They can do all kinds of things. (21:18 - 21:36) Those are nanobots. They can also communicate by communicating with the cloud or with an outside type of device, control device. They are essentially biosensors in our body. (21:37 - 21:58) And there's a lot of scientists who are too good to look into nanotech or refuse to look at nanotech. And this is a very serious area. Well, and our viewers, my viewers can also look on ironwiredaily.com for my interview from earlier this year with Dr. Mihalcea, and she shows videos in there of all of this nanotechnology that's found in the blood. (21:59 - 22:37) She's also got an excellent two-volume book titled Transhuman. One of the things is that while she is showing what's in the blood, I think what's important for people to tie is actually the researchers that have been going on for possibly decades in nanotech. And how I first just got into nanotechnology as an issue was I had a database from the 1970s of all the WEF members and young global leaders. (22:38 - 22:50) And of course, there would be the press in there. Of course, there would be politicians in there. Of course, there would be leaders in industry and banking and whatnot. (22:51 - 23:14) But there was another section, less common, but consistent through all the decades. And it was scientists, but the scientists were of almost exclusively nanotechnology. So what was the WEF's interest in nanotechnology? So we'll go through her evidence next. (23:16 - 23:44) They contain heavy metals. And the research that is available for people to know is that the heavy metal contaminants assist in the sensor technology, self-assembly nanotechnology, heavy metals and nanotechnology. And she found this in injections in human blood, initially in vaccinated and later due to shedding. (23:44 - 24:01) She's attributing shedding to the unvaccinated as well. Yes, and to add weight to what you've just said, this is a discussion that I had with Dr. Mihalcea. Some of the self-assembling technology uses materials that are already in the human body, but we don't have those heavy metals. (24:02 - 24:30) And so they inject them along with these vaccines in order to give the raw materials that the nanobots need. Right. And I just had a discussion with Chat GPT on how nanotechnology could be used as a location sensor in the smart city to enforce the idea of a carbon, individual carbon budget, lifetime individual carbon budget. (24:30 - 24:56) An internal international research group of over 60 doctors, pharmacists, and other professional examined the COVID-19 injections, mRNA injections from six different manufacturers. We have AstraZeneca, BioNTech. I've analysed that word before, but biology and technology, BioNTech, right? I put that in my book. (24:56 - 25:07) It's a fusion, BioNTech, BioNTech. Moderna is mode RNA. Mode RNA. (25:07 - 25:39) Johnson & Johnson's, Lubicovax, and Influspitera. This group, known as the Working Group on COVID Vaccine Analysis, used scanning, electromicroscopy, energy dispersive x-rays, spectroscopy, and mass spectroscopy. And inductively coupled plasma analysis, bright field microscopy, dark field microscopy, and live blood image diagnostics. (25:39 - 26:37) And if we go through the FDA manner in which they examine and we look at what the FDA shows that, you know, what they visually look like, the nanotechnology, and what Dr. Mihalcea found, or Mihalcea found, that is what is most convincing in some ways is that the FDA mirrors in their descriptions, visually, as to what's being found in our blood. Most recently, another international research team examined hundreds of C19 injections from Pfizer, et al and they found countless tiny sharp metal objects. And that is also described on the FDA, leading one researcher to consider the severe effects of these impurities are probably misdiagnosed by many pathologists as myocardial infractions. (26:38 - 27:05) Similar stainless steel fragments were found in COVID vaccine vials in Japan. So the self-assembly is actually a feature described by the FDA, the TEDMED talks of 2013. I will give them to you for your show notes because people, this is probably the area that people have the hardest time understanding just how well-researched it is and how important it is to the blob. (27:05 - 27:23) Doctors from Italy published a study of darkfield blood microscopy of 1,006 patients who received Pfizer-Moderna COVID bioweapon and showed 94% of the individuals had self-assembly nanotechnology structures in the blood. And you can imagine what that can do to your body. Well, and it's spreading. (27:24 - 27:40) I myself, of course, have never taken the injections nor has anyone in my family. I had my own live blood analysis done around the same time that I interviewed Dr. Mihalcea and I have some of the same structures in my blood as do almost all of us at this point. Right. (27:42 - 27:57) Hydrogel polymers. The most serious concern about the C19 injections centres around the use of hydrogel polymers that self-assemble and self-spread. This is a substance created by nanotech known to be in the C19 injections. (27:59 - 28:23) These nanotechnologies are what are called lipid nanoparticles. Okay, it's in the ingredients list which include polyethylene glycol in the Pfizer vaccines. And I, Dr. Mihalcea, believe hydrogel is responsible for a silent surge of two deaths. (28:24 - 28:41) And I actually think that that is a, that the two is a reference not to the number two but a reference in her affidavit to a footnote. So that means a surge of deaths. Yes. (28:42 - 29:03) Okay, so Dr. Mihalcea indicated that she and other colleagues have chronicled the growth of nanotechnology hydrogel polymers in the C19 vaccinated and unvaccinated blood exposed through shedding. And this is your experience. The growth process often begins with an activity from quantum dots. (29:04 - 29:22) Now quantum dots are described by the FDA as nanotechnology, which blink and change colour. Quantum dots, nano micro dots are nanoscale technologies that can transmit information and act as biosensors. And Dr. Mihalcea shows videos of those in my interview with her. (29:22 - 29:46) And another question that some people might ask and I'm going to answer it right now is whether or not we can be certain that these quantum structures, these nanobots are the result of the injections. And so one of the very important questions I asked Dr. Mihalcea in my interview with her is because she's been doing live analysis for many years now. I asked prior to 2021, did you ever see these structures in people's blood? She said, no. (29:49 - 30:12) We were experimented on. Yes. And you know, the patents and the journal articles that I read regarding the nanotechnology in cancer patients is that, you know, these nanobots are deployed in the body and can be, you know, they can hold what is called a payload. (30:13 - 30:32) Okay. And a payload in war, in bombs is a lethal sub lethal drop of, you know, TNT or nuclear or what have you. So the payload, the nanobot can hold a payload and be triggered to release it. (30:33 - 30:48) Right. So you could be triggered to release different toxins, triggered at some point, your nanobots could be triggered to do anything. So, and the fact that they can communicate, the more heavy metals they have, the easier they communicate. (30:49 - 30:58) So it's interesting that we are getting sprayed constantly in the air. Nothing about that is in here though. So let's get into the blood clots. (30:59 - 31:24) This activity is often followed by the aggregation of quantum dots into spheres. Her testimony includes that spheres break open and create ribbon-like filaments using near infrared spectroscopy. And I'm going to take you to a video before we go on of a 2013 TED talk describing how the nanobots work. (31:25 - 31:41) This TED-Med talk was presented in Israel regarding, you know, exactly what we're seeing right now. This is not, this is not made up science. This is serious science that has been going on and held back from the public. (31:41 - 31:52) She determined these filaments are hydrogel polymers, right? Again, listed in ingredients. This lipid nanoparticle is listed in the ingredients. It's part of how this vaccine is assembled. (31:53 - 32:18) That experiments show these filaments invade the body by growing continuously even after death. And why would they grow after death? Because a nanobot is not part of your organic body. And so the, they are, they have within them something that allows them to keep connecting and finding themselves within the body even after death. (32:18 - 32:34) And Dr. Mihalcea also found that those hydrogel clots, they would form much more rapidly in a cooler environment. So after the person dies and their body temperature drops, that causes them to form rapidly at that point. That's interesting. (32:35 - 32:56) Dr. Mihalcea further provides that later the hydrogel transforms the blood into sheets of polymer plastic. The hydrogel forms clots that can be seen with the naked eye and they pose a much greater health risk than normal blood clots. There's a lot of people, scientists, who I call Luddites in some ways that refuse to engage with on-ana technology and they should. (32:57 - 33:21) The blood clot of a C19 vaccine person shows remnants of blood fused with yellow rubbery plastic-like hydrogel substances. And those clots show an indestructibility, right? I have an uncle who has blood clots that go right up to, from his foot, right up to his hips. I have a cousin who has blood clots riddled through two of his legs. (33:22 - 33:42) I have a friend whose mother, right after the booster, had broad system failure and then started just bleeding out of her neck. My father had a stroke after his booster. My friend's aunt had a stroke and died after her booster. (33:43 - 33:50) You know, are any of those reported events? None. No. None are reported. (33:50 - 34:00) I also interviewed the two well-known undertakers who were, they were in that documentary. Their first names are coming to me, John and Richard. For some reason, I can't think of their last names. (34:00 - 34:20) One of them's from Great Britain, one is from the U.S. And in that interview, I asked them, prior to 2021, did you ever see these kinds of clots before? No. Polyethylene, part of the polyethylene glycol in the Pfizer C19 shots is a well-known choice for making bioplastics. Unlike normal blood clots, polymer bioplastic blood clot is harder and much harder to dissolve. (34:21 - 34:40) It's far harder and much harder to dissolve. So they, she attempted with Clifford Carmichael to dissolve nine different, with nine different reagents, including fuel injection cleaner, sulphuric acid, alcohol, and lye. None of them made any difference except for a minor reaction with lye. (34:40 - 35:21) So this, this obviously is going to translate to harm to patients. So she believes that the symptoms that are called long COVID, which include brain fog, fatigue, shortness of breath, heart palpitations, accelerated agents are correlated with these blood findings because even prior to being a full-blown clot, microclots in your capillaries can cause all kinds of effects and exhaustion in your body. But moreover, you know, this is transhumanism, okay? And so we are, humans are being transformed into transhumans without our consent. (35:22 - 35:36) And hydrogel is an extremely versatile substance that can mimic any cell in the body, including the brain. But it doesn't just mimic the cells, it replaces them. Okay, so she's witnessed the growth of hydrogel sheets in human blood. (35:36 - 35:49) The growth results in a reduction in natural blood cells. So of course you're going to be fatigued. This change in the body is nothing less than transhumanism and affected people are unwittingly being transformed without their consent. (35:50 - 36:20) Okay, and I contend that transhumanism or genetic changes are in fact a genocide when led to their natural conclusion. It's a genocide of man as we existed prior to 2021 or 2019. Dr. Mihalcea quotes parallel research, including an MIT study that actually allows the many hydrogel interfaces towards merging humans with the machines. (36:20 - 36:44) And anybody in Canada can go to the Horizons Canada interface, which is a galling, you know, display of a desire to bring men in the machine. I have a chapter in my book that is really important on transhumanism. So I encourage you to get World on Mute because I contextualise it with our laws and what we're experiencing in our society. (36:45 - 37:06) Another study reports success in using hydrogel to achieve a 36.3% enhancement in urite extension, which means achieving a growth in synthetic cells in the brains. This is literally growing a parallel brain. So the tribunal, I think was most disturbed by Dr. Mihalcea's work. (37:06 - 37:53) They were very disturbed by everything, but that was one of the most disturbing areas, I think, of evidence to have to review and to contend with. And they concluded that these heavy metals, polyethylene, poisons, toxins, nanotechnologies, biosensors are deliberate experiments on mankind in an attempt to abuse synthetic control mechanisms into humans that in effect are simultaneously done without our consent and which have killed countless and mean to others. And it's purest form, the mass application of COVID-19 nanoparticle injections or mRNA nanoparticle injections attempt to fuse mankind with technology is an experiment of pure evil on mankind. (37:54 - 38:06) At its logical endpoint, it is the end of mankind and a genocide. And that was partly a submission of mine. It's also what I say in my book. (38:07 - 38:42) Dr. Mihalcea arrives at firm conclusions about C-19 injections and she concludes they are an aggregation of poisons, nanotechnologies that cause broad range of diseases, DNA devastations and deaths. And she indicates the governments have deliberately foisted a bioweapon on its own citizens. How is it that government systems are going to take down what governments are doing? I ask you that. (38:43 - 39:01) I wish I had an answer. Well, this is why I went to a tribunal outside of that system. The tribunal finds for these additional reasons that the COVID-19 injections are biological and technical weapons of mass destruction. (39:02 - 39:38) Mankind has yet to achieve justice in the broad application of these technologies on the population. It is evident that those promulgating this experimentation on mankind are motivated by a view of man that does not involve man himself as author of his destiny, but a mere lab animal whose biological harm, destruction or death is a waste product in a social-demonic engineering of the highest order. And then some of that language is right from my submission. (39:38 - 39:47) So I'm very proud of that. Part three, broad systemic disease. Dr. Andrew Z, shout out to you. (39:47 - 40:10) He's a really wonderful and amazing and intelligent man. And he's also a tribal practitioner. So his additional testimony and peer-reviewed article support finding that COVID-19 injections are biological and technical weapons designed to harm, not protect or cure. (40:11 - 40:21) They've been the cause of major contributing factor to a wide ranges of diseases. Okay. And this is what he lists in his sworn affidavit. (40:22 - 40:52) And he is a champion and titan in this area. Neurocognitive issues such as MECFS, dementia, psychosis, brain fog, cardiovascular concern, and such as arrhythmia, stroke. And of course, we made reference to Aaron Seery later on, and Aaron Seery's material that he was able to obtain from Pfizer, et cetera, all show these as known side effects. (40:52 - 41:26) Right? So, wow. Obstetrical and gynaecological concerns like utero placental insufficience, spontaneous abortion, miscarriage, irregular menses, heavy bleeding systems. Problems like multi-system inflammatory systems, chronic fatigue, pain, haematological, oncological concerns such as coagulopathy and increased advanced cancer development and much more. (41:29 - 41:57) I just want to break out here for one second. And how many women am I know, just how many women I know who have been going through this. And of the five pregnancies that I knew of vaccinated mothers, one had a spontaneous abortion. (41:59 - 42:19) My aunt's niece on the other side of the family gave birth to a stillborn baby at eight months. Another friend had to deliver her baby, her placenta calcified. And so the baby was not receiving any kind of nutrition. (42:20 - 42:32) Another baby, the placenta was old and had to be removed. And the fifth, those are all of the pregnancies. There's none, no pregnancies that turned out. (42:32 - 42:37) There was no normal. The fifth had failure to thrive, didn't know how to suck. Didn't know how to suck. (42:39 - 42:55) And if we refer to the Pfizer papers or Dr. Naomi Wolf, this accords with what she found. So part four, risk to human genome and shedding, and Dr. Paul Alexander is referenced here. Okay. (42:59 - 43:22) So it poses a risk to the human genome and to future generations. And the bio, he says that the biodistribution of the lipid nanoparticles throughout the human body wrecks havoc on multiple organ systems and body systems. And it poses a significant health hazard even to those who have not received the injection. (43:23 - 43:47) It appears true regarding closer intimate contact. Okay. At this point in time, based on the scientific data, the refusal to discontinue and to remove the mRNA injections from the market and the deceptive attempts to conceal the dangers, it is his professional opinion that COVID-19 injections are in fact biological and tactical weapons of mass destruction. (43:47 - 44:10) So the gene altering, we looked at that too in here, and the number of destructive means and horrific, is horrific on a plane and scale that mankind has yet to grapple with. Right? Yes. It will be decades yet before we know the true damage. (44:12 - 44:23) Mainstream media is not describing this. They're not describing this study, this study, this study, this study. And our doctors are describing it here and there. (44:23 - 45:14) This order attempts to bring it forth in one place. Certainly there are, you know, graphene, as it mentioned in here, there's certainly all kinds of new, new articles that you can append, you could go on for a long time in terms of describing what are the harms as a result of the shots. But when you have something that intergenerationally changes your DNA, and not to make you stronger, but to make you more susceptible to disease, right? Right? To affect future generations, right? If you believe I'm a follower of Christ, but you don't have to be, this is demonic. (45:14 - 45:55) But if you believe in Darwin, origin of species, and that the fittest have survived, that we've gotten here because of our fitness to survive on the planet and survive with what it is that we're facing. The only thing that we haven't had been given is the ability so far to take down these monsters. But if you're pure Darwinist, and I have a science degree before and math degree before I went into law, they are totally invalidating completely the survival of the species. (45:56 - 46:06) So it's demonic. I get back to it's demonic. Because who the, in my view, it's only, you know, Satan makes war on God's most dearest creation and that is us. (46:06 - 46:32) And you can have a different opinion and I still love you. For it implies an evil intent disproportionate to its ability for this tribunal to quantify in one declaration, right? This is sinister. This tribunal has difficulty fully articulating the level of evil that has taken place in the application of COVID and antiparticle injections as biological and technical weapons on humanity. (46:32 - 47:05) The tragedy has historic proportions due to the injections capacity for intergenerational harm. Multiple studies have detected the contamination of these shots with bacterial DNA plasmids, okay? Which can integrate into the human genome and cause harm. And for people who don't understand this, there's DNA in the shots at levels that far exceed what is the minimum that, you know, that should be there. (47:05 - 47:17) These are their shots. They make them. Plasmids have been designed, plasmids by definition have been designed to integrate into genome. (47:18 - 47:34) Yes. Integrate into your genes with greater efficiency. While I have not interviewed Dr. McKernan, I had the pleasure to be in the World Council for Health meeting over two years ago where he announced what he had found that some of these vials contained up to 30% DNA. (47:35 - 47:48) And for those who don't know, SV40, if you want to get foreign DNA into a cell, that's the way you do it. And SV40 is a cancer promoter as well. It also is, yeah. (47:48 - 48:02) So the SV40 promoter enhancer nuclear localisation sequence. And they can alter the genome cells to make cancers more cancerous. So these sequences can end up in your cells. (48:02 - 48:36) Then you have children and you're giving them cancer promoters and the plasmids that have integrated in different places in your genome. And most especially through the mitochondrial DNA, which is passed on by the mother. So there were three areas of plasmids that were located that included your mitochondrial, neural, sort of your brain area, you know, just to explain it to a lay person. (48:37 - 48:59) Your mitochondria is the energy storehouse, right? The powerhouse of the cell. Whether or not the cell has the energy, the ADP, ATP sort of system. OK, so we're electronic beings, right? We photosynthesis taking an electron from sun or the sun energy, putting it into glucose. (48:59 - 49:14) We take that glucose and literally we pump out through the mitochondria actual electrons. We're electronic. One doctor showed an estimate of a global study that 17 million deaths. (49:15 - 49:29) And we do not need to decide how many perished to declare the COVID-19 injections by weapons. That study, by the way, was Dr. Denis Rancourt and Dr. Joseph Hickey here in Canada. That study was done over two and a half years ago. (49:30 - 49:46) Now we can assume that that number today is much higher. I have difficulty with what they've done. And I'm glad I brought this forward. (49:47 - 50:01) We find and confirm they are gene-altering agents. Oh, yeah, and the plasmids went into your immune system to weaken your immune system. And they went into your cardiovascular and blood system. (50:01 - 50:16) So the purpose of these shots was not to help. This is a bioweapon on proportions people cannot grapple or accept with. It was done to their children. (50:16 - 50:42) And I want to tell you something. The silence that you have in your mouth in the face of this and your denial mechanisms, you are imposing that on your children. You put the weight of your insufficiency to have moral, sovereign authority onto the shoulders of your children. (50:43 - 51:05) Your silence is in their mouths. When it's only going to be more difficult, rise up. We find and confirm that these are not only gene-altering agents, but harmful spike protein throughout the body resulting in immune reactions against the recipient's own cells. (51:05 - 51:36) Sure, like just logically, just logically, let's make the most horrific part of the coronavirus, the spike protein. For how long? In our cells. So they found that they were not only gene-altering agents and that they produce, but also produce the harmful spike protein throughout the body resulting in autoimmune reactions. (51:37 - 52:17) I had two of my aunts that are alive, two out of three that are alive, not be able to walk. After receiving the vaccine, one disintegrated her hip so entirely she needed a new hip. And this, none of those things were ever reported, right? Anything that's happened to you, around you, ask if it was reported. (52:17 - 52:35) We had a fellow who was a, running to be mayor. He was incredibly vivacious, social, smart, EQ, IQ, had the perfect mix. He, after the vaccine, dribbled and then died. (52:36 - 52:44) He turned into a vegetative disease. It was just within a month he was gone. I can't remember now which doctor it was that I was interviewing. (52:44 - 53:02) This was, this had to be three years ago now, who tried to file reports with the Canadian equivalent of the various system and the name of it to speak to me right now. And every time, they would just send it back saying, no, there's no conclusive evidence of the vaccine. That's right. (53:03 - 53:18) And basically just refused to file it. That's right. And in my book, I have listed a woman in New York who took it on herself and she was terminated because she wanted to file. (53:19 - 53:31) On vaccine adverse events. So cardio, this is a, this is a sustained coordination to kill mankind in front of our faces. In front of our faces. (53:32 - 53:50) As many of us as they can. And this decision is, I hope, enough to slap a few people in the face. Cardiovascular disease such as myocarditis, heart attacks, strokes, cancers, infertility and foetal loss. (53:52 - 54:10) So the DNA fragments and Dr. Speicher and other published articles. And this again goes into, I think you mentioned Dr. Kevin McKernan and Jessica Rose. And I think that they have issues with nanobots and nanotechnology. (54:11 - 54:25) However, they are very strong on the DNA contamination. And, you know, those published articles and Dr. Speicher's affidavit were also integral. Yes. (54:26 - 54:43) Dr. Rose is an expert on the VAERS system. And I did an interview with her, boy, almost two years ago now, where she showed conclusive evidence that a large volume of data was removed from the system to hide all of this. Yeah, so it's hard to get it in. (54:43 - 54:48) Most people aren't even reporting it. They're not reporting to their doctors. They're not reporting any of these instances. (54:48 - 55:00) Maybe they're in denial. Maybe they're not connecting. And maybe, you know, I have a friend who was so gung-ho about it, but just because it gave you the ability to travel or what have you. (55:03 - 55:35) And she's just surrounded in cancer. Her neighbour, her boss, her sister, just surrounded in cancer. The tribunal finds that the deliberate silence by regulatory agencies and governments in response to published articles showing the risk of genomic integration necessitates by implication of a knowledge collusion and intent to continue the mass application of biological and technical weapons of mass destruction on the world population. (55:36 - 55:49) Right, we have complete silence. You know, the CDC just put back the pregnancy, you know, pregnant women can get the COVID shots. They just put it back. (55:51 - 56:30) And of course, at the time of the, when you're pregnant, that's when genomic integration is most easy. You know, that's a very vulnerable size-wise via the concentration of plasmid DNA circulating, right? And it crosses the placental barrier. Like, just think of the size of a baby versus, you know, and their heat loss compared to an adult because of their size, right? So when you have those concentrations of DNA circulating into infants, it's more meaningful that they will have possible plasmid DNA integration. (56:31 - 56:48) Assuming the baby survives at all. Right, right, survives. And then the evidence of post-marketing adverse events by various vaccine manufacturers publicly published by RNC established a devastating amount of knowledge of adverse events, including foetal harm. (56:50 - 57:30) And I examined the contract between Pfizer and Israel regarding the epidemiological study, right, so you may recall Israelis got the shots first and if it was safe there, then the rest of the world got it. And essentially, in some ways, yet my analysis of the contract shows that a finding of adverse events contravenes the purpose of the contract and would terminate the contract. So the purpose was not to find adverse events, but to enable, enable the shots to be promulgated on the world. (57:31 - 57:40) You know, the very contracts that they sign are evidence. Yes. Foetal harm and purposeful abortificance. (57:42 - 58:01) Again, you and I reviewed some of, you know, the issues I had in my own life. This includes female friends. One who bled straight into her full hysterectomy, right, could never stop bleeding. (58:02 - 58:20) She just had to have everything taken out, 35 years old. You know, another one just clumps and clumps and clumps. And the gynaecologist she went to was overwhelmed, was swamped. (58:20 - 58:25) There are doctors that know what's going on. Yes. Miscarriage. (58:26 - 58:38) I knew a 16 year old girl who had two shots. And following the second one, had never had a period since, sterilised. Yeah. (58:39 - 58:49) And we have children who are vaccinated and we won't know. We won't know. Miscarriage. (58:50 - 59:14) Foetal chromosomal abnormality, foetal malformation, cervical insufficiency, premature rupture of membranes, premature labour, premature delivery, foetal cardiac arrest, and foetal death. Chromosomal abnormality, by the way, is another term for birth defect. Well, chromosomal abnormality, means it's a genetic change. (59:15 - 59:32) Yes. So your chromosomes were altered in a way, and since it could be random, you know, we, I don't know if you saw the video of the nurse saying that organs were born on the outside of the body, like baby was born with the organs on the outside. There were so many horrific things that she saw. (59:34 - 59:40) Yes. Most birth defects are the result of some kind of genetic change, genetic error. And this is why I bring up that point. (59:40 - 59:58) Chromosomal abnormality basically means birth defect as a result of screwing up the genes. Yeah. And they can be, you could have sub-observable chromosomal abnormalities that you don't observe until the child is a bit older, right? That's correct. (59:58 - 1:00:08) Their ability to fight infections or reproduce or their intellect or anything. Yeah. But birth defect just means a defect that was present at birth. (1:00:08 - 1:00:18) It's not necessarily visible. Yeah. So some of these adverse events are not complete. (1:00:18 - 1:00:46) We don't know. Dr. Rima Laibow indicated that this, in her view, accords with a long-time depopulation agenda that was set out in official documents by Henry Kissinger. And she calls it a doctrine of depopulation. (1:00:48 - 1:01:07) And in his December 10th, 1974, National Study and Memorandum as adopted by the United States in collaboration with the United Nations. And of course, I have a whole chapter on depopulation, how it's funded, how much it's funded. It's called Population Activities in my book. (1:01:07 - 1:01:15) And it is really worth just going right to that chapter. Censorship. Okay. (1:01:16 - 1:01:48) So you have to notice what's going on more broadly in society. So at the same time that this historic deployment of a biological and technical weapon of mass destruction by governments worldwide onto the population, the same time that that's happening, we have never before seen censorship mechanism. Okay. (1:01:48 - 1:02:15) This is, of course, my area of expertise. We know that the state-sanctioned murder has been possible with the culling of speech and speakers and whistleblowers who dare speak against the governing body's oligarchy. The sustained actions with the coordination and complicity of professional bodies that cut off at the knees many who speak against the biological and technical weapons and the routine de facto judicial notice by courts. (1:02:16 - 1:02:28) Shame on you. Shame on you. Of these structures that is imposed has created a structure to perform genocide under lawful pretence. (1:02:29 - 1:02:52) Shame on you, judges. Shame on you. We take note of Lisa Murrell's extensive work on the topic on World on Mute to supplement the total system-wide mechanism of censorship and silence that enforces and coordinates speakers and professions, unions, school boards. (1:02:52 - 1:02:59) I mean, this is politicians. It's system-wide. We went over my book and we can append it below too. (1:02:59 - 1:03:23) Such system-wide censorship and transnational coordination to use professional corporate bodies as a mechanism of silence is a long and well-planned non-accidental coordination that assisted the mass application of weapons of mass destruction on humanity. The silencing mechanism assisted it. And there are four platforms on which nobody's going to be able to see this. (1:03:23 - 1:03:37) YouTube, LinkedIn, Instagram, and Facebook because they would take it down and censor us and ban us if we put it up. That's correct. Google's already calling this misinformation. (1:03:38 - 1:03:43) Of course they are. Well, you know, just ask Google. That's what I do. (1:03:43 - 1:03:53) You want to test Google? Ask them how many sixes in the Chrome logo. And they say, no, that's a conspiracy theory. That's something you could verify with your own eyes right there. (1:03:54 - 1:04:18) The AIN Tribunal finds that the application of biological and technical weapons of mass destruction with gene editing and nanotechnology and transhumanist additions will result and has resulted in a genocide. For clarity, this panel does not minimise the Holocaust and mankind has been living in a most powerful of delusion. This is some of my writing. (1:04:20 - 1:04:55) That murder by government or NGOs or international corporate oligarchy could ever rest on any moral principle. The fundamental purpose of law is to seek the truth and provide for justice. The Tribunal finds that these bioweapons were constructed by colonial powers to be deployed universally on mankind and on our original peoples as a priority group. (1:04:55 - 1:05:08) And you know, that's true. They roll it out according to their DEI principles. As I understood it, the Aboriginals were subjected to even greater pressure than the rest of us to take these shots. (1:05:10 - 1:05:44) You only need to go through their cemeteries and starting in 2021, count the young people. As such, colonial systems have only served to perpetuate the injustice of what can only be seen as a planned and executed murder and depopulation of mankind around the world. The lack of justice in colonial systems must be seen as by design and to further the application and deployment of bioweapons on the public. (1:05:46 - 1:06:12) We ask the original peoples and rest of mankind to stand together to give this decision and declaration the force of morality and justice, which is the basis of any system of law. There can be no architecture of law that is a permissive grant to deploy bioweapons on mankind. There's nothing you can put on a piece of paper, no words in order that can justify it. (1:06:13 - 1:06:17) It's done. We've said it. And this is truth. (1:06:19 - 1:06:39) Jagmeet Singh, Justin Trudeau, Knights of Malta, Babylonians, Canaanites, all of y'all. This is the truth. Truth has a way of entering, just like your bioweapons, into the cellular mechanisms of the people listening to truth. (1:06:42 - 1:06:59) This is reconciliation. This is the courage of a complainant to stand on behalf of all of mankind, a First Nation, a clan mother, to stand on behalf of mankind. This is the reconciliation. (1:07:01 - 1:07:22) You can wear an orange search all day and then make us take a bioweapon? What is that? It's nonsense. It's all nonsense. We find that there is a consequential degeneracy in the intrinsic value of mankind by those who haven't continued to promulgate the application of weapons of mass destruction on humanity. (1:07:22 - 1:07:56) These injections are weapons, biological weapons, cellular weapons, poisonous weapons, genetic weapons, nanotechnology, intergenerational weapons, technological weapons, the tribunal forces, finds and declares that the COVID injections are in fact biological and technical weapons of mass destruction. And according to all of these statutes, this order and declaration is intended to have immediate worldwide effect. And it was issued. (1:07:57 - 1:08:46) I believe, Lisa, that the, sorry, the Alliance of Indigenous Nations, they're international, are they not? They're not just in Canada. Yeah, you know, we had, they had a judge from New Zealand, from America, from Canada, and they have been given nation to nation status. Thank you for your letter providing an update on the Alliance of Indigenous Nations of Turtle Island, including the establishment of the Alliance of Indigenous Nations and General Peace Treaty, the International Indigenous Governing Body and the Alliance of Indigenous Nations International Tribunal. (1:08:46 - 1:09:08) It's wonderful to hear of this expansion, to hear that tribunal further strengthened by its restructuring earlier this year. I trust this expansion and restructuring will benefit Indigenous peoples all around the world, including future generations. I also commend you as having a panel of judges from every continent to advance this important work and uphold the rights of Indigenous people all around the world. (1:09:08 - 1:09:35) I look forward to continuing our nation to nation relationship and learning more about your important work. The Honourable Gary Anandasangaree. We have a declaration from a body that is officially recognised by our government, and we have a reply from that government giving validation to it. (1:09:38 - 1:09:51) Um, that letter was in 2024, right? Okay. But it wasn't validating that this is a bioweapon. Are you kidding? They'll fight that tooth and nail. (1:09:51 - 1:10:00) Thanks for clarifying. Not validating the declaration, but validating their status as a nation. So now they've backed themselves into a corner. (1:10:00 - 1:10:26) So what are you expecting to happen now, Lisa? Censorship on a level that requires us to, uh, boob strap up. We are going to have to print this order up and we're going to have to take it into pharmacies in our schools. And you may have taken stuff to your schools in 2020, but this is the declaration and finding that schools are now being taught to advance the Aboriginal principles ahead of other principals. (1:10:26 - 1:10:50) And they're all, uh, they're all taught that in schools, this is important. Our schools are the areas in which you are the future, um, cemeteries of our nations. So if we don't go in there, we have now, um, already I have confirmation of people reading this into their city commissioner, um, meetings. (1:10:50 - 1:11:05) People are taking the, this, um, order and taking it places. I have heard that it's gone to the staff of the U.S. Ambassador to Canada. It's gone to the RACMP. (1:11:06 - 1:11:37) But I am asking you who's listening to share this video, to share the order and not do it electronically, to take it into pharmacies and hand it. It's got to be that if one pharmacy in your area gets it five times, you go in, your wife goes in, your daughter goes in, hand it in. It's got to be that the schools, you don't have to have to have kids in schools. (1:11:37 - 1:11:58) You don't want to go to your school, go to the public school. You don't want to go to the Catholic school, right? And then go to the tribal authorities, go to the bands, go to, you know, if it's still, you know, a reserve in your country, um, as that's how it's to me and give it to the man on the street and thank them. This is the reconciliation we've been waiting for. (1:11:59 - 1:12:09) Give it to their band authorities. Right. This, this, this genocide stops with the moral authority of the people. (1:12:10 - 1:12:30) And I would say, especially folks do take this to your city councils, take them to your politicians because they can't have it both ways. For years now, they've been pushing this nationhood status on us, that the DI, the reconciliation, all that stuff, because they had an agenda behind that. And now it's come back to bite them. (1:12:31 - 1:12:58) They can't turn around and say there's no validity to that when you hand them a document from the very nation that they've been working to create. Well, it is a little bit of judo, right? It is. Um, so I've got to tell you the day that, I decided on this, I sat down and prayed to God. (1:12:59 - 1:13:28) And I said, you know, I have so many things I can possibly work on, so many things that need my attention. Um, could you help me decide what it is that I should do today? And I read the Bible, and then I sat down and wrote my to-do list. And the first thing that came out of it was this idea. (1:13:29 - 1:13:44) The first thing, top of my list, and had a little check mark. I thought, oh, jeez, this is divinely inspired, because before that, it was nowhere. I had a list of priorities that I had made for myself. (1:13:45 - 1:13:57) And, um, you know, they're quite large, and I still am going to be going after them. But I sat down and asked for guidance, and I prayed on it. And this is what came out. (1:13:58 - 1:14:16) And so I think that when God opens doors, He opens them wide. And so it's up to us to continue to open those doors. Um, I don't know what winning looks like. (1:14:16 - 1:14:37) People have asked me. And the reason why I don't know is because we're now in a system designed by people who want to kill us. We're in a— the whole system itself is designed by genocidal, demonic maniacs. (1:14:40 - 1:15:04) And so we are guided by them to consider what justice looks like, to consider how we're supposed to get in line. We're guided by them to say, well, only— only this court matters. Or if the law is written this way, suck it up, buttercup. (1:15:05 - 1:15:13) Even if the law spells tyranny. I say to you, when the law spells tyranny, they're just jumbled up letters. They don't mean anything. (1:15:13 - 1:15:20) Don't mean anything. And so we have been schooled from the get-go. Winning is your politician. (1:15:22 - 1:15:33) Winning is this court. Winning is this judgement. What is winning? And so I ended up being back at source. (1:15:34 - 1:16:04) That I am no longer defining what winning is or what our path should be by those who are in power to kill us. And so I'm gonna— you know, I am just but one person and our tribunal members are just one brave people and— and, you know, our doctors and the complainants. The foot soldiers of this order have to be you. (1:16:05 - 1:16:35) And— and people say, well, I want— I want justice to look like this or it has to come from this place or a perfect person has to— has to institute it. I don't know what winning looks like and neither do you. And so if God opens up a door and I'm— I'm just gonna ask you to walk through that door and take it places. (1:16:36 - 1:16:47) Take it places. And that's what I have for you subject to your questions. I only have one comment, Lisa. (1:16:47 - 1:17:00) And I would say that for myself I do know what winning looks like. It's been what I've been working towards for the last five years. Winning is when enough of us know the truth that we simply refuse to comply. (1:17:01 - 1:17:27) We refuse to go along with whatever it is they try to make us do. And that takes their power away when people just simply won't do it. So if we can get the truth out there and this document is a fantastic step in that direction then the next time they try to pull something like this do we have enough people who know the truth who know what's being tried to pushed on they just say, well, we're not doing it. (1:17:28 - 1:17:32) And the government says, well, lock everything up. No, we're not doing it. We'll take these shots. (1:17:32 - 1:17:42) No, we're not doing it. They can't make us all do it. All it takes is a sufficient number of people who say, no, we're not doing it. (1:17:43 - 1:18:14) We've got to take it to the police because, you know, I've seen the legislation drafted in New Zealand, in Brazil, vaccine by cop type scenario, right? You've got to take it to your pharmacies, your schools, your police. Most politicians are cornered. Take it to your, take it to your local authorities, right? It's got to go to unions. (1:18:15 - 1:18:26) Somehow it's got to go to unions. It's got to go to the left. I call them the love left because they have an ability to organise like nobody's business. (1:18:27 - 1:18:55) It's got to break into areas where you don't think we have a foothold or where it doesn't matter. Schools gets it to some unions, right? There's teachers there, but it's got to get to your electricians. It's got to get to every single type of union, especially the activist unions. (1:18:55 - 1:19:08) They go right, in my book, I show they go right up to a globalist controlled entity now. So it's not, it's got to be, we've got to blanket the bottom. They have the top. (1:19:08 - 1:19:29) Everywhere they have the top, right? We've got to blanket the bottom. This has got to be ground up and it's got to be systematic. Go to Staples or wherever it is, print off a thousand and walk it systematically into places. (1:19:29 - 1:20:12) And don't just be a digital warrior as much as you, because that is, we're overwhelmed. Yeah, there's this study, that study, this study, that study, and you just delete it, right? Walk it, walk it in, hand it, take a note, read it with them, right? I have a reader who, within the day that this was published on my Substack, she went into every school that she could. She went into every pharmacy she could and then on her way home, she went to pick up some groceries and yelled, anybody got the COVID shot? You've all been poisoned and I have the document. (1:20:13 - 1:20:26) Courage, people. Courage, put it in because, you know, we're dealing, as if you don't have the courage to do this. As if, it's not a gun. (1:20:27 - 1:20:40) It's not, it's, you know, it's not, it's not. They are harming, maiming, killing, changing our species. The least you can do is walk it in. (1:20:41 - 1:21:07) And please, please, because when they have the top, that top starts fearing the bottom. And we have to be systematic about this. Look, I'm going to ask James Roguski to put on his website, NotSafeAndNotEffective.com, the AIN tribunal finding right at the top. (1:21:07 - 1:21:31) This Halloween's coming up. On small pieces of paper, when you're handing in your candy, you can have TheyLie.ca. You could have NotSafeAndNotEffective.com, right? And you stick that in with your candy. It's, you can file label stickers are like $12 for 3,000, 5,000. (1:21:32 - 1:21:41) You can print up those two websites. They go on your TTC bus. They go on your grocery store. (1:21:41 - 1:21:53) They go on your gas pump. They go on, you know, everywhere. There is no, this, we have to act like they did in war. (1:21:53 - 1:22:14) We have to stop thinking that we have a system that is going to work for us if we work the system way. No, right? I know people are going after the politicians, but that's at the top. Go after the people. (1:22:15 - 1:22:21) And that's your new migrants. You're a Christian, bring it into a mosque. You're Jewish, bring it into a church. (1:22:21 - 1:22:28) You're First Nation, especially bring it into a church. This is what uniting looks like. You're trans, I don't know. (1:22:28 - 1:22:36) Bring it to a white heterosexual person that you're upset with. This is it. Come together. (1:22:38 - 1:22:46) Very well said, Lisa. Once again, thank you so much for all your excellent work. And I know that you'll keep me updated on this and we will do that. (1:22:46 - 1:22:56) So for our viewers as well, and viewers, you will, as always on IronWireDaily.com, you will find a link directly beneath this interview to those documents. And Lisa's absolutely right. Print them off. (1:22:56 - 1:23:05) Don't just send them electronic, print them and take them to as many people as you can. Thank you, Lisa. Thank you very much for this opportunity. (1:23:05 - 1:23:07) It was a pleasure to bring this to you.