3 Years for False Charges: Devlin Gannon
Freedom of speech in our country is under attack. Those who attempt to bring people the truth risk arrest, and in some cases, violent arrest.
Devlin Gannon is 27. He’s an independent journalist. Last year he was covering a demonstration in Calgary when he was violently assaulted by police. He was then charged with assaulting a police officer. An untrue accusation.
In this interview, we show you the videos proving his innocence, and Devlin explains the details.
Devlin faces up to three years in prison if convicted.
5 Comments
Leave a Comment Cancel Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Will Dove 00:00 As many of you are familiar with Josh Alexander, the young man from Ontario, who has been harassed and arrested for protesting the trans agenda, but he's hardly the only young person in our country who's fighting for our rights. I have with me today, Devlin Gannon, some of you will recognize Devlin. There was an incident here in March last year at a protest in Calgary, where Devlin was accused of assaulting a police officer. But that's hardly the whole story. Devlin, thanks for being on the show. Devlin Gannon 00:35 Thanks for having me, honestly. And you're right, Josh has really stood up for some important rights. And people of our age and of his age are kind of quiet in this day and age right now, as far as the things that we see going wrong. Go. And I just hope that more of us see the light and kind of come forward to bring the fire for freedom, front and center in the world. Will Dove 01:01 Right. But I think to put things in context, I should tell people that this is sort of the first time we've met you. We actually met at a demonstration in Calgary prior to this incident. So you've been active in the freedom movement for some time. Now, on the day that this incident occurred, you were there in a capacity as an independent journalist? Yes, you're filling what's going on? You were interviewing people who were there. Yeah. There was an altercation with the police that they started. Yeah. After which you were accused of assaulting a police officer. Now, folks to give your context. For those of you who haven't yet seen it, we're going to run that clip right now. Devlin, I've reported on this shortly after it happened in my news report. Right. And this was before you had taken the time to highlight on that video, the fact that you clearly tripped over somebody else's foot, you can see clearly in the video, I could see it. You were six feet away from it at the time. Yeah. And so I'm thinking this is absolutely ridiculous that you've been charged with assault for somebody you weren't even standing close to. But it turns out, that's not really the story. Devlin Gannon 02:36 No, it's actually a little more curious than that. To be honest. The story has been an evolving one over the the time in which I've been, you know, going in and out of the court and having lawyers represent me. There's, there's new details that have come to light over recent months that have changed the view I have on this whole assault charge, still, obviously an assault charge, but they're claiming something else entirely, then the video, you can't really see in any of the video footage, because from what happens like I get kind of drugged pretty far back, a lot of police are on top of me just dogpiling. And during that time, I get tased and I'm being punched by them. And that's the time in which now they're claiming the assault took place. And the details in which surrounds this assault are kind of laughable, but they are they're serious, because you know, I'm facing a seven day trial over this. But Will Dove 03:39 let's fill it in a seven day trial with potentially What if they find you guilty? Devlin Gannon 03:43 Jail time of upwards of three years. So then that's, you know, no criminal record in my history. So that's what I'm facing with my first ever Will Dove 03:52 And how old are you? Devlin Gannon 03:53 I'm 27. Yeah, right. So yeah, there are so claim is during this time, which I'm being dog piled on and manipulated into a pretzel and have no control over my limbs that I grabbed the private parts of one of the officers who was in this dog pile, again, in which I have like, no control over my limbs. They're like, behind me being manipulated in every way. And yeah, they're claiming that his junk was grabbed during that time, and that's what my assault charge is. Will Dove 04:26 Okay. So now you've you've been through courts so far. Yeah. But your actual hearing the seven day trial we're talking about? Devlin Gannon 04:35 Yeah, that's not scheduled to happen until well, March of 2024. So right, two years, like it's actually March 18 of 2024. And the incident happened on March 19 of 2022. So we're one day short of exactly two years from the incident taking place. Yeah. And then the trial actually starting so but Will Dove 04:59 you've you've looked at the law on this and made reference before we started the interview when we were chatting, that the right to have a fair and speedy trial means what? Devlin Gannon 05:10 Well, 18 months, right? You didn't want maximum? Yeah. And so they're putting it two years 24. So it's already past that. And it's gone through multiple different judges for these dates, right, so that they're aware of the Jordan period, which is what they call the right to speedy trial. It's not written in our like, in our Bill of Rights or constitution or anything. It's it's a previous precedent set in, you know, federal court, or someone went against the court saying, I have a right to a speedy trial. And the court ruled, yes, you do. And they said it at 18 months. So it's kind of like a case law thing where you bring up and say, here's the case where the court ruled that individuals have a right to a speedy trial of 18 months. And that's just a precedent that's already been set. So any judges should be like, Okay, that's a law, that's something that we have to abide by. And it's not being abided by here. And personally, like I've been in the courts myself during periods of self representing because I've been in between lawyers. And I've sat there waiting for my turn to speak with the judge and and heard him dealing with other cases in the courtroom that day, where a date would come up for the next or for trial for this, you know, individual and it would be longer than 18 months. And the judge would bring up specifically the right to speedy trial, the Jordan period and how it needs to be before that. I've literally heard this mentioned by a judge multiple times in the courtroom. And then whenever my case comes up and is dealt with, it's just silence crickets, nothing mentioned about it. So. Will Dove 06:44 So I think we have to move on to the very important point that the officers claimed to the assault in his own statement, doesn't clearly identify you. Devlin Gannon 06:52 Yeah, no, he, in his written words, specifically says someone. And that's it. Like he says, specifically because he's got me in a headlock. He's taking me down on top of them pinning me on the ground while other officers are manipulating me and he's headlock and me against his chest. And he says that he feels someone grabbed his junk, right? And that when I get tased, and when he hears the tasers being initiated, that's when he feels it stopping. Which I mean, if you really think about it, I'd be tensing up grabbing harder anything on grabbing on to well being tased, which I can attest to, I was tense and not grabbing on to anything because my, my arms were manipulated. And I've received body cam footage through my disclosure, right. So I have lots of my own footage. But I've also seen their footage, and I've had to ask for more and more and more because they never provide you with everything. And but even from what I've received. Again, the footage I had was limited, I couldn't really hear or see what was going on in the dogpile until I received this body cam footage. And you can hear at one point, the officer yells out, he's grabbing my cock, he's grabbing my car. That's what he says. And I had like, obviously, in the midst of it, I didn't even hear this going on. I'm like being abused at the point that this is happening. But anyway, so having learned this, I'm going through the footage second by second trying to find out like proving them not. And through the footage I have. One officer has my right arm, it's up. And my hand is literally bashing against his body cam footage, like you can see my hand and fingers just mashed up against his hand as he's pinning it. And then so that eliminates that hand. And that's during the time you can hear him yelling out that his junk is being grabbed. So right hand eliminated. It's up against this body cam Will Dove 08:45 that he said you have that footage? Yes. All right, folks, can we can we share that? Devlin Gannon 08:50 I can't unfortunately. I mean, at this point, you'll have to write your description. Yeah, it's just it's done. I understand that that has to do with the court case. So yeah, but I'd like to make a couple of points here. Okay, of course. Will Dove 09:03 I'm obviously a fairly physical guy myself. I've got training in martial arts. And I can tell you that when you get to half a dozen cops laying on top of you, who are all substantially outweighed to you and trained and trained. First of all, there's a very low chance that you could even really feel what your hands are touching, even if they're free. Yeah. Because of all the pressure that's on you, and all the ways that people are moving around. Yeah. This is absolutely in my mind ridiculous that what we're talking about here is hearsay, on the part of a single cop with no witnesses. In a situation where it's extremely unlikely that you would even have been aware of what you would have been touching if you even had a handfree which have already said you didn't hear because both of them were canned. Yeah. And yet they continue with this persecution. Yes. And so I have to ask the question, because you've been in the freedom movement for a long time. What do you think this is really about? because it doesn't make any sense. Devlin Gannon 10:01 No, it doesn't. I mean, truthfully, like, if I was to really go and tell you what I think about this whole situation is like it's a prime situation for them to set an example to make a precedent set for independent journalism, even if I'm on the smaller side of that. I mean, we've seen the federal government, government, sorry, put out the rule. Now, we're essentially in you, if you don't get accreditation through the federal government, you're not a news agency, right? You don't get to go to their meetings and be there to ask the questions to our political members, unless you're an accredited news agency. And you don't get that license unless you get that now through our federal government who decides, right? So that being said, like, under their eyes, or in their eyes, I'm not a journalist, I don't run a news organization or a news website. I'm just a person. They don't I'm not accredited. So again, that's like pretty large scale to really look at this like, but it was very recently, when the government made that a thing when this happened to me, it was only like maybe a couple months after that when this whole situation occurred. And so obviously, I'm going at this to the courts from the angle of being a journalist being there, having covered us of this stuff going to everywhere, all over Alberta, being at Coots being anywhere, I could be right, and always covering things. So obviously that's how I'm going to the courts with this says I was there as a journalist, I wasn't there protesting I was there working. And this is what happened. And so they don't see me as the journalist. And on top of that, they don't like what we stood for. Right. So it's, it's an example for them to say, I think, Will Dove 11:46 no, that's the comment about not seeing you as a journalist. Right. None of us in the freedom movement, who are journalists are accredited. So yeah, you're calling about that. Yeah. And even if we did get accreditation, all that would take us one question they don't like before they pull that exactly. Right. So let's forget about that. Yeah. I think you should explain what led to this altercation. While you were there exactly what you were doing at the time that all of this started, Devlin Gannon 12:10 right? Well, so I mean, on the day of I was doing my normal typical thing of interviewing people, I had got like four or five that day, covered the events of the rally in the speeches like I always did. And to cover a bit of context of what was occurring in the city, these rallies had been growing and growing and getting quite large. The police were having to deal with them every weekend. And obviously the city council was fed up with it, they were doing anything they could to try and stop this stuff. So an injunction was put out on the city were essentially like these rallies couldn't happen in a public park anymore, because you weren't allowed a sound system. You couldn't use megaphones. And you couldn't disturb the enjoyment of the park for other individuals is essentially what they're trying to say. So with that being said, people showed up in the normal Park where the rallies happened. The announcement was essentially made where this is going to happen at City Hall. And it was done like this, you know, no, no megaphones, no loudspeakers, people yelled out, everybody walked to City Hall. So we all went to City Hall. It wasn't a park, because it's not a park. It's a public space. So they had the loud system and sound system set up there. The rally went on as normal speeches happen, there was a bit of singing even and it ended. But, you know, over half, if not more of the attendees of the rally that day, had initially parked in the area around the park where it usually happens. So after it ended at City Hall, everybody travels back to the park where they were around to get to their vehicles. And during that march back there, even you know, we weren't allowed to be on the streets for this injunction as well. There was no disturbing the flow of traffic and everything. Because prior to this, the streets were getting shut down because it was like 1000s of people marching down them. So this time around, it was you know, legal walking on the crosswalks, lots of people on the sidewalks and getting there properly. Once we got there, we come to find out and this is something I've learned after the fact through like research through different news organizations that have provided the information that Antifa had showed up in the park that day, we had all left the park to go to the rally at City Hall, but Antifa had showed up in the park we initially were at and we're probably confused as to where we went because this park was the park we had rallied at for like months on end every day. And even the police chief the day before with this injunction said the rally will still happen at this park central Memorial as long as we don't use loudspeakers and everything. So anyways, Antifa shows up there they're probably confused why nobody's there but the police are there and they do You know, deal with Antifa, as you say, there were a couple of arrests made on that end, like a couple Antifa members were arrested. And by the time our rally ended, we had zero knowledge of that even happening. Like personally, I had no idea that Antifa had even showed up in this park blocks and blocks away from where we were, we march back there, that's where my vehicle is. And once we get there, I see that there's a lot of police there. And I'm a little bit confused, because that's not where we were. And then I see that they have like a group of people kind of quarantined off in the corner, and I come do you know, to learn, oh, that's definitely anti Antifa. I had seen them at rallies before they, you know, wear masks and have flags, blah, blah, blah. So we just stay on the other side of the park, the police had already made a line across the park where we couldn't go over there. So that was what it was, I kind of looked for a couple more people interview and was about to leave to my vehicle. And then I see the police are pushing their way, like across the park into the crowd of people that I had come there with Will Dove 16:02 about how many police were there. And about how many people were left, I would Devlin Gannon 16:06 I would say the crowd size would would be a conservative, maybe 1000. The rally size that day in total, was probably about 2500 to 3000. And after it ended at City Hall, there was like a big dispersal. And a fair bit of people came back to that park, but not everybody. So it had definitely Will Dove 16:29 at least 1000 people there. Oh, yes. No. Ops were put ops Devlin Gannon 16:33 wise, I'd say like 100, there was a large line of police all the way across, there was still a huge group of police with the crowd of Antifa behind that line way over there. And then they also had a line, like kind of like a square, you know, pushing the whole park out. Will Dove 16:53 I gotta ask you as somebody who's probably been to even more demonstrations than I have, right? Doesn't one cop every 10 People seem a little excessive for peaceful demonstrators. Devlin Gannon 17:03 Oh, yeah. Like, I mean, as far as the precedent that had been set with our protests at that point was peaceful 1,000%, right. There was families, elderly kids, dogs, like every single kind of demographic that you can picture was there for freedom peacefully. And there had never been problems from our end ever. The police, many of them had even, you know, on the smaller side of things like the everyday cop that was there would say that they appreciated the cooperation and peacefulness of the group that had been rallying in the city for so long. Will Dove 17:41 Okay. But before we get to more detail system, this is important, because I've been to plenty of demonstrations. Yeah, with three 5000 10,000 people. They're never seen more than a dozen cops. Yeah. Now, either. There were changes made to the rules, just prior to this Devlin Gannon 17:56 demonstration, literally the night before for the night. Yes. So Will Dove 18:00 let's explain what those were. Devlin Gannon 18:03 What the rules were, like the whole, no sound systems, no loud speakers, even like megaphones that you can hold in your hand that was not allowed to be used in the park. And you weren't allowed to be disturbing the use of the park for other individuals. So you weren't, you know, like, you weren't allowed to be blasting sound out of a sound system. While a family's trying to have a picnic. You know what I mean? But then it's not like there was ever a people even trying to use the like these. There were 1000s of people at these things. The car was full. And it's a peaceful right to assemble it like that. It's it's a public park, Will Dove 18:43 the demonstrator I've been to the only time a megaphone was ever used was to announce it was time to marching to let people know where we're going. And if there was a sound system, it was for speeches. That's and that was at City Hall. Devlin Gannon 18:55 Yeah, the Well, at this point there. The park rallies did have sound systems like the central Memorial Park, we had been there for months. And there had been a sound system set up for the use of speeches. That was it. Will Dove 19:06 Okay. But just just speeches mean, we're not talking about blaring like Devlin Gannon 19:10 I sound like No, no, it was not a concert. It was voice. That's it. And and you know, it would end and the March would happen. And that was it. The night before this rally, they put out the even the police chief tweeted and had the whole statement saying that the rally can still take place in central Memorial Park still allowed to happen there. We just can't use the sound system or megaphones. And then the other aspect of that was we weren't allowed to march on the street because prior to this, the police had been shutting down major streets for the 1000s of people to walk down. And this time they said no streets shutting down so people had to use the sidewalks and stuff so I mean, everybody abided by that it was not hard to Will Dove 19:53
- So but it's very clearly an agenda to stifle stifle that's a good word. Yeah. Don't stifle the people who are demonstrating for their freedoms. Yeah. And as you and I have both said at all the demonstrations you've been to before that we've never seen more than about a dozen cops there. Yeah. And then now suddenly, the next morning is like a home at least 100. Cops there. Yeah. And they're pushing people. And that's
It makes me so mad to see this egregious violence perpetrated by the AKA Gondek Goons. They deserve to be taken out. Period.
Please publish where people can donate to Devlin Gannon’s legal fund. This is not the way we want our justice system to respond.
Please let us know where the event will be for Devlin on August 26. Very impressive young men. We need more to young people like him.
funny how they have now manipulated the right & expectation of a speedy trial by your accuser to now be 18 months when in the late 90’s the courts at least in Ontario all decided that 6 months was the time arrived upon to represent a reasonable speedy trial.
in fact I had unethical seat belt violations thrown out in the 90’s because the trial set was over 6 months after the incident occurred.
but today the system is so corrupt & rigged even for parking violations & victim surcharges for victimless crimes you will end up paying more to take it to court plus your time, than taking their out of court settlement & small fine for many things than actually fighting for the truth.
as now you are merely seen by a crown prosecutor before you even see a court room to set a date for trial on many offences, so if they don’t really have a solid case on you & its just for a fine for say parking violations & such, they will chop the fine by 2/3 knowing most people will pay that just to have it over with as oppose to coming back to set a court date, then showing up to present your case before a justice in a court of law.
this adds a extra step & inconvenience that allows them to shake down more people for small amounts of cash, who would rather just get it over with that day.
Great interview. Thank you.