Autogenerated Transcript From 2020, right up until now in some provinces, Canadians across our country have been subjected to gross violations of our charter rights, under the justification of reducing the effect of a supposed pandemic. Businesses were shut down. People lost their jobs. Those who could not wear masks were treated as social pariahs. Many of us could not board an airplane in our own country. Bank accounts were frozen, and millions of Canadians were told to take an experimental injection or lose their jobs. And our government is planning to do it again. All of that and more. Bill C -293, which will bring in the Pandemic Prevention and Preparedness Act, has already passed the House and its first reading before the Senate. On Monday, September 16th, just over a week from now, the Senate will reconvene, and if we do not object loudly and in great numbers, this draconian legislation will likely pass before the end of this year. The Act will not only subject us to further lockdowns and violations of our rights to freedom of movement, but censorship, surveillance, and possibly even forced injections. Lisa Mirren is an Ontario lawyer who has been raising awareness on Bill C -293, and she joins me today to spell out the many threats to our rights and freedoms outlined in this document. Rights and freedoms that we will surely lose if we do not take action and stop the passing of this bill. Lisa, welcome to the show. I'm so happy to be here, Will, and it's really important information we're sharing today. So thank you for inviting me and hello everybody. And we have to give thanks to James Regaski, who put us in touch with each other. And I'm so impressed with James. He's American, but he's keeping track of things that are happening here in Canada. And he introduced me to you and your, you're a Canadian lawyer. So if we're here today to talk about Bill C -293, let's just start with telling people what that is, because I know a lot of people aren't even aware of it. So it's essentially basically a domestication of what we were worried about at the WHO, either as the international health regulation amendments or the treaty, and it's giving a massive totalitarian power to one organization with the government that I will show to you is already deeply aligned with the WHO. So we have an organization that is going to have an absolute power over Canadians under the guise of the need to reduce pandemics. Right. And it's not just what we've already seen in the first set of lockdowns, 2020 through 2022. It's worse than that. There's more than that in there. It's a frightening document. It's a very frightening document and you have to know how to read it. Yes. You've got to be able to translate the double speak and understand what they're really saying. So I'm going to let you handle that. You were talking, first of all, about... Like a handful. One of them was from the office of Nathaniel, Erk Seine Smith. And the email was to tell me that that my concern was part of a conspiracy theory. Okay. And that I should go and look at his podcast on conspiracy theories on vaccines, conspiracy theory on basic income, and the WHO and the International House regulations. All of that was a conspiracy theory. Now, I wrote him in October of 2022, and I got his response in 2022. When we look at this bill, it was a private member's bill, and the private member who advanced it was Nathaniel Erksine Smith. So while he was telling me, in gaslighting me, that there was no plan whatsoever to have the WHO take greater control over national sovereignty, he was putting forth a bill that by that time had had its first reading. So this bill, as we look at it, and we look at the grant of power that is taking place, and we think and one reading at the Senate. The Senate is about to go back on September 17th. So it's time for the drums, people. We have to all write our Senate. We are not comfortable with this bill. Do not approve this bill. There's no edit that you can do to this bill. There's nothing you can do to this bill other than to send it to the fire. And Canadians do not consent. And so it attacks GDP. it attacks up on the basis of climate change. Yes. So I would like to share a screen if possible. And just to step in while you're sharing your screen, folks, I've read through the bill and everything that Lisa has just told you is absolutely correct. It's all in there. You've just got to translate the double speak. So I don't know. Can you see right here that the sponsor of the bill is Nathaniel Erk Seinfthin Smith. Yes. And he sent me a gaslighting email that, you know, there's nothing going on. It's all conspiracy theories. And it's had its first reading, June 17th, second reading February 8th, 2023. And its third reading was completed on June 5th, 2024. And when I found out about this bill, I wrote a substack. I can be found at lawyer. last reading in the house was June 5th. First reading passed in the Senate, June 6th, next day. It's troubling and problematic. It really is. And so let's go through the text of the bill. And here it is the status of it as the third reading. And it's an act respecting pandemic prevention and preparedness. So under the guise of reducing pandemics, we've got to do all of the things that we're going to discuss. One of the things it doesn't have in there is looking at labs, funding lab research, selling organisms. It doesn't look at gain of function research. It doesn't look at conflicts of interest between NGOs and pharmaes that make our pandemics profitable. It doesn't look at ending diplomatic community because that's what should happen. We should end diplomatic community, and we should bar contracts on our behalf that take away the liability of any organization that can get under our skin. So the summary here says that it also mends the Department of Health Act, okay, and that's important. We're going to look at that last. and that it's the public rights. Yeah, that would be correct. There was anything else in there. There's nothing. She said, there's nothing in here about actually protecting people from, you know, possibly harmful injections or, yeah, conflicts of interest or anything like that. No, it's all about how they're going to violate our rights. It's all about how they're going to violate their rights. And it's astounding. It's astounding the breadth of this and the reach. So the first point I'm going to make is that there's a one health approach. And the talking points on one health might be everybody in the whole wide world, we're going to have the same health approach, one health. But what is it really? It is a multisectoral, multidisciplinary collaborative approach that focuses on the human, focus, focus on the human, animal, plant, and ecosystem health. So everything under the sun that the good Lord invented and the welfare interface. So what the welfare interface? Your relationship with your government. Every single thing that is your relationship from your government. So that's right in the preamble that we're going to have a one health approach. To prevent pandemics, what needs to be in the equation, everything, right? So that's, that's first and foremost in your preamble. To talk about that one health approach for just a moment, notice folks, they're putting plants on the same level as humans. It's a satanic viewpoint. It's a viewpoint that we are cattle, we're a blade of grass, we're a microbe, we're a rat in the field, right? We are the equivalent of that. And anybody who views mankind in this way should be held to account, right? If we believe in humanity, we must hold our views on life, right? This is anti -life. This is pro -death. This is you are cattle. And anything can be done. things to you. So we have to call out their circular morality that makes no sense. And we have to call out the fact that, no, we're not a blade of grass. We're not a microbe. We're not a piece of algae. You know, we're more. And we want more. And we have our inalienable rights. And we're going to stand up for them. So what does this pandemic prevention and preparedness plan. This gives the authority of somebody to create a plan and then enforce it. And we don't have a plan. We just give them powers to do a plan that covers broad things. So at no point, did our members say, can I see that plan? Or if they did, I don't know. No point they said, okay, Could you append the plan so Canadians can actually see it? Similar legislation will passed in New Zealand, and I looked at that plan, and that plan gave the police the ability to assist the chief medical officer of health or their employees with, one, quarantine persons, places, so your whole town is quarantined? Things in animals. So the police can quarantine all of those things and use forces if necessary. So then we see in the New Zealand version again that once you've been quarantined, the police can use force if necessary to assist the chief medical officer of health or their employees with administering a preventative medicine. So, you know, just so you know, the plan that came out of New Zealand, very fast after they passed, allows police to assist with your physical being, your children, your mother, your community, and everything that we own. So let's call that what it is, what the worst possible interpretation of that would be, and that's forced vaccination. It's forced vaccination, but if you're taken away from your family, what else is that? Right? What else? That's like getting on the, that's like getting on the trains, my friend. What else is that? If you're taken by police and forced quarantined, using force if necessary. That's not someone calling you 12 times a day to see if you're still in your house after a vacation, right? What's forced quarantine? That's removal of property? Oh, you know, your animals have COVID or next disease. That's a level. That's a level. It's The forced quarantine or concentration camps, let's call it what it is, that's always the first step towards genocide. This is a, yeah, if you look at that plan, it is a genocide. It is a genocide. It is a genocide. And I'm sorry for all the people who have perished in genocides before, it's not to diminish whatever their suffering is. We don't learn from past or our history. What's the point of it? What's the point of all the suffering that everybody has endured? If we really love humanity, we don't have an equivalence that we're a blade of grass or a rat in field. So what are, it has to set out a summary of mitigation strategies that the Minister of Health intends to implement in order to prevent the risk of. Well, what? Material risk? Risk. That's not defined. So what it's not defined, it's a broad mandate. That could lead to pandemics. Oh, wow. Yes. Right? That was the one that, that was the first clause as I was reading through it that really set off my alarm bells. Could lead, which means it's anything they say it is. Well, in pandemics, it's it's not even defined, right? Exactly. It's anything they say to it. We haven't defined pandemic. We haven't defined what could lead to a pandemic. So it's anything they say it is. It's a ridiculous broad mandate. And then you've got to add to that. Let's think. When the WHO declares what they're They, we are in probability under the sense of an emergency, so there's the suspension of our ability to exert our rights in emergencies. So when you lose your rights because of this bill in place, it's also also contemporaneously or at the same time, you're losing your ability to challenge the loss of those rights. Yes. So it's a double whammy. And until it manifests, what's our ability to go to court to stop it? So this has got to be people power right now. And we have to really bring the hammer down in terms of it's all hands on deck. We're going to let the Senate know this is not passing and we're not consenting to this. And this is horrific. And we're going to do it in such a way that all our nation knows and we're going to do it in such a way that just like the trucker movement, we're going to inspire other places. We are. of pandemic risk and describe how Canadian activities, domestic and abroad. So let's talk about the jurisdiction here. This act purports to regulate Canadians living in another country. Normally, the laws of that country would apply. But all of a in, you know, you doing something in another country might violate this pandemic plan, this prevention plan. So, and what are those activities? Anything? Activity is a broad word, right? You eating meat in Europe, right? Or you got to Mexico and you have a cow. I don't know. Activities too broad. So we have. Or you're farming. Or you're raising chickens. Yes. So I wanted to know what public health, you know, the researchers that they like, think about what the key drivers are of pandemic risk. And I got a armful of results. And they all kind of said the same thing. And I'm going to take you to the Harvard T. Chan School of Public Health. School of Public Health. So, you know, these are, these are the same people. This is the elk that work together. And so here it's coronavirus and climate change. And we're going to talk about what are the key drivers here? So, uh -oh, climate change affects the transmission of coronavirus. So, and I want to, you know, when they say they're the experts and we got to listen to them and, you know, because they own the science and they're so smart. Well, this is Harvard and they're so smart. See how smart they are. Let's just as the planet heats up, animals big and small on land and are in the sea are headed to the poles to get out of the heat. I don't know about you will, but when I'm lost and I can't find which direction to turn, I just look out my window and I'm like, where are those animals going? Oh, that's north. They're all beaten that way. That's north. That's what's happening, okay? That means the animals are coming into contact with other animals they normally wouldn't, and that creates the opportunity for pathogens to get into new hosts. So let's say they're saying that climate change is part of pandemic risk. It's one of those things that could lead to a pandemic, okay? And there is no evidence for this whatsoever. Well, of course there is. There's Harvard. There is. My viewers, for the most part, are well aware that the entire global warming and um thermal volume in air, heat doesn't go from a cooler substance to a hotter substance. It's the sun. I took environmental science with minor in chemistry. I was a greenhouse gas goon in my 20s. I've since recovered. Many of the root causes of climate change also increased the risk of pandemics. This is important. Deforestation, which occurs mostly for agricultural purposes. So agriculture is causing climate change, which causes pandemics. We've got to reduce the risk. This is how they tie it all together. It is the largest cause of habitat loss worldwide. Oh, so you having food on your plate is going to cause climate change or going to cause animals moving or going to cause deforestation. Better get out of your rural communities. Better stop growing things that doesn't grow in a lab. Loss of habitat forces animals to migrate, potentially contact other animals or people or and share germs. That is Harvard. That's the tenuous connection that gets them to govern everything. Large livestock farms, uh -oh, no state, can also serve as a source of spillover infections from animals to people. Less demand for animal meat and more sustainable animal husbandry. Well, for the only the elites that get to eat that, right? Right. Could decrease emerging infectious disease and lower greenhouse gas emissions. Oh, like all the leaps of logic in there that you have to get to. But I want your viewers to start with that viewpoint that the top dogs in Harvard, in public health, think we need not to eat meat, right, not to have deforestation due to agriculture or people having a cottage or living worldly. And all of that is related to reducing pandemics. So keep that in mind as we read through this because you're going to see it. To insert something there, Lisa, I know a lot of people aren't aware of this. Our government is so dedicated to wiping out farm animals, agriculture, that as far back as two years, they started investing money into research to find a way to put a biological kill switch into herds, into livestock, so that they could essentially press a button in Ottawa and your herd dies. I'm not making this up. We got reported on this more than once. Now, as far as I know, they don't have the technology yet, but they're financing it, trying to find a way to do it. I wouldn't doubt it. I wouldn't doubt it at all because, you know, we're gearing up. I'm going to take you through on a different podcast, the stuff that deals with the event 201 of climate change. And a few people know that. And there's an event 201 that plotted 2020 to 23. So let's stay tuned and park that. And we'll go through that. Identify the key drivers of pandemic risk. Well, we just did that. The key drivers of pandemic risk are humans in rural environments and climate change. So your cars having agriculture, agriculture is a key driver. Yeah, and think about that for a second, folks. What Lisa just said, key drivers are people in rural environments. Wait a minute, I thought all of us gathering together was causing diseases to spread. That's why we had to do all that six -foot distance. But it's purple in people in rural environments that are the problem. It's the end justifies the means type of logic and we have to stand up to its utter stupidity, right? So what they're saying is we're going to empower, you know, experts who are humans with brains and they're going to tell us other humans with brains what we have to do. Sorry, I think for myself. All right, you can take that out or not. Ensure sustained collaboration between the Minister of Health, provincial governments, and indigenous communities in the development of a plan. Okay. We got to unpack this. It's sustained collaboration. So all the time, collaboration. All the time. So they get this broad mandate. They have to do all of this stuff and they have to work in all of our other departments, right? So they, okay, to cooperate with this plan, we need to get into your provincial government. You need to get into your indigenous communities. And we have to align all the approaches, sustained all the time, and we're aligning Everything those departments do have to align with this vision. And so this is a way to implant this technocracy, this evil view of humanity, and take over every part of every government functioning in provincial, indigenous. And we're already talking the Ministry of Health, so we're at the federal level. Yes. Now, get on to the next, in one sentence. You've got to keep coughing up and barfing and throwing up. And let me point out, anytime our government talks about indigenous communities, indigenous rights, what they're referring to here for the most part is on Drip, the United Nations Declaration for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which is nothing but a grab to control our resources. So they're subverting our indigenous communities. the indigenous communities are the first to get the indigenous. And, you know, I saw the, you know, the differences between how the communities were coming together. Well, we need to do a better job to come together with indigenous communities. It has nothing to do with helping them and everything to do with saying, oh, well, the indigenous communities knew how to live with the land without causing climate change. So we've got to give everything back to, you know, the elites through indigenous communities. other pawn that is being played against us. And I want our indigenous communities to say, screw you too. Like I really do. And I know a lot of indigenous freedom fighters. So I think they can line up with us as well. But let's look at here. Address any jurisdictional challenges. So what could be a jurisdictional challenge? Okay, well, first is the constitution that gives the province the right of health. So the Ministry of Health is federal. There's a jurisdictional challenge that they have to smooth out and address. Yes. If we talk about resources through climate change, right, Alberta's resources in gas, but mining, but anything, right? That's a jurisdictional challenge that they can smooth out. What's another jurisdictional challenge? Well, I can talk about one very specific one to Alberta. Unfortunately, only Alberta, Saskatchewan have a provincial bill of rights. Now, Daniel Smith, the Premier of Alberta, who was elected in May of last year, before she was elected, she said she was going to amend the Health Act to make it illegal to basically force or coerce anyone into taking a medical treatment they didn't want. And then that got really quiet after she got elected, and I found out recently why. It was because she discovered that, unfortunately, any order from the public health officer transcends the Health Act. The only thing that transcends orders from the public health officer is the Bill of Rights, the Provincial Bill of Rights. So now this fall, Daniel Smith is amending the provincial bill of rights in Alberta to make it illegal to coerce, force anyone to take a medical treatment, but they don't want or to discriminate against them if they didn't take it. And that's exactly what they mean here. Jurisdictional challenges. Well, how can they overcome it once Daniel Smith changes that? And this is just one example. I'm talking about Alberta as an example here, of course. Once you've done that and that's in place, well, how are they going to overcome that? How are they going to do some kind of legislation that's just going to make the Berta Bill of Rights null and void? It doesn't matter. We still get to dictate to you. So they're going to take out people who oppose them as what they wish to do. There's just got to be so many of us that always oppose. Yes. People have to always understand that we have to move the herd. And we have to use language that brings more people to the table and to understand, to take them through so that they understand where we're going. You know, if you had the ability to put your hand up and stop COVID and the madness, you would have done it in hindsight. So many people in hindsight regrets, you know, taking the job or whatever it is they did to comply. We've got to make the herd move. And so let's do it. But other jurisdictional challenges are the idea of, do I want an NGO? Does that NGO, is this a treaty? Is this moving? Because if it's giving power, as I'm going to show you to the WHO, is this the jurisdictional challenge there that we might have? And how about the courts? Do the courts usually have jurisdiction to rein in legislative branch, to reign in the executive branch. So is that a jurisdictional challenge they're moving? And how about the jurisdictional challenge of our personal sovereignty, our personal sovereignty that we do not consent? Is that a jurisdictional challenge? So when they say any jurisdictional challenge, they're working on against all of those things. And how about the jurisdictional challenge of at home and abroad, right? Because that's, who has jurisdiction over a Canadian in a different location? Is that a jurisdictional challenge? So what we have here is any jurisdictional issue. They have to already be working on it and align the approaches in order to eliminate us the possibility of asserting that jurisdictional challenge. Right. Because it's a big And it's very big. And let me just jump in for a minute here because people often don't understand just what's really going on with this WHO, one health agenda with all the, right now what we've got is the Canadian government drafting this legislation to basically say to Canadians, we're going to take our marching orders from a foreign power. Well, that's one more step towards world government to the point where our governments, our federal governments have given up their jurisdictional power to organizations at the UN, the WHO, to make rules for all of us everywhere in the world. And our politicians get to throw up their hands and say, well, our hands are tied. We've signed these treaties. We have to follow these powers that are outside of our own country. They're dictating to us. away our country. It's, it's, this is the globalist agenda, folks. This is what they're trying to do to build this one world government where they can dictate to everyone everywhere. And our government here in Canada is complicit in this. Right. They're helping them to do it. Yeah. Yeah. Well, they really are. They really are. And they have the wool over everybody's heads, right? Because they're controlling everything through the media. So, you know, your voice and bringing your voice to all of your community is so important, so big. But I think also when we get into the weeds here, who is going to want to consent to this? Who isn't going to want to say, screw you? In the horse you rode in on. And folks, we're not even halfway into it yet. It gets way worse. I'm here to tell you it does. Provide for training programs, including collaborative activities with other levels of government, indigenous communities, and relevant agencies. Now, back to the indigenous communities, there's a lot of people now are new indigenous, that real indigenous people are saying, Who are you? So I think the new indigenous that are qualified, they're the, you know, the deep state operatives getting in there. Not good. But training programs. So we go back to that New Zealand plan and they train their police, their paramedics, and their firefighters to be part of the domestic, you know, push. CD countries for a 2025 push. So that training program, that's what I'm worried about, all levels, with other levels of government and indigenous communities. So the fact that they're saying, you know, there's the municipal, we want to saturate indigenous communities, we're going to get in there, we're going to own them. We're going to get into the every level of government and we're going to own them and we're going to collaborate with them by training them. They're going to be our bitches. That's what it is. And then all of that has to align with the approach in 3A. So just briefly, what's 3A? Multisectoral, multidisciplinary collaborative approach known as the One Health. So everything has to align with the satanic view of humanity. There were nothing. Let's go back to one of the first points we talked about here. We're the same level as plants. Yes. And the same level of the animals in mass running north at all times. Right? You don't know where north is. Don't worry about the north star. Just follow the animals. I looked at Made and I can tell you two things. Let's see. I'll tell you the things that disturbed me. The definition, right, isn't like you're immediately on death's doorstep. You don't have long to live. It's the reasonable probability of death. So the only thing I can tell every single one of us is the minute we're born. It's the only reasonable thing that I can foresee. No, reasonable foreseeable of death. Reasonable foreseeability of death. you are unable to. Unable or not able, I can't remember how it's worded, is not defined. Right. So you're in the toilet. You're indisposed. You're asleep at the hospital. What is unable to? The people who review, I have somebody who has a friend who reviews all the forms. The people who review the forms to make sure it's okay, Right? The person's dead. That person who reviews the form to make sure it's okay, doesn't talk to the person. They say, oh, here's the consent signature and here's the witness. And, you know, does it all stack up? Yes, it does. Fine. There it goes. Right. The person who can sign on your behalf can work for me, just not be the person performing the job. strength and robustness while eliminating it. And I just have an ability to read their stuff and just walk right through their bullshit. And I don't know why. Well, I would hope it's because you have a brain, as do the viewers. And when we show them these things, a lot of them do understand. They take a look at it and go, wait a minute, that's, you know, there's, there's, there's, There's the political ease. There's what there's, the words they're using. And then this is what they really mean. Yeah. And I think, but, you know, like, look, this is the standards and guidelines that pertain to the prevention and response to pandemic risk. Oh, you know, just gloss over that. Like, if someone's just reading it, assuming that they want to reduce pandemics, and you read it with the assumption that they want to reduce pandemics, it all seems okay. Of course, we're going to train people. So describe the state of research in relation to preventing and responding to infectious disease that could lead to a pandemic. Like not, not today. No, it's the galloping animals going north because you have agriculture and you have deforestation that leads to pandemics, right? Describe the state of research. Well, I did that for you. I did that for your viewers. What is the state of research is deforestation because humanity wants to eat and have agriculture or live in rural communities, okay? And anything that is climate change, I think if we go over there, it also talks about air pollution, which, you know, CO2 is not air pollution. You have the concentration of CO2 in your lungs at any given time is really high, right? And the concentration in homes and offices is really high. And they pump it into greenhouses. But, okay, they found out that your mortality goes up if there's air pollution. So then they get to take away your cars. They get to do all kinds of things that, you know, all of industry. And we're going to see is, you know, the Ministry of Industry involved in this pandemic prevention? Let's find out. You know, we'll just stack that department. So there's a, there's an association between air pollution and recovering from pandemics, right? You know, and so infectious disease spread as a result of climate change. How likely? Yeah, it is likely. So that means anything that they've demonized because of climate change, they get to go after. So if you look at your transnational tropes, you're not allowed to disagree with, that you go to jail for it's gender that hides transhumanism and actogenesis, which is potting children, right? That's, you know, all of mankind being men and trafficking in humans. Why do we never look at it trafficking in humans? Because it's the next economy. men that are coming in. Or they're going to be individuals who have not lived in Canada and don't know how to fight for our freedoms. So if you just dilute us with, you know, seven to two, and that's not my race because I have, you know, I live in Miss Saga. Tell me if I'm not surrounded and all my best friends aren't of every race already. And multi -generational Canadians know how to fight for Canada, regardless of race, but new immigrants do not know what they're losing. And so you just dilute us, right, so that the people standing up are fewer and fewer. So immigration can't talk against it. It's a transnational trope. It's about making your border a few blocks. What's another transnational trope? If I can think of another one, I'll tell you why you can't disagree with it or talk about it. DEI. Oh, okay. So that's a good one. And I'll tell you that I've spent a lot of time. Equity. Equity is the same results. So equity is the same number of calories. Equity is the same square footage. It's the same debt at 35. It's the same all -vaxed. Everybody thinks equity is the same latte's, great education and great jobs. Equity, in fact, is communism, but it's not even any communism. It's Stalin. It's mail. It's their viewpoint. And since equity is the same result and it can't outlaw its worst iteration, it's not a moral program. Why it should be viewed as a moral program, right? Why? They're putting, they use it to take the people who usually had to fight for their rights. And they're saying, here, this is how we're giving you your rights. And so then they neutralize the people who normally fight power. So social justice owns power. Neutralizes a portion of the population so that they're looking in the rear view mirror at what happened to their ancestors maybe three, four generations ago and saying that's what we're going to rectify now, while in front, power is moving to do CBDC, right, to do this digital feudalism to take away all of our rights. And so if we say to those people, you know, it's us versus you, then, you know, that's not how we bring people together. If we say to them, power has gained you so you're looking in the rear view with the mirror right while the forwards are moving at the front come join us come join us here's where power's moving you're usually good at you know organizing and and beating up power this is the real thing this is the real fight you've got the blinders on because power owns social justice inclusion is the only reason let's get to that one, that is given for CBDC. Like, why do we need CBDC? Well, so we can all be included. Inclusion is all of us in the nap. Inclusion is no one shall escape. Inclusion is this viewpoint that everybody gets there. So once we're all there, hey, oh, you with the rainbow and hey, you with every other person that I've been taught to hate, we're all the same now. There's not going to be, a hierarchy. There's not going to be, it's going to be the same number of calories, right? This is a mass depopulation. I'm sorry. No, but you're absolutely right. People hear diversity, equity, inclusion, and what they hear is, is fairness. That's not what it is. It's about putting all of us in a pen, the same size pen for all of us, with the same stuff for all of us, and absolute control. And let's get to diversity, right? Diverse. If you look at everything, they love their little acronyms. When we talk about one health approach, what is the philosophical underpinning that views mankind as animal? There's only one, And it's satanic. One of the principles of Satanism is that humanity, not only is, you know, we're made in God's image. I believe that. But that means all of us have something of God in there, all of us. And Satanism hates that. And it takes God's most important creation and says you're worthless. you're worth and in fact you're not only worthless and so we get to do all of this to you that's one health you're the worst you're the worst of all the animals there's nothing redeeming in you you're the worst you're ruining the environment you're doing that's all the messaging don't have kids right yes yes so when we look at the Olympics we you know we saw we Mocking Christianity. Well, mocking Christianity, and I am Jewish friends, Muslim trends, mocking Christianity is the first way detectives in the 90s could identify a crime of the opult. So say, okay, oh, well, you know, there was an upside. Oh, there was blood in the chalice. There was, you know, these symbols, there were stars, there was pentagrams. So if you look, when DEI goes through an organization, they have a logo before. um resources on how to identify occult crimes the they sit in the circle of power because they think they're protected from the demons they're conjuring the circle of power um bubbles that are joined are the symbol of the beast it's sixes without the tails so you're you see DEI symbols if something goes through an organization you're going to see circles what they can't And his crosses, they have to bend it, they have to put them upside down. You know, what is One Health? It's a satanic viewpoint. It's right out there. We're no better. What they do is they want a clear religion from the square and how they do from the public square. And then they take Hollywood, the Grammys, big music, big events and, you know, your Netflix, everything, and they put demonic stories and worship in front of us. So just like the Nazis took over symbology between 1930 and 1939, the symbols that are going through are the snake knot, the bubbles, the The circles, go into LinkedIn, go into any of the big organizations, the minute DEI goes through. DEI is diverse. It's die the word of God. They want any word of God, whatever religion you are, that gives you strength. They want to remove it because it is a source of strength. And I'm sorry that God is the last conspiracy. If anybody ever gets there. It's the last conspiracy. They believe something. The people at the top doing this believe something. They believe in Satanism. They believe in the Antichrist. They believe they're doing that work. And they believe they get power from that. And what they do fear a lot is number one, us organizing. Number two, us calling it out. And number three, us having a faith based system that gives a strength in the face of evil. There's nothing like strength in the face of evil. And I don't know if your viewers are up to that, you know, or they think, you know, they fell for the idea that church is dumb or religion is dumb and progress is science. But all of that was the same push while they were pushing forth their satanic viewpoints. You know, it's anything pro -life, right, anti -Euthanasia, anti -sterealization, let's talk about California's abortion laws. They proposed that abortion would be legal up to two years perinatal. And so perinatal is after birth. Yes. That's, right? So up to two years. On the left. and their mom's belly, and they love that, and they think of that time as a, you know, very sacred. And so I don't, I think it's being, the reason why governments are going after that right so hard is because it's going to be the government's right. It's going to be the government who owns the right to whether or not you can have a baby. It is. That's where they're going with that. And so, you know, it's the right to die through euthanasia. It's the right for the government to put you down like a dog. It's the right to love to sterilize your minors, right? That's the inability to reproduce. You know, and vaccines have incredible fertility issues. So diversity is die the word of God and die the strength that comes from knowing that. I was raised Christian without reading the Bible and I was astounded when I started to. Let's park that. Yes. And you can start, let's park that and you can decide to kind of know. I would like to add just one comment before we move back to the, they'll C -293, I believe the reason why globalists and those in power have always attacked Christianity. And especially right now, more so than any other religion, I would say Christianity is the one that places the highest value in human life. So if you can remove that belief, now it's very easy to attack people's value of human life. And that's what they're doing. Through made, through environmentalism, through this document they were examining today, they're trying to tell us, as you said, humans aren't just as bad as plants. No, we're a disease. Yeah. And we need to be wiped up. Yep. Yeah, it's true. And so you can decide if that part is something you want in or out or if your viewers are ready for it, I'm, that you know my belief system. Many of my viewers are Christians. Provide for the establishment of the interlinking surveillance systems for infectious disease in Canada and infectious disease of concern outside Canada. So let's look at that. Surveillance has been the number one thing that Justin Trudeau is putting through. That's why he's hiring all those people, that everything has been about surveilling Canadians, you're going to be known online, you're going to be known in the real world through the smart city infrastructure. So interlinking of surveillance systems is they get to own all the surveillance, link them together, right, and through that, control infectious disease, right? And remember this is one health. They want all, you know, surveil the animals, the plants. They want to surveil everything and link it all together. They want to play God. They want to have this control through AI, through electronics. And when you look at, you know, energy, you have to be energy poor. You have to have huge energy bills. And what we're finding is that already all the AI is using up 25 % of our energy across the world right now. It's a huge amount. Twenty -five percent, right? So watching us to save the environment? Oh, really? No, it's really just about watching us. Watching us to save the environment? That's a bunch of BS. Interlicking the surveillance system. Okay? So that's what they're going to do. They want us all to be part of their surveillance. And so if we look at care in the UK, okay so they get one riot and they're like okay i have the solution i have the solution biometrics right and where was the media where was the media did the media say gee that's funny when do you put those cameras off that looks like three to five years work that you did and but it's ready huh that's interesting wow what technology uh is uh and software system do you have where did the Where does the hardware go? Who lands? Where does it land? Who is employed to look at it? Who else gets to see all our images? What's it used for? What are the programs that analyze it? When did you beta it? No? No questions. Just there's a riot. You know, problem. And we have the solution, biometrics. So, Surveillance. That's where Trudeau's going. If you want to do, I have an excellent presentation that I can do on the municipal deep state and take you through my research there. Support local public health and primary care building. So local public health. So what we find is, you know, public health Canada is a satellite office of the WHO pursuing to the 2005 international health regulations. And then they get to own all the other public health. So when we hear, you know, Toronto Public Health or, you know, Bonnie Henry or Teresa Tam, they're working for the WHO. It's been a cross -embedded organization since 2005. the international health regulations required that each country designate them. And I'm going to take you through who, what organizations in Canada are part of the WHO's satellite office system. And so if you believe that those are autonomous and that they cooperate constantly with the WHO, but those are autonomous, you're culpable. So because of that, we get to protect them in any way we want to. And back to the Christians, vulnerable populations, Christians make transgender people or diverse people feel threatened, apparently. So we can do anything to them to protect the vulnerability of marginalized populations. That's where that can go. So it can be really offensive in terms of, you know, who stands up to them the most, they have to go after first. So that. they can take the view of marginalized population, and on that basis, reduce society. And we know that that's as broad as they want. It's anything to do with who owns land, where you're living. It's anything for the protection of vulnerable, marginalized population. And anybody who thinks, oh, well, no, you can't read it that way. Then why didn't they limit themselves? Why didn't they write it exactly what they mean by it. They gave themselves a broad grant of power that is always infused with one health, which is everything under the sun and then everything in the government interface. So they don't intend to have like a narrow approach to this. And everybody who's still, you know, drinking the Kool -Aid, I don't know what to say to AD. Working conditions of essential workers across all sectors. So all sectors, everything, they get to decide how, oh, you know, climate change, you have to work from home five days a week and you can't go to grocery stores. You have to walk there, right? All sectors. Who's essential? Well, they say anybody who's essential, maybe they get to leave their city. Maybe they don't. What are the working conditions? Right? If you look at the 666 patent from Gates, well, I'd say that the working conditions are quite horrible. The availability and management of relevant stockpiles. So that gave in New Zealand the police the ability to control relevant stockpile. So what's the relevant stockpile? Is it food? Is it clean water, what's the relevant stockpile that they get to control over, right? They get to control through that, all of industry. What's relevant? They get to take it. They get to manage it. They get to manage stockpiles. The way they've worded this, what they want people to think they mean by relevant stockpiles is things like vaccines. But as you're very wisely pointing out, they haven't defined it. It could be anything. Well, that's why, and they go including, including, it means not limited to. So testing equipment and personal protective equipment. So they nudge you to think that it's about us had run out of pandemic. We ran out of masks. They nudge you. You're nudged. What does equipment mean? Well, maybe it means farming equipment. Well, it says including testing equipment, but You know, relevant, they get to decide and stockpiles is not defined. So it's not defined. It's anything. Stockpiles is not defined. The availability, so whether or not you get it, doesn't mean so that you get it. They control the availability of it. So, who gets it? Who doesn't? You get your water today. Oh, you had two burgers last year, Right. Availability. They get to control the availability and then they get to control the management of relevant stockpiles. So all of society is governed by this. The search capacity of human resources required for the testing and contact tracing of persons exposed to. This is chasing you down. Right. So that's why they're, they have that training stuff because we saw in New dealing. They train the cops. They train people. Now, on this point, the National Defense Act was changed to, for the first time ever to allow the Canadian Army to be in charge of civil authority. That's the Canadian Army used against Canadians. Blair and Trudeau made an announcement on that. This is where this is going. It was just a few months ago that the military was going door -to -door in an Ontario town doing health checks. Health checks, yes. What does that mean? Practicing. Practicing. Yes. And why was it that the military was the ones distributing the vaccines? Ever notice that your alarm systems are online now? Yes. Yes. So they can be eliminated online. Ever noticed that they went from focusing on people coming in to putting personal sensors to know where you are in the room? Ever notice that they say, okay, well, if someone's in, we know what room they're in because they're... Someone's in. It's already too fucking late. Excuse my language. Right? No, no, you're absolutely right. And it goes beyond that. I reported on this a while back. There's now technology using nothing but Wi -Fi transmitters and receivers that can see through wall. They can see where you are and they can see so well they can read the printing on a page. I did a report yesterday, I think, that LED light bulbs can be used as listening devices. Boom. Hey. I'll send you my substack on that. Please do. Okay, so search capacity, that's getting, oh, and Blair then on a CBC, in a CBC article, which I reported on, bemoaned the fact that he couldn't get the instant immigrants to be cleared fast enough for the army. So So they bring in instant immigrants, fighting age men, and Blair bemoaned that it was taking two years to get them through the traditional methods of tech seeing if they're safe, right? Because they're letting people in without checking to see if they're safe first. But then when the army has this procedure to try to check if they're safe to put them in the army, they have to go back to their countries and figure out who the hell they are. Let's think about that. But it goes beyond that. Why does the U .N. not allow soldiers with the U .N. to serve in their own country? That's right. Because that would question their loyalty to the U .N. So what our Canadian military is doing is they're very consciously trying to replace our Canadian soldiers with foreigners who will happily violate our rights because they have no loyalty to this country. So Matt, out of Liberty Council in Florida is taking on a case whether Obama had decided that they're getting rid of Christians in the U .S. Army. And if you have a pro -life approach or if you have a loyalty to your country, maybe if you're asked to do things that are immoral, you might not do it. But all I can say will is the best late plans of mice and men. I believe very much that the trucker convoy was a CIS or CIC. am, everything that they do, all of it, all of it, everything that they do has the potential to turn against them as well. And we don't know who are waking up in these conversations. We're bringing new warriors all the time to the table in terms of freedom. Indeed, we are. And we are. There's a bunch of Davids. There's so many Davids looking at this Goliath and not being They're not. And there's far more of us than there is of them. There's far more. So they want to prevent us from being strong. They want to prevent us from organizing. Organizing fearsome. And the message that, you know, your government is, you know, you have to give up on it, is because they actually do fear. They fear government holding them to account. So the message is that, oh, you know, you got to give up on government. just not ones with wounds. So it's horrific. Their viewpoint is absolutely horrific. So communication of the risk to the public. Hmm. This is what they, this is the control all communication. They get to communicate the risk to the public. They get to tell you how severe the disease is. They get to do that. And anybody else who does, it gets to be shut down. They get to own the science again. They get to own whether or not you need to take that life -saving device. They get to own the communication of risk in terms of climate change, because that's part of their narrative. They get to own all the communications of what is risk. You know, right now, you know, the communications are that, you know, Catholic women Or, you know, I am the person with the brain and I'm the only person with the brain and I get to say everything and anybody else with the brain no so yes and what it says the words that it says are communications of risk to the public but what it means is propaganda and censorship yeah that is the censorship that's right and that is the propaganda that's right they get to own it again Okay, providing measures, including training to increase the ability of health care workers in a range of settings to manage sudden and unexpected increases in patient volume. So the people in health care are going to be supplemented by firefighters, paramedics, police, and army for whatever the next one is. It's time to say no to this garbage. they get a little bit of video of that hospital being overwhelmed and the workers there could talk about how they were overwhelmed with all these COVID patients. Meanwhile, all the other hospitals were empty. I have some patents that I've dug up on how energies through 5G, 6G, etc. can be used to manufacture illness. So you just need to turn it on. Yes. In fact, I reported just very recently, they now have done experiments with mice. Now, these mice were genetically altered, but then what do the injections do? They genetically alter people. And they injected these mice then with a nanoparticle, which placed a switch in their brain cells, and using magnetic frequencies, 5G, electromagnetic, magnetic frequencies, they could control their behavior. This is a science fiction, this is, the study is out there. Are they? There are substances in the natural world that help you purge yourself of this stuff. And so at the same time, there are pharma is going after the control of health substances that are natural. Yes. And now, I was talking to somebody in the U .S., Todd calendar recently. And we were, he was telling me that nicotine has been discovered as a substance that can assist with the removal of spike and nanotech. I can see what. I'm, I'm actually a very avid neurohacker and one of the supplements I use occasionally is nicotine as a something, right, and what nicotine does. What's in the news? What's in the news this week and last week? The government wants to get rid of nicotine chewing gum. Right. Because what nicotine does is it's, the name of the neurotransmitters escaping me at the moment, but it boosts the most common neurotransmitter in the body, and that basically clocks up everything. So if you've got processes going on your body that are cleaning out your cells, if you take nicotine and you increase the level of that neurotransmitter, well, what you've done is you can increase the level of everything. And so you've sped up that cleaning of process. Right. So, you know, another thing, I think that quercetin is really something that's helpful. And guess where it has the highest concentration of quercetin? And it's growing everywhere. I don't know. Dandelions. Really? Yeah. So in your spring, you, I make dandelion pancakes. Nice. Okay. So include the following information to be provided by the Ministry of Industry. Minister of Industry. Okay, so if you didn't think it was going after everything that we manufacture and our GDP, there it is. So they get to, they're going to embed themselves. risk and that they get to own the risk and they get to set down the science. Well, there it is. The science I took you to it. Okay. So then it's including vaccines testing personal protective equipment and measures the ministry of industry intends to take to address any supply chain gaps. Oh, okay. Right? So they get to look at supply chain gaps and they get to be in charge of hoarding supplies, right? We saw that before. So they're giving themselves control over our economy in a wholesale way. And then remember we looked at communications. Well, look at the communications capacity and infrastructure. Oh, they get that, do they? They get the communications capacity and infrastructure. So this one group gets all that too. Is get out of the left for electronic platforms and tools. So that, so all your electronic platforms, including electronic applications that enable contact tracing and use your vaccine passport, a person's exposed to infectious disease that could lead to a pandemic. Okay, so they get your electronic platforms and tools, they get your communications capacity and infrastructure. They get to, we have a problem with the CBC now? After consultation with the Ministry of Agriculture, oh, are they going after food? Oh, are they? So remember, to save you from a possible pandemic, because it might be a little bit uncomfortable with a pandemic, they get to make your life absolutely horrific. horrific. And they need very little excuse. Very recently I was speaking with a gentleman from B .C., whose brother owns one of the largest chicken farms out there. They called his entire flock, hundreds of thousands of birds. And here was their excuse for it, no substantiation. They found, they said, in a ditch about a kilometer away from the farm, a bird, a wild bird that said, had died from bird flu. There was no evidence that the chickens were infected. No, no. They never produced this bird. Yeah. And they called the entire flock. Yeah. So, um, usually bird flu, you know, it takes a long time to go across anywhere. And I always laugh at, and I'm like, they should have invented the flightless chicken because birth flu is going everywhere. If only chickens couldn't fly. Well, the other thing is the barns are almost hermetically sealed. It's virtually impossible for an outside pathogen to get into the chicken barns. The levels of protection that they put on these things. It's ridiculous. The farmers themselves go through basically a decam contamination chamber when they go into the barn. They wear suits, like hazmat suits. It's unreal. It's like if there's a higher level of medical security on these chicken barns, then there is in most of our hospitals. But they call an entire flock dozens of barns because they say there was a wild bird found dead, a kilometer way in a ditch. We need to cut this into a lot of little videos as well as big ones because I think we really have to flood the world with this kind of information. Because if once regular people understand they're coming for our food, you know, you'd ask a mother how she feels when she can't put food on the table and my mom? No. No. There's a bigger no. You wake up the mother bears. You wake up the mother bears. There is nothing a mother. If she truly, she's told the vaccines are for safety or she's told something for safety fine, right? You're coming for my kids? Really? You're coming for whether or I can put food in their belly? Really? And that's all. Let's just tell the immigrants. Let's tell everybody. Like, let's tell everybody. And as a matter of fact, we do split these into small bites that we put out on the, on the social media platforms. So, yes, that will happen. So we reduce the risk of posed by antimicrobial resistance. So if they, if they finally just say, well, we get all risk, too bad, all cow, anything that's ever gotten a vaccine or, you know, pharmaceutical product or antibiotics, we have to get rid of them. So, you know, hey, we should reduce the risk of, by getting rid of the herd. Regularly commercial activities that can contribute pandemic risks, including industrial animal agriculture. Sorry, no more. They're going right after it. It's just right there. Yes. And then they're saying promote commercial activities that help reduce pandemic risk, including the production of alternative proteins. Eating bugs. Eating bugs. It's right there. It's goo meat. Okay. Phasal commercial activities that disproportionately contribute to pandemic risk, including a high -risk species. Okay. So a cow is a high -risk species. a high -risk species and they get to phase out commercial activities that disproportionately conduits pandemic risks. So as us doing climate change, including activities that involve high -risk species. You've got to have a PhD in reading their BS, including the following information to be provided by the Ministry of Environment. Oh, really? So it is climate change going after the Ministry of Environment. Consultation with relevant provincial ministers, a summary of changes in land use in Canada. Boom. This is your private property rights. Okay? This is your private property rights. Remember, we went and we showed that deforestation from agriculture, you and your rural communities, land use in Canada, including in relation to disturbed habitats. What's the biggest disturbing? Farming. That could contribute to pandemic risk. It just has to contribute a little bit, tiny little bit. You may animals move north because it's hot enough, such as deforestation. What's the biggest cause of deforestation? Right there. The biggest cause of deforestation is average. Encroachment on wildlife habitats, okay? And urbanization. Oh, there's nothing that they don't get to do with changing land use in Canada. This is going after property rights. They get to wipe it out, take it. They get to wipe it out and take it. Okay, and I haven't looked at the Federal Sustainability Act. So, presumably, that can be ratcheted as well. A summary of measures, the ministry environment intends to take to reduce the risk of commercial wildlife trade in Canada. Okay, well, I don't know if they're going to have to had their rates, the Mennonites, in Canada and abroad, including measures, oh, including, to regulate and phase out live animal markets. Okay, so, yeah, okay, the live animal markets are dangerous. That's because they don't want actually you having meat. And after that, you know, are they giving us B12? because if you can't live without B12. And the only known substance, other than, I think, yeast, is meat and dairy. Yes. So you have a week. And B12 is the precursor for just about every neurotransmitter and hormone in our bodies. If you don't have B12, you will die. And you won't be up to think. And so how do you mount a resistance and you're weak? Yes. Now there's people who are coline. eggs and you need a source of coline in your diet. If, however, you don't have that craving, your body can make coline. So there's a bunch of us, and I'm one of them. I need eggs. And I see it in, you know, in my father. And I see, you know, and then I see it in my daughter. I'm a lot interested in. Summary of the measures of the Ministry serve environment to protect global biodiversity. Oh, okay, global bond. So again, this jurisdiction, right? So how are we spending and printing money to take this abroad? So to halt and reverse global deforestation. And what another way is, is that while all those people living in countries, maybe we have to take them in and them in our cities because of that'll reduce global deforestation. That'll do it. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Right. Right. Okay. Foreign Affairs. Of the measures that minister intends to take to support global health equity. So global health equity means that we're going to have to spend a whole lot of money to make sure every other country is getting dosed up with vaccines that likely sterilize you or whatever. Yes. Or make you an RFID tag. And so this is both doing things to other populations that, you know, in our name. So hurting other people in our name, which is awful. And then spending our money. So there's nothing left in the pocketbook because it's inflated. set out in consultation with relevant ministers a summary of key operative measures or agreements on disease outbreak prevention between the government in Canada, other foreign governments, key international organizations, including World Health Organization, the United Environment Program, World Organization for Animal Health, and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Okay. So first of all, we talked about a lot of people. Let's break this down. The plan is with the Ministry of Health. So the Ministry of Health can have an agreement with all of those people, which normally might be classified as a treaty, or a cooperative measure, which doesn't even even have to hit the books. It's a cooperative measure. We don't even have to know about it. And then all of a sudden, that agreement is part of this plan. So who can that agreement be with? It can be with the Ministry of Health and the government of Canada. So they can just have an internal memo, a cooperative measure, and change law. Yes. And it should be pointed out that it is one of the lynchpins of the One Health Initiative from the WHO, that they want to get the wealthier nations to pay for vaccines, research, whatever, in the poorer countries. As you said, to make sure everybody gets dosed with the same thing. What I want people in farming to understand is they're not going to live long after this anyways. Like, they're like, you know, the people who think, I just got this, like, you know, equity, you know, we did an IPO and yeah, whatever. What's the smart city that you're living like in once they have AI operative? I read this thing called TED -S, and it's an an acronym that spells deaths, and it's about how to get to the vaccine passport in the EU. And health is defined as nine sectoral data spaces. So your health is not, how do you feel today? Yeah, I'm not going to run two miles. I feel great. What is health? Health is data. You're just a data point. This is one health. This one else, you're just a data point. And freedoms, right, they just slowly change the meaning of words. Freedom is freedom of movement of goods, freedom of movement of people as in labor, freedom of movement of data, freedom of movement, I think there's two more things. There's no more freedom of speech. There's no more freedom of religion. There's no more inalienable rights. It's a view of mankind's utility to whoever they were being useful to. It's diabolic. So in this one measure, they get to have a memo that with any of those organizations to control us. And it's part of it all. set out in consultation with the Minister of Transport, the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, and other relevant ministers, the roots by which and rates at which pathogens that could lead to pandemics could enter Canada. So is it coming in by car? Oh, it's coming in by ice car, internal combustion into gas. Is it coming in by train? Is it coming in by plane? They can shut down all movement because, well, a pathogen is coming in that way. And they can reduce any risk. So any risk, oh, maybe it's greenhouse gases. So again, like we solve for climate change, which climate change might, might, you know, cause us not to be able to feed the plant. Right? Just the dumbest setup whatsoever, and who can't see through this has got an IQ of a doorknob or is drunk too much Kool -Aid. Considerations. When establishing the plan under subsection 1 or when providing the required information on subsection 2, the Minister of Health or Ministers referred to above in subsection 2 as the case may be, must. Okay, there's that word must. government telling them they have to do that. They have to control everything through preventing pandemics. And it has to focus. Does anyone know what focus means? On human, animal, plant, ecosystem health, and welfare interface. So the ecosystem, there is a salamander that used to live back where your farm was. It doesn't live there anymore. Let's change land use policy in the city for you. Right? There used to be a beaver dam here. That's where your cottage is in the city for you. Anything that reduces any little bit of the pandemic risk. Take into account the best scientific information available will they own it. They define what the best scientific information is. Leverage international expertise by using internationally developed metrics that they develop for pandemic prevention and preparedness. Take into account the recommendations made by the advisory committee following this review of the response of the coronavirus disease. I don't know. If it's there or not there, I I don't know. This is already horrific bill. Tabling. Within two years of the day on which this act comes into force, they must prepare a report setting out a plan. Now, this is 2024. This was tabled in 2022. There's been ample time for us to show us what the plan is. And they haven't. But I bet just like New Zealand, the minute this passes, they'll have a plan. So September 17th is when our Senate goes back. It's no. Will, this is the most important no. Publication, they have to publish the report within 10 days after it's tabled. And then every three years they get to do a new plan. Oh, now we've discovered having babies, the real way is good. We have to have everybody potted. That's a leap that people aren't ready, maybe for, but Attali, who was the advisor to Francois Mitterrand, advised us and warned us in an interview in 1981 that we were nearly at the point where we could sell mankind man and that we needed an ethical manner in which to deal with that. And lo and behold, he was assassinated. In the updated plan, the Minister of Health report on the progress, yada, yada, okay? Let's go down noun to the amendments to the Department of Health Act. Okay. So the Department of Health Act is amended by adding the following section, the national coordinator, the guy at the top, the top down, whatever this person they intend to be, I'd like to know. Because that national coordinator, what that means is dictator? That is the person in Canada who does all of this top down. That person, the National Coordinating of the Pandemic Prevention and Preparedness, whoever they're putting there, whoever they want to put there. Wouldn't you like to know, F -O -Y, that? Okay, because that, for the purpose of coordinating the activities under the Pandemic Preparedness Act, the Minister shall appoint a National Pandemic Prevention Preparedness Coordinator. From a month. So that person all right, he, her, she, them, that already sits among the officials of the Public Health Agency of Canada. Right. That person is there. They're going to be plucked. They're trained. That's the deepest state, right there. And my guess would be we're talking here about somebody like Teresa Tam. We've already seen what happens when those people, as public health officers, were given that kind of power. Although those ones are worn out. I'm not saying that it would be Teresa Tam. I'm talking about that that's a sort of position that we're looking at, that we're going to, probably a public health officer, possibly, the federal public health officer, whatever, is going to be given this kind of dictatorial power to implement all this. That person likely knows how this is going to operate. That person does. It's you and I, our job is to get Canadians, new immigrants, everybody across the board to understand how this is going to operate. I have a podcast starting at, you know, in 15 minutes. Well, we have still so much to talk about on what else I've discovered in terms of how the WHO controls this. So why don't we, why don't we stop this one here? Yeah. We'll see if we set up a time next week. Yeah. And we'll do with this again. Yeah. So the takeaway points for everybody is that we have to write our MPs, because they can still cross the floor and make a motion, you know, what I'd like to see is a motion by the Conservative Party to defeat all legislation passed in the last four years under this minority government dismantle it all in one omnibus, dismantle at all, including this with a viewpoint that this is so anti -life, anti right and have all in peace across the floor that's that's my vision my second vision is that Canadians tell the Senate no you know whether they review these videos whether they send these videos to you know reporters I want people to really consider where this is going if they you know a lot of people are in denial they think we we finished COVID we did all that where it's all done right I don't want to hear about it. Don't tell me about your vaccine injuries. I don't want to talk about how I'm injured or whatever it is. My vision is we have to rise up on mass and we have to have despite everything else that they're throwing at us right now, a laser focus. They talk about focus. When they want to focus on one health, let's focus on humanity. When they want to focus on a satanic viewpoint of us that were no better than a blade of grass, let's focus on that we are worth something. know, you know, just like Lord of the Wings, that you have to take the journey, you have to get in there, and you can't just sit on the sidelines. You have to get in. And you don't know where the next David is coming from and where that slingshot is. Like, we have to do everything the opposite of them. So if they want us divided, we have to be united. We have to stay together. If they want us unorganized, we have to be organized. If they want us without hope, we have to bring hope. And in regards to hope, I have believed since day one, and I've committed the last four years of my life to this fight, that we are going to win, the globalists are going to lose, the tyrants always lose in the end. But our activities are very important because we determine how much damage they're going to do in the meantime. And... it's when you're going to take that stand. And every day that you take it earlier, your right is easier. And I would suggest to every one of you who has watched this interview this far, and I know it's been a long one, but very important. Sit down right now. Write a letter to your senator. Tell them we do not want this in this country. To every senator, to every MP, to every premier in every province, in every provincial government we've explained has a jurisdictional issue here, right? And the governor general, she can dissolve this government. All right. Thank you very much for your time, Lisa, for your research into this, and I look forward to speaking with you again. Okay. I do too.