Special Report |
Conservatives vs Liberals: Top 10 Fears for the Future
In May, Policy Horizons Canada issued a survey of 35 questions, “Disruptions on the Horizon”, but they gave the survey to 500 government employees, and not to the general public. Knowing that most, if not all of these government employees are liberals I recreated the survey at ironwiredaily.com and over 200 conservative viewers took the survey. The results are very revealing.
In this Exclusive Special Report, I show you the differences in responses in five categories, Society, Economy, Health, Environment and Politics, and I present my thoughts on why we differ in our opinions.
Also note that the Policy Horizons survey was a psyop. The government is testing to see which fear buttons to push to get the gullible to give up their rights and freedoms. From the results I’m able to tell you the direction the narrative will follow in the coming years.
Forewarned is forearmed.
LINKS:
Professor St. Onge’s Article, Canada’s Worst Decline in 40 Years
The DeepWare Video Analysis Online Tool
Resemble.ai Deepfake Audio Detection
I have finally had the time to analyse the data from my recent reproduction of the Policy Horizons Canada Survey, in which the government prepared a 35 question poll to measure Canadians concerns about upcoming crises. Policy Horizons Canada however, did not release the survey to the public, but gave it to 500 government employees. I reproduced the survey at Iron Will Report.com and over 200 of you took the time to complete it. I knew that we, as conservatives and aware of the false narratives, would have very different responses from the government employees, who, I think it’s safe to assume are largely liberals. And indeed we did. The difference in responses is very revealing. For the rest of this report, I’m going to refer to them as liberals and us as conservatives. I’ll also use the pronouns us and them. While I can’t be certain that every one of the 500 government respondents is a leftist, I think we can assume that the majority of them are. They do, after all, work for Trudeau’s government. Policy Horizons published the exact wording of the questions, but not the possible responses so I had to take an educated guess at those. For the responses on Likelihood and Impact I’m 99% certain I got it right. They ranked each question on a scale of one to five. This is pretty standard in surveys, so I gave you five possible responses from Definitely Won’t Happen to Definitely Will Happen for Likelihood, and Not Measurable to Disastrous for Impact. On Time Horizon the survey responses required more guesswork. On the results published by Policy Horizons Canada, they only have three time periods, 3 to 5 years, 6 to 8 years and 9 plus years. I don’t know if they only gave respondents those three options or if the response simply never averaged out to less than 3 years. For my version of the survey, I decided to go with more granular data and gave you the option of five time periods, from 1 to 2 years up to 9 to 10 years. This necessitated adding a new icon to the chart, a circle for 1 to 2 years, although even we only had 2 questions that fell into the 1 to 2 year Time Horizon. However, overall we felt that these threats were more imminent than the liberals did, with most of our responses falling into 3 to 5 years, where the bulk of theirs are in the 6 to 8 year range. Both us and the liberals only had one question we ranked as 9+ years, and it was the same one, Many Canadian Regions Become Uninhabitable. It was clear from the liberal response that they did feel this was a serious question, where it’s obvious from our conservative response that we considered that question something of a joke. While I’m not going to cover all 35 questions in detail in this report, I will be going over the more significant ones, and I’ll do my best to explain why we and the liberals differed in our opinions. Of course I can only guess at this so I invite you to draw your own conclusions. Finally, it’s important to understand that the entire Policy Horizons Canada survey is a psyop. Not so much for the 500 government employees who took the survey, but so the government can ascertain from the responses which fear buttons to push in order to convince the gullible to give up their rights. After I cover the responses, I’ll talk more about this, and also about something useful we can do, as individuals, with the survey responses. As you can see here from the Policy Horizons results chart, attempting to display all 35 questions from both charts would simply make it unreadable, so I’ve split it into the five categories, Society, Economy, Environment, Health and Politics. You’ll notice the order is wrong in the legend. This is not a mistake, at least not on my part. That is the legend they created so to avoid confusion I decided to stick with it, however I’m going to go through the results in order of the sections. On each chart you will see our responses colored and outlined, while I’ve grayed out theirs, although I’ve added the question numbers to each one so you can more easily spot the differences. Finally, I’ll be turning all of this into a Fact Sheet at Strong And Free Canada, my freedom organization, where you’ll have all the questions and responses from both sides in front of you for easy reference. I’ll announce when that Fact Sheet is ready. Finally I have to give a shout out to Matt Halma, a data analyst who has co-authored a number of papers with Dr. Peter McCullough and others. I freely admit that formulas that can make sense out of this kind of data are not my strong suit. Matt gave generously of his time to calculate the results. People cannot tell what is true and what is not. Liberals felt this was highly likely and of great concern, but not to the degree that conservatives did. Of all concerns in this survey, this was the number one coming crisis for us. We also believe it’s going to happen sooner than they do, and in fact the results can be interpreted as a recognition that this is already happening. With AI deep fake images and videos it is becoming ever easier to create a false narrative that looks real. Fortunately we can fight fire with fire. There are a number of deepfake detection tools available that are free and easy to use. If you use Chrome you can install the free plugin DeepFakeProof, which scans images in real time as you browse and alerts you if it detects a possible fake. For videos, you can download the free Microsoft app Microsoft Authenticator which works on both your android device and Windows computers. You can also use the free site DeepWare, where you can enter a video link and it will scan the video for signs it’s a fake. For audio files, you can use Resemble Detect, which scans audio files. I’ll place links to all of these beneath this report. There are other tools as well. You can simply search for deep fake detection tools and you’ll find a number of them, from free to paid. Of course any of these tools could be programmed to lie to you, so work on your analytical thinking skills and ask questions. Does this seem likely? Is it just a little too convenient, and most of all, does it serve the globalist narrative?Similarly we are also much more aware than liberals of the threat posed by AI, many of whom I’m sure see AI as an effective governance tool without giving much thought to how it can be used to control us all through Digital IDs and social credit scores. We were also far more concerned about Downward Social Mobility. This difference is not surprising as, if you’re a government employee you’re probably drinking the kool-aid and are thus one of the herd. As conservatives aware of the truth, we are far more likely to be marginalized for not going along with the sheeple and are already experiencing Downward Social Mobility. Along with Downward Social Mobility, we also ranked the threat of Basic Needs Going Unmet and Food becoming Scarce as of great concern. This too is not surprising, as the government respondents to the survey have high-paying and secure government jobs so they’re not feeling the pinch like many of us are. The most interesting Society concern in terms of the gap between us and liberals is Men Are In Crisis. Once again, I don’t find this surprising as the woke have forgotten what men are, so of course they don’t see a threat. In terms of the economy, we have more of a spread than the liberals but as with all other aspects of the survey feel that the threats are much more imminent. With only one exception we ranked these threats as likely to happen in the next 3 to 5 years, while the liberals almost universally saw economic threats as being 6 to 8 years out. We ranked Biodata is Widely Monetized, Energy is Inaccessible and Unreliable, Household Debt Reaches a Tipping Point, and Large Economies Face Public Debt Crises in the upper right quadrant, as being both highly likely and highly impactful. The liberals had no concerns that made the upper right quadrant, and the majority were clustered in the middle. I would think that once again this is due to the Horizons Canada Survey being given to government employees who typically have six figure salaries with almost no possibility of losing their jobs, even for gross incompetence. Tellingly, though, liberals ranked People Cannot Afford to Live on Their Own as almost as likely as we did, although not as impactful, from which I would read that they saw this question as ‘Other People Cannot Afford to Live on Their Own’. We were also almost equal in the likelihood of Space is Commercialized and Under Regulated, although we felt this is coming sooner and will be slightly more impactful. I personally would say this has already happened. The majority of space development today is in the hands of private companies, such as Elon Musk’s Space X. By underregulated, they mean ‘not under government control’ which I suspect most of us would see as a good thing, but of course to a liberal who thinks everything should be under government control this would be bad. Also, they clearly have not been paying attention to the news as while they ranked Homemade Bioweapons Go Viral as more impactful than we did, they think it’s less likely. There are now home gene editing kits. All it will take is some weekend mad scientist to cook up a new virus or bacteria and it could be a catastrophe. This is not technology that should be in the hands of anyone, let alone people who have little or no knowledge of biology. Finally under Economy it is worth noting that we ranked Immigrants Do Not Choose Canada as far more likely than they did, but about as impactful. I suspect this is for different reasons though. We, who are struggling to preserve our Canadian identity would see lower immigration as good for our country. Liberal government employees likely think it’s bad, as they’re buying the false narrative that rampant immigration is good for our economy, and like to quote a rising GDP as proof. What they are ignoring is that as immigration increases, GDP per capita drops precipitously. Rampant immigration is the major reason that Canada now ranks last of the G7 countries in every single economic indicator. Environment, as I suspected is the one area where we ranked the threat as lower than the liberals, because we’re not buying the false climate alarmist narratives. In fact, the only question where we ranked the threat higher than they did was on Geoengineering Takes Off, but again I suspect this is because we see monkeying with the environment as a recipe for disaster where they think it will be the solution to the non-existent spectre of manmade global warming. We were somewhat concerned about Biodiversity is Lost and Ecosystems Collapse but in our case likely because we’re aware of the real threats, such as 5G and aluminum being sprayed into our atmosphere, and not global warming or overpopulation or any other such nonsense. While, somewhat to their credit liberals didn’t think the question Many Canadian Regions become Uninhabitable as much more likely than we do, they ranked the impact much higher. Once again this will be due to the false climate narrative. We pretty much responded to that question as if it were a joke, ranking it the lowest of the threats out of all 35 questions on the survey. In fact it was one of only two questions we ranked in the lower left quadrant. The other was a related question, under Economy, The North Experiences an Economic Boom. There are two questions here, though, that require special mention. As I said earlier in this report this entire survey is a psyop. What liberals read into Healthy Environments are a Human Right is, I suspect, a very different thing than we do. Most of us understand this is a lever to pass legislation to kill the fossil fuel industry and certain kinds of manufacturing, as well as quite possibly farming and ranching, whereas the liberals undoubtedly think this is a noble human rights move guaranteeing that we won’t all die from global warming or whatever other completely non-science idea they believe in. And finally, Emergency Response is Overwhelmed deserves special mention. Remember that this question comes under Environment, not Health, so they’re not talking about emergency rooms and ambulance response times. This is priming the pump for not controlling the forest fires they are intentionally setting, so they can then tell us that global warming has gotten so out of control that our country is literally burning to death as happened recently in the almost certainly intentionally set and disastrous fire in Jasper, Alberta. While Health had only 3 questions, it is the section where we most closely agreed, likely because the dramatic devastation of a health care system that was once the envy of the world has become impossible to ignore. While they felt that Health Care Systems Collapse was less likely than we do, they ranked it as having even a slightly higher impact than we did. Antibiotics no longer work was a trade off, with us ranking it more likely but less impactful. I would guess that is because many of us have already come to understand that Big Pharma definitely does not have our best interests at heart so we are looking for other ways to protect our health, although we should be concerned about this one. Remember the shortage of antibiotics for children that was manufactured by Trudeau’s government last year. This is another strategy to attempt to make us all dependent upon the ‘miracle’ mRNA shots they want us to believe will be the solution to every health problem under the sun, while those same shots have now killed some 20 million people worldwide. Notably we ranked Mental Health is in Crisis as both more likely and more impactful than they did. Probably because not following the herd is stressful at times, and has cost many of us relationships with friends and family. In Politics, we ranked World War Breaks Out as far more likely, although very slightly less impactful. This could be because most of us know the globalists are trying to start World War 3 to decrease the population, increase their profits and introduce destabilization that will make people easier to control, and that we’re already well along the path to another global war. We had a similar spread on Civil War Erupts in the United States. Again, this is something the globalists want to see happen, especially if Trump gets re-elected. Having the leader of the second most powerful nation on earth opposed to the globalist agenda is very bad for their plans, as Yuval Harari admitted outright at the WEF Annual General Meeting this past January. Also note they are already engaging in predictive programming for a U.S. Civil War. Remember that prior to 2020 a number of disaster movies about pandemics were released. This year’s Civil War and last year’s Leave the World Behind, produced in part by the Obama’s, are priming the pump for people to believe that America is falling apart. And if you are under the impression that America is still the most powerful nation on earth, I’ll refer you to the dramatic spread in military might between the U.S. and China. That is a war that America would almost certainly lose, especially if Russia joins in. Trump has stated his desire to stay out of the Ukraine conflict as much as possible, and I personally think that’s a very wise move. While I feel for the people of Ukraine as I do for the common people caught in any war, the U.S. becoming heavily involved would push them right back into the cold war with Russia, and this time around, likely China and perhaps the rest of the BRICS nations as well. A cold war that could turn into a hot war on that scale would be devastating for us all, which is why the globalists want it to happen. Billionaires running the world was something of a no-brainer and even the liberals seem to realize that, although they weren’t as concerned about it as we are. Likely because they don’t yet understand that Billionaires Running the World means a total loss of their rights and freedoms. Cyberattacks Disable Critical Infrastructure was one of the few questions where we and the liberals pretty much agree, both on likelihood and impact, although I doubt they realize these cyberattacks are being instigated by the globalists to steal our data and convince people that blockchain, the technology required for CBDC’s, is the only way to secure their data. We were also very close on International Alliances are in Constant Flux. As China and the BRICS nations grow in power they will become a real challenger to the NATO states, building their own international economic system that will allow them to continue and even increase their human rights abuses without fear of crippling economic sanctions from America and the NATO states. This will be appealing to other dictatorial governments. Already four new nations have joined the original BRICS five, with a dozen more expressing interest. Not surprisingly, we ranked Canadian National Unity Unravels as both more impactful and much more likely. Remember that Policy Horizons Canada gave their survey to 500 government employees, I assume mostly in Ottawa where they live in a bubble, surrounded by other leftists who are hell bent on reshaping our country in the image of their woke ideologies, so of course they don’t see this as the major threat that we do. Of note is the question Indigenous Peoples Govern Unceded Territory. Neither of us showed much concern with this, but we should. This is what UNDRIP is, the United Nations Declaration for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples which is a blatant attempt by the globalists to seize control of our resources, which indigenous lawyer Leighton Grey tells us that B.C. and Nunavut are one legal pen stroke away from doing. Ceding control of all resources to indigenous peoples. What many people on both sides don’t understand is that it won’t be the indigenous peoples who will be controlling resources, but the globalist forces behind them. To understand the degree to which this is already happening I highly recommend the book Disrobing the Aboriginal Industry by Professor Frances Widdowson. Billions of dollars have been shunted into supposed aboriginal rights and relief programs while almost none of it ends up in the hands of our indigenous peoples. The vast majority of that money goes to lawyers, activists and companies that profit obscenely from this false narrative, and it’s been going on for decades. As I stated at the beginning of this report, the entire survey is a psyop. From the results I can predict the fear buttons our government will push going forward. Of course the completely false climate alarmist narrative, which many young people have swallowed to the extent that they don’t believe they’ll live to see old age. They will prey upon everyone’s fears that the truth can no longer be determined, which will only serve to make people more vulnerable to their lies. Cyberattacks will increase in frequency and severity, and most of those will target health and financial records, which the globalists want for their Digital IDs and social credit scores. Health Care Systems Collapse and Antibiotics no Longer Work are obvious strategies that will be used to convince people that Big Pharma is the only way to protect themselves from becoming sick and dependent upon overloaded and understaffed hospitals for treatment. Mental Health is in Crisis will convince more and more people, especially our youth that they are the victims of PTSD, and therefore cannot be expected to do anything productive. We are already seeing this happen. The threat of wars will justify manufactured conflicts and terrorist acts to create fear and destabilization and be floated as the reason for food and supply chain shortages. However, there is also something good we can take away from the results to this survey. Whenever we find ourselves in conflict with others, such as our friends and family who are buying the narratives, it’s always best to start the conversation with common ground. Both we and the liberals are almost equally concerned about our ability to distinguish truth from lies, and AI is a common source for that. We both feel that Biodata Being Monetized is a concern, as well as, to a lesser extent, household debt, which can lead to discussions about Trudeau’s government, who almost everyone hates and which can be proven to be the source of the problem. I’ll post a link to an excellent recent article by University of Toronto professor Peter St. Onge where he covers that the economic disaster of Trudeau’s government in detail. Also research Personal Information Banks or PIBs, Trudeau’s very own Social Credit Score system. Unfortunately we don’t have much in common in regards to Environment so I wouldn’t advise starting the discussion there, but we’re both very concerned about our health care system and mental health. Common stressors such as the cost of groceries can be a good starting point for that discussion. And finally under Politics you can find common ground over concerns about wars, cyberattacks and billionaires running the world. If you can start the conversation by establishing common ground, you will find people much more receptive when you suggest, gently, that there may be factors in other concerns they are not aware of. This is an opportunity to educate them, and perhaps even in time, to get them to take the red pill. Finally I confess that even I had an ulterior motive in recreating this survey, albeit a benevolent one. Your responses have told me what you are concerned about, and I’ll be working to bring you more interviews and news stories that address your concerns.