The Woke Indoctrination of Canadian Lawyers: Roger Song
You will own nothing, and you will be happy.
In 1949 China fell to communism, and their promise to the workers was much the same. Farmers were granted land to work with a promise that all their needs would be met by the government, as long as they did as they were told.
Roger Song was born two years before the Maoist cultural revolution in 1966. One of two children, he remembers that he and his family lived on 20 eggs a month, two kilos of meat, rice and a few vegetables. All provided by the government under a social credit score system.
Roger immigrated to Canada twenty three years ago. He has been practicing law here since 2008. Roger is suing the Alberta Law Society over their Diversity, Equity and Inclusion agenda, which has been codified by the society under section 67.4 of their mandate. Section 67.4 allows the society not only to dictate that lawyers complete continuing education requirements, but what exactly those requirements are. This year’s course, titled The Path, is a five hour indoctrination video on indigenous culture. Failure to complete the course, which has everything to do with woke politics, and nothing to do with practicing law, will result in suspension of a lawyer’s license.
Roger remembers being subjected to indoctrination growing up in China. The government told people what to believe, where they could go, what they could eat, and above all, what they could and could not say.
In this interview, Roger Song reveals the startling parallels between the woke movement in Canada that is infecting our schools, our colleges and of course the internet, with Chinese Maoism. A system that promised you would own nothing, and you would be happy.
Originally posted 2023-12-06 17:00:56.
5 Comments
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Excellent interview. It’s up lifting to hear another defender of freedom.
I loved this interview from start to finish! Thank you for interviewing yet another sound-minded man who speaks from the depths of intense personal experience.
One thing I feel frustrated about is the use of the word “woke”. What is woke? What exactly does “woke” consist of? I hear this term used repeatedly and there is no definition. In addition, the meaning of the word “woke” implies awake, and someone who is woke is implied to be awake. I woke you up. When I woke up….. This doctrine is the opposite of awake. It is double-speak. This language is the language used to create schizophrenia…..or to split someone’s sense of or grip on reality. This has actually been found by a psychiatrist that is well known: RDLang. As a psychotherapist familiar with this knowledge, and who has seen this language used in families in which there is serious dysfunction (I do not use the term mental illness), and the children have difficulty functioning and having confidence in themselves to the degree that they cannot function in their lives because their reality has been undermined by their parents. Is this what is being created in our society? I think that it is.
From Dr Robert Malone’s Oct 24/23 substack: What is Woke? -he also goes on to provide examples. ( You are not alone.)
:’Woke’: an intolerant and moralizing ideology. It is often used to disparage a liberal progressive orthodoxy. Like its cousin ‘canceled’ the phrase bespeaks ‘political correctness’ gone awry. Though “woke” has its roots in anti-racism, it was mis-used so often that it lost any and all remnants of its original meaning.
Woke’s constant mis-use has ultimately resulted in the word representing all the problematic attempts to redefine society to conform to a very small minority’s understanding of how the world should operate.
Dr. James Lindsay is perhaps the best educated critic of “Woke” and the Woke agenda today. “Woke is Maoism with American characteristics.” Here is a recent presentation by Lindsay that I found helpful in defining “Woke”. https://rumble.com/v2qzc4e-woke-a-culture-war-against-europe-james-lindsay-at-the-european-parliament.html