The Canary is Dead: How the EU Serves as a Warning to Canada
Christine Anderson
In recent years the Canada that many of us knew and loved has become unrecognizable. Unbridled immigration has all but erased our culture, woke ideologies have brainwashed our children, jobs are awarded for anything but merit, and our courts and…
(0:00 - 0:33) In recent years, the Canada that many of us knew and loved has become unrecognizable. Unbridled immigration has all but erased our culture, woke ideologies have brainwashed our children, jobs are awarded for anything but merit, and our courts and governments have become complicit in the globalist agenda to steal from us our rights and freedoms and make of us slaves subject to their totalitarian control. But it could still get very much worse. (0:34 - 1:30) Christine Anderson, a member of the European Parliament, ingratiated herself with the Conservative Canadians when, three years ago, she singled out Justin Trudeau as a dictator. Based on Article 195, I doubt that it would have been more appropriate for Mr. Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, to address this house according to Article 144, an article which was specifically designed to debate violations of human rights, democracy, and the rule of law, which is clearly the case with Mr. Trudeau. Then again, a Prime Minister who openly admires the Chinese basic dictatorship, who tramples on fundamental rights by persecuting and criminalizing his own citizens as terrorists just because they dared to stand up to his perverted concept of democracy, should not be allowed to speak in this house at all. (1:30 - 1:37) Mr. Trudeau, you are a disgrace for any democracy. Please spare us your presence. Thank you. (1:38 - 2:10) But Ms. Anderson has been vocal on many other aspects of the globalist agenda as well. Despite being an MEP herself, she objects to the very idea of the European Union, which is nothing but a model for a global government. I had the opportunity recently to sit down with Christine and discuss the issues that face both the European Union and Canada, but where the globalist agenda has advanced in Europe to the point where they have become our canary in the coal mine. (2:11 - 2:34) In this interview, Ms. Anderson shows us just how bad the situation in Europe really is, and where Canada will end up if we do not put a stop to the leftist globalist agenda. Gangs of immigrants ruling our streets. Energy so expensive that people will freeze in their homes, while that same energy becomes increasingly unreliable. (2:34 - 2:59) Our country flat broke to the point where we will risk being taken over by the IMF. And streets so dangerous that even in broad daylight, it is not safe for a woman to walk alone. Christine, thank you so much for your time today for this interview. (3:00 - 3:10) Oh, thanks for having me. And you ingratiated yourself with conservative Canadians a couple of years ago when you very publicly put down Justin Trudeau in the European Parliament. Thank you so much for saying what we're all thinking. (3:11 - 3:24) But what a lot of people don't know is that you have been extremely vocal about conservative values and against the globalist agenda. And so these are the things I wanted to talk to you about today, because there's a lot going on in the European Union right now. It's probably war coming. (3:24 - 3:49) There's the economy, there's the immigration, and these are all things that you have addressed. And the European Union, because of its globalist leanings and control, is kind of a canary in the coal mine for Canada, because we've got the same kind of thing happened here, but the Union's a little bit farther down the road. And so I really wanted to get your views as really a warning of where Canada's going to end up if we keep following this path. (3:50 - 4:09) Yeah. So when I first heard about that Carney might have intentions of, you know, getting closer to the EU, possibly even, you know, becoming a part of the EU or what have you not. My advice to Canadians would be the advice I give everyone that is thinking about joining the EU Union. (4:10 - 4:24) It's actually run, run as fast and as far away as possible. So the EU, it's not a democracy. It is a facade for democracy, a democracy illusion. (4:26 - 4:39) Just take in the EU parliament. We are by no means a parliament, at least not in the sense that you would think the parliament should operate, right? The parliament usually has the powers to pass laws. We don't pass laws. (4:40 - 4:58) That's actually done by the council. It's the body that is comprised of the members of the national executive. And if everyone, you know, listened to what the teacher had to say in school, in democracies, you actually have division of power. (4:58 - 5:15) And you should never mix, you know, you have the adjudicative, you have a legislator and you have the executive, and you should never mix those. On the EU level, however, they are mixed. So you have the national executive from the national member states that are passing the laws on EU level. (5:16 - 5:31) What does that mean? What are the repercussions of that? Well, it's quite simple. Let's say the German government wanted to pass a law, right? And the German Bundestag, the only legitimate representation of the German people, said, no, we don't want this law. We're not going to pass it. (5:32 - 5:48) So usually the story would be done right here and there. But what does the secretaries do or the members of the government do? They simply travel to Brussels, introduce the law there, or get the commission to introduce the law. And then it gets passed there. (5:48 - 6:10) But then it comes back to the member states, and it's mandatory, whatever comes from the EU, they have to then put it in law. In essence, the German people, the sovereign of Germany, has been bypassed effectively. And that without even changing the constitution or upending it, they just circumvented it. (6:10 - 6:22) And you've got a number of nations within the EU that are talking about exiting. Poland did before Donald Tusk got elected. But there's Hungary, there's the Netherlands, and even the Dexit movement in Germany. (6:23 - 6:40) Yes. How far along do you think that nobody yet, aside from Great Britain, which already left, has come right out and said, we're leaving. But from what you're hearing behind closed doors, perhaps other conversations, how close do you think this is to happening? There is talks about that, especially in the Eastern European countries. (6:41 - 6:53) For the simple reason, the people in Eastern European countries, they recognize totalitarianism when they see it, because they've lived through it. They've seen it. They know what it feels like. (6:53 - 7:01) And they're feeling the exact same thing. So they have learned how to read a newspaper. It is not important what the newspaper says. (7:02 - 7:14) The most important thing, what doesn't it say, and what is written between the lines. And they just see it. So there is a strong movement sort of like away from the EU. (7:15 - 7:34) However, with the Eastern European countries, since they're economically not that strong, they usually get lured back in with the promise of money. But the EU also threatens these countries. Look, if you don't do A, B, and C, as we tell you to do, we will cut your funds. (7:35 - 7:49) That happened in Poland a number of times. So that usually works just fine. In Germany, so my party, we are very critical of the EU institutions for very good reasons. (7:49 - 8:05) I mean, it's the biggest nut asylum in the world, you know, just to say it like that. So we do so for very good reasons. What we are asking, however, the German people, or we should hold a referendum. (8:05 - 8:30) Do we want to stay in the EU or do we want to leave? Just like in Great Britain, right? And whatever the result is, I guess we're going to have to deal with whatever the result is. But I was very glad that Nigel Farage finally came through and he had been campaigning for 28 years on that. 28 years until it finally happened. (8:31 - 8:48) So that was very important for people that are critical of the EU, because it kind of set an example. It made clear, yes, you actually can leave the EU. And there isn't going to be lightning coming down. (8:49 - 8:55) You're not going to be washed over the face of the earth. Nothing is going to happen to you. You simply say, I want to leave and you leave. (8:56 - 9:07) So that was a very important step. You know, kind of like one brick taken out of the wall kind of thing. So yeah, there is talks and we'll just see where it goes. (9:08 - 9:25) My personal opinion is there is no way to fix the EU. Because it is corrupted on so many levels. And the way the EU institutions work, the way it's set up, it has nothing to do with freedom, democracy and the rule of law. (9:25 - 9:36) It's downright anti-democratic. And that is not a mistake that is by design. It is to take away the democratic process further and further away from the people. (9:37 - 9:49) So the people will no longer even know who can they hold responsible for what decision. That's what this is all about. And the EU is, at least in my opinion, and I want your thoughts on this. (9:49 - 9:54) It is a model for a global government. Of course it is. That's exactly what it was set up to be. (9:54 - 10:14) And exactly when this is what is happening, we're learning that it's just a way to take away people's individual rights and freedoms, to destroy nationalism and to give the countries who are members of it really no choice in going along with whatever they're told to do. But it is a failed experiment. The EU is flat broke, getting ready to go to war with Russia. (10:14 - 10:39) It has failed. And so this is, once again, where I want your perceptions, because this is something that Canadians... So maybe I should explain, because you were actually alluding to the exact same, the proper thing here. So I'm totally convinced the ultimate goal, these problems that we are seeing, we're seeing them in every single Western democracy. (10:40 - 11:10) And the ultimate goal, and I'm convinced that is the ultimate goal, they will, they want to install like a one world government, right? Okay. In Europe, they faced obstacles. Because looking at this rather small planet, sorry, continent, where we live together in Europe with so many different cultures, so many different languages, so many different people and their faiths and everything, it would have been impossible. (11:10 - 11:24) And they're proud people. It would have been impossible for them to be able or to be willing to give up governing powers to a one world government. They would have never taken that step. (11:24 - 11:45) So the EU institutions are actually a stepping stone. First, you needed to convince the European peoples in Europe, yeah, let's have this EU institution. And the way we were sold this thing is by saying, well, we've been fighting wars for so long, for hundreds of years, and we need to come together and just stop this. (11:46 - 12:00) That was kind of like the incentive, and was that, you know, we need to move together. And how it started out was actually like a trade union. And it worked fine, right? We had same interests in certain areas in trade, stuff like that. (12:01 - 12:06) So we took down tariffs. You know, we worked together. That was just fine, but it didn't stop. (12:07 - 12:28) It's one step at a time. And now we're looking at this supranational kind of monstrum that is governing us, where the national parliaments, they're the only legitimate representation of the peoples in Europe, are being just, you know, bypassed, circumvented. We're seeing that. (12:28 - 12:54) We're giving more and more competencies to Brussels, but Brussels is, you know, just doing whatever the hell they want. So they are not listening to the people, none of that. But the EU institutions as a stepping stone, right? And once that is concluded, then it's just a very small step to take it from Brussels to whatever, you know, global government they come up with. (12:55 - 13:03) That is a very small step. But it was necessary to get the peoples in Europe on board. Now, you see very clearly what it is, what's happening. (13:03 - 13:11) And there have to be a whole bunch more. You're hardly the only member of the ID party. And there's the other right-wing party in there. (13:11 - 13:20) And you gained 45 seats in last year's election, the right-wing did. But it seems the left is still very much in control. And especially with Ursula von der Leyen still being president. (13:21 - 13:38) And of course, I think most of my viewers know that she's very much a globalist, very strongly associated with the WEF. And so here's a question I've really been wanting to ask you, Christine, because it probably doesn't surprise you, I have a very hard time getting any sitting politician to interview with me, because they don't want to be tainted with that brush. You've got the courage to do it. (13:39 - 13:54) And you can give us a window into the thought processes going on in there. So there's people like von der Leyen, who are globalists, totally on board with their agenda, knows exactly what she's doing. But then there's the other ones, the ones who are on the left, but they're the brainwashed ones. (13:54 - 14:03) They're actually buying the climate alarmist narrative, the whole COVID narrative. They're actually buying into this. And yet the EU is crumbling around them. (14:04 - 14:35) So can you give us some sort of picture of how it is that these people can continue this delusion when their world is collapsing? Yeah, actually, that is beyond me. But we are seeing that, once again, virtually in every single Western democracy. There were conservative parties in all of these different countries, right? But they all started to move into this globalistic kind of nonsense idea what the left was advocating for. (14:36 - 15:13) Notably, Angela Merkel, that started, you know, at the other end of the planet, there was a tsunami and it destroyed a nuclear power plant. Which prompted then the chancellor of Germany, which doesn't have any tsunamis, by the way, to just shut down all of the nuclear power plants, right? So the tsunami at the other end of the world may have destroyed one nuclear power plant in Japan, but it destroyed all nuclear power plants in Germany. That's a neat trick, isn't it? But yeah, she was just kind of like, you know, wanting to stay afloat and wanting to be in power. (15:13 - 15:29) And she just kind of went along and the people were horrified. Oh, my God, you know, this nuclear power plant just, you know, went bust and, you know, the people, of course, are dying by the hundreds of thousands, which is not true. Never is true. (15:30 - 15:40) Anyway, so she just called out a moratorium. That's what she called it. So shut him down immediately to have some time to think about what to do with it. (15:40 - 15:51) So she came up with a plan of, you know, just shutting them all down. And we are now actually in a situation, our energy prices are way up. We can't pay them anymore. (15:51 - 16:40) A lot of industry is leaving Germany because they can't foot the bills anymore, right? But the funny thing is about that, the nuclear power plants that were shut down in Germany had the highest standards in the entire world, right? We are now, however, buying nuclear power because these stupid windmills and the solar panels, guess what? The wind's not always blowing and the sun's not always shining. Who would have thought, right? So then we have to buy the nuclear power from France, Poland, especially in the Eastern European countries. They are building nuclear power plants that the stupid Germans can buy from them since we are so principled, we don't have nuclear power anymore, right? But it's just insane. (16:40 - 17:07) But to me, to come back to a question, it is beyond me why the conservatives in virtually every single Western democracy sort of go along with all of this nonsense, climate change, transgender madness. I mean, you name it, right? And the only answer I have for that, I mean, they're not stupid. They really aren't. (17:07 - 18:06) So the only answer I have for that is because all of these programs, everything, it leads to only one final goal. And that is, yeah, to pretty much tax all the peoples around the world into oblivion to save the planet, steal our identity, whether it's our national identity, our cultural identity or our sexual identity, what makes us who we are to our core, they even steal that to ultimately pretty much enslave all of us. So they want to transform our free and liberal societies that are comprised of free individuals into some kind of a mindless sort of collectivism that is just a malleable mass where we can all be shoveled around any which way. (18:06 - 18:26) The globalitarian misanthropists, that's what I call them, they can shovel us around where they need us to be. So, you know, if you chose your job or, you know, your profession or whatever, what you usually do in a free society, you know, you say, I want to become this, I want to become that. Well, that's going to be done within the future. (18:27 - 18:43) They will tell you where you are needed. And that's what you will do. And if you don't comply, guess what? They have these super neat 15 minute ghettos, you know, all waiting up there, building them as we speak. (18:43 - 18:50) That's where they're going to incarcerate us pretty much. And it's not about our convenience. It's not about, you know, saving the planet. (18:51 - 19:22) If it was about, you know, improving the quality of our life in these 15 minute ghettos, well, they would start with erecting libraries, schools, leisure centers, you know, all kinds of nice things. But what are they starting out with? They're starting out with surveillance cameras and barricades. So why would you need surveillance cameras and barricades in a neighborhood that you're just dying to live in? Why would you need that? Well, my viewers don't need an answer to that rhetorical question. (19:22 - 19:37) So let's, I want to move on to you and you've alluded to this, the issue of energy in the European Union. We've just had this major failure of the power grid in Spain and then learned it was largely manufactured, made to happen. You referenced to the shutting down of nuclear power plants. (19:37 - 19:54) And of course, the political globalist left is object to nuclear power plants because it's the only green energy that actually works. And they don't want us to have that because then they can't control it. And as you said, it's getting to the point where people in the EU, they can't afford power. (19:54 - 20:03) They can't afford to heat their homes. Yes. And I think that could be a major trigger for the people to suddenly understand what's going on and to resist it. (20:04 - 20:14) What do you think? Is it really getting to that point where the people are, I mean, we got winter coming, you know. I know. Again, in a few months, people are gonna be freezing in their homes. (20:14 - 20:22) I know. Well, you know, there is one thing that people finally need to, really need to understand. And that's just the following. (20:22 - 20:44) Never in the entire history of mankind has there ever been a political elite that was truly concerned with the welfare of regular people. So the question is, why do we think it's any different now? They don't give a damn about regular people. So they kind of masquerade it, you know. (20:45 - 21:03) So if people can't, you know, buy their energy bills anymore, they will subsidize it for a certain amount of time. Just to kind of keep the peace for as long as their agenda has been fully implemented. And then they will, they simply will not care. (21:03 - 21:21) It's as simple as that, right? They're still gonna have their homes, you know, they have air conditioning, they have the eating, all of that. They will eat steaks while we eat bugs, right? So, I mean, people need to understand they don't give a damn about us. They really don't. (21:21 - 21:34) They're doing their own kind of thing. And that's just bad. And, you know, just looking at all the celebrities, you know, fighting for climate change and, you know, fighting against climate change, saving the planet, but yet they're flying all private jets. (21:35 - 21:54) And, you know, so like the hypocrisy, people need to understand they will not care about us. They will only do so for as long as it takes to have a totalitarianism fully blown. And then you will find out how much they care about you. (21:55 - 22:00) Not at all. Right. And it's always the people who don't have to give up anything who are telling everyone else they have to give things up. (22:00 - 22:01) Of course. That's right. Yes. (22:01 - 22:13) Now I want to talk about immigration because I think there's probably no area in which the EU, as I alluded to early on this interview, is more of a canary in the coal mine for Canada. Yeah. We have a huge immigration problem here, but it's even worse in Europe. (22:13 - 22:24) Yes. It's just gotten to the point where, and what I really wanted to talk about, Christine, in reference to that, was the impact it's having on the European countries. We see the riots on both sides. (22:24 - 22:31) We've got the immigrants rioting, and then you get the people who don't want the immigrants rioting. One major concern is the violence against women. Oh, yeah. (22:31 - 22:43) From some of these immigrants that come from countries that do not value women. Yeah. Well, to make a long story short, in Germany, we are no longer safe. (22:43 - 23:05) It's as simple as that. So, I mean, to me, it was always, the biggest accomplishment of any society, to me, was always to have a peace in the public sphere, to walk when you want to walk in public or whatever, and you would be safe to do so. So biggest accomplishment. (23:05 - 23:35) But we are sacrificing that now on the altar of diversity and tolerance and what have you not, right? So what we're faced with in Germany is actually there is two brutal gang rapes happening in Germany every single day, every single day. And when I say brutal gang rapes, I mean brutal gang rapes. These women are beaten within an inch of their lives. (23:36 - 23:49) This is what I'm talking about. And that's not even counting the rapes that occur where there's only one perpetrator, right? So we have these random knife attacks. And they are no longer happening on a daily basis. (23:49 - 24:03) We're talking hourly basis, like 12, 13, 14, 15 random knife attacks everywhere, all over Germany. So it doesn't matter where you are. It doesn't matter what time of the day you leave the house. (24:04 - 24:16) It can get you anytime, anywhere. So this is what we're actually talking about. We are talking about separate train carriages for women so they can travel safely. (24:18 - 24:36) What? We are actually implementing the gender apartheid that is known from the countries that these so-called refugees came from. This is what we're talking about. So we are now locking up our women in separate train carriages. (24:37 - 24:54) And women, they really don't even leave the house anymore, especially on New Year's Eve. Because in 2015, you might remember Cologne, a thousand of these so-called refugees just ganged up on women. And there were hundreds of them sexually molested. (24:54 - 25:13) I mean, it's disgusting, right? And since they ganged up on them, like in large groups, you couldn't convict anyone. I think there was like two convictions, if at all, right? And that is a known phenomenon in these Muslim countries. It's something called Tara, Marrakesh, something like that. (25:13 - 25:35) So they literally set out a lot of men, isolate one woman, and just have at it, right? So we are seeing that in Germany. And I really do not want that in my country. I do not want my daughters to be subjected to that. (25:35 - 25:47) But that is a lived reality in Germany right now. And our government is not doing a damn thing about it. On the contrary, here we have now a new government, which has had elections in February. (25:48 - 26:09) And the runner up for the former conservative party, he literally ran on, I will close, that's what he said, I will close the border on day one. That's what he promised. And all the people once again were, well, now he's saying the right stuff. (26:10 - 26:15) He knows what's going on. Yeah, we're going to elect him. And they did. (26:15 - 26:28) So he's now the chancellor. And guess what happened? The precincts closed. Now, 24 hours after the precincts had closed, he appeared in front of the media and said, no one ever said anything about closing any borders. (26:29 - 26:41) So he backtracked it right away. So they are phony. And like I said, it seems to be in every single Western democracy, the former, what once were the conservatives, they just, they're sellouts. (26:42 - 26:57) All across the board. And something I haven't heard about directly, although I'm sure it's happening, it's what I would refer to here in Canada as the criminalization of self-defense. If a situation like that happened, if I saw a woman being assaulted, I'm going to go to her defense. (26:58 - 27:06) Now, I'm a fairly physical capable guy. So I put that bastard in the hospital. Even here in Canada, there's a pretty good chance I'm going to prison. (27:07 - 27:16) Yes, exactly. And that leads to the fact that you will have these bystanders, right? They will take out their phone, but they will not do anything. They won't get involved. (27:16 - 27:20) They will not help. Right? And yeah, but that's what we're seeing. Exactly. (27:20 - 27:31) If you do help, or it's like police officers, you know, off-duty police officers. There was just a big case in the United States. I forgot the name. (27:32 - 27:43) So he intervened. He got involved to save that citizen from that attack. And yeah, he now stands trial. (27:43 - 27:56) How sick is that? Seriously. So, but we're seeing that everywhere. So people are afraid to even defend themselves, right? Out of fear that they are going to be the ones getting charged. (27:58 - 28:07) It's as simple as that. So what does that lead to? Well, people, they won't defend themselves. Right? So, but that's not how our society can work. (28:08 - 28:28) It really can't. And, you know, just looking at Germany, like I said, the peace of the public sphere. I mean, back in the days, if you walk down the street and a stranger, you know, walked towards you, worst case scenario, you just passed each other up, not saying anything. (28:28 - 28:35) Best case scenario, you wished each other a good day. Nowadays? I don't know. He may have pulled out a machete. (28:35 - 28:43) He may have pulled out, he may pull out a stick and just beat me over the head with it, just because he felt like it. Yeah. That is a lived reality. (28:44 - 29:01) And anybody who dissents, who pushes back against this globalist agenda is silenced. And unfortunately, Germany has the honor of having silenced the probably most prominent figure in the world, Rainer Fulmich, who was arrested under false pretenses, lured. Yeah. (29:01 - 29:05) And very recently, sentenced to two more years. Yes. And he did nothing wrong. (29:05 - 29:08) I know Rainer. I've interviewed him several times. I know the circumstances. (29:08 - 29:13) He was accused of embezzlement. It was absolutely false. In fact, the money has long since been returned. (29:14 - 29:18) Yeah. And yet he is still in prison. They want this man silenced. (29:18 - 29:26) Yeah. But see, that's just the thing. And that's how we actually recognize, well, to quote Solzhenitsyn, he was, of course, speaking about communism. (29:27 - 29:40) I would like to alter his quote a little bit. You can recognize totalitarianism by the way, by their leniency on criminals and by criminalizing dissidents. And that's exactly what we're seeing. (29:41 - 29:49) And not just in Germany. We're seeing in Great Britain, you know, Great Britain, UK, Germany too. You get arrested for a mean tweet. (29:49 - 29:55) 1,200 people per year in the UK for the last two years running. Exactly. Have been arrested for social media posts. (29:55 - 29:57) Exactly. For like mean tweets. Right. (29:57 - 30:09) But it's totally fine to, you know, groom and gang rape, like thousands of girls. No one says anything. And the authorities, they keep quiet out of fear of being called racist. (30:10 - 30:29) Right. So, I mean, how worse can it actually get? Well, and that's a good question, Christina. I'm going to turn around on you because you have this experience of not just being European, German, but being an MEP, being in the, let's call it the halls of power and hearing the conversations that are going on. (30:29 - 30:35) And then seeing what's happening here on the streets. Yeah. We know that the European Union is on the verge of collapse. (30:36 - 30:49) They're gearing up for war with Russia. The analysts I've spoken to are doing, they say they're doing this because they're broke and they're looking at Russia's resources and thinking, well, if only we could take those. Unfortunately, every analyst I've spoken to says they're going to lose. (30:49 - 30:58) They're going to go against Russia. Russia is going to ally with China and Europe is going to lose. And you know why? You know why? Because Ursula von der Leyen, we already talked about her. (30:58 - 31:08) She used to be the secretary of defense in Germany. And she turned our military into a ridiculous daycare center. Yes. (31:08 - 31:11) Which is the same thing that's happened to the Canadian military. Exactly. Yes. (31:11 - 31:24) So it was more important for, you know, the kids to be taken care of, you know, in the barracks and everything than to actually train our soldiers on how to defend our country. Right. It's totally ridiculous. (31:25 - 31:32) Then we're talking about a whole line of tanks. They were decommissioned, taken out. There was nothing wrong with them. (31:32 - 31:43) You know, nothing technical, totally fine. But they had to be decommissioned. Guess why? Pregnant, highly pregnant women couldn't fit in them. (31:44 - 32:14) I mean, on what planet would you want to fit a highly pregnant woman into a tank? On what planet would you want to do this? So, but like I said, yeah. And, you know, after the conversation, between Donald Trump and Zelensky in the Oval Office, where Zelensky didn't do quite that well. Anyway, you know, like the European leaders, they came together and they were like, you know, in defiance of Trump and how dare he treat Zelensky this way. (32:14 - 32:20) And they formed this coalition of the willing. That's what they called it. I was laughing my butt off. (32:20 - 32:27) And I was like, how about a coalition of the capable? Yes. But wouldn't that be more sensical? Right. So, yeah. (32:27 - 32:57) But like I said, they're complete idiots as far as that is concerned. But my biggest fear actually is, and you were, I think, kind of alluding to that, you know, when a situation in your own country gets uncontrollable, if the people rise up and, you know, they kind of don't elect you anymore, they don't like you anymore. What do you do? You pick a fight with someone else in the hopes that will, you know, unite the people. (32:58 - 33:10) And that seems to be their go-to right now. Yeah. Now, none of us have a crystal ball, but one gentleman who has had a better track record of predicting the future than most is Martin Armstrong of Armstrong Economics. (33:11 - 33:34) Over 30 years ago, he created a predictive model that correctly predicted a lot of world events. And when I interviewed him recently, he said that by 2029, the European Union will no longer exist. And from your perspective, as an MEP, as a German, as a European, when it falls apart, and I think it's going to, whether it happens by 2029 or not, it's going to fall apart. (33:35 - 33:55) What is, not just so much what it's going to look like, what is the impact going to be on the people? Um, okay. So if it were to happen, I would probably have the biggest party I could think of. The thing is this, they are, I mean, they're already in a predicament and they're realizing that. (33:55 - 34:28) Their window of opportunity is closing, right? So that doesn't only go for the EU, that pretty much every government in the Western democracies right now, they're facing this challenge, right? Because they completely overplayed their hand during COVID. A lot of people woke up and now they're faced with this backlash, right? But I mean, if it falls apart, so it falls apart. I mean, what's the big deal? I think we're in total agreement that it falling apart would be a good thing. (34:28 - 34:43) We need to return to nationalism. But they will do everything to prevent that from happening. So the discussions we are having right now, there is a new committee that has been formed, a special committee in the EU Parliament. (34:44 - 35:19) And it's called the Democracy, European Democracy Shield. So they're coming up with now ways to protect the European democracy, right? So, I mean, they're not even realizing there is no such thing as a European democracy, but set that aside. But what they're discussing is actually more censorship, right? And what Ursula von der Leyen is now talking about, rather than fighting, you know, all the hate speech, disinformation, misinformation and malinformation. (35:21 - 35:59) So she's no longer talking about the debunking, all of that, what I just mentioned, pre-bunking. And she specifically refers in that context to kind of like a vaccination and inoculations, what she said. So in essence, what they are now working on is to figure out what kind of explanation critics may come up with to pre-bunk it before it even happens, right? It doesn't get any more totalitarian than that. (36:00 - 36:26) That is actually, so before, actually you can't even think it anymore and they will already intervene, right? Yes. This is what we're talking about. And yeah, I mean, if it falls apart, and I think it will eventually, but they will put up a fight and they will do whatever they can to prevent this from happening. (36:29 - 36:42) I don't think they will be successful in the end, but yeah, we will be left with economies that are completely disabled. They will no longer be functioning. So we have to rebuild. (36:43 - 36:50) That's what we're going to have to do. Right. Now I'm glad you brought up the pre-bunking, Christine, because as we've already agreed, the EU is a model for a one world government. (36:51 - 37:06) And a lot of people have this sort of odd conception of a one world government that it's going to be, there'll be no national borders anymore. Well, that's not going to work that way. The way they want to do it is to have control of the national governments and to bring them in line with various policies. (37:06 - 37:22) The problem that the globalists have is unlike tyrants in history who had armies to go out and point a gun at people and say, if you don't comply, we'll shoot you. Well, these globalists, they don't have that. And so they have to use psychology, fear. (37:23 - 37:37) They have to get people to voluntarily give up their rights. And the EU, as right now, what I'm seeing is a model of just how far people are willing to go, giving up their rights. They're freezing in their homes. (37:37 - 37:47) They can't afford food. There's people, I don't know about other European countries, but I know in Germany, they've had everyone under the age of 60 now register for a probable draft. Yeah. (37:48 - 37:52) They're going to go to war. Somebody else on false pretenses. Yeah. (37:52 - 38:00) Well, all of these rich elites, as you said, sit back in their homes. It's not going to affect them any. And the people keep going along with it. (38:00 - 38:05) I know. I know. Yeah, because, you know, this is actually mind boggling. (38:07 - 38:34) For the life of me, I cannot understand why people, they have completely forgotten. What does the concept of freedom, democracy and rule of law actually mean, right? It means government of the people, for the people, by the people. It means that the people are in charge and they get to tell the government what to do, right? But it seems to be twisted now. (38:34 - 38:52) And the people think, no, the government is our boss and they get to tell us what we have to do, right? If we speak up, then we're naughty children that need to be punished. But again, it's like this got completely twisted. And that's actually where this whole COVID madness comes in. (38:53 - 39:17) That was a trial balloon. They were trying to figure out how far can we go to get the people to just do what the heck they're told, right? So it was notably, we had a special committee, once again in the EU Parliament, the COVID committee. And first, the title of it was Lessons Learned from COVID. (39:18 - 39:28) And when I read that, I was like, dang, they really want to take a look at where they went wrong and what they could have. No, no, no. That's not what they were trying to figure out. (39:28 - 39:40) They were trying to figure out where did we fail to get the people to do just what they were told, right? And they have figured that out. They actually have. So that was what that was all about. (39:41 - 40:09) And now our fundamental rights have been turned into privileges that the government can hold, grant or withhold, depending on how you, the citizen, behaves, right? So like this completely shift in paradigm that happened. And now what was COVID? That's the reason COVID was brought along, right? And you saw that, especially once again in the Western democracies. You didn't see that happening in China. (40:10 - 40:19) Why not? Because China already was a totalitarian regime. You didn't see that in North Korea. Why not? Already a totalitarian regime. (40:19 - 40:29) You didn't need to do that there. This gaslighting and this shaming people, ostracizing them, threatening them with their livelihoods if they don't take the jab, you won't have a job. None of that. (40:30 - 40:49) But you needed to do that in the Western democracies because we have this thing called democracy. And yes, you do have to conduct elections every once in a while. And trust me, they would have wanted to impose much harsher restrictions on us, but they couldn't. (40:49 - 41:01) Why? Because there are elections. And the politicians that impose these restrictions, they might not have gotten elected again. But they have a solution for that too. (41:01 - 41:19) You know what that is? WHO. They just changed the pandemic treaty or whatever, changed the statutes, the international health regulations. And now the WHO will have governing powers in case of the next pandemic. (41:20 - 41:34) All it does is to provide the elected governments with plausible deniability. And add a political out. So the people's rights are violated under the WHO rules. (41:34 - 41:39) Yeah. Well, we have to follow the WHO rules. It wasn't me. (41:39 - 41:48) They even get to say, I would have never done that to you. It was the WHO. And that's exactly the same concept that works for the EU institutions. (41:48 - 41:54) The national governments say, we would not have passed that law. It comes from EU. We can't do anything about it. (41:55 - 42:11) Christine, I really appreciate your time today and the clarity that you've brought to Canadians who were on this path, but we're not as far along as the European Union is. But it's where we're going to end up if we don't turn things around. And you have been a politician there since 2019 in MEP. (42:12 - 42:35) You are one of the rare ones who actually understands, not just understand what's going on, but are not afraid to tell the truth. And so for my Canadian viewers who are sitting here listening to all of this, you're painting this horrific picture of what is happening in Europe. What is your advice to them? Well, my advice actually is do come back to the basics of democracy. (42:36 - 42:47) And as I said, you are the boss of the government. You get to tell the government what they have to do. It's not the government that can shame you to doing whatever. (42:47 - 42:56) And it's not the government that has the right to dictate to you what your political will is. It's you. You need to voice your opinion. (42:58 - 43:14) I'm talking about totalitarianism lots of times. Totalitarianism works when the government has been successful in controlling your very thoughts. So it is very important. (43:15 - 43:24) Every dissenting voice breaks that cycle of gaslighting. So please speak up. Don't hide. (43:25 - 43:36) I do understand. Yeah, there may be repercussions, but as long as you fear these repercussions, they have power over you. Take away the power. (43:37 - 43:48) Don't be afraid of them anymore. Take it away. And as soon as they realize it's not even working with you, the intimidation is not working with you anymore, they no longer have power. (43:48 - 43:56) On a more practical view, get into politics. Get involved. Get elected on municipal levels. (43:56 - 44:01) Get on school boards. Make your voice heard. Get involved. (44:02 - 44:15) Do not trust the ones that got us in this mess in the first place. You need to bring about the change because ultimately it's going to be up to us, the people. Thank you.