(0:00 - 2:35) Welcome to this special edition of Truth Rx on the Iron Wire. I'm Will Dove, the founder of the Iron Wire. Five years after the start of the COVID narrative and the rollout of the mRNA gene therapies masquerading as vaccines, thousands of papers have now been published on the dismaying panoply of adverse effects, the deaths and injuries that have affected tens of millions, and the myocarditis, the inflammation of the heart muscle, which is killing record numbers of vaccine recipients, including athletes and children, and having a deeply detrimental effect upon the lives of hundreds of millions more. Recently, Dr. Peter McCullough once again gave testimony before a U.S. Senate committee on the COVID mRNA vaccines, this time specifically in to myocarditis. Dr. McCullough is one of the world's top cardiologists. Peter's testimony went viral, not just for the information which he presented to the Senate, but for the force of his testimony. I know Dr. McCullough personally. While extremely knowledgeable, in fact, being the most published scientific author in history, he is humble and soft-spoken. I myself have never seen him be this direct, and it appears that finally the Senate may be listening. The hearing was chaired by Senator Ron Johnson, who has been a pivotal figure in the U.S. on investigating big pharma and especially the COVID vaccines. I'm going to play for you now the highlights of Dr. McCullough's testimony. The hearing lasted several hours, but this video will give you the highlights in 16 minutes. I'll return after the video with the supporting evidence for Dr. McCullough's statements. Please, in my layman's terms, I just kind of laid out the harmful mechanisms of this injection. Can you and Dr. Vaughn, because I think you've both spoken to this, again, in layman's terms, talk about why this caused so much harm in so many different ways because of the biodistribution. Dr. McCullough. 80% of Americans took a vaccine. 20% didn't. 20% did not take a vaccine. The vaccine was never safe enough for me to take. Messenger RNA devised by Pfizer and Moderna has been chemically modified to be unassailable to enzymes in the body to be broken down. (2:35 - 3:28) The messenger RNA is found in the human heart of people who die after the vaccine. It's found in the brain. The spike protein is found everywhere in the body. Three studies now show the spike protein is circulating in the blood for six to nine months after people take the shot. This part of the virus, the lethal part of the virus in the vaccinated, it's circulating in the blood. And then they take a booster, they get more circulating in the blood. It is a killer protein. It cannot be safe. It was not safe by design. Safety trumps efficacy. We cannot tolerate false drug claims. And we saw a poster behind Senator Blumenthal making a false drug claim that vaccines saved millions of lives, specifically the COVID vaccine. (3:29 - 3:40) Well, let's take a look at that. When someone signs consent for a vaccine, Senator Blumenthal, does the consent form say it's going to save their lives? Of course it doesn't. It's not on the FAQ. (3:41 - 8:17) There's never been a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial ever showing that COVID-19 vaccines reduce mortality or hospitalization. There's not even a valid non-randomized study. Thankfully, COVID mortality went down for three reasons. Because we all got the infection, vaccinated and unvaccinated, so we developed population natural immunity. We developed early treatment, credit to Operation Warp Speed. We used all the Operation Warp Speed tools, additional drugs. We treated patients with multi-drug protocols at home so they don't go to the ER. So Governor Greene never saw the patients we treated because they were successfully treated at home. And the third reason is the virus mutated to a much milder form. Those things happen concurrently with rollout of the vaccine. The vaccine cannot be falsely credited with saving millions of lives. We can't allow false drug advertising to be put up on a poster behind one of our public servants. We cannot accept that. So let me quickly... And I will have a lot more questions. So the point I want to make is I think an awful lot of folks are saying that there was not informed consent. I would argue they violated the invaluable principle of informed consent with this COVID injection. I just think that's indisputable. I'll start with you, Dr. McCullough. Do you want to weigh in on that? I've presented at the FDA advisory meetings. I've advised companies for decades on this, so I know the regulatory science very well. When a product definitely results in death, and there are thousands of peer-reviewed papers on this, Governor, the COVID vaccines in some people, sadly, result in death. Some on the very first day they take the shot. That must be a black box warning on the product immediately. I just checked the package inserts for the currently available products, the ones that Senator Blumenthal wants to pursue. Sounds like Governor wants to still pursue these. Our FDA still wants them to be administered. They still don't have the word death in the package insert. As of today, they don't. And so Americans are not fairly informed. Do you have any doubt in your mind that the COVID injection caused some deaths? I mean, what do you think of the, what is it, 38,607 right now listed on VAERS? What do you think the real number is? And do you have any science to back up your opinion? The best data are autopsies. So in the largest autopsy series published to date, I know because I'm the senior author. Of all the deaths we examined, and we re-reviewed them, we had an adjudication committee. We had ways of arbitration, deciding on did the vaccine cause death? The answer is of these cases that came in for autopsy after vaccination, 73.9% of individuals, it was determined that the vaccine was the cause of death. First off, there's Hulscher and colleagues who's sitting right behind me. And again, by FDA's own laws, that should be included on that package insert, correct? Immediately in 2021, Dr. Carol Tosetta, working with the Daily Cloud, wrote Peter Marks in the summer of 2023 and said, where's the black box warning? Where is it? No word from Marks. But my guess is the reason they were so concerned about issuing a warning on the Han is again, they didn't want to, they didn't want any vaccine hesitancy on this, right? And also, if they alerted doctors to the fact that if you have a patient with myocarditis, you might want to ask them, did you just get a vaccine recently? And otherwise, doctors looking at myocarditis trying to figure out how to treat it, right? Not trying to figure out the cause because myocarditis does happen, you know, Dr. McCullough quickly. Myocarditis was so common that in the UK and Australia, they actually did issue guidelines to doctors on how to recognize it and when to get MRIs. That's how big a problem vaccine myocarditis is. Also, one of the points I made is they did not warn, or they didn't advise doctors to advise against strenuous physical activity, right? They pulled that off of the one warning that they gave. (8:18 - 13:05) Talk about how dangerous that is. Also, I mean, the mild. Talk about how often myocarditis is mild versus serious. Before the pandemic, there was myocarditis. Can be caused by Coxsackievirus. The most dangerous type is called giant cell myocarditis. It was very rare. I had seen two cases in my career. One was fatal, but it's in our guidelines. Anyone who develops myocarditis cannot undergo strenuous physical activity. They have to be taken out of sports. It's mandatory because the surge of adrenaline, when there's inflammation in the heart, triggers a cardiac arrest. You can imagine how reckless it was for the sports teams to mandate vaccines on athletes, provide no provision of safety, and then have them go out on the field. Why would these federal health officials, when they're discussing putting that warning, that advisory for physicians as they did their kind of weak need warning of myocarditis, what does that tell you? Why would they pull that out? It was reckless not to provide prudent guidance on reducing the risk of cardiac arrest when a patient has vaccine myocarditis. Whether it's acute myocarditis that we clinically recognize, by the way, 90% are young men, 90% are hospitalized. Tracy Hogan and others at UCSD show that multiple studies, but there's a larger group of subclinical myocarditis. These are patients with heart palpitations, blood pressure swings, atypical chest pain. Listen, this is water under the bridge. Fortunately, very few people are taking COVID shots anymore, but these patients still have symptoms. A recent report by Kalyusmu in Journal of the American College of Cardiology has shown cardiac arrest in people years after the vaccines, and they have found vaccine micro scars in the heart. Okay, I think we've probably gone about as far as we're going to go today. What I am going to do is give each one of you, and we'll end with the governor, you can have the last word. Well, I'll probably have the last word, but give you each, and I really respect it, not much more than a minute. If there's just something non-itchy point you want to make, can you make it in a minute? And we'll start with you, Dr. McCullough. You've asked for us to cite evidence. Three papers by Nathaniel Mead, who's in the audience today, a former National Institutes of Health writer, three of them that contain nearly a thousand references, so they're all there in these papers, have concluded that the risks of COVID-19 vaccination far outweigh any theoretical benefits. We've heard countless wishful thoughts from Senator Blumenthal and from Governor Green, Dr. Green, but they're wishful. They wish the vaccines would have saved lives. They wish the vaccines would reduce severity. I can tell you, because you know this, I was one of the few doctors who was on the real front lines of treating acutely sick patients at home. That's how we reduced risk of death, not via a vaccine. The marathon runner, he passed away because he didn't receive effective early multi-drug treatment. It didn't matter whether he took a vaccine or not. Our CDC knew about thousands of patients fully vaccinated early in 2021 dying of acute COVID-19. It was abundantly obvious the COVID-19 vaccines did not reduce the risk of death. I don't want America to be fooled by this hearing today, thinking that the vaccines saved lives, because they didn't. In the hearing, Dr. McCullough made reference to a paper on myocarditis from the COVID shots, which he had co-authored. Note that two prominent Canadian scientists were also involved in the extensive research which was done. Dr. Jessica Rose, an expert in analyzing VAERS data, the vaccine adverse events reporting system in the U.S., and Dr. William Makis, one of the world's foremost cancer researchers. Also contributing was Nicholas Hulscher, an epidemiologist who works with the Foundation and is another of the contributing doctors to our weekly TruthRx shows. And finally, Dr. Nathaniel Mead, another epidemiologist and the primary researcher on the paper. Dr. Mead is among the most meticulous and conscientious researchers I have yet encountered, and his work is highly respected in the scientific community. (13:07 - 15:02) The release of the paper and Dr. McCullough's testimony before the U.S. Senate has sparked a large number of commentaries from other concerned scientists and doctors. One of the most well-known among them is Dr. John Campbell from the UK, who has been raising the alarm on these vaccines for years, and whose reputation is such that he is one of the very few people able to have his commentaries posted to YouTube without being censored. This is because, like Dr. Mead, Dr. Campbell never makes any assertions that are not backed by solid evidence. Dr. Campbell released a video on the paper very shortly after it was published. Once again, I'm going to play for you an excerpt of Dr. Campbell's video. Probably the most definitive paper yet published on the adverse reactions from the mRNA vaccines has just come out. It's in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Research and Innovation, and it's open access, and I'll be showing you how to access it in a minute. But let's just start with a quiz. Now, here we have the all adverse events reported, filed under the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System in the United States from 1990 through to 2024. So the quiz is, guess what year was 2021, the year of the vaccine rollout? Well, I don't think you'll be too surprised that it's the first big red column. 2021 vaccine rollout year. So that's the first part of the quiz. This is the second part. Now, these are deaths reported under the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System domestic data, all death adverse events reported. And I'm not going to make light of this. (15:04 - 15:42) And 2021, again, is the obvious year there. The year of the vaccine rollout, and we see that the deaths were over ten and a half thousand in that time period, which is completely unacceptable. Now, I'm just going to give you the conclusion of this paper before we look at it. Or maybe just look at the paper first. Here's the paper itself. This is the paper here. Now, it's an incredibly thorough piece of work. This is a very impressive piece of academia. They've tied everything together really quite. (15:43 - 15:53) I was really quite taken aback when I read this paper, the quality of it. So here is the study here. Myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination. (15:54 - 18:25) Epidemiology outcomes and new perspectives. Now, it's just incredibly thorough piece of work. I'm not going to sort of scroll through it all, but if we just look down, it covers amazing amount of detail, ties together all the literature pretty well. So it runs to, what is it, one page one to 43. And the amount of referencing and scholarship in here is really quite impressive. The amount of work that's been done on this to get this compilation. We're down to what? A hundred and... How many references are there? 341 references. Really is quite an impressive piece of work. And the conclusion. We urge governments to remove the COVID-19 mRNA products from the market. Pretty clear. Due to the well-documented risk of myocardial damage, a risk that is strongest for young males in the, well, under 40 years of age. But let's just look at some of the important data that's come out from it now. This first one we see here, this is the adverse events types reported. So this is not adverse events, it's the different types, the different manifestations of adverse events. And we see it six times, the types of adverse events are 6.2 times higher. So six times more than we would expect. And here we see that here. So here we see the influenza vaccine in purple and the COVID vaccines in red. And the more types of adverse reactions are occurring in the mRNA vaccines. But here we see the age groups. So number of adverse events here. For example, we see a nought to fours there, 3,263. The idea that you'd be giving experimental RNA vaccines to children six months to four years of age, I just find it reckless, appalling. But there we are. And then five to 11s, a bit low in these age groups, but still an awful lot. And then the adverse, the number of adverse reactions start to increase. (18:26 - 18:51) And these are normalized per million doses in the different age groups. Basically, as I understand the pathology, once the myocardial muscle is dead and it's scarred, the muscle is never going to recover. We're talking about permanent myocardial damage in a proportion of these adverse events. (18:55 - 21:59) And 10 to 20% fatality rate, quite appalling figures. The day after Dr. Mercola's Senate hearing was released, I contacted him and Dr. Mead, both of whom I have interviewed in the past, to request an interview. Both of them responded within minutes, and we were able to do the interview the next day. Mine is the only interview I know of yet in which both Dr. Mercola and Dr. Mead delve deeply into the data and the conclusions which we must draw from them. For a limited time, this interview, nearly an hour long, is available for free at IronWiredaily.com. A little over a year ago, a Japanese study was released, which tested thousands of vaccine recipients and found in each and every one of them elevated levels of troponin 1. Troponin 1 is a special protein found in your heart muscle. It works like a tiny switch, helping your heart muscle cells contract and relax to pump blood around your body. Normally, it stays inside the cells, so you don't find much of it in your blood. If your heart gets damaged, these muscle cells can break open and release troponin 1 into your bloodstream. Doctors measure this with a blood test. When levels are high, it's a sign that your heart muscle has been injured. Once again, the Japanese study found elevated levels of troponin 1 in the blood of every single person who has taken the COVID vaccines, even those who had no signs of myocarditis. While we can hope this means that, in those cases, the damage is minimal, other studies have shown that myocarditis always results in a shortened lifespan. The most important thing to be learned from my interview with Drs. McCullough and Mead is that, while the evidence of myocarditis and heart damage in the COVID-injected is dismayingly widespread, there are highly effective treatments, and Dr. McCullough covers those treatments in detail in the interview. If you or someone you know has taken the COVID vaccines, I strongly advise you to take the time to watch this interview. As with any medical issue, early treatment is key. From those of you who have no signs of myocarditis to those suffering a severe impact upon your quality of life, the treatments which Dr. McCullough lays out in the interview have been proven to be highly effective in limiting the damage, in some cases, completely. You will find that interview at ironwiredaily.com, titled Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis: The Data. You will also find past interviews with Dr. Jessica Rose and Dr. William Makis. Underneath the interview with Drs. McCullough and Mead on the IronWire site, you will also find a direct link to their paper. (22:00 - 22:16) You will find links to Dr. McCullough's spike protein detoxification and a document from epidemiologist Nicholas Hulscher and Dr. McCullough to assist physicians with diagnosing vaccine-induced myocarditis and the effective treatments for it.