WHO: The criminal organisation that needs to be brought to an end – The Expose
WHO: The criminal organisation that needs to be brought to an end
In a couple of weeks, the World Health Organisation is hoping that its Pandemic Treaty will be adopted.
We should not be debating the merits of a modified agreement for a criminal racketeering organisation, Dr. David Martin said two years ago. We should end the criminal organisation itself.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
On 16 April, the World Health Assembly (“WHA”) reached a significant milestone on 23 April 2025, when countries finalised a draft global agreement aimed at improving how the world prepares for and responds to pandemics. This agreement, known as the Pandemic Accord, will be submitted to the 78th WHA for adoption, which is being held from 19 to 27 May 2025.
Note: The Pandemic Accord has been called various names over the years. It has also been referred to as the Pandemic Treaty, Pandemic Agreement and WHO Convention Agreement + (“WHO CA+”).
Key elements of the proposed Accord are a “One Health” approach to pandemic prevention and, as it is claimed, it upholds national sovereignty. The United Nations (“UN”) regards the Accord as a breakthrough for “health equity” and says the Accord “emerges in the aftermath of the covid-19 pandemic, which exposed critical vulnerabilities in global health systems and stark inequalities in access to diagnostics, treatments, and vaccines.”
It’s unlikely that those who have followed The Exposé, or any other independent source, need reminding that the “One Health” and pandemic-vaccine agendas are nefarious. Not only has the so-called covid pandemic been shown to be false but the subsequent outbreaks of other diseases and suspected to be the buildup for another attempt to declare a pandemic, such as mpox (previously known as monkeypox), respiratory syncytial virus (“RSV”) and bird flu, have been shown to be following the same playbook.
But in the event you need reminding, it’s worth watching a recent interview with Dr. Meryl Nass about bird flu. “We’ve been lied to, and that is how we have been governed for a long time. And we have to learn to distrust what we’re told, and we have to get the evidence and find out for ourselves what’s really going on … The goal is to create covid-like situations where garbage products are injected into us,” she said.
Read more: Bird Flu, GOF: How Pandemics Serve the Needs of the Biodefense Industrial Complex, Dr. Meryl Nass, 6 May 2025
While the World Health Organisation’s (“WHO’s”) Pandemic Accord will not be binding on the UK, as stipulated in the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act [1984], the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, currently Wes Streeting, is empowered to adopt it without reference to anyone else. The section in the Act giving the Secretary this power needs to be repealed.
The problems with WHO don’t stop with its Pandemic Accord. As we have been warning our readers for years, the organisation is rotten to its core. To refresh our memories, the following presentation by Dr. David Martin details why WHO is rotten and should be destroyed.
At a ‘Health & Democracy: Expert Hearing’ held at the European Union Parliament a year ago, Dr. Martin summarised the evidence that WHO is an organisation that is not serving the health of the people but is a criminal organisation driven by the business interests of its sponsors.
Dr. David E Martin is the founder and chairman of Mosaic Technologies and M-CAM International. Through Mosaic Technologies, he has worked on global investigations of biological and chemical weapons. His work includes publications and academic appointments in medicine, law and economics. As a contractor for the US Treasury through his company, M-CAM, he led investigations and supported the prosecution of some of the largest financial frauds in US history.
The following is a summary of his presentation in the video above.
Table of Contents
WHO as a Criminal Conspiracy
For 110 years, a small group of criminal industrial conspirators have been lying to the people of the world, subordinating the human population for their own sinister plans to enrich themselves while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity.
“When the words ‘acceptable death rate’ become part of an industrial norm, we have lost the plot of humanity,” Dr. Martin said. “That’s not my words. Those were the words of the World Health Organisation and of Pfizer and of Moderna when they were given the authorisation to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing THEIR goals.”
Since its formation in the 1940s, WHO has been a criminal cartel with a singular intent. They use a four-step process to execute every one of their plans:
- Planning an exercise.
- Seek funding for that exercise.
- Create a rationale for the thing that they’re going to do.
- Deploy and profit from their actions.
This violates the Clayton Antitrust Act. The Clayton Act addresses specific anti-competitive practices not covered by the Sherman Antitrust Act, including mergers and acquisitions that could substantially lessen competition.
Related: Monopolies and Dominant Market Positions: Antitrust Enforcement Explained, Michael Edwards
In the USA, the Clayton Act was passed in 1913, the same year that WHO’s progenitor began, marking the beginning of a 110-year criminal conspiracy which we now call the World Health Organisation, Dr. Martin said.
Dr. Martin didn’t mention the name of the organisation that was WHO’s progenitor in the USA. He may be referring to the Pan American Health Organisation (“PAHO”), which became one of the six WHO regional offices. Before it was known as PAHO, it was called the International Sanitary Bureau, which was established in 1902. By 1923, the Bureau had been renamed PAHO.
In Europe, Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (“TFEU”) – which Dr. Martin thinks should now be called the Treaty for the Dysfunctional European Cabal – prohibits anti-competitive agreements, such as cartels or agreements to fix prices or limit production.
“Article 101 unambiguously lays out that [covid] was never a public health anything,” Dr. Martin said, because the pandemic was used as a smokescreen for agreements and price fixing to happen in violation of Article 101. “It was racketeering for the purpose of instilling terror to adapt the behaviour of a population.”
To prove there was no “death pandemic” in 2020, even in theory, Dr. Martin referred to data from Zurich for life assurance claims. “Data from Zurich [ ] shows us that in the year of the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance companies paid $30 billion less in claims,” he said. “The data is unambiguous. We did not have a pandemic, we had genocide.”
Related: Covid Related Pay-outs Almost Double In 2021 Across UK’s Insurance Industry
Historical Eugenics and Harm
WHO, the Wellcome Trust and the Gates Foundation conducted a clinical trial for a malaria vaccine in 2011. The trial resulted in the deaths of 66 children in the vaccine group and 28 children in the control group. They not only murdered the children receiving the malaria vaccine but also murdered the 28 children in the control group, Dr. Martin said. Why? Because the control group wasn’t given a benign saline injection, they were given a cocktail of pathogenic disease-carrying injections. But they have not been held accountable because WHO enjoys immunity from legal process.
WHO is a specialised agency of the UN. The ‘Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations’ states:
ARTICLE IV The Representatives of Members
Section 11. Representatives of Members to the principal and subsidiary organs of the United Nations and to conferences convened by the United Nations, shall, while exercising their functions and during their journey to and from the place of meeting, enjoy the following privileges and immunities:
(a) immunity from personal arrest or detention and from seizure of their personal baggage, and, in respect of words spoken or written and all acts done by them in their capacity as representatives, immunity from legal process of every kind.
Resolutions and Immunities of the United Nations, 13 February 1946
Article V, Section 13 of the ‘Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialised Agencies’ adopted by WHO’s First World Health Assembly on 17 July 1948 states the same as the above.
“If you didn’t intend to commit a crime, why would you need to give yourself permanent and absolute immunity from every form of prosecution and, it’s worse, even investigation for prosecution of every kind?” Dr. Martin asked. Because “this is a criminal organisation that set in motion their own law to protect themselves against crimes they knew they were going to commit.”
As proof that they knew they were going to commit crimes from the outset, Dr. Martin described the people involved in the early days of WHO.
Dr. René Sand, who was in the “hospitality of the Germans” at Dachau concentration camp in 1940, played a significant role in the creation of WHO, he said. “In 1947, mysteriously, with the largesse of the Rockefeller Foundation, [Sand] was nominated to become the first director-general of the WHO.”
Within five years, Sand authorised the real purpose of WHO through the then director-general Dr. Brock Chisholm, who advocated for population control as the organisation’s primary objective.
The WHO project is not a public health goal but rather a means to advance a genocidal programme, to reduce and control the population, that began with the Carnegie Foundation’s funding of the Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory in 1913, Dr. Martin explained.
Related: The Vatican and World Population Policy: An Interview with Milton P. Siegel by Stephen D. Mumford, Population Security
Covid, Gates Foundation and Organised Crime
The covid pandemic was an organised crime racketeering entity set up to give itself absolute immunity and control over who lives, dies and has a chance at life.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation provides 88 per cent of the voluntary contributions and so has controlling interest in WHO. This constitutes a violation of every competitiveness law in Europe and the United States.
Not only is Gates’ funding of WHO is not an independently funded charity donation, but under tax laws on both sides of the Atlantic, it constitutes directed donations. Directed donations are forbidden under tax laws in both North America and Europe and do not have a place in the charter of the World Health Organisation or any of the UN-affiliated organisations.
“When I say [covid] is a crime, I mean: it’s a tax crime, a racketeering crime, a money laundering crime and now the crime of racketeering leading to murder and global terrorism,” Dr. Martin said.
The criminals have been using coronavirus as a platform to develop biological weapons for decades before covid. In 2006, Dr. Martin said, “When they actually planned the release of the use of a biologically modified chimaera associated with the model derived from coronavirus, they said”:
To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, [Peter Daszak] said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs [medical countermeasures] such as a pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of process, Daszak stated. [Emphasis added]
Forum on Medical and Public Health Preparedness for Catastrophic Events; Forum on Drug Discovery, Development and Translation; Forum on Microbial Threats; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Board on Global Health; Institute of Medicine; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. Rapid Medical Countermeasure Response to Infectious Diseases: Enabling Sustainable Capabilities Through Ongoing Public- and Private-Sector Partnerships: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2016 Feb 12. ‘6. Developing MCMs for Coronaviruses‘. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK349040/
The crisis Daszak was speaking of was a crisis of diminishing funding, rather than a health crisis.
In December 2010, WHO, UNICEF, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced a collaboration to create a Global Vaccine Action Plan. The collaboration followed the call by Bill and Melinda Gates at the 2010 World Economic Forum gathering in January 2010 for the following ten years to be the “Decade of Vaccines.”
The Decade of Vaccines scheme was the funding base for Peter Daszak’s partnership with both the University of North Carolina and the Wuhan Institute of Virology for the chimeric production of pathogens.
Gain-of-Function Research and Cover-up
In 2014, the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”) sent a letter to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill regarding a grant that the NIAID had awarded the University. The letter unambiguously stated that gain-of-function research had been authorised.
On 17 October 2014, the White House announced a moratorium on funding gain-of-function research. The moratorium was lifted three years later on 19 December 2017. NIAID’s letter confirming that they were funding gain-of-function research was dated 21 October 2014, during the moratorium.
Not only did the letter confirm NIAID was funding gain-of-function when it shouldn’t have been, the “Specific Aim 3: Novel functions in virus pathogenesis in vivo” noted in the letter was not included in the original grant. In vivo refers to in living organisms or systems. The original grant, Dr. Martin said, was for clinical simulations and models. “But this grant was modified with this letter to say ‘we were going to authorise gain-of-function research during the moratorium in living systems’.”
Dr. Martin also highlighted the last paragraph which stated, “as your grant is currently funded, this pause is voluntary.” “How many times have you met a voluntary moratorium?” he asked.
The last line, “or continue to conduct the applicable GoF research until the end of the currently active budget period” raises a particular issue. The problem with this statement is that the funding for the research was provided with an indefinite-term and unlimited amount contract from DARPA and NIH.
“Isn’t it convenient to have a perpetually funded project that needs to stop when the money runs out. When you find out that there is no point where the money runs out because there is no end to the thing that has no end,” Dr. Martin said.
Dr. Martin made it clear that he was not making allegations. He was making accusations. Because they have admitted to the crimes themselves. He pointed to a paper published in 2016 that stated a SARS-like Wuhan Institute of Virology virus 1 (“WIV1”) “is poised for human emergence.”
Read more: Menachery VD, Yount BL Jr, Sims AC, Debbink K, Agnihothram SS, Gralinski LE, Graham RL, Scobey T, Plante JA, Royal SR, Swanstrom J, Sheahan TP, Pickles RJ, Corti D, Randell SH, Lanzavecchia A, Marasco WA, Baric RS. SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 15;113(11):3048-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517719113. Epub 2016 Mar 14. PMID: 26976607; PMCID: PMC4801244.
“Does that sound like we’re just surprised that something in Wuhan went a little Haywire in December of 2019? Or does it feel like we were told, ‘look at Wuhan!’,” Dr. Martin said.
Biological Warfare Research: Covid “Vaccines” Are Bioweapons
Because of his work for the US government in the 1900s and 2000s, Dr. Martin is acutely aware of what the definition of “biological weapon” is in the US criminal code for violations of biological and chemical weapons. So, Dr. Martin does not use the term lightly when he says they were developing a biological weapon. Besides, the conspirators have admitted it.
At a conference sponsored by DARPA and the MITRE Corporation in 2005, Ralph Barrick, the architect of the lethal strand of genetic material injected into billions of people, gave a presentation titled ‘Synthetic Coronaviruses. Biohacking: Biowarfare Enabling Technologies’. (See Ralph S. Baric’s curriculum vitae, ‘Professional Development/Invited Presentations’, point 57, page 36 HERE.)
“Does that sound like a public health distribution programme? Does that sound like something that is accidentally misinterpreted to mean something else? Or does ‘biological warfare enabling technologies’ sound like NOT countermeasures or pandemic preparedness? It sounds to me like biological warfare enabling technologies,” Dr. Martin said.
Ralph Barrick received significant funding for his research, including non-competitive DARPA grants and NIAID grants, totalling over $140 million for “ synthetic biological warfare enabling technologies.”
“So, do I have a problem calling the [covid] injection a biological warfare enabling technology? Absolutely not. Because that’s what they called it,” Dr. Martin said.
Covid Pandemic: Foreknowledge and Fear
On 18 September 2019, “the racketeering, co-conspiring cabal of interlocking directorates, also known as the World Health Organisation,” announced that they would be conducting an exercise for a rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen.
The intention was to create a deadly agent and promulgate fear to drive people to accept a universal vaccine, Dr. Martin said. “[They said] ‘we stated on 18 September 2019 we were intending to kill, and we were intending to kill to create the fear that would drive people to accept something that without coercion no one would have accepted’,” he said.
Related: Event 201, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Profiteering from the Pandemic
As stated earlier, we were told that investors would respond if they saw profit at the end of the process. “Lo and behold, guess what, they saw profit at the end of the process,” Dr. Martin said.
In 2022, Pfizer made $100 billion in covid profit from public funds. In 2023, NIAID received a back payment royalty of $400 million from Moderna. This is the first of the royalty payments. This is after lying to Congress in October 2020 when Moderna was asked to verify whether NIAID was promoting an injection that would enrich NIAID. NIAID is one of the 27 institutes and centres within the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”). Anthony Fauci also said NIH had no financial interest in Moderna’s “vaccine.”
WHO wasn’t going to be left out. It requested an expansion of its budget by 11 per cent, which was then donated by those who profited from the vaccine. In other words, “they laundered the money right back [to WHO],” Dr. Martin said.
Summary: Racketeering and Global Terrorism
Covid is not a public health crime; it is not a constitutional crime. Covid is a criminal act done by a criminal institution (WHO) established to enable criminal behaviour since its foundation in 1947.
The crime is that there are criminal racketeers who conspired and developed an “emergency.” The same criminal racketeers planned, manufactured and carried out agency capture to control the narrative and ensure we use terms such as “vaccine,” ”face mask,” “health” and “social distancing,” none of which had ordinary use definition.
The criminal racketeers price-fixed with interlocking directorates, where known competitors came together and fixed prices in direct collusion, violating European Union standards and the Sherman Act and Clayton Act in the United States.
“These were crimes, it was organised crime and we should treat it as such,” Dr. Martin said.
The criminal racketeers publicly lied under oath, resulting in death and destruction of liberty and destruction of the integrity of well-meaning people. Dr. Martin acknowledged the contributions of academic and medical professionals who tried to stop the corrupt outcomes of these crimes. But “until we treat this as a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers resulting in global terrorism for the purpose of profiteering and murder – until we have that conversation, we’re having the wrong conversation,” he said.
Call to Action: Destroy WHO
“We are not here to debate the merits of a modified agreement for a criminal racketeering organisation. We are here to end the criminal organisation itself,” Dr. Martin said.
He made a call to every person on Earth to take a stand against the criminal organisation, specifically WHO, and to work towards its destruction rather than just limiting its power.
“Don’t just limit the power of the WHO. Destroy the WHO,” he said.
Featured image: “Member States made history in Geneva today by reaching consensus on a proposed Pandemic Accord”—Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus on Twitter, 16 April 2025
#image_title
” data-image-caption=”
#image_title
” data-medium-file=”https://i0.wp.com/expose-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/FtMay7.png?fit=300%2C169&ssl=1″ data-large-file=”https://i0.wp.com/expose-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/FtMay7.png?fit=639%2C359&ssl=1″>
While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.
