UK government plans to mandate new homes have solar panels and also plans to block sunlight reaching the Earth’s surface; the two do not go together – The Expose
UK government plans to mandate new homes have solar panels and also plans to block sunlight reaching the Earth’s surface; the two do not go together
Almost all new homes in England will be legally required to have solar panels installed by 2027, as part of the UK government’s net zero plans. At the same time, the Government is funding “experiments” to reduce the amount of sunlight that reaches the Earth’s surface, where the solar panels are.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
The UK’s Future Homes Standard aims to ensure that new homes built from 2025 produce 75-80% fewer carbon emissions compared to homes built under the current Building Regulations. It will require new homes to have very high levels of energy efficiency and low-carbon heating systems, ensuring they contribute to the UK’s net-zero carbon emissions target.
The standard includes specific performance requirements for building elements like external walls, roofs, floors, windows and doors, as well as minimum efficiencies for heating systems, ventilation and lighting. It also demands that people’s homes be adorned with solar panels.
“The so-called Future Homes Standard regulations is due to be unveiled ‘soon’, billed as ensuring that properties are ‘highly efficient’ and do not have fossil fuel boilers by 2030,” the Daily Mail reported. “The latest version of the blueprint could see four-fifths of new homes required to have solar panels covering 40 per cent of their footprint.”
A Ministry of Housing spokesman said, “Through the Future Homes Standard we plan to maximise the installation of solar panels on new homes, as part of our ambition to ensure all new homes are energy efficient, and will set out final plans in due course.”
This mandate is expected to add between £3,000 and £4,000 to the cost of building a home.
Meanwhile, war criminal and former Prime Minister Tony Blair has said that the government’s net zero targets are “unrealistic” which has caused the Labour Party to descend into bitter infighting, with some Members of Parliament and unions urging a re-evaluation of net zero policies while others are defending them.
A day after issuing his comments, Blair, who has advised Sir Keir informally, backed down and insisted he supported Labour’s plan to reach net zero by 2050.
Blair wasn’t criticising the false “climate change” premise on which net zero policies are built. He merely criticised the current net zero approach as “doomed to fail” and called for a pragmatic “reset,” arguing that people in developed countries are unwilling to make financial sacrifices and lifestyle changes when their impact on global emissions is minimal.
Downing Street failed to guarantee the UK’s net zero czar, Ed Miliband, would still be in post by the next election, sparking claims that senior figures in Number 10 are trying to oust Mad Miliband over his hardline climate change policies.
While politicians debate current net zero policies, the climate change scam continues. And it doesn’t come cheap. Solar power, for example, is at least 10 times more expensive than natural gas. And the total cost of the UK’s “net zero transition” is going to cost the taxpayer a fortune. According to the Office for Budget Responsibility’s 2021 Fiscal Risks report, the fiscal cost of achieving net zero in the UK was estimated at around £1.4 trillion over the next 30 years, which translates to approximately £50,000 per household.
Read more: What will Net Zero cost? The Critic, September 2021
To that, add the cost of the UK government’s efforts to reduce or block the sunlight reaching the Earth’s surface as a way to “combat global warming.” These experiments involve injecting aerosolised particles into the stratosphere and brightening clouds to reflect sunlight away from Earth. The “experiments” to reduce the sunlight that reaches the Earth’s surface are being conducted through the Advanced Research + Invention Agency (“ARIA”), a clandestine outfit that is sponsored by the Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology. It was created via the ARIA Act (2022) with an initial investment of £800 million from the UK Government to pursue high-risk, high-reward research projects.
A fact that may have escaped ARIA is that “sunlight is not a pollutant, it is the language of life,” as a petition to stop the UK’s Sun-dimming experiments quite rightly states.
Read more: UK government is openly funding solar geoengineering; make your voice heard
It may also have escaped ARIA’s attention that on the Earth’s surface are the solar panels that the UK government is in the process of mandating. Solar panels are designed to convert sunlight into electricity using photovoltaic cells. It is claimed that they can generate electricity without direct sunlight but they are most efficient under direct sunlight. On cloudy or overcast days, they can still capture diffuse light and convert it into energy but at a lower power output efficiency.
Current commercial solar panels only convert 15%-22% of the Sun’s energy into electricity. To achieve this, typically, an average of four to six peak sun hours per day is enough sunlight to make a solar renewable energy system worthwhile, according to Green Power Energy which is a supplier of solar panels and is likely prone to overselling their product.
Peak sun hours refer to the duration of sunlight that is strong enough to generate the maximum power output of the solar panels. For example, if a solar panel has a power output of 250 watts and it receives four hours of peak sun, it would generate 1 kilowatt-hour of electricity.
Conditions that affect the efficiency of solar panels include the angle and orientation of the panels, the time of year (sunlight hours and solar intensity), the weather (e.g. clouds, rain and snow) and whether the panels are installed in full Sun exposure or shade conditions.
Adding to the reliability and efficiency problems of solar panels is the geographical location.
The effect of seasonal changes on photovoltaic solar panel efficiency is also heavily influenced by geographical location … regions closer to the equator experience less variation in day length and sunlight intensity throughout the year, making solar energy more reliable in those areas. For instance, solar panels installed in tropical or subtropical regions like parts of Africa, South Asia, or South America can generate power more consistently across seasons.
In contrast, regions farther from the equator, particularly in higher latitudes, experience much more pronounced seasonal variations in sunlight. In places like Scandinavia, Alaska or northern Canada, solar energy production may drop dramatically during the winter months due to limited sunlight.
Does Seasonal Changes Affect the Efficiency of Solar Panel? Invertor, 2 April 2024
Because of its geographic location, the UK has among the lowest theoretical photovoltaic power potential in the world, according to the World Bank. The theoretical potential of solar power is determined by the long-term distribution of solar resource from global horizontal irradiation (direct and indirect sunlight).
And for practical photovoltaic potential, the World Bank ranks the UK as Level 0, the lowest maximum potential.
Read more: World Bank report states that solar power has minimal potential to produce electricity in the UK
So, let’s put this all together. The UK government wants to enforce that all new homes in England are equipped with solar panels to produce electricity, at the buyer’s expense. The UK government also wants to reduce the amount of sunlight that will reach those solar panels by using chemtrails and other solar geoengineering methods, at the taxpayers’ expense. This obvious contradiction of seeking to harness sunlight while reducing sunlight is not due to stupidity or lack of common sense – it is an agenda. What agenda?
The goal of the “green economy” is wealth redistribution that benefits multinational corporations and private banks, while stripping away individual freedom, wealth and property. A government that is implementing or supporting plans to strip away our liberties is acting unconstitutionally.
As stated in Magna Carta (1215), the government cannot remove the liberties and customs that we have had for thousands of years. With its net zero agenda and solar geoengineering projects, the UK government is acting outside what the constitution permits. The UK government is, therefore, acting criminally.
Read more:
- The decades-long “climate change” plan to strip away personal freedom, wealth and property
- The Climate and Nature Bill will destroy the UK economy and end private property
- David Kurten: Net Zero Zealots will use the Energy Bill to take your home away from you
#image_title
” data-image-caption=”
#image_title
” data-medium-file=”https://i0.wp.com/expose-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/FtMay1c.png?fit=300%2C169&ssl=1″ data-large-file=”https://i0.wp.com/expose-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/FtMay1c.png?fit=639%2C359&ssl=1″>
While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.
