Dr. Guy Hatchard discusses the bizarre and anti-nature decisions being made by governments and public services. 

In the UK, there are the “experiments” to dim the Sun and the NHS is defying a court ruling that sex refers to biological sex by refusing to have women-only wards. 

In America, while concerns are justified about falling birth rates, the role fabrics that are used to make our clothes is being ignored; underwear made from polyester negatively affects fertility.

And in New Zealand there is the proposed Gene Technology Bill.

All these unnatural “solutions” contribute to problems we are seeing.  Nature knows better than man, Dr. Hatchard says.  “Nature is not just neutral. It is trying to help us.”  It’s time to stop scoffing at those who are choosing more natural lifestyles.

A Licence To Kill

By Dr. Guy Hatchard, 25 April 2025

The average number of sunshine hours in New Zealand is above 2,000 per year. In the United Kingdom, it averages around 1,350. [For solar panels to be worthwhile, a minimum of 4-6 hours of sunshine strong enough to generate power is required per day, which translates to 1,460 – 2,190 hours of “peak sun hours” per year.  Because of its geographical location, the UK is well below the minimum of sunshine required for solar panels to be an effective source of energy.  Read more HERE.]

Incredibly, The Telegraph reports that the British government has decided to approve experiments to “dim the light of the sun.” The British boffins (is that the right term or should it be “buffoons” or possibly “dimwits”) are going to try to turn clouds whiter and intend to seed the upper atmosphere with pollution to deflect light from the sun. I suppose they are aware of periods in history when particles emitted by volcanic eruptions dimmed the light of the sun and caused widespread famine and death. But no matter, Professor Mark Symes, the programme director for ARIA (Advanced Research and Invention Agency), said: “Everything we do is going to be safe by design.”

The UK isn’t stopping there. In what should be a win for common sense, the Supreme Court has ruled there are only two sexes, but a movement has sprung up across the country. Some hospitals are defying moves to have women-only wards. The London Marathon organisers have decided to let “trans” people run in the women’s category, offering a lifeline to those bearded ladies with their larger hearts and bigger bone structures who aspire to the top step of sporting achievement. Sometimes we just don’t know what to think.

Over in the United States, President Trump is worried that there are too few genuine American babies being born and too many foreign tourist births. A curious mix. The fall in fertility that has engulfed the Western world should be a matter of concern. Certainly, our diet and lifestyle are having an effect, but have we considered our clothing? We should be. A study published in 1993 entitled ‘Effect of different types of textile fabric on spermatogenesis: an experimental study’ found that male dogs that were dressed in polyester underpants lost fertility, whereas there was no effect on those dressed in cotton or wool. Similar studies on female dogs in 2007/8 found falls in fertility and effects of polyester garments on pregnancy including spontaneous abortions. How they managed to persuade the dogs to wear underpants for six months is a mystery; an even bigger mystery is why they didn’t ask the same questions of humans? How dim is that? This should have raised red flags thirty years ago. Instead, our underwear shops are full of polyester.

Nature Knows Better Than Man How To Organise

Nature is not just neutral. It is trying to help us. Fashionable scientists and governments from both sides of the aisle scoff at those sticking to natural living. It seems that everyone these days feels they have the right to edit or cancel nature. Have we forgotten that nature has laws? These are not rules, they are paths to promote evolution. Physical laws have a common mathematical structure of least action. With their cosmic reach, they have succeeded over millions of aeons and continue to operate in our favour today. Nature is not just neutral, as some seem to think; it supports and promotes health. Organic cotton vs polyester, whole foods vs processed foods, sunshine vs artificial light, herbs vs chemicals, the fragrance of a rose vs synthetic scents, natural immunity vs injections, fresh air vs air conditioning, spring water vs chlorinated and fluoridated water, the human voice vs autotune: we know which ones come first. Take one step more and realise that “natural” is not just helpful, it is essential. And then a second step to realise that thousands of synthetic chemicals and processes are polluting and degrading life on the planet, the air, the water, the soil, our food, our life and our health.

Most people can feel the distinction between the real and the synthetic, you can touch, see, taste, smell or hear the difference. Consumers instinctively care about traditional natural foods. A misconception of the New Zealand Gene Technology Bill and similar biotech deregulation around the world is the suggestion that there will be a high demand for “climate-friendly” alternative foods. This doesn’t seem to be the case. An article from the Australian Daily Mail entitled ‘Vegan ‘butcher’ unleashes as business dries up amid surprising new trend: ‘We’re out of money’’. It documents falling demand for plant-based meat alternatives with multiple companies in the industry going under during the last two years.

The article documents the reasons consumers are turning away, including:

• Higher price: “Budget concerns are a much bigger factor now, and also environmental concerns, [i.e. long-term damage to the environment].”
• “Plant-based was considered healthy, then people realised it’s mostly processed foods and the trend now is on whole foods.”

Most of these meat alternatives are produced using biotechnology processes subject to residual DNA contamination in virtually all products. Contrary to the expectations of governments and biotechnology entrepreneurs, these are not proving attractive to consumers. They aren’t economic winners for anyone.

There is a deeper agenda here. Cast aside for a moment all the legislative fluff contained in hundreds of pages of New Zealand’s Gene Technology Bill, the main purpose appears to be the removal of any requirement to label the genetically modified (“GM”) origin of biotechnology foods. This will remove any element of consumer preference. We simply won’t know what we are eating. The biotechnology moguls believe removal of any labelling is the only way for GM foods to establish a market presence. This amounts to a carte blanche to experiment on the public, a “licence to kill” which extends into the field of medicine as happened during the pandemic.

Of course, under the proposed regulatory regime, GM food will not be sold without any labels; their labels will happily splash about deceptive and misleading words like “natural,” “healthy,” “whole,” “nutritious,” “tasty” and so on without any hint of their GM origins. The whole Gene Technology Bill enterprise is an intentional consumer fraud. 

We Cannot Change The Past, But What We Do In The Present Can Change Our Future

[For New Zealanders:] Write to your MP, demand the withdrawal of the Gene Technology Bill and a provision for full disclosure labelling of all genetically altered origins including processing using genetically modified microorganisms. Tell your friends, shopkeepers you know and work colleagues about the Gene Technology Bill. There has been so little public discussion that few people are aware of its draconian provisions, It also contains a clause legalising medical mandates. The Bill should be withdrawn.

About the Author

Guy Hatchard, PhD, is a New Zealander who was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food testing and safety company (now known as FoodChain ID). 

You can subscribe to Dr. Hatchard’s websites HatchardReport.com and GLOBE.GLOBAL for regular updates by email. GLOBE.GLOBAL is a website dedicated to providing information about the dangers of biotechnology.  You can also follow Dr. Hatchard on Twitter HERE and Facebook HERE.

Follow Daily Expose on Telegram