(0:00 - 0:21) Good evening, I'm Will Dove, and these are the top stories for Friday, June 6th. In today's news, Mark Carney's government has wasted no time in tabling a new surveillance and control bill. Finally, a published study confirms the strong link between vaccines and SIDS, and yet another study on mRNA vaccines reveals their link with turbocancers. (0:22 - 3:24) Bill C-2, introduced by Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangari, under the title The Strong Borders Act, is raising significant concern among Canadians over what many see as an escalation of government powers at the expense of fundamental freedoms and privacy. While the Act is billed as a necessary tool to combat organized crime and money laundering, critics argue it veers far beyond its stated intent, threatening both civil liberties and longstanding financial practices. The legislation would introduce sweeping new surveillance powers, including provisions allowing law enforcement to intercept mail in transit, effectively repealing privacy protections that have shielded Canadians' correspondence since Confederation. Notably, existing laws already enable police to track suspicious letters and packages, and even conduct sting operations by posing as mail carriers, making C-2 for this stated purpose unnecessary. Bill C-2 also aims to compel nearly every organization offering any form of electronic service to Canadians to arrange user data in formats easily accessible by law enforcement or intelligence agencies. This could affect a broad swath of companies. Social media sites, cloud storage, telecoms, gaming platforms, and many more would be required to provide subscriber information, including location data, without a warrant or judicial oversight. Matt Hatfield, Executive Director of Open Media, highlighted the danger, noting it would be possible for police, CSIS agents, border agents, and even special constables to demand this kind of information without going before a judge. As if the aforementioned aren't enough of a violation of our rights, C-2 would also restrict cash transactions. If passed, it would become a criminal offense for any business, professional, or charity to accept cash donations, deposits, or payments of $10,000 or more, even if the amount is structured as a smaller series of payments. This mirrors Quebec's Bill 54, which lets police presume anyone carrying $2,000 or more in cash is involved in criminal activity, allowing for seizure of funds and forcing citizens to prove their innocence to reclaim it. Though the government points out that few Canadians use such large amounts of cash, critics warn the threshold could easily be lowered, eroding privacy and autonomy further with each step. Once the precedent is set, it becomes simple for the federal government to reduce the limit to $5,000, then $1,000, and even lower, effectively phasing out cash altogether. This is seen as a slippery slope towards totalitarian oversight, where personal financial transactions are constantly visible to authorities and subject to control through central bank digital currencies and digital IDs. Bill C-2 is quite simply a preparatory step by our globalist-controlled liberal government to set us up for total control of the populace simply by restricting how we can use or even carry our own money. (3:25 - 3:52) And, as usual, they are hoodwinking voters by calling it an anti-crime law. This is as much an anti-crime law as Trudeau's Gun Ban Bill is, taking guns away from law-abiding citizens to make us defenseless before government jack-booted armed enforcers, while doing nothing to disarm the actual criminals. The bill was introduced on May 26th, just five days after Parliament reconvened under Carney's government, and passed first reading a week later. (3:53 - 5:54) It's clear that our globalist-liberal puppets are going to attempt to ram this bill through as quickly as possible. We strongly recommend that you contact your MP and insist that they vote against this bill. New research analyzing 2,605 infant deaths reported to VAERS from 1990 to 2019 reveals 75% of sudden infant death syndrome SIDS cases occurred within seven days of vaccination, peaking sharply on day two. The study attributes this pattern to newborns' underdeveloped CYP450 enzymes, which detoxify drugs and environmental toxins. Preterm infants face heightened risks due to accelerated vaccine schedules and routine Tylenol use, which further inhibits detoxification. Epidemiologist Nicholas Hulscher describes the findings as a biological signature of vaccine injury, noting coroners frequently overlook neuropathological evidence to avoid implicating vaccines. In Boteman versus HHS, autopsy reports showed missed brainstem abnormalities in a child who died post-vaccination. Pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas observed zero SIDS cases among unvaccinated patients in his practice, contrasting with national averages. Despite calls for genetic screening to identify high-risk infants, critics accuse health agencies of ignoring precautionary measures. Karl Jablonowski of Children's Health Defense argues caesarean deliveries and aggressive neonatal vaccination compound risks, stating, Every SIDS death should be treated as a potential vaccine homicide. The study demands an immediate halt to vaccines for children under 1 and criminal penalties for providers administering them. It seems that new reports on the dangers of mRNA vaccines are now coming out weekly, and yet Health Canada continues to claim the COVID vaccines are safe and effective. (5:54 - 6:32) The latest study, released this week, reveals that these shots may induce cancer-linked changes in bone marrow within weeks of injection, linked to the emerging scientific evidence pointing to the connection between mRNA technology and alterations in the body's fundamental immune system processes. Researchers cited in the report claim that, upon administering mRNA shots, there is rapid and notable reprogramming of bone marrow cells. These changes have been characterized as cancer-linked, implying that the altered bone marrow may create a biological environment more susceptible to the development of cancerous cells. (6:33 - 8:07) These effects are seen within a matter of weeks following vaccination. The report refers to laboratory analyses and cellular studies observing that immune cell populations and their behavior are markedly shifted by the presence of spike protein-coding mRNA. In particular, the reprogramming appears to affect the way bone marrow cells differentiate and respond to subsequent immune triggers. Scientists referenced in the article warn that these shifts can compromise the body's ability to detect and destroy abnormal or precancerous cells, potentially opening the door to tumor formation. One key point highlighted is the speed at which these changes reportedly occur. Rather than being a gradual effect, the article emphasizes that this reprogramming is observable in a short time frame following injection, raising questions about long-term health implications for recipients. Some experts stress that these findings should prompt immediate further study and potential re-evaluation of current public health policies on mRNA vaccine administration, especially for vulnerable populations. While exact statistics regarding the prevalence of these changes among vaccinated individuals is not available, the study does note that the cellular reprogramming documented in laboratory settings is robust and consistent. Scientists in the article call for wider independent investigations to quantify and better understand the risks and mechanisms involved. I'm Will Dove, and those are the top stories for Friday, June 6th. Stay tuned next week as I'll be introducing my new co-anchor, Hannah Byrne.