(0:00 - 0:56) When most of us refer to the trans agenda or the trans movement, we mean transgenderism, people who believe they can choose their gender. But independent journalist Jennifer Bilek has written an excellent book which reveals that transgenderism and transhumanism, the globalist ideology of merging humans with machines, are in fact one and the same trans agenda. Transsexual, transgender, transhuman dispatches from the 11th hour is an expose of how a handful of wealthy and influential people have hijacked the political left, financed transgender clinics and woke educational systems, and manipulated governments and legal organizations all for the purpose of normalizing transhumanism, which should really be called anti-humanism. (0:57 - 1:31) Because if they are allowed to succeed in their agenda, it could well lead to the end of what it means to be human. Jennifer, welcome to the show. Hey Will, thanks for having me on. It's a pleasure to be here. And I have to say, I loved your book, Transsexual, Transgender, Transhuman Dispatches from the 11th Hour. It's a collection of your blog posts on all the research, and it's been very in-depth, that you've done into this whole trans agenda. (1:31 - 1:57) And I love the title because, and we were talking about this before the show, when people use the term trans agenda, they tend to be referring to transgenderism, and they don't understand that it's actually all connected with the transhumanism. So we're going to be covering all of that today in this interview. And where I want to start, because you've talked about this in some of your blog posts, there's, and I think maybe we can do both of these together. (1:58 - 2:13) There's the attack on children, which is Soji in the Drag Queen Story Hours. But that also conflates with the attack on dimorphism. For people who don't know what that term means, the division of men and women, humanity, into two sexes, which is very much also an attack upon women. (2:14 - 3:41) So please talk about that. And I think that's going to be our starting point. Well, the binary, the attack on the binary, the sex binary is the most important aspect of this whole system. I like to think about transsexualism, fetish of adult men, who wish to not only present as women, but see themselves as women and have other people see them as women. So basically, they want to own womanhood for themselves. So there's that. And then there's transgenderism, which works as sort of a bridge to from this fetish that deconstructs womanhood to transhumanism, which is, in this case, in the particular arena that I research, is about deconstructing reproductive sex and having that usurped by the tech industry. So, via reproductive technologies, which we see already happening. So this is really a conglomerate, a system that works in conjunction with each other to basically abolish the binary, the sex binary between men and women. (3:42 - 5:02) And one of the things they're doing with that is they're hijacking terms or changing terms to make them more acceptable to people. You were talking about transsexualism, which is really autogynephilia, a sexual fetish, as you were just explaining, men who get aroused by the idea of having female characteristics. There was a term that you used in your book, which I loved. Rather than transgenderism, you called it synthetic sex identities. Yes, I think that really calls attention to what's going on here. Transgenderism sounds like transcendence. You're transitioning from one thing to another, which nobody actually does in the arena of sex or humanity. Nobody has transcended their biological sex and nobody has transcended their humanity as yet. This is what they're aiming for, but nobody has done this yet. So I think the synthetic sex identities really call attention to the fact that it's bullshit, for one, and secondly, that it's industry. This is about industry. I don't know where I was going with that. (5:02 - 10:36) That's all right, that's all right. Because there's a point to all of it, and I'm going to do a very short quote here, not from your book, from a book you referenced from Dr. Miriam Grossman's book, Lost in Trans Nation. She said, if a man can be a woman, then woman means nothing. But I'd like to add something to that observation. Same is true for men. If a woman can be a man, then man means nothing. And this is the real undermining of that binary sexual identity, that if they can convince people that a woman has become a man or a man has become a woman, which of course is not true, just because you may have changed someone anatomically doesn't mean you changed them biologically. But that's the illusion that they're trying to create through these trans surgeries. Right. And I think that illusion is very, very vital to this project. When you have these surgeries at mass scale, as they're being done now, and you have people posing and sometimes convincingly of the opposite sex on an industry scale, what this does is it grooms the public, and especially children, because they really don't care about us because we're on our way out. But the next generation is really being groomed to think of themselves in parts to the technological reproduction market. We're no longer host biological systems connected to the ecosphere by our sex, by reproductive sex, which is just what the ecosphere is. It's reproduction, regeneration, death, regeneration, death. So where children are being groomed away from this, acknowledged that we're systems that are part of the larger biological system, and towards the idea that we can manifest our destiny through technology, including sex and death. And then they go beyond that though. And these are some things that you revealed in your book that I'd kind of been aware of on the periphery, but I didn't realize how far they were going with it. One thing in technology that they're working on is creating egg cells from any cell so that they can artificially create humans. And another technology, I don't think you mentioned it in your book, but which I've reported on not long ago, is the creation of artificial wombs. So if they succeed in this, if they can create an egg cell from any cell, then it follows that eventually they can create a sperm cell from any cell. They have artificial wombs. They can start artificially creating people without the need for men and women. Exactly. Which is why the whole sex binary is being deconstructed because this is where the technology is going. They are researching these things. The technological reproduction market is already like $33 billion global revenue. And it's projected to be a lot more than that like in just a few years. It should be like $54 billion, I think. And women are being specifically erased in language and law and socially by men inserting themselves into their sports and into their colleges and into every place that women are separate, men are being inserted there. And this is because women have the lion's share of responsibility for reproduction. Men don't have that kind of investment. So it's women that are being targeted in this process of deconstructing. But you're absolutely right. It's a human problem. I have come to this research through campaigning partially for women's rights and partially for the environment. But I realized fairly quickly that, oh, this is not just some sort of patriarchal system attack on women, but it's industry. And when you have an industry that is going to exploit people, in this case, you need to dehumanize them because they're basically slaves in this process of colonization. You do that to all kinds of people that you're going to colonize, you have to dehumanize them in order for that to flow pretty freely for the rest of the population. So that's what we see really going on here. But men are also being targeted. There's also being made into parts. We're no longer a whole system, as I said, but now we're vaginas, we're penises, we're sperm, we're eggs, we're wombs, we're chest hairs, it's just mix and match. (10:37 - 12:28) Lego sets, you know, commodities. Anything but men and women. Right. The market has come to us, basically. And with this whole human rights program that they have going, this narrative, we're basically inviting it in for a full course meal, and we're on the menu. Yes. Now, up to this point, I have been focusing on both sides of the equation, how this trans agenda, and once again, folks, I'm using that to mean not just transsexualism, transgenderism, but transhumanism, as you're going to see as we get through this interview. But how this trans agenda has targeted both men and women, but it is targeting women more. And I want to explain what I mean by that, because as a man, I should probably explain. Let's talk about going into the other gender sports. Well, as you made reference to, we see men doing that an awful lot and getting away with it. But you don't see typically women going into men's sports, which is a pretty good reason for that. And here's the other thing that really bothers me. And this even happened at our gym recently, where my wife encountered a trans man, I'm going to call him a man, in the women's change room. And the problem with this, that a lot of people just can't seem to get their heads around, is that if a woman who thinks she's a man goes into the men's change room, I've never heard of it happening, but if it did, she's not a threat to the men in there. But if a man who thinks he's a woman goes into the women's change room, you just dropped a predator in that room. The average man is twice as strong as the average woman. And a lot of these men, as you point out, and I've discussed this with other people I've interviewed on this, a lot of them are sexual deviants. (12:29 - 12:41) Pedicures, absolutely. Women at risk. And so, I'd like you to talk about that a little bit, about how this whole trans agenda, it does unfairly target women and the psychological effect it has to be having on women. (12:42 - 15:22) Oh, it's pretty profound. I mean, at this point, and it's all really about violation, violating boundaries, because ultimately they want boundary-less mess. People that don't have boundaries, you can control them a lot more easily. And especially if they're groomed to not have boundaries as children. I mean, the boundary around our sex is the most vital boundary we have as human beings. That's why rape is such a heinous crime, because it's somebody actually violating your most intimate boundary. And all these boundaries are being dissolved. And that really started like, it probably started back before the 80s. But in the 80s, you had these talk shows, where everybody would get on the talk shows, and they would talk about their most intimate, personal struggles with their families and other people. Just like throwing up their most personal things on television for the world to see. And that just completely escalated where now you have social media and people are doing the same things. And mass, it's not just a few little talk shows, it's everywhere. Everybody's exposing all of their personal information. And there's no more boundary between the personal and the social, which is what these drag queen story hours are about, breaking down children's boundaries. And the whole sexualization in schools, breaking down their boundaries. They don't want them to have sexual boundaries. And so, women are being targeted, of course, as well. Because again, this is about technological reproduction. And they want that boundary collapsed, deconstructed. And so, right now, we have male predators actually in women's prisons, in the cells with women. And of course, all sorts of men are taking advantage of this. Sexual predators, violent male criminals, murderers, that are taking advantage of these laws that have been passed. You can identify as anything that you want. Well, of course, you want to go to the women's prison. Well, I'm suddenly a female. Give me some hormones and I want to get over there in their camp. And they are. And women are being raped in prison. I mean, it's just so insane. This whole thing is so insane. (15:22 - 16:28) And the narrative around this, that people are buying this human rights movement for the marginalized is just crazy. It's so crazy. I mean, if your government, all the politicians, all the corporations are suddenly on board in a nanosecond of biological evolution, suddenly telling you that sex is not real. Sex, which is life itself, is not real. It's suddenly on a spectrum. You got to know this is some sort of serious science. But we're so conditioned to listen to whatever we hear. And if we hear it over and over and over again, this has become cult doctrine. It really literally is a cult, which they're trying to manifest into a virtual reality. Like when you have a cult that's not controlled, like Scientology is a pretty big cult. They've done a lot of damage, but it's also somewhat controlled. It's not all over the world. (16:28 - 17:19) It's not driven into all of our institutions. This is becoming a virtual reality. People believe in transgender people. There's no transgender people. Nobody's transitioned anything. They've had a medical assault on their reproductive, their healthy reproductive anatomy, and they've taken drugs to attempt to disown their sex reality. That's not transitioning anything. Yeah. Exactly. And you made reference when you were talking there to, well, first of all, to the men in women's prisons. And it's especially starting when you know the statistic, and the statistic is roughly 80% of those men who are posing as women to end up in those prisons are in there for violent sexual assaults. I mean, what do you think is going to happen, people? Come on. (17:20 - 18:52) But the other thing you were talking about was sex isn't real. And what people don't understand is that that's part of the messaging, that biological reproductive sex isn't real. It's being replaced with fetishes. And you talked about this in one of your posts. So I'd like to talk about that a little bit, about how that's undermining the bimorphism, the man and woman, and replacing it with, well, sex isn't for reproduction, and therefore, why do you need another person? Right. Well, there's that. But if your goal is to usurp reproduction with technology, you don't really need sex to procreate, first of all. You can make a baby in a dish with some skin cells, right? So you don't need to copulate. And you don't need intimacy either. You don't need the bonding experience of copulation, right? So basically, sex becomes a smorgasbord of just all different acts that you can partake of. There's no more relationship to intimacy and bonding because you won't need it. So that's part of the program. And also driving that into children's schools. I mean, they're teaching them about anal sex. They're teaching them about oral sex. (18:52 - 19:20) They're teaching them that they can be born through technology, that there is such a thing as transgender children. You might not feel like the sex that you are, so we'll just rearrange you and give you some hormones. And they bring it in through anti-bullying programs. But it's really funded by the technology industry, also the pharmaceutical industry. I mean, these two industries, they're like a hand in a glove. A hand glued into a glove, I should say. (19:22 - 27:16) And with the intention of, as you said, separating people, breaking down the intimacy, the bonds between people, a lot of what's happened in the last few years has divided people greatly. The transgender movement specifically is dividing families, breaking down the family unit, which is the core of our society. Well, if men and women don't need to come together as couples to have children, to keep the race going, well, what do you need the family unit for anymore? So I see it as a direct knock on that. Exactly. And with reproductive technologies, I mean, you can create your own children. I mean, we're going to be like genetically engineering children. Like I'd like to have children with blue eyes. I'd like to have a smarter child. As it is, you can pick the sperm of some man who's a genius as opposed to some blue collar worker in Queens, New York. Do you know what I mean? So you're already, on some level, you're already, you can do that. Picking shoes. So you're already sort of engaged in a eugenics project, right? But as CRISPR technology, for instance, advances, genetic engineering, this is the future. The future of baby making is technology. It's technological. Then it gets even more disturbing because you talked about something in your book that I wasn't even aware of. Xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation, yes, is the, you know, growing animals to use their organs and things for humans, hearts, lungs. That's already well underway. They also have machines, like printing machines for artificial organs, like 3D printing for organs. So yeah, we're being deconstructed for the market. But transsexual, transgender, transhuman, this is because transhumanism is a really, really big deal. I mean, they are trying to, you know, engineer us at varying different levels. You know, it's all about entering our systems now because they've basically colonized everything else on the planet. Now we're up for grabs. So they want to get into our interior. So transhumanism is a very, very big field, but this is really, you know, where I focus is where these things intersect. Transhumanism, reproductive technologies, you know, intersect with, you know, this bridge to that from transsexualism. Because transsexualism, what it does is deconstruct womanhood. It makes womanhood into parts, right? So to normalize this fetish is to normalize the deconstruction of womanhood, women, into parts that can be confiscated, commoditized, bought and sold on the market. And then we see this happening in society. Women are not women. They're pregnant people. They're cervix havers. You know, their eggs are being sold. Their wombs are being sold in surrogacy. Yeah. So this is, you know, this is what's going on here. And people have to make this connection because we've been, you know, we've been basically chasing our tails for well over a decade now. You know, talking about gender and expression and how that relates to sex, stereotypes, sexual stereotypes. We've spent a lot of time on that. It's really time to move on because things are moving very, very fast and pretty soon we're not going to really have a choice, you know, in terms of stopping this or creating a real ethics around this. Yeah. And we're going to get to that at the end of this interview, because that's kind of the conclusion I'm leading towards. But we've been talking for the last few minutes about how they're using technology to attempt to replace human reproduction. But within the context of that, we've also talked about the attack upon intimacy between people by the attack of the attack upon society. And they're using technology to attack that as well. Something that you sort of alluded to in your book. What about all these AI girlfriends and boyfriends now that people are having? And it seems to me a natural extension of the isolation that our children's generation especially has gone through with social media and gaming and all of that. And they sit in their rooms all the time, never interacting with other people in real life. And now we've got AI friends, AI girlfriends, AI boyfriends. And of course, it's just a program that learns the responses that that person wants. And so you can essentially program your perfect partner who's going to give you all the interactions and affirmations or whatever that you want. So why would you want to go and have a relationship with a real human being who can be difficult to get along with and isn't going to do everything you want them to do? A lot of people don't anymore. That's precisely what's going on. It's more or less melding human with their technologies. We want to get them out of the biological into the technological. And that's one way to do it. We see it happening at all different fronts. And none of this is really hidden. It's not like I've just made up some sort of ideology to go along with what I think might be happening. This is all expressed. All I've done is collect some dots and put them together in an organized fashion. I'm actually a portrait painter. That's my real skill. And so I have a real knack for taking different aspects of things and putting them together to work. And so I'm really good at looking at patterns. And that's what I've done here. I followed the money. Who are the people behind this? What are they doing? What else are they invested in? Why are they doing this? And they tell us. I don't have to guess. I just have to tell you in a way that helps you understand, but you being the public. Do you know what I mean? Yes. So now let's take that to the next natural step, which you do discuss in your book. So we've talked about the attack upon, let's call it just intimacy of people coming together as people, whether it be families, societies, whatever, as couples. They're trying to break that down. They're trying to remove the idea that you need a man and a woman to produce a child. They're replacing those relationships with AIs. And that brings us to the next natural step, which I find incredibly creepy. Let's talk about being a 48. Yeah, let's talk about being a 48. I just first want to say that if you don't have privacy, you don't have intimacy. We are being surveilled from every corner of the globe. There's practically no place you can go anymore where you're not surveilled. Maybe a cave in Siberia, but honestly, there's almost no place you can go. And then all of the things that we're talking about, it's boundary violation. And the most significant thing is we don't have any privacy. We're constantly, we're like a, you know, we're in a panopticon, you know, they can see everything that we do, but we can't see everything that they do. (27:19 - 29:17) Um, so yes, moving on to Bina48. Bina48 is a robot, uh, made of a woman whose actual name is Bina. Um, and it's, uh, it's basically a bust robot. So it's, she's cut off from, you know, from the shoulders down. Um, and she was created by, uh, Martine Rothblatt, Appa Martine Rothblatt, who is a, uh, tech technological entrepreneur zealot. You know, he's a fanatic basically, but however, he is also an extremely, extremely accomplished, uh, uh, tech fanatic. Um, he, he created Bina of his wife, um, and implanted her thoughts into the robot. Um, he is also a lawyer and in the late eighties and early nineties, he created a legal structure for dissociation from sex reality. So basically he authored the first gender bill that we see all over different countries now and States. Um, and he is also considers himself a transsexual and the transhumanist he's written about, uh, transgenderism being an on-ramp to transhumanism. And he feels like the differentiation between men and women is tantamount to South African apartheid. He wants to dissolve that boundary. He thinks we will be liberated. Women will be liberated from reproduction and humans will be liberated from, um, you know, their biological families and they can have bigger and better and more differentiated families and create their relationships, their intimate relationships with people that have their, their own, the same likes and dislikes and beliefs and, you know, and like that same hobbies. So you'll be more connected to them because they have your likes as opposed to your family. (29:18 - 30:11) Um, he's also, um, created a Xeno transplantation for me, has a pig farm. Um, he was the head of a biopharmaceutical corporation. Uh, he has a, uh, transhumanist religion called terrorism. Um, and he believes that we are building, they are building technology. Um, they're building God with technology. Um, and he thinks this is a good thing. And, uh, yeah, he also worked on the human genome project at the UN level. And, um, he, uh, he has a son that is also, uh, running terrorism, uh, the religion, the cult religion of, uh, yeah, of technology as God. Um, and he's basically, he's so many different places in the culture. (30:11 - 35:09) He's been on television. So he'd been in Hollywood, he's mingled with politicians. He, um, he lectures wildly widely on the, uh, the relationships between, uh, transgender and transhuman, how transgender is a bridge to transhumanism and, um, that we should really create a, uh, uh, an institution to sort of like WPAP, the world professional association for transgender health, which is, you know, basically been debunked as a, you know, any kind of, uh, professional organization. It's a, it's an activist group. And, um, um, you know, he thinks we should have another one of those for trans humans to sort of drive this, you know, and normalize this into the culture, this, um, dissociation from sex reality. So he's basically, uh, he's, he's all over, he's out at out leadership, which is the business arm of the LGBT, uh, cartel. And, um, he works, he's on the board of the Mayo clinic now, a very prestigious medical organization in the United States. He's, um, giving lectures at, uh, Jennifer Pritzker's, um, uh, department of transgenderism at Victoria university in Canada. Um, yeah, so, so, and people listen to him, they listen to him say that we, um, we need to dissolve this boundary between men and women and we will be liberated through technology, uh, via this path. Um, and they listened to him and they clap and they go rah, rah, rah. Isn't he the most, they say she, but it's a, he, you know, isn't this the most genius man? Isn't he just amazing? He's done all of these other brilliant things. Oh, he's also co co co-founder of satellite and the Sirius XM satellite radio. So all the satellites up in the sky that are surveilling us. Thank you, Martin Rothblatt, you know, uh, he's also worked for NASA. So, yeah, so he's people just because he's had all these, you know, amazing accomplishments, you know, in the technology industry, whatever he says, whatever comes out of his mouth, they think is genius. Right. So even though this is the most absolutely insane idea to just, you know, deconstruct this boundary between the sexes, everybody thinks it's fabulous. This is great. And young people, you know, of course they're exposed to his ideas and they're young, their brains haven't formed yet. And he's sort of some tech guru, you know, and the cultures, you know, our cultures are already so enamored with technologies, you know, and growing technologies like AI. So they just think he's a guru. And in fact, he is a sort of, you know, you could call him the head. I mean, I've certainly called him the, the grandfather, the father of the, uh, excuse me, the transgender empire. I mean, this is his ideology and he has really helped to institute it legally, structurally. Yeah. Socially. All right. Now, just before we move on, folks, we were talking earlier about that Bina robot. There's a very creepy video on YouTube of the real Bina talking to the robot. We're going to post a link to that beneath this interview. So you can go check it out for yourself. So I want to move on now, Jennifer, to how they are changing society and changing the law to advance their agenda. And I want to start with a quote from your book where you quoted DMI Consulting and they said, inclusivity is more than a social cause. It's a business opportunity. And to put that in perspective, if you'll bear with me for a minute, I want to quote from your book, some of the statistics that you put in there to paint a picture for the viewers of just how much money we're talking about here. I'm going to start with one that, that I I'm going to quote this whole paragraph in its entirety. And it's actually, we're going to be talking here about $36 million, folks. And I want to prep you for that's actually pocket change compared to some of the other statistics that Jennifer provides. But I want to start with this one because I think it's expressed in a way where people can get their head around it. Because for most of us, we start talking about billions of dollars. That's not real. But I think you've made this 36 million real. So I'm going to read this. If you have 100 children on puberty blockers for seven years, the military industrial complex takes in 27 million. Puberty blockers are most often followed by wrong sex hormones to bring the body into submission with the ultimate desired result, an adult body that can pass as the opposite sex. (35:10 - 35:32) Wrong sex hormones must be taken for life at an approximate cost of $1,500 a month. If only 100 people took cross sex hormones for 20 years, the profits, the military industrial complex would amount to $36 million. 20 people, just just 100 people for 20 years, 36 million. (35:33 - 36:33) And so I wanted to start with that one. Because if you, as I said, if you bear with me just a minute, I want to quote a couple of others that you've got here, where we get into some much bigger figures. Global market insights reported the market for general surgery for identity purposes at 316 million in 2019, with a projected 25% growth rate by 2026, leading to 1.5 billion in the US alone. The global market growth for trans surgeries is projected to rise from 319 million in 2020 to potentially 30 billion by 2028. And the entire LGBT movement, marketing constituency, and by that you mean like everything, not just promotional. The whole kit and caboodle of the money that's involved in this, $4.7 trillion. It's shocking when you hear this. Staggering. Most of us. (36:33 - 39:48) Staggering. As you say, most of us who are living our normal binary lives are not paying attention to this. And we see this almost as sort of a fringe thing that's becoming less and less fringe, disturbingly. But we're still thinking in terms of drag queen story hours in our libraries. And we're not seeing this whole picture of just how much money is being generated by this agenda. And really that started with the corporatization of same-sex attraction. I mean, same-sex attraction is just same-sex attraction. I mean, it's right through the animal kingdom, including us. Since, you know, humanity started walking on two legs and probably before that, it's just same-sex attraction. However, when you corporatize these identities, right, and you make a market out of them, now you have gay bookstores, you have gay cruises, you have gay lawyers, gay travel agents, gay bankers, gay this, gay that, right? Now you've created a market that you have to grow under capitalism if you want to survive. But now you're making those out of sexual identity and there's only two sexes. But you add now orientation to those two sexes. Now you have lesbian, gay, bisexual, and heterosexual. What are you going to do to open your markets? You have to do something. Add the T, add gender identity with all these myriad identities that people have, synthetic sex identities, and now you've opened your market. If I was going to sell, you know, if I was going to sell makeup, you know, and I sold, you know, three different colors of makeup, you know, I might make a buck, but if the guy down the street is going to sell 10 colors or 20 colors, well, he's going to make a lot more money than I am, right? So you have to open your markets and that's part of what's going on here. It's an opening of markets in sexual identity. Yeah. So, so there's that aspect, but then you, so the, um, this gender identity, this transgender identity, synthetic sex identity to LGB, a human rights movement. Now you can, you're basically marketing new sexes, but it's under the guise of protecting them. When all of the money that goes into this, you know, people who call themselves transgender or people who seek to, uh, you know, deny their sex reality, they're not getting any money except the mouthpieces. We're not getting any more money. This is all going to normalize this in the cultures and our cultures, right? That's where the money goes to normalize this to normalize. And this is the deconstruction of sexual bimorphism. (39:49 - 40:28) Right. And I want to add one more statistics to everything you've just said, because this, this is the one that disturbed me the most because I did the math on it. Global market insights projection of an 11.5% annual growth rate for trans surgeries, 11.5% annually. If you compound 11.5% annually, you double it every six and a half years. And that's exactly what we're seeing. You go back 20 years and almost nobody had ever heard of a trans surgery. Certainly they'd be done, but they were exceedingly rare. Exceedingly rare. That's correct. (40:28 - 41:11) Now you've got hundreds of clinics across the U.S. alone doing this. Over 300. Somebody did the actual investigation. Alex Iran. I don't know if she's on, if she's still doing the work or not, but she lives in Israel and she, she's done this work with a lot, a lot of volunteers. They've called the gender clinics. Will you provide this surgery for children? Will you provide it? What age will you provide it? Yeah. Over 300 in North America, I should say now, not just the U.S. Right. So if we had over 300 in North America now, and it doubles every six and a half years, six and a half years from now, we can expect something more like 700. (41:12 - 41:29) Well, hopefully, President Trump has put a little dent in that program. Let's hope so. Yes. Unfortunately here in Canada, we haven't gotten that far yet. Well, you know, everybody, everybody emulates us. I don't know. (41:33 - 46:02) All right. So let's, let's, now that we've talked about the money, I want to move on from the business aspect of it to the social aspect of it and how they're pushing it politically. You had a very interesting story in your book about the Occupy Wall Street movement and revealing that you used to be on the political left and you identified that Wall Street movement as sort of the funeral pyre of the political left, the point in time at which it self-immolated and got taken over as, I'm not sure what to call it, as a political tool to advance these agendas. Oh yes. Oh yes. I mean, it was probably well in the works before that, but it was really, it became really socially noticeable, you know, around that time, you know, on the Occupy Wall Street. I mean, that was pretty interesting, that movement, you know, to begin with, until it started to be infiltrated. You know, it wasn't just a bunch of, you know, anarchists sitting around, you know, doing stupid shit in the park, you know. These were young people that were started by Canadians, disenfranchised young people who came together and they wanted to start a movement to discuss basically Wall Street, you know, that's why it started on Wall Street, you know, how the bankers and the big, you know, monopolies had control of our lives. So that's how it started. And that's really where the left used to be. They were against corporations. Now you have the left screaming out in the streets, raw big pharma, yes, we want big pharma, we want these surgeries, we want these surgeries for kids, you know. It's like, we want to take hormones for the rest of our lives. And so, you know, that really became pretty clear, you know, during Occupy Wall Street, that there was a big switcheroo happening there, you know. And then those camps were quickly shut down by Obama, right, our, you know, our hero of hope on the left. I mean, I was duped into that. I voted for him the first time. I'm really embarrassed about that, but I'm going to tell you, it's rude. You know, and then here he bails out all the biggest, you know, scoundrels and bankers on the left, you know, not on the left, but on Wall Street. I mean, it was just a joke, you know. And then he becomes the trans president, you know. So this is about the time, you know, right after that, I started to investigate the whole transgender circus. I like to call it, you know, a circus. It's really not a movement. It's more of a circus, because what you think you're getting, you're not getting, you know, it's all illusions, you know. It's a performance. And so quickly thereafter, Jazz Jennings came on the scene, a young man who was probably homosexual or had those leanings as a child. And he was put on the talk show circuit with Barbara Walters and then Oprah Winfrey and then other, you know, talk shows to talk about how he was really a girl. And so his family became pretty prominent. They started an organization for trans children, for the acceptability of denying your actual biological sex children. And so he was heavily marketed in the media and all the way through until he had medical assaults on his reproductive system so that he could pretend he was female. And his whole family supported him in this. And there was a reality TV show made about this. And, you know, millions and millions and millions of Americans watched this, were fascinated. And I was horrified. I was horrified. I didn't watch the whole show. I did watch a few episodes. (46:03 - 50:38) But that's when I started to write about this. And I started to look seriously at the money behind this. Like, why is this? Why is this happening? And then Bruce Jenner wound up on the cover of Vanity Fair in a women's corset claiming to be a woman. And I was just done. I was like, oh, this is some sort of massive psyops going on here. And I want to get to the bottom of it. There is a major stock market crash coming that will rival the crash of 1929. But there is a way to not only protect your wealth, but profit in the coming crash. The stock market chart today looks exactly like the charts prior to October 1929. Banks are disastrously over leveraged, and several major US banks have already failed. And the CDIC, the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation, doesn't have nearly enough money to cover depositors. If you have money in the stock market, it is time to get out. Governments and corporations around the world are buying up precious metals in record amounts because they know the coming crash will make their other assets nearly worthless. You can buy precious metals at wholesale prices to New World Precious Metals at premiums substantially below other Canadian brokerages. And you can even transfer savings in your RRSP tax-free. To get more information, use the link below this video to contact New World Precious Metals. They will answer any questions you may have. You may also wish to contact Adrian Spitters, a personal financial consultant who successfully predicted the stock market crashes of 2000 and 2008. You will find Adrian's contact information below as well. Finally, if you want more information on the crash and what you can do to protect yourself, your family, and your assets, see my most recent quarterly update with my team of financial experts at ironwiredaily.com. By clicking the link below to contact New World Precious Metals, you will also be helping to support our efforts to bring Canadians to truth as we are an approved affiliate partner. Right. And that's where I'm going with this hijacking of the political left. Because I would identify as a right-wing conservative, but a right-wing conservative today, if I had lived perhaps 50 years ago, I might have identified... Well, I did live 50 years ago, but I was 10 years old. I would have possibly identified a little bit more with the left because of the ideas of tolerance, of acceptance. And when I was a young kid, if you were gay, you were probably in danger of being beaten up. Well, that's wrong. As you made reference to, there's always been gay people throughout all of history. Some people are just attracted to the same sex. And of course, we should not be persecuting those people for that. But this is what I was referring to earlier in the interview. When we first started out, we started talking about how they tacked the T about 20 years ago onto the LGB acronym. And I said, they're not the same thing. Well, they're not. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, that's an orientation. Transsexual is an assault on the human being. It's a removal of gender. But they very cleverly conflated the two because, well, you're in favor of acceptance and tolerance, aren't you? And isn't that what they're doing with things like this jazz show and all? They're trying to program people to see this. Well, this is just another choice and you should be accepting of it without seeing the societal damage that it's doing. They are programming people. This is literally a cult and cult programming happening all over media. I mean, it happens the same way on every single platform. And when they change the narrative, then the narrative changes across all the platforms. Because we link, you know, the media is a conglomerate or an array of conglomerates. So, you think you're looking at one platform, Sports Illustrated, who's had four men pretending to be women in bikinis now on their covers. But you're looking at a whole plethora of media platforms that is owned by the same head. (50:38 - 50:59) So, all the messages come back, you know, come down from on high to all the different platforms. So, it's the same one over and over and over again. This is called indoctrination. This is how you indoctrinate somebody into a cult. And they're creating a virtual reality by doing this. Very, very, very dangerous because it's getting so huge now. (51:00 - 51:07) To the point where people aren't even questioning it anymore. Exactly. We have children being exposed to drag queen story hours. (51:07 - 51:15) Yeah. And even when they're resisting it, they're still talking about transgender people. We don't believe that transgender people should blah, blah, blah. (51:16 - 52:06) What do you mean transgender people? Nobody ever asked what the hell you're talking about. You got kids that have autism. You have children that are feeling very, very uncomfortable in school for whatever reasons. You have autistic kids. You have kids that have an orientation, probably going to be gay when they're adults. You have men with fetishes. You have sexual predators that don't have a fetish, but they're sexual predators and they're taking advantage of all this. You have so many different constituents of people that are just globbing onto this idea that you can transcend your sex. That's not a cohesive group and it just has no cohesive meaning. (52:10 - 52:32) It's really crazy making and people just accept the narrative because it is confusing. They're caught off guard and it's coming at them from every single sector of society. They go to the doctor, the doctor's on board, the teachers are on board, all your institutions are board, the libraries are on board, the schools are on board, everybody's on board. (52:32 - 54:19) So it must be something that's real, right? Wrong. Wrong. Right. So now we've talked about the social programming, the hijacking of the leftist tolerance to get people to just accept this, the demonization of anyone who doesn't and who speaks out against it, but they're also working to ensconce this in law. And I'm going to kickstart you on that one by once again, reading something from your book. It's just one sentence. And I, once again, Jennifer, this just, wow. The top 100 highest earning international law firms worldwide all have LGBT plus platforms supporting the gender industry. Doesn't that paint a picture right there of how invasive and pervasive this has become? Absolutely. Absolutely. And, you know, somebody wrote an article, I wish I could remember his name now. His last name is Kirkup. I can't remember what his first name is, but he wrote it for the Spectator, a UK platform. And he wrote it about Denton's law firm, how they created this legal guide for transgender children. Right. This was way back now. And I was thinking, you know, that doesn't sound right that just like one law firm would be on board for this. You know, so I just went poking around. I was like, well, what are the top, you know, 100 law firms? And I went to every single one of them and they all do pro bono work or LGBT. Yeah. But while they do pro bono work, but they're not doing it for free. (54:20 - 54:25) Right. Somebody's paying them. Better believe it. (54:25 - 55:58) Let me throw in a couple more things from your book just to give you a little more to work with here. The ACLU, the American Civil Liberties Union is actively working to establish legal precedents that normalize the concept of dissociation from biological sex. And my own note I'm adding here, folks, and especially pushing back on any legislation that would make pushing this agenda on children legal. You read reference earlier to Obama, who's been referred to as the trans president. And there's also the Yogyakarta principles that we should talk about. So the Yogyakarta principles, you know, started in Jakarta, Indonesia was, you know, it's human rights structure. I'm not, I'm not all that well-versed on them, but I can tell you that, you know, I think it was, I don't know what even the year was that it became the. Let me, let me give this. I really, I don't expect you to be able to pull this off, even though you wrote it, obviously you wrote it a while back. So, so let me, let me refresh your memory because I have the notes here. The Yogyakarta principles developed in 2006 and updated in 2017 to drive the concept of gender identity into law brought together in 2006 by the Canadian company, Allied Rainbow Communications International, ARC International, which is based in British Columbia and it's pushing the trans and SOGI agenda across Canada and funded by ARCUS, which is founded by John Stryker. Right. (55:59 - 56:40) There's your connections. Who's funding all of this pro bono work for the LGBT? Well, all the people who are behind pushing the agenda on society. And I guess we could talk about them. Like, who are they? Um, yes, let's talk about them. Let's talk about them. So, uh, John Stryker, you mentioned John Stryker. He is, um, the heir to the, uh, Stryker Medical Corporation fortune. Stryker Medical Corporation is now worth $133 billion. The last I'd look, but every year I look at it, it goes up and up and up. (56:40 - 59:40) Um, and I got just recently got into the facial feminization market, but they basically do, um, surgery equipment and robotics. And, um, he is, he also used to be a banker and he started in 2020, he started the ARCUS Foundation for, um, you know, an LGBT organization, the NGO. And, um, you know, gay marriage was already solidified at that point. So what are you doing? Why do you need a, uh, basically a, you know, a behemoth, uh, LGBT NGO anymore? Um, well, you needed to drive this ideology. And in fact, he claimed that, um, when they changed the funding mechanism, um, for the organization, they, he didn't mention in an interview, if you don't get on board with gender ideology, basically you're not getting your money anymore. So there's that. And, um, he has created an incredible network of, uh, funding to other LGBT organizations to drive this ideology to, uh, institutions like the Victory Institute, which calls people from different universities, um, LGBT people, um, from different universities to train them for political positions like Rachel Levine, for instance, our health secretary, our last health secretary, um, under Biden, um, train them to be, um, political agents for this ideology. And, um, also GLSEN who goes into schools and indoctrinates, um, the teachers and the principals and the students, um, to get them on board with this ideology. And then there's GLAD, which goes into, um, the media who contacts the media. This is the way that you're able to speak about gender ideology because it's part of the LGBT, right? Um, and the LGBT is a cartel. It's no longer any kind of, you know, civil rights movement for, for gay people or the marginalized. It's a cartel and you will, it's a $4.7 trillion cartel. So our marketing constituency can be your marketing constituency too, if you get on board with our ideology. And if you do not, well, then you're out in the cold. Yeah. Cause our constituency is going to take their business elsewhere. So everybody wants to get on board for the LGBT. So we have John Stryker, John Stryker's sister, Pat Stryker, worked with Tim Gill in Colorado to turn the entire state from a red state to a blue state. (59:41 - 1:00:19) Um, he and Pat and, uh, two other people, the governor of Colorado, and there's another guy, uh, I forget his name. Um, but the four of them have been, uh, have been come to know, become known as the four horsemen of, uh, political Colorado politics or the gang of four because of their aggressive, ruthless, um, uh, pursuit of driving this ideology into the culture. Um, and Tim Gill, um, owns the second most significant LGBT NGO probably in the world. (1:00:20 - 1:00:49) Between the two of them, they, they put in more than a billion dollars of funding to, uh, other LGBT NGOs, smaller ones, um, transgender organizations, uh, cultural institutions, the media, uh, medical centers, uh, religious organizations, museums, you name it. Um, they're funding it. And again, to get people on board with this ideology. (1:00:50 - 1:00:59) Um, and Tim Gill comes out of Quark Press. He founded Quark Press, a computer software corporation. He's now invested in artificial intelligence as well. (1:01:01 - 1:02:32) Um, yeah. So then you have, um, so they are major, major Buku players in this, uh, industry and, um, driving the industry. And they also call other philanthropists to get on board for the, um, for this ideology, for this program. And you have Jennifer Pritzker, um, and the whole, really the entire Pritzker family. Jennifer Pritzker used to be James Pritzker. Uh, and it's, they're one of the wealthiest families in the United States and, um, they're worth billions. There's a lot of them. They're worth many billions. And, um, Jennifer Pritzker used to be James Pritzker. And he decided in beyond the middle age that he was, you know, he was a woman. So he threw on some pearls and let the inner dress and, you know, people said, Jennifer, you know, what are you going to say? He's your boss and he's a billionaire, right? And his cousin, Penny Pritzker was a secretary of commerce for Obama. And he, she basically introduced him to all the heavy duty funders, uh, to get him into the white house to become our first trans president. Right. And JV Pritzker, who governed Illinois recently, even after the cash report and the W path files, uh, were dumped, um, he made his state sanctuary state for children. So if you can get them over the border, their parents have no, no claim to them. (1:02:32 - 1:03:22) Nobody has any claim to them. If they want surgeries, hormones, you know, cross-sex hormones, wrong sex hormones, you know, we'll get that for you. Don't worry. And they fund so many millions of dollars to, you know, these cash strapped, uh, universities and institutions, the military, uh, other LGBT NGOs, um, and, you know, medical centers, um, and universities across the country and Canada. Uh, Jennifer Pritzker started the first chair position, which I mentioned earlier that Martin Rockwell had lectured at, um, you know, uh, talking about transgender to transhumanism. He funded the first, uh, trans chairperson position over there at Victoria university. (1:03:24 - 1:04:32) Um, yeah, so there, you know, they work in a sort of concert, you know, and, um, you know, it sounds like, well, how, you know, how, why would people get on board for this? Well, they get on board for money. They get on board because they're indoctrinated just like anybody else has been indoctrinated with this. I mean, you see all over Hollywood, you know, people are coming out with these transgender children, you know, as if they were hanging on trees all this time. We just didn't, we just didn't realize it. You know, it's just insane. Well, and now folks, I strongly recommend you read the book because Jennifer's just scratching the surface of these people. And when you start to read who these people are, you, you come to understand that one, a lot of them know each other and are working together and they very much have a common goal. But I wanted to talk now about, oh, there it is. I'm sorry. I just lost my, my view of my note for a moment there. Some of the things that these people are doing beyond just funding things. Uh, we've already talked about Arcus, the Arc Foundation in Canada. (1:04:33 - 1:06:23) Here's one queerbio.com, which is essentially a trans wiki. Uh, the managing editor is Mark Bonham, who's a Canadian, who is also behind a lot of this. There's also, uh, the Trevor project and AI for trans kids to program them. And even a transgender Barbie produced by Mattel. This, this is how far they're going to infect our society and especially our youth with the idea that all of this is normal. That we can transcend our sex, human reality with technology. That's what they're normalizing. And yes, it's everywhere. It's everywhere we look, but it's so dense and it's so pervasive that people don't even realize, you know, they're going through their day, you know, what now people are starting to realize, they're just starting to realize, you know, how, um, really, uh, tyrannical this is, you know, with the, with the, I think the, the men and women's sports were really brought at home for like mainstream. That's something is really pretty amiss here, but now the cat is really coming out of the bag, you know, uh, with the surgeries on children. I mean, all of this has really been kept out of the media, you know, or when it's, when it has, you know, been shown to the, you know, through the media, it's been promoted as something that's positive and good. Yeah. I mean, these surgeries are barbaric here. They're absolutely barbaric. And for people who don't understand that, and I know it's, it's a disturbing thing to do, but I strongly recommend you go in your look up some medical images, nude images of people who have had these surgeries. (1:06:23 - 1:06:48) If you're thinking that, that they've taken these people and they've made them look like the other gender. No, they haven't. They've made them look like Frankenstein's monster. It's horrendous what they've done to them. And they're doing it to children, young people. Yes. And then trying to convince them that this is perfectly okay. That, that once you do this, you're going to feel like you fade in. You're going to, you're going to, you're not, you're not going to be a boy anymore. (1:06:48 - 1:08:48) Now you're going to be a girl. And that gets into, I think we need to talk about this very briefly. And I'm referencing here information from Abigail Shrier's book, Irreversible Damage, which you also referenced in your book, where there's this narrative that if children are not allowed to transition, they're at higher risk of suicide. And what they're doing is they're making a wrong inference from the actual data. The actual data does say that children who transition do commit suicide at a much higher rate, but not children who are denied transitioning. We don't actually have data for that. All we have is the data for the ones who actually transitioned as opposed to the ones who did not. Now, among the ones who did not, we've got- The ones who had medical assaults on their healthy reproductive system. I mean, I know that's a mouthful, but I really prefer to spell that out, what that is for people, because it's not transitioning. They don't transition anything. They're having medical assault on their healthy reproductive systems. And that is very accurately said. And when they reach a point of realizing what they have done to themselves, what they've allowed to be done to their bodies, and that it is not reversible, that's when they commit the suicide. And so Exactly. And there are a lot of young people who have not committed suicide, and now they're coming forward in droves. And you can find them all over social media talking about what has happened to them. It's brutal. And it's never just the child. I mean, these children are connected to families. They have mothers and fathers and grandparents and uncles and sisters and brothers who are traumatized by this hellscape. Their families are decimated by this insanity. (1:08:49 - 1:12:39) And I recently interviewed two of them, Kelly Lynn Peary and Faith Grillo, who transitioned, and I'm going to use that term, but let's make it clear what we mean. They had medical assault on their bodies, but I'll, for convenience, use the term transition. They transitioned to men, realized they'd made a mistake, were now coming back. And when I was discussing this with them, they both told me the same thing. They were having psychological, emotional issues. They went for therapy. They didn't get therapy. What they got was an immediate referral to a trans doctor and started them on hormones and pushed them into surgeries. And the conclusion that both of them came to is that psychological treatment in our society has now been replaced by the trans agenda. If you go to a therapist and you're having difficulty fitting in, chances are very high they're going to tell you, well, if you just transition, you'll be fine. To varying different degrees, yeah. And there are also healthy children, children that are doing perfectly well until they encounter this indoctrination process and they become indoctrinated. I mean, I've heard countless stories by friends who cover this angle of the issue. I mean, I can't go there. I just can't do it. I mean, I'm already immersed in the whole money, tracking the money and the power behind this, but other people are tracking other aspects of it. And I have friends that are contemplating the decimation to families and children by this whole system. So now, earlier, Jennifer, you were talking about some of the people who are behind this. And as I said to the viewers, I recommend you read the book because there's a long list of people in there and it's very revealing. Two of these prime motivators behind it are trans individuals, men who think they're women. Some of them are gay, but there's also a list of very, very powerful influential men who are not trans or gay, including George Soros, Marc Benioff, Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffett. All of these people have donated to these agendas. And what struck me when I was reading your book and all of these people that you listed is how they are predominantly men. And I have a theory about why that is. Now, this isn't something you touched on in your book. So I'd like to tell you my theory and I want your thoughts on it. And I want your honest thoughts on it. If you think I'm off on left field, you let me know. Because now I'm going to pull back full circle to where we started talking about the title of transsexual, transgender, transhuman. It's all one agenda. And in your book, you do mention, for example, that the WEF, Klaus Schwab, they're engaged in this too. And we were talking earlier about AI and how they're trying to technologically change humanity. And Klaus Schwab talks about that in his fourth industrial revolution. That's their goal, to remove our humanity and to replace us with a fusion of machines and computers and biology. And it's all about a control agenda. Now, I've given a lot of thought to what I call the globalists. And that's a very general term. Some people, when they say the globalists, they mean the world economic forum. Well, I mean, anybody who's wealthy, powerful, and is behind this one world government, new world order agenda. So I'm using that term very generally. They are almost all men. And as a man, I can think I can talk a little bit about male psychology. (1:12:39 - 1:16:39) We are genetically programmed to be very, very competitive. Now, let me translate into what it means for these people who are at the top 1% of 1% when it comes to wealth. You and I as regular people, we think about money as a means to purchase things. We need food, we need shelter, we need clothing, sometimes for purchasing luxuries. A very common goal for people who are in the middle class is to have a holiday once a year, especially if you live in a colder climate like I do, to go down to Mexico or something, lay on a beach for a week and drink Mai Tais and get away from the cold. To put this in perspective, though, you have to understand that for these people, the money stopped representing buying things a long time ago. Any one of these people could go and lay on that beach for the rest of their lives, and it wouldn't dent their net worth. They wouldn't even notice it. To them, money is not what you can purchase. Money is power. Money is influence. And I think this is why these people are predominantly men, because this whole thing is a control agenda. And what do those men want? How do they get to the upper 1% of 1%? They're very competitive. They want to win. And what's the ultimate win? Control. Because it has always been a historical fact that those who climb to the very top very often view the rest of us, the normal people, as serving no other function than to be the pedestal that they stand on. And so I think, and this is where I want your opinion, because as I said, folks, this isn't in Jennifer's book. This isn't Jennifer's idea. This is mine. That the reason why so many of them are men, and many of them are straight men, it's because it's all about control. And this is a way to get it. If you can strip away people's identity, if you can separate them and get them to give up on intimacy and relationships and feel that they don't need that, if you can tell them that they're not needed even for reproduction, then you can program them with anything you want. And why would you try to control a populace through force when they will willingly comply because they've been brainwashed into it? Well, I think that that's not too far off the mark. I asked a very wealthy client of mine once, why really, really rich people are not happy with three swimming pools, a Learjet, and five mansions? Why do they keep striving for more? I mean, it seems kind of just unproductive to me. I mean, to living life, you know, because you're craving for more and more and more. And he just said, well, it's just, it's really pretty simple. It's a power trip. They're trying to out-compete each other. Um, and of course, you know, the social arena is really still top heavy with men because women have babies, you know, they have to leave the arena, you know, to make children and to grow those children. And they predominantly are still the ones doing that, even though, you know, some of that has changed. Um, and so they also have most of the money for that very reason. Um, and I also believe at root, um, it's a fear of death. You know, women are closer because they give birth, they are closer to the actual life cycle. (1:16:39 - 1:17:17) You know, they, they bring life into the world. They understand that in a way that men never can because of their biology. And so death is not the same thing for them. They don't fear it in the same way that men do, I believe. Um, and I think this drives a lot of men and you see this through religion, through the, through the ages, you know, men trying to control women's bodies. Um, and now you see it through, you know, through these tech gurus, you know, and it's, um, it's not just, I mean, it is, but it's not just some left woke ideology run amok. (1:17:18 - 1:19:05) Um, because men on both the right and the left are trying to control women's reproductive functions. Peter Thiel, for instance, has, you know, invested in femtech and there's another, um, company that he has that, uh, keeps track of women's hormones and their cycles in order to keep track of, uh, their fertility for reproducing the species, you know, and then you have, uh, you know, men on the right also trying to control, uh, abortion rights while you have men on the left claiming to be actual women and the entire political apparatus going along with them. So, you know, the, the, the new, um, the new priest is really a tech priest. You know what I mean? They're all trying to control women's biology because they're scared to die. I'm dying and of nature. I think it was in the movie, uh, Moonstruck with Cher, you know, there's an older woman in there and her husband is messing around on her, right. And she winds up in a restaurant alone one night and she sees this man who's her age, uh, flirting with a very young woman at the mother table. And I think he gets dissed along the way and he comes over and he asked if he could sit with her and she's like, oh boy, okay, go ahead, sit down. Right. So he, she asked him, you know, why do men screw around? You know, and he, I wonder whether it was her or him that said, it's because we fear death. Um, I think he said it. And then she said, I think you're right. But it was really, really like a part of the movie and very funny and very real. I mean, it's very real. I mean, it's just playing out and you know, all the world's a stage really. (1:19:06 - 1:20:08) Well, and you might have a very good point there because there's another instance of Klaus Schwab standing up in front of the WEF on the stage talking about how everybody in that room wasn't going to die because they were going to inject their consciousness into computers. Right. Well, that's, you know, basically Martin Rockwell's ideology too. You know, he thinks that we're all going to be upload into cyberspace as data and he's trying to manifest that. Uh, that's our ultimate, you know, his ultimate goal. Um, on the way there, we will merge ourselves with the machines and become cyborgs. Um, until we don't need the human aspect anymore. Um, and he, um, he's done some mock trials for, for bringing, uh, rights, uh, you know, legal rights to AI, you know, because these entities, whatever they are, are going to be moving around the world with the rest of us. They won't be quite human. (1:20:09 - 1:23:38) Will they? They'll be sort of beyond human. So, but there's still going to be rights if they're going to function with the rest of us. So basically what you have here, this whole structure of gender identity rights is really just the gestational phase of AI rights. Yeah. And yeah, you're absolutely right. And that's where I was going to go next. That's the next thing we can expect because if an AI, a computer program has rights, what makes humans special? They've already given rights to corporations. Yes. We see where that led. Right. And so I want to conclude with an observation once again, from the title of your book and ask a question based on that, because the full title is Transsexual Transgender Transhuman Dispatches from the 11th Hour. And the conclusion that you draw in the book, and I agree with you is we are in the 11th hour, even though a lot of people are still able to ignore this full agenda and pretend it's just sort of not happening or it's just not all that important. As we've demonstrated in this interview and you have in your book, this is huge. We're talking about a $4.7 trillion industry. We're talking about these surgeries that are doubling every six and a half years, the indoctrination of our children, having all these things passed into law, extremely wealthy individuals continuing to push this agenda. And if we don't push back now, it's going to be too late soon. Your final thoughts on that, Jennifer? Well, that's the name of my blog as well, the 11th Hour, the 11thhourblog.com. And I put it in the title for my book, not only because the book is based on the blog, but because humanity really is in the 11th hour. Every year we become more ensconced with technology and we become further away from each other and the land. And in that process, we become more reliant on technology. Most of us couldn't go with the only animals on the planet that could go out to the forest for a week or even a few days and basically survive off of the land. I mean, that's pretty insane that we're that dependent on technology. And that if the grid went down tomorrow, what in the God's name would any of us do? What would we do? Those that are living in civilization, which is most of us, right? And so the more that we rely on the technology, the more dependent we become on the technology. And once we fuse that technology into our systems, like Neuralink, for instance, Elon Musk's Neuralink is doing computation inside and connected to our brain circuitry. You can't really tell who's in charge here, right? And the more we give over to this process, the more the technology grows because it depends on us until what? Until who knows what. (1:23:39 - 1:24:19) We're not human anymore. We have to start examining this and start broadening our conversations on this issue because a lot of in the blogosphere, as far as I've seen in the past decade, most people are still focusing on these people who are attempting to deny their biological reality by having these medical assaults on their reproductive systems. They don't really get into the reproductive technologies that are already here and exponentially growing. (1:24:21 - 1:24:38) They don't connect it to the transhumanist paradigm. They don't make the connections. Or if they're stuck on the transgender thing, that there are people that have different feelings about their sex. (1:24:42 - 1:26:07) The narrative is so simple and so stupid that it's really embarrassing. I think a lot of people won't even address it because they are embarrassed. They've actually gone along with this as long as they have. But these big podcasters, why wouldn't you be talking about the money? You know, Tucker Carlson had somebody on his program he interviewed who has nothing to do with this arena, co-opted some information, and put it out as his own about the money. He did so very, very badly. A lot of people jumped on social media. A lot of people had followed me and others got on social media. They were like, Tucker Carlson, why didn't you go to the source? Why aren't you? What are you? Is it Fox? They interviewed me. They did a recording, an interview with me, and they didn't put it on. Sometime later, somebody else contacted me and I had mentioned this and they were like, oh, that was us. We loved your interview, but we couldn't get it past the editors. Yeah, Joe Rogan. A lot of my followers will go, hey, Joe, put you on the run, put you on the run. They'll say that to other large broadcasters, you have podcasters, but they don't. I always make a joke and I'm still waiting for Joe Rogan to call. (1:26:07 - 1:26:19) Why wouldn't you? Why wouldn't you want this information out there? Don't know. Make your own assessment. Neither do I. It's destroying our society. (1:26:20 - 1:27:32) It is. It's destroying our children. Honestly, I would go back to painting tomorrow because I feel like I've been in this industry, you know, reporting on this industry for a long, long time now. I haven't painted in like six years. It's just crazy. I would go back tomorrow if I could, but if people are not, you know, people still don't have the information that I have. Until they do, what can they do? They're going to continue to circle the drain. Gender, gender this and gender, gender that and transgender people and transgender people. You know, they had dysphoria. You're kidding me, right? The governments of the world, the politicians, the hundred largest international law firms, all the largest corporations in the world, they're all invested in it. It's still a part of the population that has identity issues about their sex, right? Right. And they're going to overhaul society for them to make them comfortable. That makes perfect sense, right? Well, that's what I was talking about earlier with rule by the minority for the minority. It's insane. It can't possibly work. (1:27:32 - 1:27:58) It is insane. And the narrative is insane that they would care in any way, shape or form about, you know, men that, you know, want to dress up as women and, you know, women's undergarments. We care so deeply about you. We want to protect you. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. If it wasn't so dire, it would be a lot funnier. (1:27:58 - 1:28:25) But, you know, you have to laugh because, you know, if you don't, it will crush you. I have a very good sense of humor and I really like to work on keeping it, you know, because I'd be sunk without it. And the people that deal with the children that are being mauled, medically mauled, and the families decimated, I give them so much credit because I couldn't do it. (1:28:27 - 1:28:42) And the porn, Genevieve Gluck, you know, Redux Magazine, she's covering the porn angle. These men, their brains are rotted by porn, by the porn industry. It's just so horrific. (1:28:42 - 1:29:06) I mean, the fact that she goes there every day and writes about them, reports on it, blows my mind because I couldn't do it. You know, I'm glad I'm doing the money. But what you did do, what you did do, Jennifer, was an excellent exposé of how it's all tied together, who's behind it, who's financing it all, and just how pervasive it has become. (1:29:06 - 1:29:15) So thank you so much for your excellent book. Folks, as always, you will find a link to Jennifer's book and her blog beneath this interview. Jennifer, thank you so much for your time. (1:29:16 - 1:29:19) Thank you, Will. Thanks for having me on. I really appreciate it. (1:29:25 - 1:29:39) Thank you. Social media platforms promote content based upon how many likes, shares, and follows they get. Please help us to spread the truth and take just a few moments to hit those like and follow buttons and then share this video to your own account. (1:29:40 - 1:29:48) Truth is becoming ever harder to come by, but you can help spread the truth and it will cost you nothing except a few moments of your time.